PDA

View Full Version : Why socialism doesn't work - a classic example:




qednick
07-23-2007, 03:46 PM
This article should speak for itself:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=470335&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&expand=true#StartComments

JPFromTally
07-23-2007, 09:52 PM
Wow! What they don't mention is how those kids all get free health care to boot.

It's a beutiful day in Michael Moore's utopia.

foofighter20x
07-24-2007, 02:07 AM
LOL@ one comment... The guy said that they were 14 Labour Party votes bought and paid for...

This gives perfect reason to why people on the government welfare role shouldn't be allowed to vote; it's creates a distinct conflict of interest.

JosephTheLibertarian
07-24-2007, 02:22 AM
All collectivism sucks... socialism isn't the only form of collectivism, individualism is what creates freedom.

angelatc
07-24-2007, 10:52 AM
LOL@ one comment... The guy said that they were 14 Labour Party votes bought and paid for...

This gives perfect reason to why people on the government welfare role shouldn't be allowed to vote; it's creates a distinct conflict of interest.

At this point we're practically all on the welfare system.

angelatc
07-24-2007, 10:57 AM
I lost a lot of faith in the "workfare" program when I saw how Giuliani used it to slash city budgets. He replaced city workers woth welfare workers who ended up making less than $2 an hour, IIRC. Of course, they were promised that eventually they would be hired into the city positions, but seriously....where is Giuliani's motivation to do that?

qednick
07-24-2007, 11:00 AM
Wow! What they don't mention is how those kids all get free health care to boot.

It's a beutiful day in Michael Moore's utopia.

What Michael Moore and other universal health care supporters don't seem to realize is that it's not free healthcare - someone somewhere has to pay for it. When they use the word "free" what they really mean is "free to them". It's always easier to stick your hand out and expect someone else to pay for things for you.

angelatc
07-24-2007, 11:12 AM
The argument in that article that is hard to counter is that if the children were in State care while the parents were in the street that the cost to the State would be substantially more.

ANd of course, (insert violin here) the children are always emotionally better off with their parents.

angelatc
07-24-2007, 11:17 AM
What Michael Moore and other universal health care supporters don't seem to realize is that it's not free healthcare -

Progressives aren't stupid. They're mean and greedy, but didn't you hear Biden explain that the solution is to take money away from people who do not need it?

The Progressive Paul-bashers always say that Libertarian Economics are fool-hardy. Coming from the mental giants that built the pyramid scam known as Social Security that remark's hysterical.

qednick
07-24-2007, 11:17 AM
The argument in that article that is hard to counter is that if the children were in State care while the parents were in the street that the cost to the State would be substantially more.

ANd of course, (insert violin here) the children are always emotionally better off with their parents.

Yup. A double-edged sword.
The father said he turned down a job that paid 300 a week because they'd lose 400 in benefits. The system is broken and needs to be adjusted so that people are encouraged to work.

ChooseLiberty
07-24-2007, 11:56 AM
LOL. I'm sure immigrants in both the UK and the US abuse the system much more than this. How about $1 BILLION in illegals medical bills in one US city alone?

So you see the article is really nothing.

timosman
09-21-2017, 05:11 PM
bump

Natural Citizen
09-21-2017, 05:39 PM
Socialism can not work because it can not calculate.

Bada Bing.