PDA

View Full Version : statiscally impossible




Real_CaGeD
01-09-2008, 10:18 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

corsairtro
01-09-2008, 10:19 PM
old news that has already been debunked

It was formatting

Real_CaGeD
01-09-2008, 10:21 PM
1500 votes to 1 in a single precinct? I dont think so bud.

Jeremy
01-09-2008, 10:22 PM
1500 votes to 1? I dont think so bud.

boston.com already said it was a mistake

if you want to talk fraud, there are lot of better things out there that aren't mistakes

tamor
01-09-2008, 10:23 PM
When they took Keyes out, the columns sifted incorrectly --

Real_CaGeD
01-09-2008, 10:24 PM
When they took Keyes out, the columns sifted incorrectly --

It doesnt matter what column, nobody is gonna have 1500 votes to somebody else 1 in a single precinct!

Jeremy
01-09-2008, 10:32 PM
I just gave your thread one star because you ignored what I said! D:

anitasanger
01-09-2008, 10:37 PM
if it has been posted, forgive me, there is just so much information here. this appears to be a blatant documented example of EXTREME voter fraud. i mean this is live free or die. ron should have won. anyway, lets get this video around!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

Azprint
01-09-2008, 10:38 PM
old, you could check couple posts below yours.

Drknows
01-09-2008, 10:38 PM
Hey Rudy got 9.11% in three different precincts now thats impossible. :D

anitasanger
01-09-2008, 10:41 PM
well this makes my blood boil. how on earth can we spread liberty if it is all rigged, no matter how severe the rigging?

RonPaulVolunteer
01-09-2008, 10:44 PM
Something is certainly amiss... legal action is required...

Jeremy
01-09-2008, 10:46 PM
we already know this was a mistake

if you want to look at possible fraud.... this isnt it

a mistake by boston.com that was fixed hours ago

FrankRep
01-09-2008, 10:48 PM
Boston.com made a mistake, that's all.