PDA

View Full Version : Paul should stay in at least until Super Tuesday




LastoftheMohicans
01-05-2008, 09:19 PM
As we get closer to Super Tuesday, more people will begin to drop. Since Ron Paul has the money, he will be able to stay. Any debates will include fewer people and he'll be able to talk in more detail.

hueylong
01-05-2008, 09:21 PM
This isn't even an issue. We've raised a ton of money, and are already running commercials in Super Tuesday states.

We have more than 200,000 contributors -- and only 3% are maxed out.

The revolution is on -- all the way to the convention.

Huey

RedLightning
01-05-2008, 09:21 PM
Um he should stay in until the end.

constitutional
01-05-2008, 09:21 PM
We plan to stay in this until the end. :)

ecliptic
01-05-2008, 09:22 PM
We'll just win the nomination - DUH

sasha_2008
01-05-2008, 09:22 PM
I agree he needs to stay in through Super Tuesday but he doesn't have the money for 22 states he needs money now.

gerryb
01-05-2008, 09:22 PM
As we get closer to Super Tuesday, more people will begin to drop. Since Ron Paul has the money, he will be able to stay. Any debates will include fewer people and he'll be able to talk in more detail.

WTF?

Ron Paul will be in the primary all the way to the convention.

idiom
01-05-2008, 09:23 PM
We are hanging out for the convention. The Convetnion is going to be a mess. We need every delegate for every state that we can manage, then we need a Massive rally at the convention.

RonPaulFever
01-05-2008, 09:23 PM
Is this a joke?

RonPaulVolunteer
01-05-2008, 09:23 PM
I think the plan is for him to stick around for the next 9 years...

But you on the other hand are more than welcome to leave.... bye bye...

.

trey4sports
01-05-2008, 09:23 PM
why wouldnt we? jesus, the leading republican in the field dropping out so early would be silly!

cmon we have raised more than double the next competitor and we havent spent much at all!!!

every single candidate is afraid of the Paul machine

Elwar
01-05-2008, 09:23 PM
Is the inauguration on a super Tuesday?

Eponym_mi
01-05-2008, 09:24 PM
I'm a bitterender. I'll vote for RP in the general even if I have to write him in. Ron Paul is easy to spell.:)

dsentell
01-05-2008, 09:24 PM
Is this a joke?

For real! He started this stupid thread then immediately got off the forum!?!?!

LibertyEagle
01-05-2008, 09:26 PM
As we get closer to Super Tuesday, more people will begin to drop. Since Ron Paul has the money, he will be able to stay. Any debates will include fewer people and he'll be able to talk in more detail.

What are you talking about? :rolleyes: He's in for the duration and he's playing to win.

literatim
01-05-2008, 09:30 PM
This was seriously a troll-esque post.

chipvogel
01-05-2008, 09:33 PM
Is 76 to old to run for a second term?

PMatt
01-05-2008, 09:35 PM
Stay until the GOP nominates some one. If unfortunately it's not him and he has better polling numbers (say something like 25-35% among GOP voters by then) I would hope he'd reconsider running 3rd party or independent.

RedLightning
01-05-2008, 09:36 PM
Is 76 to old to run for a second term?

No, but if he gets a great VP, I think he would just let him run after Ron Paul's first term.

LastoftheMohicans
01-05-2008, 09:36 PM
I didn't mean it the way I wrote it. I agree he should stay in to the end. I was only addressing those who think it over if he loses IA and NH. He definitely has the money and the support to pick up steam later and go all the way to the convention. I don't think any one candidate is going to string together a lot of victories. The race is wide open.

MGreen
01-05-2008, 09:38 PM
Thanks for the advice...