Lesser of three evils

[LibertiORDeth]

Which democrat candidate (of these three) is the best? (Or, the "lesser of three evils").

[quantized]

I fear a Hillary's presidency the most. Enough said.

[Antonius Stone]

probably barack. at least his foreign policy has some sense and he is a good speaker so that would translate into being a great diplomat. Doesn't change the fact that he doesn't have a clue on economics or personal freedoms, but he'd be a great diplomat or secretary of state.

none of those other clowns are even qualified to be Post Master General, much less secretary of state or POTUS

[spacebetween]

I've at least heard John Edwards say the phrase "tax credits." Can't say I've heard the same from either Hillary or Obama.

[newmedia4ron]

NONE
make it an option now

RON PAUL FOR THE LONG HAUL
Write-in if I have to
DON'T SETTLE!

[LibertiORDeth]

I've at least heard John Edwards say the phrase "tax credits." Can't say I've heard the same from either Hillary or Obama.

He also has the worst health plan. (worth=spending the most money)

[LibertiORDeth]

NONE
make it an option now

RON PAUL FOR THE LONG HAUL
Write-in if I have to
DON'T SETTLE!

I agree.
This is just an opinion poll, however.

[ProBlue33]

LOL ABH in 08

[Abobo]

Hillary has outright said she wants government control of video games and the internet. Edwards is a socialist and Obama is a media creation with no substance and no views of his own.

So, they all suck. I'm voting Ron Paul for president and Libertarian on everything else.

[LibertiORDeth]

Hillary has outright said she wants government control of video games and the internet. Edwards is a socialist and Obama is a media creation with no substance and no views of his own.

So, they all suck. I'm voting Ron Paul for president and Libertarian on everything else.

So no vote?

[Alan84]

I don't believe a word they say. They're all NeoCons.

[Dutch]

I didn't vote.
I know none of the above.
I only know Dr. Paul.

Dutch

[tfelice]

None. The worst Republican is 1000 times better than the best Democrat

[forsmant]

Edwards is all about income redistribution. I think he is the least worst because that income may be redistributed to me!!!

[quantized]

Edwards is all about income redistribution. I think he is the least worst because that income may be redistributed to me!!!

LOL

[schmeisser]

Edwards is all about income redistribution. I think he is the least worst because that income may be redistributed to me!!!

:eek:
:(

[LibertiORDeth]

WTH A vote for Hillary???

[quantized]

Wow! We have one vote for Hitlery! Hmm...

[quantized]

WTH A vote for Hillary???

LOL

Hillary supporters have infiltrated our forum. Notice there are newbies starting thread on "Attack Obama", "Hitlery must win" etc. :rolleyes:

[hazek]

I refuse to vote in this polls. You should have put an option of not voting in it.

[jd603]

I agree, these three people will NOT change foreign policy, it's just fact, we get fed this same crap over and over every election and it never happens, the only one who might actually do something is Ron.

[Dave Pedersen]

Hillary is the easiest to impeach ;)

[LibertiORDeth]

I refuse to vote in this polls. You should have put an option of not voting in it.

Actually, you have that option, which it sounds like you are exercising. :D

[LibertiORDeth]

Hillary is the easiest to impeach ;)

I thought we tried that with Billary...

[UziSprayTF]

None. The worst Republican is 1000 times better than the best Democrat

hmmm, not really. I would go obama before 9u11iani.

Here is my voting order

Ron Paul
Libertarian Party
Constitution Party
Huckabee (only for the sales tax thing, sounds like the next least warmonger-er on the republican side)
McCain (hates torture)
Romney (sales tax thing, but I HATE his view on torture)
Thompson (seems dumb as bricks and was kinda involved in the Libby scooter thing, but talks conservative on inflation)
Kucinich (no war, no war, etc... very socialist on other things though)
Obama (no history, but voted against the Iraqi war)
9u11iani (man I hate this guy, but meh, at least he wont raise taxes)
Clinton
Edwards

[MayTheRonBeWithYou]

I fear a Hillary's presidency the most. Enough said.

Pretty much.

[danberkeley]

probably barack. at least his foreign policy has some sense and he is a good speaker so that would translate into being a great diplomat. Doesn't change the fact that he doesn't have a clue on economics or personal freedoms, but he'd be a great diplomat or secretary of state.


Are you serious? Obama isn't willing to take a nuclear strike off the table when it come to Iran.

[voytechs]

Are you serious? Obama isn't willing to take a nuclear strike off the table when it come to Iran.

They're all CFR, it doesn't matter what they say.

[chipvogel]

same message from all 3 just different messengers

[VoluntaryMan]

"Best" for what? Best to beat?

[evandi]

LOL

Hillary supporters have infiltrated our forum. Notice there are newbies starting thread on "Attack Obama", "Hitlery must win" etc. :rolleyes:

Thats because Obama is getting a lot of independent votes. He is seen as a "change" candidate. It is not newbies who are saying that, its intelligent people.

But if Obama starts winning in landslides we might get the independent vote anyway so I don't care.

[Oddball]

"Best" as measured by which yardstick??

All three are crackerjack neo-Marxists.

[quantized]

WOW! i cannot imagine any Ron Paul fan to say hillary is the lesser evil of them all, unless they are from the Hill camp.

[H Roark]

None - No Evil

[Kingfisher]

I call it a tie.

[AdoubleR]

None option missing!

[Thomas Paine]

Asking me to vote between these three is like asking me which incurable STD I prefer to be inflicted with for the rest of my life.

[ronpaulitician]

Best for Paul to run against: Hillary.

[LibertiORDeth]

None option missing!

None=don't vote.

[LibertiORDeth]

Asking me to vote between these three is like asking me which incurable STD I prefer to be inflicted with for the rest of my life.

Lol I know.

[LibertiORDeth]

O wow four for Hitlary?

[pilby]

i vote hillary. being the least charming of the bunch, the Republicans in Congress might actually have the balls to oppose her programs

[Nyte]

I can't in good consciouses vote for any of these tools.

[ChickenHawk]

Hillary, she has no principles so she may do the right thing for the sake of popularity.

[AdoubleR]

None=don't vote.

Didn't :D

[LibertiORDeth]

125 votes, turned about how I expected percentage wise.

[Birdlady]

I can't vote.

Edwards went to Bilderberg Meeting in 2004, the year before he was picked to be Kerry's VP.
Obama is a CFR member.
Hillary is a CFR member.


Asking me to vote between these three is like asking me which incurable STD I prefer to be inflicted with for the rest of my life.
LMAO

[LibertiORDeth]

I can't vote.

Edwards went to Bilderberg Meeting in 2004, the year before he was picked to be Kerry's VP.
Obama is a CFR member.
Hillary is a CFR member.


LMAO

:p Ok.

[quantized]

Hillary is in every sense the opposite of Ron Paul. i cannot imagine people here voted for her.

[jrich4rpaul]

Mike Gravel

[quantized]

that tear was costly.

[Scott Wilson]

Which testicle would you prefer to have cut off?

[slamhead]

Both Barack's and Hillary's ambition scares me. I at least think Edwards, although he was a scumbag ambulance chaser, would be better than those two.

[Shellshock1918]

None of them. They all hold the same beliefs. Socialists, everyone of them.

[Luft97]

None of the above.

[sparebulb]

The problem with voting for the least of the three evils is that you would still be voting for evil. Count me not voting.

[Conza88]

I agree.
This is just an opinion poll, however.

YEA, SO ADD MY OPINION..

My opinion: this poll is FUCKEN RETARDED..

The lesser of ANY EVIL, is STILL EVIL.

Add the None, or something similar option - or I'm considering you a troll. (Your actions are exactly what one would do.) So change IT.

[Dave Pedersen]

You could use these results to show who among those three can take the most votes away from Ron Paul. Obama obviously is the best one to target for truth attacks.

[defcreative]

I can't believe I'm seeing this thread in the Ron Paul forums.

[stewie3128]

We're actually looking at the evils of three lessers here.

[austin356]

Clinton = No Change

Obama = Tactical Change

Edwards = Retro Change

Paul = Strategic Change

[ForLiberty-RonPaul]

I agree.
This is just an opinion poll, however.

my opinion is that there should be a "none" option. They are CFR. Enough said.

[quantized]

Clinton = No Change

Obama = Tactical Change

Edwards = Retro Change

Paul = Strategic Change

WORD!:)

[Menthol Patch]

They are all equally evil.

[olehounddog]

I refuse to vote for the lesser of any evil. it would still be a vote for evil.

[quantized]

evil

[bcreps85]

None, but Hilldog is the devil and Edwards is a blatant nutjob liar. I don't like Obama much, but he has more sense than the other two...

I'd probably "throw my vote away" on an independent or libertarian though instead if I couldn't vote for RP. Lesser of two evils is still evil.

[humanic]

Hillary = CFR, Bilderberg, Bill Clinton, completely phony
Edwards = CFR, Bilderberg
Obama = CFR, Zbigniew

Would not cast a vote for any of them.

[quantized]

wow. what an embarassing poll for Hillary.

[quantized]

Hillary wins the nomination!! Congrats!

[quantized]

oops...

[JenaS62]

Had the question been "who is the most evil" I would have voted for Hillary. But I simply cannot pick between the 3 of them on who is the least evil so I did not vote.

[quantized]

Had the question been "who is the most evil" I would have voted for Hillary. But I simply cannot pick between the 3 of them on who is the least evil so I did not vote.

that would be an interesting poll. :D

[Truth Warrior]

The least of two ...... three evils is still just bloody friggin' EVIL! ( Applies to the Reps too. )

[quantized]

ooooo

[quantized]

what a poll