PDA

View Full Version : Other then RP who is best?




Abyss
01-04-2008, 02:44 PM
I am curious.

Huck = evil
Rudy = evil (less so)
Romney = not so bad?
Thompson = even better?

How about John Edwards (Dem)?

I just want to know would Edwards be better then any rep candidate other then paul?

Mesogen
01-04-2008, 02:55 PM
Mike Gravel

And Huck = stupid

Rudy = evil and stupid

Romney = stupid, but knows evil people and wants to be like them

Thompson = lazy, stupid, dumb

Edwards = pure evil

fortilite
01-04-2008, 03:17 PM
I fear a Huckabee presidency. Romney while bad would not be nearly as awful.

For the Dems, even though Obama is more socialist than Hillary at least he isn't as corrupt. Edwards would be a nightmare, he is more socialist than the other two.

Gotta go with Romney as the least bad.

RPFTW!
01-04-2008, 03:26 PM
Huck = batshit crazy fundamentalist
Giuliani = pure evil
Romney = bad but not horrible, blood sucking corporatist
Thompson = mediocre, lazy and bad at playing politics (which is good)
Hunter = best after RP and Tancredo

Gravel = Ok if he wasn't a socialist
Kucinish = same as above
Obama = fake but probably best of the dem front runners
Edwards = same as above
Clinton = succubus

LivingFree
01-04-2008, 03:26 PM
I fear a Huckabee presidency. Romney while bad would not be nearly as awful.

For the Dems, even though Obama is more socialist than Hillary at least he isn't as corrupt. Edwards would be a nightmare, he is more socialist than the other two.

Gotta go with Romney as the least bad.

Mitt is the LEAST bad person to vote for?

Wow. What has our government come to . . .

DaronWestbrooke
01-04-2008, 03:38 PM
Obama & Kucinich-
The only other true anti-war candidates.

Jake!
01-04-2008, 03:40 PM
on the "other side" I prefer Richardson and Kucinich

gardeniabee
01-04-2008, 03:45 PM
Once I understood the nature of our problems, the breadth and depth of the corruption of the corporatocracy, and it's enmeshment with global banking, and military-industrial complex, and how this affects every one of us, whether it is the farmers being strangled by such companies as Monsanto with its genetic seed experiments and exclusive patents, the "Animal RFID" tagging, or we the people with our loss of the Bill of Rights, the shredding of our Constitution, and OUR "Personal ID" tagging, the abuse of our right of Eminent Domain, the treason of our leaders such as Cheney declaring himself NOT part of the Executive Branch and thus not subject to oversight request from Congress, the constant lying to the public; the refusal to protect our own borders while putting soldiers on the borders of Afghanistan and Iran, North/South Korea, Lebanon/Israel, or wherever else around the world; the refusal to protect our jobs and our products; the secret planning of the North American Union plan (SPP) and the open (non-Customs) Highway from Mexico through the U.S. and into Canada; the Patriot Act that allows the President to call me an "enemy combatant" by my supporting any oppositional stance or questioning the government; the new draft plan that would return the draft and require, at the President's bidding, all people, male and female between the ages of 18 and 42 to serve two years Active Duty, for "fighting Terrorism" and for Homeland Security, etc... I don't know of any person other than President Dr. Paul.

The other candidates are still in denial.

Most Americans are too.

Are you?

How can you even THINK that another person is an acceptable candidate? It would mean that we would be voting for a sleep-walker, a media-hypnotized robot, puppet of Murdoch, corporatocracy, military-industrial complex, and global banking elite. Small numbers though they are; and though MOST of the people who work within those organizations are probably sincere, honest individuals, it only takes one "captain" in each to direct their ship's agenda against We the People.

Wake up, America! This is our last chance.

The other candidates don't know any better. I don't think they are bad people. But they are in denial or are ignorant, or are part of it.

gaazn
01-04-2008, 04:01 PM
socialists and neocon/fascists have taken over the two parties, so it depends on whether a socialist, or neocon/fascist is better. but if you have to choose one, the person who would do the least damage to america long-term would be bill richardson because he is not too socialist and he is not a neocon.

pcosmar
01-04-2008, 04:04 PM
Other than Ron Paul, none in the R or D camps.
Kent McManigal
http://kentforliberty.com/

Eponym_mi
01-04-2008, 04:04 PM
NOTA

I'll be voting for Ron Paul in the general, nomination or not. His name is VERY easy to write.:)

thegr8drronpaul
01-04-2008, 04:26 PM
If Huckabee or Hillary win, I'm moving out of the country (at least for the next 4 years).

As far as likability, I'd say Obama.

Son of Freedom
01-04-2008, 04:26 PM
After Ron Paul, hmmm?












NOBODY that I'm aware of that's running.

benhaskins
01-04-2008, 05:00 PM
cfr member = "Thanks for the offer, but i'll have to pass"

forsmant
01-04-2008, 05:07 PM
None of the other canidadates are aware of the Feds affect on the economy. We are already in a recession and the next president will be in deep shit if they don't understand how to deal. Bailing out 50 sub prime borrowers and enacting "new deal like" legislation will only further erode the economy. The fed is helpless.

Kingfisher
01-04-2008, 06:38 PM
None of the frontrunners can be trusted no matter how likeable they seem. They would all take their marching orders from the CFR

VoluntaryMan
01-04-2008, 06:56 PM
Lesser Evil Scale (Politics Neutral):

Republican Presidential Candidates

[10 = most evil / 1 = least evil]
10. Huckabee
9. Giuliani
8. McCain
7. Romney
6. Thompson
5. Hunter
1. Paul

Democrat Presidential Candidates

10. Clinton
9. Edwards
8. Obama
8. Dodd
8. Biden
8. Richardson
7. Gravel
4. Kucinich

Alabama Supporter
01-04-2008, 07:55 PM
Huckabee might be least bad since Rush, Hannity, and Beck hate him. I'm figuring that he may be different than Bush if these guys hate him.

VoluntaryMan
01-04-2008, 08:20 PM
Huckabee might be least bad since Rush, Hannity, and Beck hate him. I'm figuring that he may be different than Bush if these guys hate him.

They only hate Hack because they know he's a general election loser. Last election was creepy enough, with 2 Yalee Bonesmen competing to be our master pro tem. If Both Huck and Hill were nominated, this election would be just as creepy, with Mrs. Clinton running against a chubby, cheeseburger scarfing, instrument fingering, corrupt ex-governor from Hope. The talkshow boys want a general election winner, and they know that ain't Huck. They don't hate him for his politics. Besides, it's far from unanimous; Medved's been pushing Hack for months.

Catatonic
01-04-2008, 10:45 PM
next best is gravel