Why Does It Take So Long To Count Those Votes?

[VRP08]

86%
reporting

Romney (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#893)
26,524
26%
0
Thompson (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#57302)
13,932
13%
0
McCain (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#1701)
13,693
13%
0
Paul (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#302)
10,184
10%
0
Giuliani (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#32884)
3,613
4%
0
Hunter (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#155)
458
0%
0


Not that it matters much....just want to see the 100% already!

[VRP08]

...

[VRP08]

Hello?

[Joe3113]

Because they need time to fix the vote in the precincts where they knew Ron would do well

[VRP08]

this is weird...there is no reason it has to take so long. the dem already have their 100%

[idiom]

Deep in rural Iowa: "I know I left the rest of the votes around here somewhere..."

[VRP08]

Deep in rural Iowa: "I know I left the rest of the votes around here somewhere..."
:rolleyes:

[VRP08]

93%
reporting

Paul (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#302)
11,232
10%
2

[VRP08]

still counting...this aggrivates me!

[VRP08]

I think they don't like giving the vote to RP.....it is veeeeery sloooow if anyomne else follows...and RP voters sloooowly go up

[silverhandorder]

Deep in rural Iowa: "I know I left the rest of the votes around here somewhere..."

That was great LOL.