PaleoForPaul
01-01-2008, 03:41 PM
In the past 28 years, there have been four times there was a 'challenge' in Iowa (ie, not just an incumbent running). These are the results:
2000- George W. Bush* (41%) Steve Forbes (30%), Alan Keyes (14%), Gary Bauer (9%), John McCain (5%) and Orrin Hatch (1%)
1996- Bob Dole* (26%) Pat Buchanan (23%), Lamar Alexander (18%), Steve Forbes (10%), Phil Gramm (9%), Alan Keyes (7%), Richard Lugar (4%) and Maurice Taylor (1%)
1988- Bob Dole (37%) Pat Robertson (25%), George H. W. Bush* (19%), Jack Kemp (11%) and Pete DuPont (7%)
1980- George H. W. Bush (32%) Ronald Reagan* (30%), Howard Baker (15%), John Connally (9%), Phil Crane (7%), John B. Anderson (4%) and Bob Dole (2%)
So only two of four races predicted the correct nominee. Buchanan's strong showing in 1996 is a good sign for us.
What doesn't bode well is how the whole playbook being run against Ron Paul is the same one that Buchanan faced in 1996. All of the polls had him hopelessly low (8-9% in Iowa IIRC), then he came out at 23%, along with many supporters claiming voter fraud against Buchanan.
If anyone is interested, here is a whole bunch of stuff about primary fraud from back then. I think it's been posted here before:
http://www.networkamerica.org/archive.htm
2000- George W. Bush* (41%) Steve Forbes (30%), Alan Keyes (14%), Gary Bauer (9%), John McCain (5%) and Orrin Hatch (1%)
1996- Bob Dole* (26%) Pat Buchanan (23%), Lamar Alexander (18%), Steve Forbes (10%), Phil Gramm (9%), Alan Keyes (7%), Richard Lugar (4%) and Maurice Taylor (1%)
1988- Bob Dole (37%) Pat Robertson (25%), George H. W. Bush* (19%), Jack Kemp (11%) and Pete DuPont (7%)
1980- George H. W. Bush (32%) Ronald Reagan* (30%), Howard Baker (15%), John Connally (9%), Phil Crane (7%), John B. Anderson (4%) and Bob Dole (2%)
So only two of four races predicted the correct nominee. Buchanan's strong showing in 1996 is a good sign for us.
What doesn't bode well is how the whole playbook being run against Ron Paul is the same one that Buchanan faced in 1996. All of the polls had him hopelessly low (8-9% in Iowa IIRC), then he came out at 23%, along with many supporters claiming voter fraud against Buchanan.
If anyone is interested, here is a whole bunch of stuff about primary fraud from back then. I think it's been posted here before:
http://www.networkamerica.org/archive.htm