Ron Paul on Pakistan??

[jankyflava]

Did I miss something here? Is there any particular reason that Ron Paul is on all the different networks today answering questions about how he would handle the situation is Pakistan??

Here they are...

MSNBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdVLYK4ZgoM
FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etQDCrd584s
CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EidPmOpDJ08

[rasheedwallace]

he did well, and yes, i was surprised to see his opinion being asked today as well.

[0zzy]

He was going to appear on these shows before this took place.

[jankyflava]

But why would all the networks have him answering to this? I don't own a TV so I only know what I've seen on YouTube, but did they ask him much else about his candidacy or just how he would handle Pakistan?

[Liberty Star]

Did I miss something here? Is there any particular reason that Ron Paul is on all the different networks today answering questions about how he would handle the situation is Pakistan??

Here they are...

MSNBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdVLYK4ZgoM
FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etQDCrd584s
CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EidPmOpDJ08


Given the atmosphere that neocons fear marketers have created, his answers may appear shocking to some. But practically and philosophically, RP's views on interventions and our support for dictators are sound and right on.






We may never find out who's behind it but today's Bhutto assassination benefits Musharaf's military dictatorship if we look at motives. Huck has apparently expressed concern and an apology, odd reaction. Ron Paul should address role of interventionist Neoconservatives in South East Asia mess and how their foreign policies are making world a more dangerous place. Someone had said that when you have a big hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail. For many neoconservatives in charge of things lately, military solutions is the fix for every problem, in the world. A horrible and a dangerous paradigm.

It is quite ironic that GOP is supporting Islamic radicals regime in Iraq right now, who knows what will come out of there decades from now. Few decades back in Afghanistan, we funded and armed Islamic militants. There may have not been any Talibans, Osama and big mess in that region had it not been for Afghanistan destabilization then and the long war between US/Saudi/Pakistan supported Mujahideens and Russians and millions of orphans that the war created. Those orphans later became a crop for Talibans and other radical militant groups and Afghanistan a fertile ground for radicalism and global terrorism.

We need to reevaluate our support of military dictators and autocrats if we are to meddle into other countries affairs, such puppet regimes breed radicalism in the world. Bush praised current military dictator back when he overthrew a democratically elected government there, hard to comprehend where our convictions about peace and freedom lie.

[idiom]

He is the only one with a different answer to Bush.

[nwfla4ronpaul]

He is the only one with a different answer to Bush.

I heard Michael Savage call him a putz on the radio. It seems Mike supports muslim genocide so of course he cannot understand how anyone wouldn't want to bomb the islamofascist. Savage is a real nut. I think he actually wants to nuke the middle east.:eek: