Shuster in AGAIN for Tucker...

[Teenforpaul08]

How well do you guys think the interview/interrogation will go?

[Yom]

Are you serious? That sucks! Tucker would have given him time to discuss the issues and wouldn't have addressed that stupid Civil War issue!

[piotr1]

What time will it be?

[Teenforpaul08]

Yep. Watching Tucker right now. This is gonna suck!

[KCIndy]

I wish Tucker was in. Too bad RP couldn't have put off an appearance until Tucker was back. After that Nevada brothel fiasco, I think Tucker owes Ron Paul a favor anyway! :mad:

[AlexMerced]

they havn't even announced that RP is on the show

[fletcher]

I can't stand David Shuster from hardbaaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll. I'll wait for the youtube.

Yes, that is how he says hardball.

[thePhilosopher]

they havn't even announced that RP is on the show

Yeah I noticed that too, since its a big news day I'm not shocked... hopefully an interview will still air.

[hamilton1049]

removed

[angelatc]

I assume Paul has been bumped in order that they might expand the assassination coverage.

[krott5333]

he cant possibly bring up the civil war crap again after Bhutto's death

[MRoCkEd]

is he on yet

[AlexMerced]

Buchanon better mention RP now since he didn't on Christ Matthews

[CavortingChicken]

can someone let us know before he get on??

[kalami]

pat laying the smacketh down

[Teenforpaul08]

Well, it's on RP's website...

[Yom]

Buchanan is basically supporting Ron Paul's position right now, saying that Pakistan is a nation of 170 million people and that we shouldn't be telling them who to have as their leader. He also said that we'd be angry if other people told us how to run the investigation of JFK's assassination after he was killed. He's basically repeating Ron Paul's stance exactly.


Edit: Actually now he's advocating a bit more interventionist position, but he still just said the same above.


Candidate responses coming up next. Apparently he thinks 2 candidates used it inappropriately to promote themselves (or might be the opinion of some). Probably Biden and McCain.

[Teenforpaul08]

Buchanan is basically supporting Ron Paul's position right now, saying that Pakistan is a nation of 170 million people and that we shouldn't be telling them who to have as their leader. He also said that we'd be angry if other people told us how to run the investigation of JFK's assassination after he was killed. He's basically repeating Ron Paul's stance exactly.


Edit: Actually now he's advocating a bit more interventionist position, but that is what he just said.

I just heard that, too. It would be awesome if Buchanan endorses RP before the Iowa caucases.

[kalami]

ya and the other guy scoffed at that and held the position that the U.S. should play a greater role in Pakistan's internal affairs (read: replace Musharraf)

[devil21]

I imagine if RP hasnt been bumped then the questions will be about the same as Wolf's were (if you were president, how would you handle this?) but with a more antagonistic approach.

[Yom]

He might have been bumped. Shuster's trying to smear Hillary instead of Biden, though (probably ignoring Biden because he is considered second-tier), but Buchanan is defending Hillary but not McCain.

[BeFranklin]

Ron Paul is next up, with an antagonistic tag line (biased - "Blaming the US)

For those American's who have a different opinion, don't WE count as U.S. too?

That is outrageous, its not even news reporting or talk show, its a direct attack
on a plurity of opinion in a free country.

[Paulite]

ron paul will be one shortly

[blackmouth]

What!!?!!! Blames the U.S.?

That Shuster is in for it now!

[tsetsefly]

this fucker is already saying that Paul is blaming the US for this, what a cocksucker...

[ItsTime]

hes on and already misquoting him

[Paulite]

start your recorder guys!!!!!!!!! shuster just announced ron paul will be on

[jumpyg1258]

Wow he just twisted Rons words again and said Ron blames the US for Pakistans problems

[hellah10]

blaming the US

what a lovely title... .fuck the MSM

[KCIndy]

Here it comes - Shuster's going to attack Paul for saying Pakistan is none of our business... :(

[devil21]

He's not bumped. They will be speaking with him shortly on Tucker. I didnt like the lead in though....

[Yom]

WTF?! He's smearing him again.

Shuster the spinster: "Coming up next, presidential Candidate Ron Paul and his comments on the assassination and why he thinks it's the fault of the United States" (paraphrased a little)

Under the video of him walking somewhere it had the subtitle "Blaming the U.S."


I can't freaking stand this guy!

[kmforpaul]

Hopefully the "blaming the US" line will make people realize how dishonest MSNBC is; of course, after Dr. Paul has enlightened them all.

[Sarge]

Dr. Paul coming up.

youtube please.

[TXcarlosTX]

here we go again.... why doesnt he learn. he going to get owned again!!!

[familydog]

Makes me wonder if Tucker has any control over who fills in for him. I can't see him approving of David's attacks. Esepcially since Tucker said he will be voting for Paul.

[Yom]

Up now!

[european]

Hopefully the "blaming the US" line will make people realize how dishonest MSNBC is; of course, after Dr. Paul has enlightened them all.
Ron Paul should go and attack the journalist who is doing that. Also the producer and call upon the newsstation to get honest journalists in. The American people will love that :) Its the underdog fighting the establishment ;)

[dw1345]

Here we go...

EDIT: nevermind... Biden Talk.

[BeFranklin]

hes on and already misquoting him

Nope, he hasn't even been put on the air, and is already slandering him.

[hellah10]

get ya popcorn ready

[devil21]

Am I the only one who giggles when that guy says "loose nukes"? Reminds me of the South Park with Hillary.

[MRoCkEd]

okk coming soon or not?

[BeFranklin]

Here comes another home run...

[CoreyBowen999]

Am I the only one who giggles when that guy says "loose nukes"? Reminds me of the South Park with Hillary.

LOL thats exactly what I think!

[kmforpaul]

Pat's got some good points. It's sad that people act on experience and name recognition in times of a threatened security. Although I'm distraught he didn't bring in Ron Paul's thirty year experience into question.

[Crickett]

45 minutes in..nothing discussed about Ron but the smear

[MRoCkEd]

pat predicts huckabee iowa and mccain new hampshire

[derdy]

Are you guys suprised Tucker isn't on? He's probably hanging out with Hof at the Bunny Ranch.:rolleyes:

[dw1345]

Huckabee's gonna win..... Mccains gonna win.... Romney's gonna win.... blah blah blah.

Anyone else find it interesting when he said, "The person that inspires young people to get out there and vote is the one who's gonna win this thing." That's Ron Paul right there.

[Vaughn]

Paul must have nerves of steel. lol

[pacelli]

They are really whoring out Clinton on this rag of a newscast.

[BeFranklin]

Anyone bothering to watch? Just youtube.

[rational thinker]

Is he on yet?

[pacelli]

Is he on yet?

Nope. Current topic- OBAMA: Expecting change by repeating patterns is madness.

[Teenforpaul08]

I think the Buchanan Momentum theory is not relevant to the voters that RP has. A recent poll shows that at least 80% of RP supporters will NOT change their minds if RP loses Iowa. This is no average campaign. As a matter of fact: it is a movement!

[all J's in IL for RP]

I'll be surprised if Shuster gives Paul more than 15 seconds at a time before he starts speaking over him... "Do you REALLY mean that? Aren't you blaming the U.S. like those surrender monkey Democrats?"

[pacelli]

I'll be surprised if Shuster gives Paul more than 15 seconds at a time before he starts speaking over him... "Do you REALLY mean that? Aren't you blaming the U.S. like those surrender monkey Democrats?"

I'll be surprised if we see Ron Paul for more than 15 seconds. They've been teasing us all day for this interview.

[MsDoodahs]

<sigh> is he on yet? I have left the room so I don't have to watch that Shuster bastard.

Someone do play by play...

[rational thinker]

Tell me when it's on please because I don't feel like watching propaganda while waiting.

[Eponym_mi]

They want RP supporters to watch the whole show to bump their ratings up 1000%.

[hellah10]

put the fucking doctor on already....good god, i need to go to the bathroom

[xexkxex]

Coming up after the break... ;)

[Yom]

Finally he's going to be up next. Everyone tries to portray his views as controversial, though, but they're no different from what he's been saying this whole campaign!

[rational thinker]

He's On Next!

[pacelli]

Tell me when it's on please because I don't feel like watching propaganda while waiting.

Ed Schultz and Pat Buchanan are off now. ANd supposedly they will be talking to Ron Paul "after this..". The tag line was "Causing Controversy".

[sluggo]

Get ready for another ambush. This Shuster is a first class POS.

[Teenforpaul08]

He will be on after the current comercial break!

[RSLudlum]

after break,

Shuster vs. the good Doctor: Round 2

[Crickett]

Finally going to be on..got a bit better introduction this time...he may get 15 seconds to talk, it sucks

[kalami]

hey guys, in case you didn't know what Paul actually suggested was controversial. Think in those terms because we have to marginalize him.

[pacelli]

put the fucking doctor on already....good god, i need to go to the bathroom

Haven't you learned they always waste 55 minutes before putting him on for 30 seconds? =0

[evadmurd]

Coming to the plate, Dr. Ron Paul.

[kutibah]

They want RP supporters to watch the whole show to bump their ratings up 1000%.

+1

[all J's in IL for RP]

Only 5 minuets left in the hour. Teaser is one thing but this is short shrift.

[Crickett]

He won't give him the time to go a "round" he MAY have 30 seconds, but I doubt it..
Last time I fall for this ruse..

[devil21]

He's on!

[Teenforpaul08]

Shuster: "why do you blame the U.S. for the death of Bhutto?"
Paul: Well, that isn't what..."
Shuster: *interrupts* "Thank you."

[pacelli]

On now.

[Trassin]

This is going to suck. At least the bitch and ex-military asshole from earlier aren't there now though.

[hellah10]

so far so good...

[dw1345]

Here we go

[ExpatinArgentina]

Tucker is has probably been pulled for supporting the doctor.

[all J's in IL for RP]

Zero...Take that Shillster!

[pacelli]

Of course they play the video from the assassination in one window, and make it larger than the window with Dr. Paul speaking.

[hellah10]

HA! in your f'ing face Shuster... i bet he was banking on RP to say 100% US fault

[Yom]

Despite the earlier smear, he's much more respectful this time. I think the emails might have had an impact.

[Oliver]

Despite the earlier smear, he's much more respectful this time. I think the emails might have had an impact.

+1

[pacelli]

He's trying to bait him into saying something damning.

[evadmurd]

He swings....it's a high fly ball to deep centerfield. Going back are the Neos...back....back...back...it's outta here. Home run, Ron Paul!

[Paulite]

2 minutes??

[hellah10]

nice interview

fuck you frank!

shuster was much much much more respectful this time around

[pacelli]

Interview finished. Didn't youtube.

[devil21]

Wow! Grand slam! Shuster tried pathetically to make RP look bad but as usual, water off a duck's back.

[TXcarlosTX]

not bad

[kutibah]

Great interview! Paul seems to get better and better on them throughout this evening =)

[Crickett]

Weelllllll...I am surprised..the guy Shuster learned his lesson, obviously. RP shone as far as I am concerned..enough is enough!

[Real_CaGeD]

That was good, he opened the hardball show.

[RPinSEAZ]

Despite the earlier smear, he's much more respectful this time. I think the emails might have had an impact.

It's yellow journalism. The MSM of today haven't forgotten the lessons of Hearst.

[Eponym_mi]

Despite the earlier smear, he's much more respectful this time. I think the emails might have had an impact.

I disagree...he still interupts RP's answers. Still being an asshole.

[Teenforpaul08]

lol...somehow, it didn't seem satisfying.

[BeFranklin]

Did great.

Time to complain about that "Blames US" comment. It was biased so badly, sponsors should know. Might think next time about being honest and fair. Baiting didn't work, but should still complain.

[Eponym_mi]

RP didn't do too bad on this one....but he did a lot better with Terri Kennan and then Wolf Blitzer earlier today.

[hcbrand]

Why don't they ever comment on Ron's statements? No roundtabling...

[ExpatinArgentina]

Something fishy here. Ron Paul's supporter Tucker steps out and Frank comes in with a "Blames the U.S." comment.

[BeFranklin]

lol...somehow, it didn't seem satisfying.

Ron Paul didn't get to speak more then 2 minutes and was interrupted at that. Other then that, great to hear Ron Paul. Only reason I watched the show.

Let the sponsors know they are antagonizing the large blip in ratings they received. Sponsors don't like that. I wouldn't, I don't pay to make more people mad at me.

[Eponym_mi]

Why don't they ever comment on Ron's statements? No roundtabling...

Obvious...marginalizing. His proposals aren't worthy of discussions.:rolleyes:

[tsetsefly]

good interview but not sure what the answer shoudl be on the nuke question, but seriously what can you do about that?

[Ron LOL]

This is the part of the campaign where it's actually okay to invoke O'Reilly and point out that nobody watches MSNBC :D

[all J's in IL for RP]

Why don't they ever comment on Ron's statements? No roundtabling...

Knowing the groupthink of most pundits, I'm rather glad to have Ron's message go out unadulterated.


Ron Paul didn't get to speak more then 2 minutes and was interrupted at that. Other then that, great to hear Ron Paul. Only reason I watched the show.

Let the sponsors know they are antagonizing the large blip in ratings they received. Sponsors don't like that. I wouldn't, I don't pay to make more people mad at me.

Nah...I'm fine with it. Why complain when they actually GIVE him airtime?

[Ron2Win]

tube plz

[Eponym_mi]

good interview but not sure what the answer shoudl be on the nuke question, but seriously what can you do about that?

Look at all the chaos after the USSR fell. Did we get nuked? No! The military keeps control of the weapons while the civilians go crazy. But even if Al Qaeda somehow managed to get Pakistan's nukes, I'm not concerned. If they tried to use them, the entire middle east would be a glass parking lot. We have a hell of a lot more nukes than Pakistan.

[MsDoodahs]

Did great.

Time to complain about that "Blames US" comment. It was biased so badly, sponsors should know. Might think next time about being honest and fair. Baiting didn't work, but should still complain.

I'm glad you said that...I'm working on a list - names, telephone numbers, emails and snail mails - for another mainstream media giant that felt comfy attacking the good doctor. It won't bother me a bit to add the sponsors of MSNBC.

I don't think advertisers pay to have their ads run on shows that generate lots of boycotters to their products, do they?

Once I get it together, I'll be posting it here.

:)

[MsDoodahs]

Let the sponsors know they are antagonizing the large blip in ratings they received. Sponsors don't like that. I wouldn't, I don't pay to make more people mad at me.

Honestly, when I get the list together, we need to present a concerted effort, one or two sponsors per day until we've completed the whole list.

I want them totally and completely snowed under.

The ones that have brick and mortar stores need picket lines out front.

I'm serious.

We can't break the MSM by asking them to play fair.

But we can damn sure cause their "sponsors" to reconsider advertising with those filthy bastards at MSNBC.

:)

[Teenforpaul08]

Look at all the chaos after the USSR fell. Did we get nuked? No! The military keeps control of the weapons while the civilians go crazy. But even if Al Qaeda somehow managed to get Pakistan's nukes, I'm not concerned. If they tried to use them, the entire middle east would be a glass parking lot. We have a hell of a lot more nukes than Pakistan.

Exactly. Why are we (meaning julie annie) calling the Middle East "bullies" when we are the ones bossing them around? Even Osama understands that if he attacks the U.S. with nukes, all of the Middle East would get nuked. The MSM doesn't understand that "you don't step on Superman's cape." No one can militarily harm the U.S. because they would get nuked. Proof? Look at Japan. People should be afraid that WE have nukes!

[sluggo]

Honestly, when I get the list together, we need to present a concerted effort, one or two sponsors per day until we've completed the whole list.

I want them totally and completely snowed under.

The ones that have brick and mortar stores need picket lines out front.

I'm serious.

We can't break the MSM by asking them to play fair.

But we can damn sure cause their "sponsors" to reconsider advertising with those filthy bastards at MSNBC.

:)

+1

[Ron2Win]

No tube?

[FreeMind&Market]

What to do about the nukes? What can you do? Really, does anyone think we can go in and protect them as bad as we flubbed up Iraq after the initial invasion? We couldn't even keep our own equipment from being stolen. Our best hope is that Pakistan's military has them secured.

[mrchubbs]

Youtube is here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icT_R9uDvms

[NewEnd]

Youtube is here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icT_R9uDvms

authentic

:)

Thanks

[greendiseaser]

This is the part of the campaign where it's actually okay to invoke O'Reilly and point out that nobody watches MSNBC :D

seriously.

i'd rather watch Fox, if only because if you're gonna do propaganda, do it WELL.

MSNBC has the most boring, subtlely biased, lame ass "news" coverage.

CNN for news. Fox if you want to see what "the establishment" is whoring.
MSNBC if you want to fall asleep.

Headline News for comedy.

CNBC to stare at the money honeys!

:D

[rg123]

Honestly, when I get the list together, we need to present a concerted effort, one or two sponsors per day until we've completed the whole list.

I want them totally and completely snowed under.

The ones that have brick and mortar stores need picket lines out front.

I'm serious.

We can't break the MSM by asking them to play fair.

But we can damn sure cause their "sponsors" to reconsider advertising with those filthy bastards at MSNBC.

:)


Well said I agree 100% hit them till their servers heat and sponsers in the pocket book just like what was done to Imus

[Ron2Win]

Youtube is here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icT_R9uDvms
thanks your are the man.

[obstruksion]

Douchster