View Full Version : Is bad publicity better than little or no publicity?

12-23-2007, 05:36 PM

12-23-2007, 05:37 PM
sometimes i think... because sometimes the bad press blows back up in the medias faces and makes them look dumb

12-23-2007, 05:40 PM
It depends on the situation. I think little to no publicity right now makes the media look like a crock of sh*t, so that's a plus for us because many people are being aware of their bias and most importantly CORRUPTION. Is bad publicity bad for our candidate... who knows.

12-23-2007, 07:43 PM
The old saying is right -- any publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell your name right.

"Ron Paul" is pretty darn easy to spell.

12-23-2007, 07:48 PM
If the only publicity you receive is bad publicity, than no publicity is probably better.

12-23-2007, 07:49 PM
Of course negative publicity works...look at Huckabee!

Immediately after all that dirt came out about him releasing that convicted rapist, he skyrocketed!!! :mad:

12-24-2007, 12:55 AM
This is an old saying that makes no sense. I've yet to hear a convincing argument in its favor. The brothel stuff didn't help, the 9/11 nuts don't help, the Stormfront stuff didn't help, the lawsuits over the Iowa straw poll didn't help. Cut it out, moonbats!