crasster
12-23-2007, 09:50 AM
I think Ron did very well.
No, he did not know the specific numbers, and frankly neither did Russert. He asked Paul how much the income tax revenue was. Then he quoted Paul "1 trillion".
Paul may have taken this question literally, so he did not quote the exact number. But I assure you, the income tax is not EXACTLY 1 trillion.
His question was specific, "How much" not "about how much".
Same with the troops over seas. Paul may have taken the question literally.
As far as the earmark question, I think Ron did very well. He said the "government steals this from my district, so I tried to get it back". I don't see what is so confusing about it. No hand in the cookie jar there. Ron basically said "The whole system is corrupt and that is what I want to change so people won't put in earmarks to get their stolen money back".
I think it was a pretty positive interview, 7 out of 10 for the media, but a TRUE 10 out of 10 for MTP. Russert GRILLS people, it's his job and is known for it.
Think of the dirt he tried to pull on Ron. All back in 1988, 1987 from newspapers.. HAHA.. (most that Paul refuted) Mitt downright LIED on his show about his dad marching with Martin Luther King. OUTRIGHT LIED!!!!! Right there on national TV! Everybody knows it's a lie. Mitt is a goner after that.
There were no questions of the failing dollar or the economy in general. No questions on our National Debt. Of course, these are the most important issues for our country. Tim was 100% negative the whole time.
Hopefully he'll grill the Huckster on his dog torturing son, and bring up the fact that Ron Paul raised 3 M.D.'s
No, he did not know the specific numbers, and frankly neither did Russert. He asked Paul how much the income tax revenue was. Then he quoted Paul "1 trillion".
Paul may have taken this question literally, so he did not quote the exact number. But I assure you, the income tax is not EXACTLY 1 trillion.
His question was specific, "How much" not "about how much".
Same with the troops over seas. Paul may have taken the question literally.
As far as the earmark question, I think Ron did very well. He said the "government steals this from my district, so I tried to get it back". I don't see what is so confusing about it. No hand in the cookie jar there. Ron basically said "The whole system is corrupt and that is what I want to change so people won't put in earmarks to get their stolen money back".
I think it was a pretty positive interview, 7 out of 10 for the media, but a TRUE 10 out of 10 for MTP. Russert GRILLS people, it's his job and is known for it.
Think of the dirt he tried to pull on Ron. All back in 1988, 1987 from newspapers.. HAHA.. (most that Paul refuted) Mitt downright LIED on his show about his dad marching with Martin Luther King. OUTRIGHT LIED!!!!! Right there on national TV! Everybody knows it's a lie. Mitt is a goner after that.
There were no questions of the failing dollar or the economy in general. No questions on our National Debt. Of course, these are the most important issues for our country. Tim was 100% negative the whole time.
Hopefully he'll grill the Huckster on his dog torturing son, and bring up the fact that Ron Paul raised 3 M.D.'s