PDA

View Full Version : Grassroots Effort to inform Media on the White Supremist ties...




mcgraw_wv
12-20-2007, 10:20 AM
Everyone, all the 2nd tier blogs and news sites are posting the letter from the white supremist claiming more involvement, we are all starting to see it.

How do we combat this?

We ALL need to post, email, and comment on these sites, and we ALL need to have a consistent strong response.



IMO, our response should be to Point out that the media outlet in question is taking the word of a White Supremest that was NATIONALLY EMBARRASSED over the word of a 10 term congressman, a doctor and a man who served our country through the military.

We must stress that this man was nationally embarrased on TV, and to lash out, he is making claims to derail Ron Paul as a presidential candidate.

We are 2 - 3 days away from seeing this White Supremeist on CNN for interviews abotu this, he will lie, adn say anything, as him on TV extends his Agenda.

A united response, and attack on all stories, posts, and interviews will showcase how dirty the MSM is for taking the word of a man of low character over the word of the good Ron Paul.

fedup100
12-20-2007, 10:23 AM
The zionist and their helpers have been busy overnight.

hasan
12-20-2007, 10:40 AM
how about we list all the llinks on white supremacy on this thread and then we can respond to them?

kylejack
12-20-2007, 10:41 AM
No, do not e-mail bomb the media about this. Its not being covered hardly at all. Don't help them.

yongrel
12-20-2007, 10:41 AM
This too shall pass. It's not a big deal.

FrankRep
12-20-2007, 10:42 AM
..

jenninlouisiana
12-20-2007, 10:45 AM
I disagreee. We need to leave this alone. I don't think in the end a whole lot of people care about this issue. Ron Paul has explained it as clearly as possible.

Blogs are like ********, everyone has one. :) (I'm sure you can figure the word out).

Plus, by clicking on their links, you give them web traffic.

This is one of those things where you need to know when to stop.

Leave it alone and let it die.

videogeek
12-20-2007, 10:51 AM
I say wait until Sunday at least. 2nd tier bloggers just need something to write about. When it becomes an issue on the bigger blogs, or on Meet the Press on Sunday, then we should spend some effort putting it to rest. If we do that now, we run the risk of turning a non issue into an issue.

Jobarra
12-20-2007, 10:53 AM
You know, I think it would be hilarious if Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert did a REAL news report on these lightly veiled attacks. At the end of the report just look at the camera and say "The joke here is that a parody news show is the only one that reports this REAL news!" It'll never happen, but it would be great and I'm sure their ratings would skyrocket.

It's funny, I don't care for Nader at all, but the other night I saw a show on PBS about his 'works'. When they got into his presidential runs, it showed how quickly the Left organized attacks on him. They still blame him for the loss in 2000 due to the fact that there was only a 500+ vote difference in Florida. His supporters pointed out though that every single third party in Florida got more votes than the difference, so why do they blame Nader?

aravoth
12-20-2007, 10:53 AM
it's not an issue, drop it.

mcgraw_wv
12-20-2007, 10:56 AM
Well Google News searches are showing this story EVERYWHERE... it went over the AP, and all the local news stations have picked it up and any one else with the AP.

It's already been posted on a Non-Sports talk forum on a football website... So it's making it's way around the internet right now.

Jobarra
12-20-2007, 10:56 AM
I say wait until Sunday at least. 2nd tier bloggers just need something to write about. When it becomes an issue on the bigger blogs, or on Meet the Press on Sunday, then we should spend some effort putting it to rest. If we do that now, we run the risk of turning a non issue into an issue.
I think it's a guarantee that Russert will bring it up on Sunday. It's really just about the only thing they can attack with. I'm sure they'll make up some more stuff though. Seems fairly easy to link someone's message with a campaign's message apparently. People are just outrageously stupid in this country as evidenced from the blog comments.

Cardinal Red
12-20-2007, 11:00 AM
The zionist and their helpers have been busy overnight.


I am Zionist.

I've also been a part of this campaign as both a donor and volunteer from day 1.

We're a big tent here-- Let's keep it that way

Highstreet
12-20-2007, 11:01 AM
Everyone, all the 2nd tier blogs and news sites are posting the letter from the white supremist claiming more involvement, we are all starting to see it.

How do we combat this?

We ALL need to post, email, and comment on these sites, and we ALL need to have a consistent strong response.



IMO, our response should be to Point out that the media outlet in question is taking the word of a White Supremest that was NATIONALLY EMBARRASSED over the word of a 10 term congressman, a doctor and a man who served our country through the military.

We must stress that this man was nationally embarrased on TV, and to lash out, he is making claims to derail Ron Paul as a presidential candidate.

We are 2 - 3 days away from seeing this White Supremeist on CNN for interviews abotu this, he will lie, adn say anything, as him on TV extends his Agenda.

A united response, and attack on all stories, posts, and interviews will showcase how dirty the MSM is for taking the word of a man of low character over the word of the good Ron Paul.


Here is the TRUTH:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=61142 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=61142)


Spread it!! How would a "racist" want an African American for a VP?

Kregener
12-20-2007, 11:02 AM
If you are a Zionist (by my definition) you stand directly opposed to my beliefs and stance on the core issues that have led to the destruction of our Republic.

And Ron Paul's.

???

Highstreet
12-20-2007, 11:03 AM
If you are a Zionist (by my definition) you stand directly opposed to my beliefs and stance on the core issues that have led to the destruction of our Republic.

And Ron Paul's.

???

Quit worrying about this issue and spread the truth:

Here is the TRUTH:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=61142 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=61142)


Spread it!! How would a "racist" want an African American for a VP?

kylejack
12-20-2007, 11:04 AM
If you are a Zionist (by my definition) you stand directly opposed to my beliefs and stance on the core issues that have led to the destruction of our Republic.

And Ron Paul's.

???
No. Many zionists don't believe in spending American tax dollars to promote Israel. They want the U.S. out of the situation so Israel can handle this on their own.

Derek Johnson
12-20-2007, 11:06 AM
I heard Fox radio talking about the Cavuto interview mentioning Paul not returning a white supremacists money. It's not a big deal, Paul slammed Cavuto to the ground and it just makes the MSM look stupid...and shows how far they will go to smear Ron.

mcgraw_wv
12-20-2007, 11:14 AM
I am Zionist.

I've also been a part of this campaign as both a donor and volunteer from day 1.

We're a big tent here-- Let's keep it that way

What does that even mean? What is a Zionist, and what directly supports yoru cause with Ron Pauls?

kylejack
12-20-2007, 11:15 AM
What does that even mean? What is a Zionist, and what directly supports yoru cause with Ron Pauls?
Zionists support the promotion of the Israeli state. Not every Zionist wants the US government to help out, because this "help" means that the US also has to restrain Israel from handling things how it wants to handle them.

Kregener
12-20-2007, 11:15 AM
No. Many zionists don't believe in spending American tax dollars to promote Israel. They want the U.S. out of the situation so Israel can handle this on their own.

Then (by my definition) you are NOT a Zionist.

*WHEW!*

kylejack
12-20-2007, 11:17 AM
Then (by my definition) you are NOT a Zionist.

*WHEW!*
Your definition is at odds with the actual definition. Zionism is just the promotion of a homeland for the Jewish people in Israel.

ARealConservative
12-20-2007, 11:25 AM
Your definition is at odds with the actual definition. Zionism is just the promotion of a homeland for the Jewish people in Israel.

yep - it really comes down to being a collectivist or not.

zionism is collectivism

Kregener
12-20-2007, 11:29 AM
Okay.....

Here is the "actual" definition (if you will accept Merriam-Webster)

Zionism

Main Entry:
Zi·on·ism Listen to the pronunciation of Zionism
Pronunciation:
\ˈzī-ə-ˌni-zəm\
Function:
noun
Date:
1896

: an international movement originally for the establishment of a Jewish national or religious community in Palestine and later for the support of modern Israel
— Zi·on·ist Listen to the pronunciation of Zionist \-nist\ adjective or noun
— Zi·on·is·tic Listen to the pronunciation of Zionistic \ˌzī-ə-ˈnis-tik\ adjective

So, I guess it all comes down to what your idea of "support" is. I "support" Israel's right to exist. I believe in free and open trade with the state of Israel. I believe these to be in complete agreement with Ron Paul's idea of "support".

ANY money, read- one red cent, of "aid" is unconstitutional and promotes tyranny both here and in the Middle East.

kylejack
12-20-2007, 11:31 AM
yep - it really comes down to being a collectivist or not.

zionism is collectivism
Since its all taking place outside of the United States, there's no reason a zionist couldn't fully support a Ron Paul presidency. Indeed, when Israel bombed Iraq's new nuclear reactor in 1981 and Reagan was condemning them, Ron Paul was one of the few people defending their right to do so. As long as people aren't supporting collectivism in the United States, I'll call them a fellow supporter.

tsetsefly
12-20-2007, 11:32 AM
The zionist and their helpers have been busy overnight.

and shit like this doesnt help, the white supremacist probaby hates jews as much as you do and he hates ron paul I am sure no jew put him up to this...

tsetsefly
12-20-2007, 11:33 AM
I disagreee. We need to leave this alone. I don't think in the end a whole lot of people care about this issue. Ron Paul has explained it as clearly as possible.

Blogs are like ********, everyone has one. :) (I'm sure you can figure the word out).

Plus, by clicking on their links, you give them web traffic.

This is one of those things where you need to know when to stop.

Leave it alone and let it die.

agree...

tsetsefly
12-20-2007, 11:34 AM
Well Google News searches are showing this story EVERYWHERE... it went over the AP, and all the local news stations have picked it up and any one else with the AP.

It's already been posted on a Non-Sports talk forum on a football website... So it's making it's way around the internet right now.

lol, changed my mind then... we shoudl adress it a bit, but really its a post from a socialist racist, how much credibility does he have..

allyinoh
12-20-2007, 11:37 AM
The whole thing doesn't even make sense. Most White supremist want to keep their names unknown.

Also, why would a group of people who only like whites and would like to see others wiped out meet at an ethnic restaurant? It definitely is invalid and if the media believes it, they are really stupid.

ARealConservative
12-20-2007, 11:39 AM
Since its all taking place outside of the United States, there's no reason a zionist couldn't fully support a Ron Paul presidency. Indeed, when Israel bombed Iraq's new nuclear reactor in 1981 and Reagan was condemning them, Ron Paul was one of the few people defending their right to do so. As long as people aren't supporting collectivism in the United States, I'll call them a fellow supporter.

I don't think we are positioned to turn votes away from anybody at this point.

But I do understand the confusion in this type of support as it does collide with the Dr.'s views on collectivism.

Highstreet
12-20-2007, 11:42 AM
The whole thing doesn't even make sense. Most White supremist want to keep their names unknown.

Also, why would a group of people who only like whites and would like to see others wiped out meet at an ethnic restaurant? It definitely is invalid and if the media believes it, they are really stupid.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=61142

Spread the truth.

Paul called for an African American as a possible VP back in May 2007.

This is BS, and we need to spread this story from May.

Cardinal Red
12-20-2007, 11:48 AM
No. Many zionists don't believe in spending American tax dollars to promote Israel. They want the U.S. out of the situation so Israel can handle this on their own.

Bingo.

And, I might add, that while as a Zionist, I want Israel to do well and might personally contribute money to causes in Israel for that purpose, as someone who is first and foremost an AMERICAN, my primary directive is to support America's interests-- and That's why I am supporting Ron Paul.

I understand there are many Ron Paul supporters who are non-Zionists or anti-Zionists. That's fine with me-- but lets not use divisive names that underestimate the diversity of our movement.

Lets focus on Ron Paul's message of Peace, Prospertity and freedom:)

Teflon Master
12-20-2007, 12:15 PM
We need to do something. It appears that LGF's troll of a post has now been put on Townhall. We can't just "wait it out" and "ignore them". We can, but the MSM doesn't. It saddens the fuck out of me that they have resorted to using fake troll posts on some internet forum as a source that Ron Paul is racist.

Yeah, lets forget that Ron Paul has never mentioned anything remotely racist. Lets forget that Ron Paul has the endorsement of Walter Williams. Lets forget that he offered his own money to mend a gold metal for Rosa Parks.

We need to do something. We need to get together and combat the trolljob LGF is doing right now.

Jobarra
12-20-2007, 12:17 PM
Still would be nice for people to just say "Look, even White Supremecists are changing their ways due to Ron Paul's stance on Freedom and Liberty"

kylejack
12-20-2007, 12:20 PM
We need to do something. It appears that LGF's troll of a post has now been put on Townhall. We can't just "wait it out" and "ignore them". We can, but the MSM doesn't. It saddens the fuck out of me that they have resorted to using fake troll posts on some internet forum as a source that Ron Paul is racist.

Yeah, lets forget that Ron Paul has never mentioned anything remotely racist. Lets forget that Ron Paul has the endorsement of Walter Williams. Lets forget that he offered his own money to mend a gold metal for Rosa Parks.

We need to do something. We need to get together and combat the trolljob LGF is doing right now.
Nah. Ignore them. LGF is not a big deal and neither is a blog on Townhall.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/elfyourself.com?site0=ronpaulforums.com&site1=littlegreenfootballs.com&y=r&z=3&h=300&w=610&range=3m&size=Medium

They are less popular than this forum. "Do something" about this if you want to make them more popular.

Teflon Master
12-20-2007, 12:23 PM
Nah. Ignore them. LGF is not a big deal and neither is a blog on Townhall.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/elfyourself.com?site0=ronpaulforums.com&site1=littlegreenfootballs.com&y=r&z=3&h=300&w=610&range=3m&size=Medium

They are less popular than this forum. "Do something" about this if you want to make them more popular.

Yeah and we said the same thing about the Nazi donations, and now the MSM are running with it. We said the same thing about the Truthers and the MSM ran for it. We can wait idly back and say that if we respond we will only be helping them, but then it maybe too late.