B9vot3r
12-20-2007, 04:26 AM
a link to the AP article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_fire_12 (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_fire_12)
paraphrasing, "Thick smoke billowed from a fire Wednesday in Vice President Dick Cheney's suite of offices in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House...The adjacent office of the vice president's political director, Amy Whitelaw, was heavily damaged by fire...White House press secretary Dana Perino said the blaze appeared to have started in an electrical closet or a telephone bank." and there are some other good tidbits about it in there as well.
now looking at this event in a vacuum, it seems innocent enough. but given cheney's history of reluctance to comply to any authority, congressional, judiciary or otherwise, and also given recent events of the ruling that presidential visitation logs are public domain (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/17/AR2007121701397.html), just 1 day prior to the fire, things become suspicious.
I have no idea where such records would be held or even in what format theyd be stored (documents? electronically?), or if theyd be in Cheney's office or his political directors office, but as this administrations history has taught us, when astronomical coincidences emerge, theres usually a viable argument for suspicion.
found an interesting little article here (http://www.extremeink.com/awtk/2007/12/shouting-fire-in-crowded-file-cabinet.html), though i would warn the reader also to consider the source, but interesting nonetheless.
also for those of you wondering what a 'telephone bank' is,
linkety link link... (http://www.hansabanka.lv/engl/pakalp/pr_5_3.php). (another separate area of interest/concern. do all VP's have telephone bank service in their private offices? Is this normal equipment to have in such a high office?)
im pretty ignorant on this story but i think theres a possibility there is more than meets the eye, so id encourage any and all scrutiny, including 'youre looking too far into it', but id appreciate more if people got interested or could post more information that might help clear up any suspicion.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_fire_12 (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_fire_12)
paraphrasing, "Thick smoke billowed from a fire Wednesday in Vice President Dick Cheney's suite of offices in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House...The adjacent office of the vice president's political director, Amy Whitelaw, was heavily damaged by fire...White House press secretary Dana Perino said the blaze appeared to have started in an electrical closet or a telephone bank." and there are some other good tidbits about it in there as well.
now looking at this event in a vacuum, it seems innocent enough. but given cheney's history of reluctance to comply to any authority, congressional, judiciary or otherwise, and also given recent events of the ruling that presidential visitation logs are public domain (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/17/AR2007121701397.html), just 1 day prior to the fire, things become suspicious.
I have no idea where such records would be held or even in what format theyd be stored (documents? electronically?), or if theyd be in Cheney's office or his political directors office, but as this administrations history has taught us, when astronomical coincidences emerge, theres usually a viable argument for suspicion.
found an interesting little article here (http://www.extremeink.com/awtk/2007/12/shouting-fire-in-crowded-file-cabinet.html), though i would warn the reader also to consider the source, but interesting nonetheless.
also for those of you wondering what a 'telephone bank' is,
linkety link link... (http://www.hansabanka.lv/engl/pakalp/pr_5_3.php). (another separate area of interest/concern. do all VP's have telephone bank service in their private offices? Is this normal equipment to have in such a high office?)
im pretty ignorant on this story but i think theres a possibility there is more than meets the eye, so id encourage any and all scrutiny, including 'youre looking too far into it', but id appreciate more if people got interested or could post more information that might help clear up any suspicion.