National Review

[Matt Collins]

I am looking at the Dec 17th copy of the National Review Magazine and their cover story is "Who Should Win?"

And it has drawings of McCain, Fred, Romey, Rudy, and Huck. The inside articles has people discussing each candidate individually.


Guess who is missing?!?!?!


Give these assclowns a piece of your mind (politely). About 200-300 words to letters@nationalreview.com should do the trick.




.

[Indy Vidual]

Send them the good Doctor's own words:

Congressman Ron Paul: Archives (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html) (Dr. Ron Paul in his own words and brilliant writings)

[Antonius Stone]

I think this is all that needs to be said can be summed up with this:

"Your apparently purposeful exclusion of Congressman Ron Paul from your series of articles on the Republican Presidential candidates exposes your lack of journalistic integrity and credibility."

[Grandson of Liberty]

I hate to have to buy a copy, but I'd really like to have a copy signed by President Ron Paul to show my grandkids someday.

[rajibo]

That God we're making history, and since history is written by those who win, all this old media will be irrelevent to non-existent.

[Matt Collins]

I think it is absolutely pathetic that your Dec 17th issue completely abstained from mentioning US Congressman Dr. Ron Paul who is a top tier Presidential candidate.

Your integrity as a serious conservative publication is worthless as far as I am concerned. I will not be purchasing any gift subscriptions for my friends this Christmas.


-Matt Collins
Nashville, Tn

[anotherone]

How strange is it that conservative magazines are purposely ignoring Ron Paul, while liberal magazines like "The Nation" are writing fair articles about his supporters and fund raisers?

I hope we remember this for years to come.

[Matt Collins]

Truth be known however I did buy some gift subscriptions to Reason Magazine for some close friends of mine ;-)

[Matt Collins]

How strange is it that conservative magazines are purposely ignoring Ron Paul, while liberal magazines like "The Nation" are writing fair articles about his supporters and fund raisers?

I hope we remember this for years to come.



As mentioned elsewhere, we now get to see who are the TRUE friends of liberty. And we also get to see who is a whore. :mad:



.

[Antonius Stone]

time to hit 'em up, people!

[Matt Collins]

time to hit 'em up, people!

I wonder if they'll publish any of our letters to the editor.

[juddpuds]

blimp

[Matthew Zak]

done

[Matt Collins]

Awesome