apc3161
12-19-2007, 11:17 PM
It's funny that Ron Paul is viewed as being weak on Global Warming when in reality he would probably have the most effective solution, "Let the states be in charge of it"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/washington/20epa.html?hp
The EPA recently decided that states don't have the right to have stricter emissions than what the federal government decides.
In an evening conference call with reporters, Mr. Johnson defended his agency’s decision.
“The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution, not a confusing patchwork of state rules,” he said. “I believe this is a better approach than if individual states were to act alone.”
So when 17 states said they wanted to have stricter emission rules, the federal government wouldn't let them do it.
Yes Ron Paul would have the perfect medicine for global warming. Give power back to the states.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/washington/20epa.html?hp
The EPA recently decided that states don't have the right to have stricter emissions than what the federal government decides.
In an evening conference call with reporters, Mr. Johnson defended his agency’s decision.
“The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution, not a confusing patchwork of state rules,” he said. “I believe this is a better approach than if individual states were to act alone.”
So when 17 states said they wanted to have stricter emission rules, the federal government wouldn't let them do it.
Yes Ron Paul would have the perfect medicine for global warming. Give power back to the states.