The conspiracy we SHOULD be talking about - what happened in Ohio?

[QuesoPantera]

http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/17/harvey_wasserman_on_new_ohio_voting

If we want to talk conspiracy to undermine the government, don't focus on theories based on loose circumstantial claims. The kind where the deeper you dig, more holes in logic up. We all know what I'm talking about, no elaboration necessary. :rolleyes:

This piece goes deep into the circumstances surrounding the '04 election in Ohio, and has a devastating array of facts to support the idea of massive voter fraud.

Has Dr. Paul addressed the 04' Ohio vote? Do you think he should?

[fgd]

Circumstantial evidence, no smoking gun of fraud.


Anybody with a simple electronic machine could have gone in there and turned the election, and we know it was done, because the Republican Secretary of State was also co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign. How do you top that?

The article is full of "could haves" with no "did".

[ronpaulfollower999]

I believe that there was voter fraud. Who would really want Bush for 4 more years? (sorry to the people who voted for Bush in 2000 or 2004)