crasster
12-18-2007, 07:36 PM
I myself and a 9/11 truther. However, I leave this out of Ron Paul & his campaign & my activism.
I do feel a reeking staunch of crap after watching that interview. Almost as if were to make you happy, then cheer, get out of your seat punching the air, just to be sat back down and slapped in the face. Glen spent 1/3rd of an hour questioning and the motives of Ron Paul supporters.... How in the world is Ron supposed to know what his supporters are going to do?
The title at the bottom was "Honest questions" but they made him respond to a question and did not let us see the death threat video. Is this because the accusations to Beck were true? Is this because it could show us bravery of other individuals in this country willing to put their own ass on the line to defend freedom?
We'll never know will we?
If we could cut the interview to the first 30 minutes & the end statement, I think it was absolutely great. Going into 9-11 truth was absurd for Glen to do to Dr. Paul. Even if I think 9-11 was extremely questionable on our governments behalf (at least let it happen) Ron is not supposed to answer for me.
I could support Romney, and they would never ask Romney that.
Though I feel 9-11 truth is important, and I disagree with Dr. Paul, HE WOULD DEFEND TO HIS DEATH MY RIGHT TO BELIEVE IT! Unlike Glenn who called it a "Dangerous growing movement".
Ron and 9-11 are not intertwined. I'm sure even if there was knowledge in some areas of the government, that RON probably was not a part of it. LOL.
He mentioned the "blimp" and "wonderful supporters" but concentrated for numerous minutes on the "Few" who he considers dangerous.
Well that's my rant.
I do feel a reeking staunch of crap after watching that interview. Almost as if were to make you happy, then cheer, get out of your seat punching the air, just to be sat back down and slapped in the face. Glen spent 1/3rd of an hour questioning and the motives of Ron Paul supporters.... How in the world is Ron supposed to know what his supporters are going to do?
The title at the bottom was "Honest questions" but they made him respond to a question and did not let us see the death threat video. Is this because the accusations to Beck were true? Is this because it could show us bravery of other individuals in this country willing to put their own ass on the line to defend freedom?
We'll never know will we?
If we could cut the interview to the first 30 minutes & the end statement, I think it was absolutely great. Going into 9-11 truth was absurd for Glen to do to Dr. Paul. Even if I think 9-11 was extremely questionable on our governments behalf (at least let it happen) Ron is not supposed to answer for me.
I could support Romney, and they would never ask Romney that.
Though I feel 9-11 truth is important, and I disagree with Dr. Paul, HE WOULD DEFEND TO HIS DEATH MY RIGHT TO BELIEVE IT! Unlike Glenn who called it a "Dangerous growing movement".
Ron and 9-11 are not intertwined. I'm sure even if there was knowledge in some areas of the government, that RON probably was not a part of it. LOL.
He mentioned the "blimp" and "wonderful supporters" but concentrated for numerous minutes on the "Few" who he considers dangerous.
Well that's my rant.