PDA

View Full Version : Matching Contributions?




rockwell
12-17-2007, 01:06 PM
ANYONE HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE POSITION ON MATCHING FUNDS MIGHT BE? THAT'S A BIG SHOT IN THE ARM CONSIDERING THE AMOUNT RAISED.

Primary election

The federal government will match up to $250 of an individual's total contributions to an eligible candidate.

Only candidates seeking nomination by a political party to the office of President are eligible to receive primary matching funds. In addition, a candidate must establish eligibility by submitting to the FEC proof that at least $5,000 was raised in each of at least 20 states. Only a maximum of $250 per individual applies toward the $5,000 threshold in each state.

The spending limit increases every cycle due to inflation. The FEC estimates that the limits for the primary election will be $40.9 million, of which a candidate must abide by state limits of 65.4 cents per person of voting age population in a state, or $817,800, whichever is greater.[1] Certain fundraising expenses (up to 20 percent of the expenditure limit) and legal and accounting expenses incurred solely to ensure the campaign's compliance with the law do not count against the expenditure limits.

Once they have established eligibility for matching payments, Presidential candidates may receive public funds to match contributions from individual contributors, up to $250 per individual. The contributions must be in the form of a check or money order, although with the Internet, credit cards are also eligible as they can be tracked. Contributions from political committees and cash contributions are ineligible.

Eligible candidates may receive public funds equaling up to half of the national spending limit for the primary campaign, although because of the donors that give up to the $2,300 limit, they generally raise much more money than they receive in matching funds.

In 2008, many of the top candidates have chosen not to accept the primary matching funds. So far, John McCain[2], Tom Tancredo[3], John Edwards[4], Chris Dodd[5], and Joe Biden[6] have qualified for and elected to take public funds in the primary. Other major candidates have eschewed the low amount of spending permitted and have chosen not to participate.

ronpaulitician
12-17-2007, 01:07 PM
The RP campaign has already stated that they disagree with matching funds on principle. Hope someone else can find a link for you.

rockwell
12-17-2007, 01:09 PM
What principle? Matching funds is derived from money voluntarily given by the taxpayer unlike all the other money they confiscate. In fact it may be the only money the government collects that people have to opt in. I can't see how that violates any principle.

Taco John
12-17-2007, 01:10 PM
This is a long dead issue. The RP campaign will not take matching funds.

Taco John
12-17-2007, 01:12 PM
Paul has used the money raised by volunteers to hire staff and buy television airtime. Although he could obtain millions more in matching funds from the Federal Election Commission, Benton said, "Ron rejects matching funds on principle. Ron is not the kind of guy who compromises."


http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-moneyman16dec16,0,6282421.story?coll=la-home-center

rockwell
12-17-2007, 01:17 PM
I appreciate his principles, but that seems foolish considering that the money is given voluntarily by the taxpayer specifically to offset the influence of PAC money.

Oh well.

hueylong
12-17-2007, 01:27 PM
Public funds come with spending limits. We can raise more than that on our own. That's why everybody opts out of matching funds.

Huey

RobertJ
12-17-2007, 01:56 PM
Once you accept "matching funds" you have to play by the FEC rules, that is most likely why RP wont take the money. I dont blame him, I wouldnt take it either.