Rand Paul as VP? [Archive] - Ron Paul Forums / Liberty Forest

gerryb

12-16-2007, 07:19 AM

What does everyone think about Rand Paul for VP?

I don't know anything about him myself except for the fact he speaks before/in place of Ron occasionally. The YouTube's I've seen of him he has carried himself and his fathers message well.

What do you all think? Five children, eighteen grandchildren, and one great-grandchild. Sounds like a good dynasty to get started to me!

dvictr

12-16-2007, 07:20 AM

Ran Paul 1216!

ronpaulfollower999

12-16-2007, 07:23 AM

Paul/Paul

newmedia4ron

12-16-2007, 07:29 AM

MODS: PLEASE BAN ALL VICE PRESIDENT THREADS FOREVER lol

worst forum topic ever

http://cbg.nohomers.net/images/cbgseat.gif

conner_condor

12-16-2007, 07:36 AM

Look what happened to the people who supported huck before looking into his back ground?
They got screwed.:D
I am sure he would make a good VP if RP says so.

CelestialRender

12-16-2007, 07:38 AM

It's a terrible political decision. You have to have a VP with a slightly different emphasis, and from a different region, to draw more votes.

gerryb

12-16-2007, 07:41 AM

Look what happened to the people who supported huck before looking into his back ground?
They got screwed.:D
I am sure he would make a good VP if RP says so.

I didn't vote yes, I voted maybe =P

And I agree, RP will make what ever selection he feels is best.

musicmax

12-16-2007, 07:42 AM

Mark Sanford

conner_condor

12-16-2007, 07:44 AM

It's a terrible political decision. You have to have a VP with a slightly different emphasis, and from a different region, to draw more votes.

Tancredo or Gravel? I would go with Tancredo.

gerryb

12-16-2007, 07:51 AM

Tancredo or Gravel? I would go with Tancredo.

I would go Gravel ONLY if they repeatedly advertise this youtube constantly. Otherwise, why pick a dem? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAyrvbD3NTE

FreeTraveler

12-16-2007, 07:56 AM

Rand Paul is, by all accounts, a wonderful man. He may be a good choice for president in the future. Neither Ron nor Rand would approve of a dynasty, and if anyone even seriously mentioned this possibility, they would both think you were totally insane. I think I agree with them.

robert4rp08

12-16-2007, 08:12 AM

I think Rand is great but is too similar to Ron. Need some differences to pickup more diverse support. He should run for prez in 2016 (after Ron Paul's 2 terms) though.

travismofo

12-16-2007, 08:13 AM

Where does Rand Paul live? If I'm not mistaken I beleive the nominees for Prez and VP must reside in different states to run together, according to the constitution.

carter5434

12-16-2007, 09:39 AM

I don't think i could vote for any other repub. candidate in good conscience, even if ron was the VP. The rest of them support the war, and i could never vote for that.

rfbz

12-16-2007, 09:45 AM

I think Pat Buchanan would be an excellent choice for VP. Everyone is looking for the real conservative in this race. They might not be sold on Ron Paul, but Pat Buchanan could help convince them.

loupeznik

12-16-2007, 09:55 AM

Nepotism. He could be the best choice based on his character but this is politics. Reporters are only interested in scandal.

Antonius Stone

12-16-2007, 09:56 AM

my sig says it all

fortilite

12-16-2007, 09:58 AM

Please look up NEPOTISM people, his son as VP would be so improper.

Stossel for VP! :D

sharedvoice

12-16-2007, 10:27 AM

I do not believe that is possible under the law.