PDA

View Full Version : Rockefeller Foundation's "LOCK STEP: This is No Futuristic Scenario"




Michael Landon
07-10-2020, 03:21 PM
LOCK STEP: This is No Futuristic Scenario

March 10, 2020 F. William Engdahl

Every day world mainstream news reports more people in more countries diagnosed “positive” for the coronavirus illness, now called COVID-19. As the reported numbers grow, so does widespread nervousness, often in the form of panic shopping for masks, disinfections, toilet paper, canned goods. We are told to accept the testing results as science-based. While it is next to impossible to get a full picture of what is taking place in China, the center of the novel virus storm, there is a process, being fed by mainstream media accounts and genuine panic in populations unclear what the real dangers are, that has alarming implications for the post-pandemic future.

During the last week of January the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ordered an unprecedented lock down of an entire city of 11 million, Wuhan, in an attempt to contain a public health situation that had clearly gotten out of control. Never before in the history of modern public health had a government placed an entire city in quarantine by imposing a cordon sanitaire around it. That lock down was quickly extended to other China cities to the extent that, for the past weeks, a major part of the world’s second largest national economy has shut down. That in turn is impacting the global economy.

At this point, as cases and the first deaths are being reported in countries outside of China, especially in South Korea, Japan, Iran and Italy, the prime question everyone has is how dangerous this virus is. The fiasco with the US CDC, where the putative tests for the novel virus were shown defective, underscores the fact that the testing for the now-named virus, SARS-CoV-2, said to cause the disease called COVID-19, is anything but 100% reliable. Despite this, influenced by a steady stream of mainstream media images of empty shop shelves in Italy, of police cordons around Washington State nursing homes said to house several presumed Coronavirus patients, of pictures of Iranian hospitals filled with body bags, millions of citizens are understandably becoming alarmed and fearful.

What is being done in city after city and country after country is cancellation of major events where many people come together. This has included the Venice Carnival, major sports events, trade shows in Switzerland and elsewhere being canceled. Major airlines are being financially devastated as people around the world cancel holiday flights, as are cruise ship lines. China orders burning of cash notes claiming they might be contaminated. The French Louvre reopens but does not accept cash, only cards, as paper might be contaminated. WHO warns about paper money contagion risk. Countries are introducing laws such as in the UK allowing legal detention of citizens who might have a virus. Growing media promotion in the West of shop shelves bare of everyday essentials such as rice, pasta, toilet paper is feeding panic buying everywhere.

Questions on Death Rate

It is important to have a perspective on the apparent deaths provably due to COVID-19. Here facts become very imprecise.

As of March 3, 2020 according to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom, worldwide there were a total of 90,893 cases of COVID-19, with 3,110 resulting in death. He then called this a 3.4% mortality rate, a figure highly disputed by other health experts. Tedros stated, “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.”

The problem is that no one can say precisely what the true death rate is. That’s because globally we have not tested all who might have mild cases of the virus and the accuracy of those tests are anything but 100% certain. But a statement about a death rate more than three times that of seasonal flu is a real panic-maker if true.

The reality is very likely a far lower true mortality according to epidemic experts. “We do not report all the cases,” says Professor John Edmunds of the Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. “In fact, we only usually report a small proportion of them. If there are many more cases in reality, then the case fatality ratio will be lower.” Edmunds went on to say, “What you can safely say […] is that if you divide the number of reported deaths by the number of reported cases [to get the case fatality ratio], you will almost certainly get the wrong answer.” The WHO under Tedros seems to be erring on the side of spreading panic.

The WHO and the USA CDC some years ago changed the definition of deaths from seasonal flu to “deaths of flu or pneumonia.” The CDC calculates only an approximate flu death count by totaling death certificates processed that list “pneumonia or influenza” as the underlying or contributing cause of death. The CDC estimates 45 Million Flu Cases, and 61,000 what they deftly call “Flu-Associated” Deaths in 2017-2018 US Flu Season. How many were elderly with pneumonia or other lung diseases is unclear. Naturally the numbers help spread fear and sell seasonal flu vaccines whose positive effect is anything but proven. Worldwide, the CDC estimated in a study in 2017 that, “between 291,000 and 646,000 people worldwide die from seasonal influenza-related respiratory illnesses each year.”

In China alone the estimate for seasonal influenza-associated (including pneumonia) deaths was about 300,000 in 2018. Note that 3,000 corona-attributed deaths, as tragic as it is, is but 1% of the “normal” annual deaths from lung-related illnesses in China, and because of the mixed or changing China accounting, it is not clear how many of the 3,000 China deaths are even from seasonal pneumonia. But owing to dramatic videos, not verifiable, of people allegedly dropping dead on the streets in China, with no proof, or of Wuhan hospitals filled in the corridors with body bags apparently of dead from COVID-19, much of the world is understandably anxious about this strange exogenous invader.

Amid what is clearly confusion among many well-meaning health officials and likely opportunism by Western vaccine makers like GlaxoSmithKline or Gilead and others, with alarming speed our world is being transformed in ways just months ago we could not have imagined.

‘LOCK STEP’

Whatever has occurred inside China at this point it is almost impossible to say owing to conflicting reactions of the Beijing authorities and several changes in ways of counting COVID-19 cases. The question now is how the relevant authorities in the West will use this crisis. Here it is useful to go back to a highly relevant report published a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation, one of the world’s leading backers of eugenics, and creators of GMO among other things.

The report in question has the bland title, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.” It was published in May 2010 in cooperation with the Global Business Network of futurologist Peter Schwartz. The report contains various futurist scenarios developed by Schwartz and company. One scenario carries the intriguing title, “LOCK STEP: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” Here it gets interesting as in what some term predictive programming.

The Schwartz scenario states, “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months…” He continues, “The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” This sounds eerily familiar.

Then the scenario gets very interesting: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

A relevant question is whether certain bad actors, and there are some in this world, are opportunistically using the widespread fears around the COVID-19 to advance an agenda of “lock step” top down social control, one that would include stark limits on travel, perhaps replacing of cash by “sanitary” electronic cash, mandatory vaccination even though the long term side effects are not proven safe, unlimited surveillance and the curtailing of personal freedoms such as political protests on the excuse it will allow “identification of people who refuse to be tested or vaccinated,” and countless other restrictions. Much of the Rockefeller 2010 scenario is already evident. Fear is never a good guide to sound reason.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”


Original Article Source:
http://https://journal-neo.org/2020/03/10/lock-step-this-is-no-futuristic-scenario/

Rockefeller Foundation's 2010 Paper:
http://http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

- ML

CCTelander
07-10-2020, 03:41 PM
A relevant question is whether certain bad actors, and there are some in this world, are opportunistically using the widespread fears around the COVID-19 to advance an agenda of “lock step” top down social control, one that would include stark limits on travel, perhaps replacing of cash by “sanitary” electronic cash, mandatory vaccination even though the long term side effects are not proven safe, unlimited surveillance and the curtailing of personal freedoms such as political protests on the excuse it will allow “identification of people who refuse to be tested or vaccinated,” and countless other restrictions.

I wouldn't call that a question. I'd say it's an absolute self-evident certainty.

To me the relevant question is "what are liberty advocates going to do about it, right the fuck now?" Looking around I'd have to conclude not much.

Anti Globalist
07-10-2020, 05:55 PM
Lockstep can be completely avoided if those that believe in freedom and liberty stand up to these tyrants.

Michael Landon
07-12-2020, 10:58 AM
To me the relevant question is "what are liberty advocates going to do about it, right the fuck now?" Looking around I'd have to conclude not much.


Lockstep can be completely avoided if those that believe in freedom and liberty stand up to these tyrants.

That's the main issue, isn't it? When will the Patriots say "Enough is Enough"?

- ML

Dr.3D
07-12-2020, 11:31 AM
When news is suppressed, it's hard to see when the line has been crossed.

Anti Globalist
07-12-2020, 12:53 PM
That's the main issue, isn't it? When will the Patriots say "Enough is Enough"?

- ML
Those patriots should have said this decades ago. We'll most likely wait until the last minute until something is actually done.

PAF
07-12-2020, 01:21 PM
I am a firm believer in taking care of business here at home protecting our freedoms and liberties before worrying about other nations and countries and giving WELFARE money to companies such as Moderna, Novovax, ID2020.

I am not sure why a United States president would hire the likes of Anthony Fauci and Moncef Slaoui when lucrative careers under Gates/U.N. would be sufficient, and then only wear a mask while seen by the American public.


"Lockstep"


https://youtu.be/FNon7eth9Oc

RonZeplin
07-12-2020, 02:17 PM
Worship the D&R party, trust the plan, we mere mortals will never fully understand 4D chess moves of the VSG's working 24/7/365 on our behalves. :aok:

:sarcasm:

Firestarter
10-16-2020, 10:14 AM
The following interview with investigative journalist Harry Vox was originally aired on 21 October 2014.
Vox predicted a planned global plandemic and explained why the “ruling class” would stage such a false flag:
They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that had been missing from their toolkit is quarantines and curfews. The plan is to get hundreds of thousands of people infected with it and create the next phase of control.

Vox bases much of what he says on the Rockefeller Lock Step plan.
I don’t agree with Vox that they will really infect the population though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30

Firestarter
11-09-2020, 10:46 AM
In May 2009, before the 2010 Rockefeller Lockstep plan, one-world lunatic and former advisor to French President François Mitterrand, Jacques Attali, wrote how a pandemic could be used to usher in the one world government.

Even if the pandemic should turn out to be mild, as one would hope, says Attali, we could learn how to use this before the next one is staged:
History teaches us that mankind only evolves significantly when it’s dead scared: It then mobilizes defense mechanisms, sometimes intolerable (singling out scapegoats and giving birth to totalitarianism); sometimes futile (to find distraction); sometimes efficient (therapeutic ones that discard eventually all the older moral principles). Once the crisis is behind us, it [mankind] transforms these mechanisms to make them compatible with individual freedom, and to inscribe them into a democratic health policy. The pandemic could provoke such a structuring fear.

Prevention and control mechanisms and procedures for the equitable distribution of drugs and vaccines should be created. Therefore a world police should be created, and a world inventory and therefore a world taxation. One would arrive then, far faster than for merely economic reasons, at the grounds of real world government. https://thewatchtowers.org/a-french-article-from-2009-predicted-the-establishment-of-a-world-government-through-a-small-pandemic-attali-pandemic-could-open-door-for-world-government/

John-G
11-09-2020, 12:56 PM
The following interview with investigative journalist Harry Vox was originally aired on 21 October 2014.
Vox predicted a planned global plandemic and explained why the “ruling class” would stage such a false flag:

Vox bases much of what he says on the Rockefeller Lock Step plan.
I don’t agree with Vox that they will really infect the population though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30


Bump

cjm
11-09-2020, 06:58 PM
That's the main issue, isn't it? When will the Patriots say "Enough is Enough"?

- ML


Those patriots should have said this decades ago. We'll most likely wait until the last minute until something is actually done.

Patriots have been saying it all along. Here's an example from earlier this year: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?546039-California-Police-STAND-DOWN-After-Marine-Vet-Challenges-Their-Integrity

Problem is, freedom isn't popular, and to most of those that claim they support liberty, a dash of fear changes their tune.


....many of these friends are ardent gun owners who get militant – rightly so – when anyone floats the idea that their having a gun might be a “threat to the community” – absent any evidence that they are a threat. They would never accept that someone else’s fear of guns obliges them to hand over their guns. . . for the sake of the community.

But I am expected to hand over my face because someone fears I might be sick.

Some of these people agreed with me – before they lost their minds – that it was silly and worse to claim that merely driving faster than a government sign says you may constituted a threat to other people. They knew that speed limits are contrivances for mulcting motorists and that the roadside show between a cop and a driver was just that, a kind of kabuki theater. Only a handful of hysterics actually believed that driving 80 MPH on a highway with a posted limit of 70 constituted “reckless” driving.

These same people believe – insist, hysterically – that it is reckless to not wear a piece of cloth over your face.

(https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2020/11/09/letter-from-an-unmasked-man/)

So as for standing up to tyrants in 2020 and beyond, it's looking like this for me:


Step one is noncompliance.

Step two is complying if they force it upon you for the sole purpose of retaining your physical freedom.

Step three is using your physical freedom to engineer the destruction of those responsible for its enactment and enforcement.

I'm also working to provide better protection for my family. My post-2008 dollar collapse preps only cover some of what's needed today.

Firestarter
11-22-2020, 10:24 AM
Since 2016, I’ve been expecting that the “ebola false flag” will be staged: https://archive.md/kO7a1 (http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=271888&postcount=12)


As bad as it is, the corona lockdown doesn’t come close to how gruesome I imagined the coming ebola police state.

Former advisor to French President François Mitterrand Jacques Attali wrote how a pandemic could be used to usher in the one world government. And that even if the (first) pandemic would be “mild”, we could learn how to use this for the next one.
Objectively speaking this COVID-19 virus is so “mild” that it isn’t anywhere near a “pandemic”.

So I guess that at one point, an ebola outbreak will be staged on top of the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by drastic measures that will make the coronavirus lockdown look like a walk in the park.
As obviously “we” will accept anything they tell and demand of us, I wouldn’t know what (or who) could stop them…

Firestarter
11-28-2020, 10:04 AM
Another futuristic scenario?!?
Posted on 22 October 2020…


In late 2020, this ambitious recovery plan helped the euro stabilize and ushered in a new European renaissance, with citizens helping to set the agenda. The European leadership used challenge-oriented policies to create 100 carbon-neutral cities across the Continent.
(...)
With COVID-19 still rampant, the world woke up to the need to prioritize collective intelligence and put public value at the center of health innovation. The U.S. and other countries dropped opposition to a mandatory patent pool run by the World Health Organization that prevented pharmaceutical companies from abusing patents to create monopoly profits. Bold conditions were placed on the governance of intellectual property, pricing and manufacturing of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines to ensure the therapies were both affordable and universally accessible.
(...)
On Feb. 11, 2021, the FDA approved the most promising COVID-19 vaccine for manufacture in the U.S. Mass production began immediately, plans for swift global distribution kicked in, and the first citizens received their shots within three weeks, free at the point of use. It was the fastest development and manufacture of a vaccine on record, and a monumental success in health innovation.
(...)
In the summer of 2022, the other major crisis of our age took a turn for the apocalyptic. Climate breakdown finally landed in the developed world, testing the resilience of social systems. In the Midwestern U.S., a severe drought wiped out crops that supplied one-sixth of the world’s grain output. People woke up to the need for governments to form a coordinated response to climate change and direct global fiscal stimulus in support of a green economy. https://archive.is/i1WXX

Firestarter
12-06-2020, 09:45 AM
Of the 4 scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development (2010), Lock step looks the most similar to the current coronavirus “pandemic”.
I think that the most important from this document are the predicted “Technology trends and applications”.

This is from LOCK STEP.

• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lowerbandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
.
This is from the scenario CLEVER TOGETHER.

• The cost of capturing data through nanosensors and smart networks falls precipitously. In many developing countries, this leads to a proliferation of new and useful services, including “sousveillance” mechanisms that improve governance and enable more efficient use of government resources.
• Intelligent electricity, water distribution, and transportation systems develop in urban areas. In these “smart cities,” internet access is seen as a basic right by the late 2010s.
• A malaria vaccine is developed and deployed broadly—saving millions of lives in the developing world.
• Advances in low-cost mind-controlled prosthetics aid the 80 percent of global amputees who live in developing countries.
• Solar power is made vastly more efficient through advances in materials, including polymers and nanoparticles. An effective combination of government subsidies and microfinance means solar is used for everything from desalination for agriculture to wi-fi networks.
• Flexible and rapid mobile payment systems drive dynamic economic growth in the developing world, while the developed world is hampered by entrenched banking interests and regulation.
http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

Firestarter
05-12-2021, 01:49 PM
In 2006, French globalist Jacques Attali, former adviser to French President Mitterand published "A Brief History of the Future – A Brave and Controversial Look at the 21st Century".
See a description of this “brilliant and provocative” book, according to none other than Henry Kissinger...
.

Attali axiomatise that the world will become poly-centered between 2025 and 2035, the United States will give up its empire status, and the world will be organized around a planetary market in 2050: the hyperempire. However, the author believes that the empire will belong partly to US, and generally, its consumption commodity will be further the prolongation of nomad commodity, like its half-blood culture, its precarious life, and its individualist or narcissist values (see p. 132). Under the pressure of the market, all the prerogatives of the states will be spoiled, its suzerainty included. The hyperempire will be set up after a geo-political fight wined by the market.


Moreover, Attali asserts that the surveillance means will replace the state’s role in two stages: the hyper-surveillance and the self-surveillance. The people will be forced, by the insurance costs, to carry out self -monitoring for complying with the rules stipulating imperatively to be in shape (both physically and intellectually).
Discretion will not have any reason to exist and curiosity, based on the idea of secrecy, will disappear. Then, the necessity of transparency will tend to be absolute in all branches. By reducing the powers and functions of the state, the market will encourage the consumers to the detriment of the workers. “The nations will be just some oases involved in a competition, in view to attract the caravans that are passing by” (p. 144). Being so weak, the states will not be able any more to govern the hyperempire, and its functions will be taken over by private commercial institutions, two of which being the centre of the empire: the assessors and the insurers. The companies will become non localized “circuses” of two types: pirate and relational. The first type will be the main actor in the second wave (hyperconflict) and the second type will be active in the third wave (hyperdemocracy). The actors will be hypernomads (expatriate population) and infra-nomads (those in extreme poverty). The rest, the vast anonymous mass will be assigned to political control, labour and consumption, and will be represented by qualified sedentary people. “The world will only be a juxtaposition of loneliness, while love - a juxtaposition of masturbations” (p. 148). The things will become increasingly worse until the arrival of the final days of freedom, in the name of freedom, and the violence of money will be followed by the violence of weapons.
http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/16_1_5.pdf

Firestarter
06-05-2021, 12:46 PM
Dutch politician Baudet of the FvD party has been publicly shamed (and fined?) for violating some of the COVID lockdown measures.
Here's Thierry Baudet on the 2010 Rockefeller Lock step plan in Dutch parliament (English subtitles).

https://youtu.be/DFrU5sXS8f4

Danke
06-05-2021, 01:30 PM
Worth watching again:



The following interview with investigative journalist Harry Vox was originally aired on 21 October 2014.
Vox predicted a planned global plandemic and explained why the “ruling class” would stage such a false flag:

Vox bases much of what he says on the Rockefeller Lock Step plan.
I don’t agree with Vox that they will really infect the population though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30

Firestarter
10-21-2021, 01:33 PM
Worth watching again:
This comes even closer!


I'm surprised that this "Cabin Talk" video, originally posted 20 September 2019, isn't deleted, better watch it quick before it's gone...
The video is less than 7 minutes, and the woman accurately predicts what would happen in the COVID pandemic.

They are planning a pandemic. An important reason for her expectation is the EO signed by Trump to start a flu vaccine task force to mandate deadly vaccines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV9Rl6d2Mys
(alternatives in case video is deleted by Youtube: https://fakeotube.com/video/3886/the-next-pandemic-is-just-around-the-corner
https://odysee.com/@wakeupcall:0/The-next-pandemic-is-just-around-the-corner:a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k0vmpwZIjL3i/)

Firestarter
11-03-2021, 12:57 PM
Some conspiracy theorists have noted that the plot 1981 movie "Early warning" is eerily similar to the COVID pandemic, lockdown, Great Reset. There is also a Christian theme in the movie...

Part of the scheme is a one world monetary system that can block people from buying (food). Some minor resistance is expected but hunger will fix this.
With the result the One world government that nobody can oppose.

https://youtu.be/aMz8kzAwWAE
(Full movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VItItJY6Hp0)