PDA

View Full Version : Who did you vote for in 2004 Election?




quantized
12-15-2007, 01:11 AM
Please vote.

brandon
12-15-2007, 01:13 AM
vote

nist7
12-15-2007, 01:14 AM
I was apathetic.

But Dr. Paul has cured me of that terrible disease.

Alawn
12-15-2007, 01:19 AM
Back then I though Bush was really cool. Boy was I dumb.

quickmike
12-15-2007, 01:22 AM
Bush 2000, Michael Badnarik(libertarian) 2004

Even back in 2000 I was mad that Bush got the nomination because I thought it was odd that the son of a former president just happened to be the one guy out of 300 million americans that they found most qualified. I mean, what are the odds? I voted for him anyway reluctantly.


Never again will I vote for another candidate without a history to back up his claims 100%

Ksuperneau
12-15-2007, 01:23 AM
Was out of town but wouldn't of voted anyways. Voting for the less of two evils is still evil.

rfbz
12-15-2007, 01:24 AM
I voted for Bush.

*ducks*

kevinblack
12-15-2007, 01:26 AM
Doesn't it get old when new members make poll questions like this?

Maybe old is not the word I am looking for here...

jasonoliver
12-15-2007, 01:28 AM
2004 - Michael Badnarik
2000 - Harry Browne

rfbz
12-15-2007, 01:28 AM
Doesn't it get old when new members make poll questions like this?

Maybe old is not the word I am looking for here...

You're right..this thread starter is the same guy who asked if we'd vote against or for Hillary if Ron Paul didn't get the nomination, heh

Ron Paul Fan
12-15-2007, 01:29 AM
I'm not sure what the OP is looking for here. He starts a poll asking us if we'd vote for the Republican nominee if it wasn't Ron Paul. Then he starts one a little while later asking what we voted in 2004. So it does get a little old and I refuse to participate in this poll!

Unspun
12-15-2007, 01:29 AM
Couldn't vote in '00 but in '04 I voted for Michael Badnarik.

quantized
12-15-2007, 01:29 AM
Doesn't it get old when new members make poll questions like this?

Maybe old is not the word I am looking for here...

Your nick as old as mine. and you think you are senior enough to make this comment. :rolleyes:

jasonoliver
12-15-2007, 01:30 AM
Bush 2000, Michael Badnarik(libertarian) 2004

Even back in 2000 I was mad that Bush got the nomination because I thought it was odd that the son of a former president just happened to be the one guy out of 300 million americans that they found most qualified. I mean, what are the odds? I voted for him anyway reluctantly.


Never again will I vote for another candidate without a history to back up his claims 100%

I voted for Harry Browne in 2000, but I remember being so happy after Bush won Bush v Gore.

2000 Bush was pretty cool. "We need less Government, not more...." "Humble foreign policy" "No nation Building"

2001 Bush was like 1998 Clinton

fogger
12-15-2007, 01:34 AM
I'm 40. Never voted in my life. Never registered. Never campaigned. Never donated. Never had a bumper sticker. Never made signs. Never marched. Never handed out literature. Never volunteered.

Until this year that is.

vinwal
12-15-2007, 01:35 AM
I didn't have any cares about politics at that time, and my mom asked me to vote for Bush so I did. That's OK because this time I have her on board for Ron Paul. :) She is VERY Christian and was leaning towards that shyster Huckabee, until I sent her a link to: christiansforRonPaul.com She now wholeheartedly supports and promotes Dr. Ron Paul. She even let me put bumper stickers on her van and I even convinced her to donate on Nov. 5th and she will be donating more Dec. 16. I told her to give generously and make it my christmas gift. :)

areyou4real
12-15-2007, 01:39 AM
Michael Badnarik (libertarian) 2004

brandon
12-15-2007, 01:41 AM
I'm surprised so many of you voted Kerry/Bush

Suckers!

mport1
12-15-2007, 01:43 AM
Why are libertarians never a choice in these? Ron Paul IS a libertarian.

quantized
12-15-2007, 01:45 AM
I'm surprised so many of you voted Kerry/Bush

Suckers!

I saw a recent youtube video on Bush 2000 election pitch, what he said sounds almosts like Ron Paul. So its not surprising why Ron Paul can appeal to some Bush's early voters.

Buzz
12-15-2007, 01:46 AM
I'm surprised so many of you voted Kerry/Bush

Suckers!

Yeah. Well, I was just a dumb teenager. :p

Birdlady
12-15-2007, 01:46 AM
I voted with the Constitution party. That year they were running Peroutka.
I will say this though. I did not donate a dime to him and I never even visited his website! lol

Things are much different this time around. :D

Richandler
12-15-2007, 01:46 AM
I voted for myself.

LynnB
12-15-2007, 01:50 AM
2004- Libertarian

Razmear
12-15-2007, 01:52 AM
Dukakis in 1988, Perot in 1992, Perot in 1996, Brown in 2000, Badnarik in 2004, Paul in 2008

eb

Mental Dribble
12-15-2007, 01:54 AM
I think 04 voting history is kidna interesting. It shows where Paul is pulling his support from. Its not defeatist like the other polls.

anotherone
12-15-2007, 02:06 AM
I think any professional pollster who saw these results would crap his pants.

Only 1/5 of RP support comes from people who voted for GW in '04. I wonder if their samples account for this?

Eric23
12-15-2007, 02:17 AM
I voted for Bush.

carter5434
12-15-2007, 02:59 AM
I actually wrote in Tony Blair, as ridiculous as that sounds. I just hated Bush and Kerry, and I kind of respect that their PM has to explain themselves in front of parlament, whereas bush gets to hide from congress.

rational thinker
12-15-2007, 03:05 AM
I could understand how someone could have voted for Bush once in and in 2000, but I can't imagine how anyone could vote for him twice!

wisconsinite
12-15-2007, 03:26 AM
Didn't vote.

I was out of the country and didn't go about the correct procedure to get an absentee ballot.


Ralph Nader in '96 and '00

Bradley in DC
12-15-2007, 03:43 AM
Good on privacy and other civil liberties, war and peace, against corporate welfare and skeptical of the Federal Reserve's powers...

A government that was only what he and DeLay would have agreed on would be about the right size, and ...

having a Lebanese-American immigrants' son that could give fluent interviews on Al-Jazira would do more to make us more secure than all the bombs we've dropped in Iraq.