Tulsi Gabbard: 'Everybody knows' Hillary Clinton is a 'warmonger'

[Warlord]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29-LniyAJnE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29-LniyAJnE

[Anti Globalist]

Anyone who thinks Hillary isn't a warmonger is deluded.

[enhanced_deficit]

Anyone who thinks Hillary isn't a warmonger is deluded.

^this.

To be fair, she is consistent though and her attacks are bi-partisan. Tulsi is one of the few progressive liberal Dems who ctiticizes pro-war neocons funded politicians in both parties:

Tulsi slams Trump as Saudi 'bitch' , 'We are not your prostitutes. You are not our pimp' (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?539315-Tulsi-slams-Trump-as-Saudi-b-We-are-not-your-prostitutes-You-are-not-our-pimp&)
@realDonaldTrump Despicable. Offering to place our military assets under the command of a foreign country—Saudi Arabia—is a disgrace and betrayal of my patriotic brothers and sisters in uniform and to our Constitution. We are not your prostitutes. You are not our pimp. pic.twitter.com/Cu1OewEMOC
— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) September 16, 2019

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard says she now supports an impeachment inquiry into Trump
By Kate Sullivan, CNN
Fri September 27, 2019


That is why it is almost mind boggling why so many anti-war libertarians have shockingly low opinion (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?539315-Tulsi-slams-Trump-as-Saudi-b-We-are-not-your-prostitutes-You-are-not-our-pimp&p=6904583&viewfull=1#post6904583) of Tulsi Gabbard?


Related

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?540289-Hillary-Clinton-says-Tulsi-Gabbard-is-a-Russian-asset-groomed-to-ensure-Trump-reelection&p=6876906&viewfull=1#post6876906)

[timosman]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?484808-GOP-candidate-(Rand-Paul)-Calls-Hillary-a-Neocon-(11-6-15)


Here's the 'tube, courtesy of the neoconservatives over at the Washington Free Beacon:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQSvtlZthQg

[angelatc]

^this.

To be fair, she is consistent though and her attacks are bi-partisan. Tulsi is one of the few progressive liberal Dems who ctiticizes pro-war neocons funded politicians in both parties:




That is why it is almost mind boggling why so many anti-war libertarians have shockingly low opinion (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?539315-Tulsi-slams-Trump-as-Saudi-b-We-are-not-your-prostitutes-You-are-not-our-pimp&p=6904583&viewfull=1#post6904583) of Tulsi Gabbard?


]

I can't speak for all anti-war Libertarians, but she harshly condemned the decision to pull the troops out of Syria. Her plan would have been to do it slowly and methodically. That means it would likely never come to fruition, and so, combined with the socialism in her platform, I am not ever going to vote for her.

She's not radically anti-war enough for me to sell out my fiscal conservative values.

[TheCount]

She probably would have increased the use of drone strikes, sent more troops to the middle east, and attacked foreign nations without adequate authority or justification.

[James_Madison_Lives]

Ha ha go to a retard state like California, start talking about Libya and they'll look at you like they never heard of it.

[EBounding]

She has great rhetoric. But she's an opportunist and I don't trust her at all. There's no way I'm going to vote in the Democrat primary. In Michigan, the partisan primary ballot you choose is public record and I don't feel like getting on a list for democrat political operatives.

She has no chance of winning her party's nomination anyway. Ron Paul had a better chance than she does.

[Swordsmyth]

She probably would have increased the use of drone strikes, sent more troops to the middle east, and attacked foreign nations without adequate authority or justification.
Or started multiple new wars.

[oyarde]

I can't speak for all anti-war Libertarians, but she harshly condemned the decision to pull the troops out of Syria. Her plan would have been to do it slowly and methodically. That means it would likely never come to fruition, and so, combined with the socialism in her platform, I am not ever going to vote for her.

She's not radically anti-war enough for me to sell out my fiscal conservative values.

She would have voted for Clinton too . Commie , Clinton voter , against pulling out of Syria . She is the same as Hillary , leading her party in dishonesty .

[oyarde]

She probably would have increased the use of drone strikes, sent more troops to the middle east, and attacked foreign nations without adequate authority or justification.

You are right , more drones for sure .