PDA

View Full Version : Gun Control Activists Suffer Setback In Attempt To Disarm School Staff




Origanalist
11-04-2019, 10:10 AM
A judge in Duval County, Florida says he is likely to rule against gun control groups, parents, and students who are challenging the Duval County Public Schools’ decision to have armed “school safety assistants” in place in campuses to protect students, though he’s giving the attorneys for the gun control groups one more chance to make their argument.

The parents and students, who are being assisted in their legal fight by attorneys with the gun control group Giffords as well as the Southern Poverty Law Center, claim the local school system has no legal authority to allow anyone except law enforcement to be armed on campus. Judge Robert M. Dees, on the other hand, appears to disagree, noting during a hearing on Monday that while there may be some ambiguity about the law, it seems clear that legislators intended for the state’s Guardian program to allow for armed school staff.

When Duval Schools couldn’t afford to hire enough school police officers to place one at every campus within the district — a mandated state law that came from the safety act — the school board opted to use school safety assistants to fill that void. The safety assistants are trained, armed, non-law enforcement officers to patrol elementary schools across Duval County.

But the program quickly received criticism, with opposition pointing to a Florida law that makes it illegal for anyone besides law enforcement to carry guns on campus.

“This boils down to whether they [the school district] have the power to enact this policy,” Justin Raphael, lead attorney for the students and parents suing the school district. “No court has addressed that question … The reality is that they [the school board’s representation] have not pointed to a section here today or in their brief that says schools don’t commit a crime by allowing guns in their school.”

The City Attorney for Jacksonville, Florida, Jon Phillips, pointed out to the judge that one section of the law may forbid anyone other than law enforcement from carrying, but that subsequent legislation allows for trained and vetted school staff to take part in the Guardian program and be armed on campus.

Still, Phillips said the Senate bill that implemented the Stoneman Douglas Public Safety Commission act clarified that guardians are authorized to carry firearms in schools.

“How we got here is somewhat convoluted but our position and our motion is that it’s abundantly clear that everything they’re saying is not correct,” he said. “These people are carrying firearms right now because it’s authorized.”

Philips went on to say that there are “no allegations that the school board did anything illegal other than authorize what was mandated by the state.”

Ultimately, the judge decided that, while there may be some confusion in state law, the intent of the legislature was clear.

“Even though I think it was a passive way to authorize guardians to carry firearms, I do think that they intended to bring school guardians within the exception to those who are prevented from carrying firearms on school campuses,” he said. “So that’s going to be the ruling.”

Dees gave the plaintiffs’ side a week to amend their complaint or decide if they want to appeal.

continued..https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2019/10/29/gun-control-activists-suffer-setback-attempt-disarm-school-staff/

XNavyNuke
11-04-2019, 07:32 PM
“We think when you put more guns in the hands of people other than trained law enforcement officers in a location, including schools, that does make children less safe,” said Sam Boyd of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

https://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/local/judge-rules-dcps-can-hire-armed-guards-for-schools/1002461089

Seriously, SPLC needs to look into some of the piss poor firearms handling done by some LEOs. Of course, that's not what this is about. The SSA's could all be Annie Oakley's and they would still disparage them.

XNN

bv3
11-04-2019, 10:09 PM
But filling half of the children's head with animosity towards the other half, and filling that other halfs' heads with crippling guilt makes the kids more safe.

Terrorizing kids with vague notions of climate apocalypse in twelve years makes em safe, tell you what.

shakey1
11-04-2019, 10:15 PM
But filling half of the children's head with animosity towards the other half, and filling that other halfs' heads with crippling guilt makes the kids more safe.

Terrorizing kids with vague notions of climate apocalypse in twelve years makes em safe, tell you what.

Yeah, then there’s that.

bv3
11-04-2019, 10:16 PM
Yeah, then there’s that.

That! You want safe kids?! Give em hormones.

Teach em fuckin butt play.

The only way to keep the kids safe is to: Keep them terrorized, medicated, aggravated, unprotected, and stupid. Since kids age, and become adults, you also have to keep adults as kids, to keep as many kids as possible safe at all times. Don't you get it?

The best way to keep a kid safe is to kill it before it is born, though, obviously.

shakey1
11-04-2019, 10:28 PM
That! You want safe kids?! Give em hormones.

Teach em $#@!in butt play.

The only way to keep the kids safe is to: Keep them terrorized, medicated, aggravated, unprotected, and stupid. Since kids age, and become adults, you also have to keep adults as kids, to keep as many kids as possible safe at all times. Don't you get it?

The best way to keep a kid safe is to kill it before it is born, though, obviously.

That’s the plan.

bv3
11-04-2019, 10:39 PM
That’s the plan.
Don't you tell me the plan. I tell you the plan. What? Do you think your individuality should come before kid's safety?! Lunatic.

shakey1
11-04-2019, 10:44 PM
Don't you tell me the plan. I tell you the plan. What? Do you think your individuality should come before kid's safety?! Lunatic.

Call me crazy.