Turkey sanctions vs 'not our problem' , 3D explanation for apparent GOPA Fakenews?

[enhanced_deficit]

Before people rush to conclusions and start calling GOPA wing pusher of fakenews, let's step back and try to decipher situation in a calm manner. It's also possible there there could be a 3D explanation for these apparently flip-fopping stances separated by couple of days only.



Flip 1:
Trump's sanctions response says Turkish offensive in Syria is our problem

Trump administration imposes sanctions on Turkey

Oct. 14, 2019
President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on Ankara as his administration called for an "immediate" ceasefire in the fragile region."Punishing sanctions have been placed on Turkey," Vice President Mike Pence told reporters during a surprise gathering at the White House. "The sanctions that are imposed today are a beginning."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/14/donald-trump-threatens-sanctions-turkey-soon-syria-invasion/3978904002/



Flop 2:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon4.png Trump says Turkish offensive in Syria is 'not our problem' (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?540235-Trump-says-Turkish-offensive-in-Syria-is-not-our-problem&)




Tags:
#Fakenews #gullibles #FoolMe3.0

[Swordsmyth]

No flip flop, Trump went the extra mile to deal with the attacks against him for "abandoning our allies", being a peacemaker isn't bad.

[enhanced_deficit]

No flip flop, Trump went the extra mile to deal with the attacks against him for "abandoning our allies", being a peacemaker isn't bad.

So you support US military/sanctions backed peacemaker role only n Syria or all countries on the globe?

Does this mean you support Trump sanction on Turkey for violating human rights of Kurds outside its legal borders?

Did you support Clinton's peacemaker sanctions against Serbia ?

Or US peacemaker sanctions against Israel over West Bank settlements few decades ago?


Where do you draw the line in terms of globalist interventions and meddling into foreign countries affairs.

[Swordsmyth]

So you support US military/sanctions backed peacemaker role only n Syria or all countries on the globe?

Does this mean you support Trump sanction on Turkey for violating human rights of Kurds outside its legal borders?

Did you support Clinton's peacemaker sanctions against Serbia ?

Or US peacemaker sanctions against Israel over West Bank settlements few decades ago?


Where do you draw the line in terms of globalist interventions and meddling into foreign countries affairs.
Trump never promised absolute non-interventionism and he must do what is necessary to avoid impeachment in order to stay in office and continue pulling us out of wars and not starting new ones as he just did in Syria.

[enhanced_deficit]

Trump never promised absolute non-interventionism and he must do what is necessary to avoid impeachment in order to stay in office and continue pulling us out of wars and not starting new ones as he just did in Syria.

MAGA is a big man and thanks to twitter is fully capable of expliaining his reasoning behind what appear to be incoherent foreign policy stances. My question was directed at you:


Does this mean you support Trump's sanctions on Turkey for violating human rights of Kurds outside its legal borders?


It's simple yes/no question, no need for complicated justifications.
Again, the question is not if you have the ability to spin out a plausible justification for this apparently conflicting policy stance.

Alpha male leaders don't get blackmailed into doing things against America-First interests by spinless Dems/libs/socialists but that secondary topic we can leave for another time.