Analysis: Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

[Anti Federalist]

Analysis: Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/26/increasingly-diverse-u-s-counties-becoming-more-democrat/

JOHN BINDER 26 Aug 2019

The more counties across the United States become diverse, the more quickly Democrat-majority they become, new analysis reveals.

The latest Pew Research Center study, as Breitbart News reported, finds that about 109 U.S. counties across 22 states that were once majority white in 2000 became majority-minority in 2018. Today, there are roughly 293 majority-minority U.S. counties, concentrated mostly along the coasts in states such as California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.

Analysis conducted by One America News Network’s (OAN) Ryan Girdusky reveals that the overwhelming majority of these increasingly diverse 109 U.S. counties also became more and more Democrat over less than two decades.

“The big takeaway is this: Republicans were losing ground because of mass immigration long before Trump. The Republican vote declined in 81 of the 109 counties,” Girdusky wrote in his weekly newsletter of the analysis. “Formerly safe Republican districts in places like Georgia, especially, that went for George W. Bush by huge majorities in 2000 were lost by John McCain and Mitt Romney.”

Take Rockdale County, Georgia, for example, where the white population dropped from 73 percent in 2000 to 30 percent in 2018. In 2000 presidential election, more than 62 percent of Rockdale County residents voted for Republican President George W. Bush.

In 2008, Republican nominee John McCain won just 45 percent and in 2012, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) won only 41 percent of the vote. By 2016, only 35 percent of Rockdale County voted for President Trump over Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton — representing a nearly 30 percent drop in GOP support in the area in 16 years.

Georgia, specifically, has experienced rapid demographic changes in the last 18 years. Half of the top ten U.S. counties that became majority-minority since 2000 are in Georgia. The electoral consequences, Girdusky notes, is significant.

For instance, in these five Georgia counties — including Rockdale County, Henry County, Douglas County, Gwinnett County, and Newton County — all went from voting majority GOP in 2000 to now being majority Democrat in 2016.

Henry County, which saw a 38 percent decline in the white population in 18 years, voted more than 66 percent for President Bush in 2000. By 2016, a minority of 46 percent voted for President Trump against Clinton. This indicates a 20 percent drop in GOP support in the area in 16 years.

Prince William County, Virginia, which experienced a 23 percent decline in the white population since 2000, once voted for Republican presidential candidates by a majority of 52 percent in 2000. Fast-forward to 2016 and only 36.5 percent of Prince William County residents voted for President Trump.

A similar trend has occurred in Orange County, California — where the New York Times and Los Angeles Times readily admit that mass immigration has forever electorally changed the region from a once GOP-stronghold to now an area where Democrat voters outnumber Republicans.

Orange County’s white population fell 12 percent in 18 years. According to Girdusky’s analysis, in 2004, the county voted nearly 60 percent for President Bush. By 2016, only about 42 percent of Orange County voters voted for President Trump, a 16 percent drop in GOP support in 12 years.

Girdusky highlights, though, rural counties that experienced quick demographic shifts due to farming and meatpacking employers enticing mostly illegal foreign workers have become increasingly Republican as a response to the changes they have seen.

‘Trump actually improved in rural counties that became minority-majority, especially when that change was due to a large influx of farmworkers and laborers who were either not citizens or just not registered,” Girdusky wrote in his newsletter.

In Dakota County, Nebraska, where meatpacking corporations have moved in and hired transient foreign workers, the white population declined from 71 percent in 2000 to 48 percent in 2018. Despite this, the area has become more Republican. In 2000, 51.5 percent voted for President Bush and even less — 50.4 percent — voted for Romney in 2012. With Trump, however, nearly 60 percent of Dakota County residents supported him against Clinton in 2016.

The changing demography of the U.S. — driven almost exclusively by historically high legal immigration levels — has huge benefits for Democrat politicians, previous analysis has found.

This year, The Atlantic senior editor Ronald Brownstein revealed that nearly 90 percent of House congressional districts with a foreign-born population above the national average were won by Democrats. This means that every congressional district with a foreign-born population exceeding roughly 14 percent had a 90 percent chance of being controlled by Democrats and only a ten percent chance of electing a Republican.

Likewise, Axios admits that legal immigration at its current rate will continue shifting the American electorate more towards Democrat control.

Currently, the U.S. is on track to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters in the next two decades should today’s legal immigration levels remain the same. About eight million of those 15 million new foreign-born voters will have arrived in the country through the process known as chain migration, in which newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.

[Anti Federalist]

Senator Ted Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the 1965 Immigration Act, said, "our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965)

Burn in hell, wrecker.

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

Phase 1. Mass immigration
Phase 2. ?
Phase 3. Small government

[Danke]

Ya, there can not be such thing as “diversity” among whites.

”diversity” can only be based on melanin, in this case.

[Swordsmyth]

Ya, there can not be such thing as “diversity” among whites.

”diversity” can only be based on melanin, in this case.
Whites exude anti-diversity, at some point whites will be declared to so undiverse that they must be eliminated so as not to detract from diversity.

[timosman]

Senator Ted Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the 1965 Immigration Act, said, "our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965)

Burn in hell, wrecker.

Teddy Kennedy's Promises: Floor Speech On The Immigration Act Of 1965 - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?538194-Teddy-Kennedy-s-Promises-Floor-Speech-On-The-Immigration-Act-Of-1965

[Mach]

Wow, even Vox will tell you that it's not just whites, go to any neighborhood that is being over-ran with different people and the home party will not like it, or those other people.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbjciJvacXY

[5Points]

White people in America love tyranny. They always have. This much is obvious.

[Mach]

:waving: :waving:

https://i.imgur.com/KPc5tqZ.jpg

[raupsnics]

hi i love and like you posts my friend god blees you

[5Points]

hi i love and like you posts my friend god blees you

Are you an illegal?

[Anti Globalist]

Soon every county will be a Democrat county.

[5Points]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?

[Anti Federalist]

Phase 1. Mass immigration
Phase 2. ?
Phase 3. Small government

Yah, been curious about that Phase 2 stage myself.

Been trying to get solid answers on that, but everybody seems pretty fuzzy on just how that is supposed to lead to Phase 3.

[nobody's_hero]

Phase 1. Mass immigration
Phase 2. ?
Phase 3. Small government

It's a sound theory, so I'm told.

In general though, I think the more populated a county becomes the more likely it is to turn democrat.

[nobody's_hero]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?

Republican = disappointing
Democrat = deranged

I mean, between the two . . . eh. I mean I know which one I prefer.

[Sammy]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?

Both Republicans & Democrats are bad. But Democrats are worse.

[Anti Federalist]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?

Simply as a thumbnail, not for the truth we all know, the former is in favor of less government, the latter in favor of more government.

[Brian4Liberty]

Senator Ted Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the 1965 Immigration Act, said, "our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965)

Burn in hell, wrecker.

And from the grave, Ted Kennedy laughs and says “I did it, I destroyed you, WASP.”

[Anti Federalist]

And from the grave, Ted Kennedy laughs and says “I did it, I destroyed you, WASP.”

That he did...the miserable fucker that he was.

His entire comment:


"Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on ... what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset ... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge ...

the charges I have mentioned are highly emotional, irrational, and with little foundation in fact. They are out of line with the obligations of responsible citizenship. They breed hate of our heritage."

No one could be that stupid.

They knew exactly what they were doing...and here we still sit, watching the invasion happen right before our eyes, too weak, beat down, brainwashed and filled with cosmopolitan world weariness to lift a finger in our defense.

[Brian4Liberty]

Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

Diversity and race is a side issue. Mainstream propaganda tells immigrants and minorities that Democrats are on their side, and that Republicans hate them. Democrats also make use of the natural human tendency to want an authority that leads, punishes and takes care of people. “Government should do something!” “Government should help and take care of people.” “Government must must control and punish those people.”

Of course, it’s nothing more than a scam from the Democrats. They are lying and taking advantage of the naive and ignorant. Newly arrived immigrants are ripe for taking advantage of, all so that the party elite can gain more power.

The idea that government is not always the solution is almost uniquely American. Thus, people who first come here not only have been conditioned to their prior society, their past society probably catered directly to the standard human desire for authority. Some of them might eventually come around to the idea of less government, but only a portion, and only if there is assimilation.

[Anti Federalist]

The idea that government is not always the solution is almost uniquely American. Thus, people who first come here not only have been conditioned to their prior society, their past society probably catered directly to the standard human desire for authority. Some of them might eventually come around to the idea of less government, but only a portion, and only if there is assimilation.

Exactly.

[Brian4Liberty]

Wow, even Vox will tell you that it's not just whites, go to any neighborhood that is being over-ran with different people and the home party will not like it, or those other people.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbjciJvacXY

They get part of it right. It is often about a group favoring their own. For example, a Hispanic person might strongly favor more immigration and be a staunch Democrat. At the same time, in the appropriate company, that person might freely admit that they want more Hispanic immigration, and express a dislike of, and desire to stop immigration from Asia and South Asia. Likewise, someone from South Asia may joke that the whole point is to make America “Indian” again. And a white or black person might say “please, no more immigration from anywhere! We are full, no vacancy!”

Where they get it wrong is calling California a success. California is the failure. People of all kinds flee California or at a minimum, they flee the urban/suburban areas.

In California, it’s about real world problems, not some obscure debate about principles. It’s about things that directly impact people and their standard of living. It’s about getting in the car and it taking 30 minutes to go three blocks, only to get on a ten lane freeway that is stop and go. It’s about astronomical housing prices. It’s about over-crowding. It’s about places going out of business simply because the new residents don’t go there. It’s about homeless people camping everywhere and leaving piles of trash, and human waste. It’s about skyrocketing crime.

That is why people in California oppose immigration. Race and diversity are in the past. Now reality is slamming them in the face.

[Philhelm]

Exactly.

Which is why, whenever someone snidely resorts to the "brown people" argument, I make sure to mention that white Europeans are some of the worst. They think we're crazy for the 2nd Amendment, and they don't even believe in freedom of speech. Fuck 'em all.

[TheCount]

This article is full of carefully constructed lies.

As an example, Prince William County has more white people in it now than ever before. The white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010.

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

[Occam's Banana]

This article is full of carefully constructed lies.

As an example, Prince William County has more white people in it now than ever before. The white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010.

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

[Occam's Banana]

In general though, I think the more populated a county becomes the more likely it is to turn democrat.

Any (supposed) mass democracy with a population of a third of a billion people is going to be a steaming hot mess, All you're going to end up with is a noxious brew of socialism and fascism (whether of "left" or "right" or "center" variety), with the "democracy" bit becoming increasingly impotent and irrelevant except as a pressure-relieving "safety valve" that allows the masses to indulge the illusion that they have some kind of say in the matter ...

[5Points]

Republican = disappointing
Democrat = deranged

I mean, between the two . . . eh. I mean I know which one I prefer.


Both Republicans & Democrats are bad. But Democrats are worse.


Simply as a thumbnail, not for the truth we all know, the former is in favor of less government, the latter in favor of more government.

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.

[Anti Federalist]

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.

Ok, then, call one group Mugwumps and the other Roundheads...or whatever you want to.

One favors more government, the other less.

[Anti Federalist]

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

I'll be curious to see if somebody actually parses the numbers to find out.

ETA - I took it upon myself to look the numbers up: turns out you are absolutely right.

Overall population increased from 280 to 400 thousand, but the percentage of that population that was white decreased. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_William_County,_Virginia)

[Anti Federalist]

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

So, like I have noted so many times:

The Great Replacement is a racist conspiracy theory and does not exist, except when it's celebrated and welcomed, then it does.

[5Points]

Ok, then, call one group Mugwumps and the other Roundheads...or whatever you want to.

One favors more government, the other less.

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

[Anti Federalist]

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

Oh for fuck's sake, go pick nits somewhere else, whoever you are.

Jesus fucking christ...Argumentarians. :rolleyes:

We had a solid GOP government at all branches in NH and successfully rolled back government in all directions.

Not anymore, thanks to the Bolsheviks democrat wave.

[Swordsmyth]

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

That's idiotic.

[Swordsmyth]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?
Republican = :gamedie:
Demoncrat = EVIL

[Swordsmyth]

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.
If the Count is posting he is deceiving.
It is obviously this:


The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

[Swordsmyth]

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.
LOL

Your ROLCON is weak.

[5Points]

That's idiotic.

No, it's not. You are either unaware of the facts, or choose to ignore them.

http://republicansexposed.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/republican-spending.jpg

[Danke]

No, it's not. You are either unaware of the facts, or choose to ignore them.

http://republicansexposed.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/republican-spending.jpg


Who writes and passes spending bills, show that graph.

We already know Clinton reporting is fake, because he spent SSI money to make the numbers lower.

[5Points]

LOL

Your ROLCON is weak.

I'm not pretending to be a conservative, if that's what you're saying. I'm against conservatism entirely. Its tyrannical and evil.

[Swordsmyth]

I'm not pretending to be a conservative, if that's what you're saying. I'm against conservatism entirely. Its tyrannical and evil.
OK.
Now that you have admitted that I will just say that your spin is weak

[5Points]

We had a solid GOP government at all branches in NH and successfully rolled back government in all directions.

Not anymore, thanks to the Bolsheviks democrat wave.

No, it's not thanks to Democrats...it's thanks to the nature of Leviathan itself. Right, left...it continues its steady march forward.

[Swordsmyth]

No, it's not. You are either unaware of the facts, or choose to ignore them.

http://republicansexposed.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/republican-spending.jpg
Congress controls spending and there are things much more important than money.

[Danke]

33 posts. and 3 stars, trolls support trolls here.

[GunnyFreedom]

Time to start campaigning for and winning minorities.

[Swordsmyth]

No, it's not thanks to Democrats...it's thanks to the nature of Leviathan itself. Right, left...it continues its steady march forward.
WRONG

One side has traitors and "moderates" who sell out TO THE OTHER SIDE, the other side is dedicated to absolute tyranny.

Side1=Republicans
Side2=Demoncrats

[Anti Federalist]

No, it's not thanks to Democrats...it's thanks to the nature of Leviathan itself. Right, left...it continues its steady march forward.

No, it didn't, not at a state level anyways.

[Swordsmyth]

Time to start campaigning for and winning minorities.
Like we ever didn't?

Let me know when it works.

We can't educate them as fast as they can come, we have to limit how many are allowed to come.

[Swordsmyth]

33 posts. and 3 stars, trolls support trolls here.
There is a network and I don't believe it is informal, most of them work as a team.

[5Points]

OK.
Now that you have admitted that I will just say that your spin is weak

What's the spin? When Democrats are in power, it seems that there is a more concentrated effort by Republicans to exert whatever kind of counterbalance they can exert against spending.

I think coercive institutions like the federal government are evil anyway, and whatever kind of gridlock that may help slow government's growth, I will advocate. That is why if I did ever vote, I would vote for Democrats.

[Occam's Banana]

This article is full of carefully constructed lies.

As an example, Prince William County has more white people in it now than ever before. The white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010.

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

I'll be curious to see if somebody actually parses the numbers to find out.

ETA - I took it upon myself to look the numbers up: turns out you are absolutely right.

Overall population increased from 280 to 400 thousand, but the percentage of that population that was white decreased. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_William_County,_Virginia)

Looks like all the numbers check out. It is important to note that by "white," the author of the OP article is apparently referring to the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" classification used by the U.S. Census Bureau. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, "the concept of race is separate from the concept of Hispanic origin" and "[White / Not Hispanic or Latino] are individuals who responded 'No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino' and who reported 'White' as their only entry in the race question." Note also that, in what follows, "white" means "white alone" (i.e., it accounts for those who reported "White" as their only entry in the race question). Thus, the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population is a subset of the merely "white" population.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau[1], the overall population of Prince William County, Virginia in 2000 was 280,813 and the white population was 193,574 (with the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population recorded as 181,756). Thus, the white population composed 69% [193,574 / 280,813] of the overall population in 2000 (with the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population composing 65% [181,756 / 280,813] of the overall population).

According to the U.S. Census Bureau[2], the overall population of Prince William County, Virginia in 2010 was 402,002 and the white population was 232,401 (with the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population recorded at 195,656). Thus, the white population composed 58% [232,401 / 402,002] of the overall population in 2010 (with the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population composing 49% [195,656 / 402,002] of the overall population).

Based on these figures, from 2000 to 2010 there was (1) a decline of 11% [69% - 58%] in the white population relative to the overall population (with a decline of 16% [65% - 49%] in the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population), and (2) an increase of 20% [(232,401 - 193,574) / 193,574] in the white population relative to the previously existing white population (with an increase of 8% [(195,656 - 181,756) / 181,756] in the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population relative to the previously existing "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population). This verifies and confirms TheCount's claim that "[t]he white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010."

The author claimed that "Prince William County, Virginia [...] experienced a 23 percent decline in the white population since 2000 [...]." Assuming, as seems obvious, that this claim was made about the white population relative to the overall population (and keeping in mind the note I mentioned in my opening paragraph), we should expect what the author refers to as the "white population" at the end of the claimed decline to be 42% [65% - 23%] of the overall population. This perfectly agrees with the U.S. Census Bureau's own estimate[3] that, as of July 1st, 2018, the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population composed 42% of the overall population. (The U.S. Census Bureau also estimates[3] that, as of July 1st, 2018, the overall population of Prince William County, Virginia was 468,011, and that the white population, as distinct from the "White / Not Hispanic or Latino" population, was 63% relative to the overall population.)

[1] PDF: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, PHC-1-48, Virginia, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2002 (https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/phc-1-48.pdf)

[2] PDF: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of Population and Housing, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, CPH-1-48, Virginia, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012 (ftp://ftp2.census.gov/library/publications/2012/dec/cph-1-48.pdf)

[3] https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/princewilliamcountyvirginia

[nobody's_hero]

Time to start campaigning for and winning minorities.

Eureka! Why didn't we think of that sooner?

[5Points]

WRONG

One side has traitors and "moderates" who sell out TO THE OTHER SIDE, the other side is dedicated to absolute tyranny.

Side1=Republicans
Side2=Demoncrats

You're just simply not awake yet. Hopefully you'll get there. I was stuck in the right-left paradigm too once upon a time. I'm so much more at peace now...in the understanding that right and left are both enemies to freedom.

[nobody's_hero]

You're just simply not awake yet. Hopefully you'll get there. I was stuck in the right-left paradigm too once upon a time. I'm so much more at peace now...in the understanding that right and left are both enemies to freedom.

You'll find a good many of us did give it up and then were forced back into it as a matter of self preservation. I never attained the inner peace either way, but I have to say I've never seen republicans form Antifa mobs and destroy downtown areas or beat up old people trying to get to their cars. You may have deemed the republicans the party of coercion, but what I see from the left are people with a passionate desire to control the lives of other people, demonstrated though mob 'activism'. By comparison, I went to a republican "protest" once. It was old people sitting in folding chairs listening to public speakers. Wild bunch they were.

[Swordsmyth]

What's the spin? When Democrats are in power, it seems that there is a more concentrated effort by Republicans to exert whatever kind of counterbalance they can exert against spending.

I think coercive institutions like the federal government are evil anyway, and whatever kind of gridlock that may help slow government's growth, I will advocate. That is why if I did ever vote, I would vote for Democrats.
When Demoncrats are in power Republicans sell out on all the most important issues or the Demoncrats just ignore them and force their agenda.
When Republicans are in power they sell out on the less important issues and block the worst things or even repeal some of them.
Divided government results in something in between and is possibly the worst condition.

If you ever did vote you would help to boil the frog slowly so please don't vote.

[GunnyFreedom]

Eureka! Why didn't we think of that sooner?

I dunno. It worked for me in 2010. It worked for Jim Womack and Donald Trump in Lee County 2016 and 2018. Still more people scoff and think it’s a stupid idea than not. Which is weird because everyone I’ve seen to really go after it it works. Especially since about 2014 and again after Trump got elected in 2016.

[Swordsmyth]

You're just simply not awake yet. Hopefully you'll get there. I was stuck in the right-left paradigm too once upon a time. I'm so much more at peace now...in the understanding that right and left are both enemies to freedom.
That's a fine excuse for doing nothing or great propaganda for enabling the left by suppressing the right.

[5Points]

You'll find a good many of us did give it up and then were forced back into it as a matter of self preservation. I never attained the inner peace either way, but I have to say I've never seen republicans form Antifa mobs and destroy downtown areas or beat up old people trying to get to their cars. You may have deemed the republicans the party of coercion, but what I see from the left are people with a passionate desire to control the lives of other people, demonstrated though mob activism. I went to a republican "protest" once. It was old people in folding chairs listening to public speakers. Wild bunch they were.

Republicans want to control your life. They want to steal from you to fund every growing alphabet agency of the federal government. They want to control what medicine you put in your body. If you are a foreigner in the middle east, they want to oppress and murder you.

Wait a second....did some of you Ron Paul folks get suckered back into this political circus...by Trump of all people???

Shame, shame. Go back to your first love.

[TheCount]

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.
He doesn't ever mention what it's relative to.

A "decline" that results in more people is exactly as stupid as a "replacement" in which nothing is replaced.



The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I've never heard anyone use decline in that manner without specifying the point of reference.

If the population of rabbits grew 40% and the population of deer grew 20%, would you say that the population of deer has declined?

[5Points]

That's a fine excuse for doing nothing or great propaganda for enabling the left by suppressing the right.

What are you going to do? Vote harder?

[nobody's_hero]

Republicans want to control your life. They want to steal from you to fund every growing alphabet agency of the federal government. They want to control what medicine you put in your body. If you are a foreigner in the middle east, they want to oppress and murder you.

Wait a second....did some of you Ron Paul folks get suckered back into this political circus...by Trump of all people???

Shame, shame. Go back to your first love.

Nope. I've based my assessment of the left entirely on what I've seen them do when they mob up in their skinny jeans and purple hair.

I might have been suckered back into by the left, if anything, based on my desire to see them humbled.

[Swordsmyth]

Republicans want to control your life.
Not nearly as much as Demoncrats and they are moving in the right direction while Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.



They want to steal from you to fund every growing alphabet agency of the federal government.
Not nearly as much as Demoncrats and they are moving in the right direction while Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.



They want to control what medicine you put in your body.
Demoncrats want to control whether you live or die.
Republicans are moving in the right direction and Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.


If you are a foreigner in the middle east, they want to oppress and murder you.
Not true, there are some warmongers but the Demoncrats start as many or more wars.
And Republicans are moving in the right direction and Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction


Wait a second....did some of you Ron Paul folks get suckered back into this political circus...by Trump of all people???

Shame, shame. Go back to your first love.
:sleeping:

[5Points]

Not nearly as much as Demoncrats and they are moving in the right direction while Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.



Not nearly as much as Demoncrats and they are moving in the right direction while Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.



Demoncrats want to control whether you live or die.
Republicans are moving in the right direction and Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction.


Not true, there are some warmongers but the Demoncrats start as many or more wars.
And Republicans are moving in the right direction and Demoncrats are moving in the wrong direction


:sleeping:

What's the evidence that Republicans are "moving in the right direction"?

What is the "right direction" according to you?

[Occam's Banana]

He doesn't ever mention what it's relative to.

A "decline" that results in more people is exactly as stupid as a "replacement" in which nothing is replaced.

I've never heard anyone use decline in that manner without specifying the point of reference.

If the population of rabbits grew 40% and the population of deer grew 20%, would you say that the population of deer has declined?

Now you're just being willfully obtuse (assuming you weren't to begin with).

[Ender]

I dunno. It worked for me in 2010. It worked for Jim Womack and Donald Trump in Lee County 2016 and 2018. Still more people scoff and think it’s a stupid idea than not. Which is weird because everyone I’ve seen to really go after it it works. Especially since about 2014 and again after Trump got elected in 2016.

My experience, as well.

[GunnyFreedom]

He doesn't ever mention what it's relative to.

A "decline" that results in more people is exactly as stupid as a "replacement" in which nothing is replaced.




I've never heard anyone use decline in that manner without specifying the point of reference.

If the population of rabbits grew 40% and the population of deer grew 20%, would you say that the population of deer has declined?

Do you consider different races of humans to be like different species of animals?

[Swordsmyth]

What's the evidence that Republicans are "moving in the right direction"?
Recent politics, including Trump.


What is the "right direction" according to you?
Smaller government and noninterventionism.

[TheCount]

Do you consider different races of humans to be like different species of animals?

No.

However, I don't have another reference for the use of English in the way that the author of the article uses it. He is certainly referring to people as animals or lifestock, and taking as a matter of fact their preferences for one party over another due to their race and nothing besides their race.

I also don't consider the races to be in competition with each other, which is why I chose deer and rabbits.

[TheCount]

Now you're just being willfully obtuse (assuming you weren't to begin with).

How so?


You wouldn't say that the nation's deficit had declined if it had increased. If it declined as a percentage of GDP you would say so. To omit your point of reference is to confuse the reader. In this case, it's obviously intentional.

[Swordsmyth]

No.

However, I don't have another reference for the use of English in the way that the author of the article uses it. He is certainly referring to people as animals or lifestock, and taking as a matter of fact their preferences for one party over another due to their race and nothing besides their race.

I also don't consider the races to be in competition with each other, which is why I chose deer and rabbits.
Most of the people increasing the number of minorities are foreigners and their cultures that are hostile to liberty are bad and absolutely in competition with the natives.

[GunnyFreedom]

No.

However, I don't have another reference for the use of English in the way that the author of the article uses it. He is certainly referring to people as animals or lifestock, and taking as a matter of fact their preferences for one party over another due to their race and nothing besides their race.

I also don't consider the races to be in competition with each other, which is why I chose deer and rabbits.
I also think the ideation that minorities have to vote such a way ignorant. I watched Black Churches turn Republican in 2018 Lee Co. Republicans swept every race in the County but one. In a like 150 years Democrat dominated county.

[Swordsmyth]

How so?


You wouldn't say that the nation's deficit had declined if it had increased. If it declined as a percentage of GDP you would say so. To omit your point of reference is to confuse the reader. In this case, it's obviously intentional.
Because in politics the ratio is what is important and automatically assumed.

[Swordsmyth]

I also think the ideation that minorities have to vote such a way ignorant. I watched Black Churches turn Republican in 2018 Lee Co. Republicans swept every race in the County but one. In a like 150 years Democrat dominated county.
It's great if you can pull it off but it is a longshot, especially when dealing with new immigrants as opposed to minorities that have lived here for generations.

[TheCount]

Because in politics the ratio is what is important and automatically assumed.

The ratio of races is important in politics?

[Swordsmyth]

The ratio of races is important in politics?
The ratio of groups that tend to vote one way or another, races tend to stick together (some more than others) but the most important factor here is that most of the replacements are recent arrivals from anti-liberty cultures.

And the people importing them are racists who think race is important in politics and intend to use race to destroy liberty.

[TheCount]

The ratio of groups that tend to vote one way or another, races tend to stick together (some more than others) but the most important factor here is that most of the replacements are recent arrivals from anti-liberty cultures.


Replacement what? Who did they replace?



And the people importing them are racists who think race is important in politics and intend to use race to destroy liberty.


You just said that race is important in politics. Does that mean that you are a racist?


You're also using race as your reason why liberty must be destroyed. Does that mean that you are a racist?

[Swordsmyth]

Replacement what? Who did they replace?
They are replacing Americans as the political majority that controls our government.






You just said that race is important in politics. Does that mean that you are a racist?
I didn't say that, the only way it comes close is a tendency that is cultural and not genetic, the people importing the replacements think it is genetic.

[TheCount]

They are replacing Americans as the political majority that controls our government.

78% of Congress is white.



I didn't say that

It's been a long time, you might have forgotten. I'll quote it for your convenience.


in politics the ratio is what is important

[Anti Federalist]

and taking as a matter of fact their preferences for one party over another due to their race and nothing besides their race.

There is no such thing as "race"...we are human beings...the stupid censor program won't let me type the proper latin name.

There is, however, ethnicity, and clearly quantifiable differentiation between ethnic groups.

And ethnic loyalty.

[Swordsmyth]

78% of Congress is white.
One whole party (including the whites in it) has announced that they exist to punish whites and natives while serving minorities and foreigners, the replacements tend to vote for them by a wide margin.





It's been a long time, you might have forgotten. I'll quote it for your convenience.
Where does that say anything about race?

We were discussing how the numbers were reported, the ratio could be between men and women or between Republicans and Demoncrats or any other groups for the purpose of that statement in context.

[Anti Federalist]

Replacement what? Who did they replace?

The majority ethnic group, compromised of western European stock.

[TheCount]

There is no such thing as "race"...we are human beings...the stupid censor program won't let me type the proper latin name.

There is, however, ethnicity, and clearly quantifiable differentiation between ethnic groups.

And ethnic loyalty.

You're making a distinction without a difference.

Call it different flavors of people or different psychic auras of people, it doesn't affect the argument.

[TheCount]

The majority ethnic group, compromised of western European stock.

There are more people of Western European stock in the United States than ever before.


I own a white Jeep. If I replace my white Jeep with a black Jeep, how many Jeeps will I own and what colors will they be?

[Occam's Banana]

How so?

You wouldn't say that the nation's deficit had declined if it had increased. If it declined as a percentage of GDP you would say so. To omit your point of reference is to confuse the reader. In this case, it's obviously intentional.

The point of reference was not omitted. In the second paragraph of his article, the author explicitly tells you what he's talking about :

The latest Pew Research Center study, as Breitbart News reported, finds that about 109 U.S. counties across 22 states that were once majority white in 2000 became [B]majority-minority in 2018. Today, there are roughly 293 majority-minority U.S. counties, concentrated mostly along the coasts in states such as California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.

FTA : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority

A majority-minority area or minority-majority area is a term used in the United States to refer to a jurisdiction in which one or more racial and/or ethnic minorities ([B]relative to the whole country's population) make up a majority of the local population.

The author was obviously making his claims "relative to the whole [county's] population" - and it is simply asinine to pretend not to understand this.

[Swordsmyth]

The point of reference was not omitted. In the second paragraph of his article, the author explicitly tells you what he's talking about :


FTA [bold emphasis added]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority


The author was obviously making his claims "relative to the whole [county's] population" - [B]and it is simply asinine to pretend not to understand this.
That's his MO alright.

[TheCount]

One whole party (including the whites in it) has announced that they exist to punish whites and natives while serving minorities and foreigners, the replacements tend to vote for them by a wide margin.

Really? Fascinating. That's quite the party platform.



the ratio could be between men and women or between Republicans and Demoncrats or any other groups for the purpose of that statement in context.
Was it?

[Swordsmyth]

Really? Fascinating. That's quite the party platform.
Yes, it is.




Was it?
In the context of the conversation there were no specific groups, I discussed the subject of politics in general, the principle I pointed out applies to the OP and to all other political articles involving any and all groups.

You are looking mighty stupid trying to distort my words into racism.

[Zippyjuan]

They are replacing Americans as the political majority that controls our government.



Isn't our government 100% Americans? Aren't they all citizens of the United States of America? Aren't all voters Americans? Is the French government going to take over? Who is it taking over for the Americans? Russia? China?

[Swordsmyth]

Isn't our government 100% Americans?
No, many of them have divided loyalties.


Aren't they all citizens of the United States of America? Aren't all voters Americans?
No, many are voting illegally and many are Americans in name only, they come as foreigners and intend to change us instead of joining us.

[Zippyjuan]

No, many of them have divided loyalties.


No, many are voting illegally and many are Americans in name only, they come as foreigners and intend to change us instead of joining us.

How many? Link? Are these French voters? Russians? Do they come here just to vote?

[5Points]

No, many of them have divided loyalties.


No, many are voting illegally and many are Americans in name only, they come as foreigners and intend to change us instead of joining us.

White power!

(I wonder if Ron Paul would endorse the white nationalism on this board that bears his name? The moderators must be in to this kind of stuff....wow)

[Swordsmyth]

White power!

(I wonder if Ron Paul would endorse the white nationalism on this board that bears his name? The moderators must be in to this kind of stuff....wow)
That's a weak attempt to defame me and the site.

[GunnyFreedom]

Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.

[5Points]

One whole party (including the whites in it) has announced that they exist to punish whites and natives while serving minorities and foreigners, the replacements tend to vote for them by a wide margin.





Where does that say anything about race?

We were discussing how the numbers were reported, the ratio could be between men and women or between Republicans and Demoncrats or any other groups for the purpose of that statement in context.

I am white, my wife is Korean. We have interracial children.

You are the kind of person that I warn my children about. Ignorant, nationalistic, statist, close minded morons.

Your mindset is directly opposed to even small government, yet you aren't aware enough to realize it.

I do apologize for the name calling...I hope you can prove my suspicion about you wrong in the future.

[5Points]

Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.

I'm amazed that liberty minded people entertain any kind of cultural protectionism or nationalism...at all. Those are coercive mindsets.

[Swordsmyth]

I am white, my wife is Korean. We have interracial children.

You are the kind of person that I warn my children about. Ignorant, nationalistic, statist, close minded morons.

Your mindset is directly opposed to even small government, yet you aren't aware enough to realize it.

I do apologize for the name calling...I hope you can prove my suspicion about you wrong in the future.
You have made it clear that you side with the communists in the Demoncrat party so it is no surprise that you support their attempts to import a permanent communist supermajority.

Your spin is weak and childish.

[Swordsmyth]

I'm amazed that liberty minded people entertain any kind of cultural protectionism or nationalism...at all. Those are coercive mindsets.
Liberty is a part of culture, if you don't protect it then you will lose it.
You obviously want us to lose it.

[Swordsmyth]

Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.
Liberty is part of culture, I'm proud to proclaim that I am protective of it.

[5Points]

You have made it clear that you side with the communists in the Demoncrat party so it is no surprise that you support their attempts to import a permanent communist supermajority.

Your spin is weak and childish.

Is that a serious statement? Or do you have something mental going on that I dont know about?

[GunnyFreedom]

Liberty is part of culture, I'm proud to proclaim that I am protective of it.
Liberty is more appreciated by some cultures and less appreciated by other cultures, but no culture has a monopoly on liberty and neither does liberty itself have a monopoly on any culture.

[ATruepatriot]

Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.

Quick question because I just hit this on my way out because i have to run again. But would I be correct in already knowing and talking to you at length for years at the DP? I am sensing a familiarity. I hung with Jake Towne, Jack Pelham, and the hated by most Steve Parent. Jack had a fantastic thing happening and I was helping him do leg work for that concept. If it had more support, it would have changed politics as we know it for the better.

[Swordsmyth]

Liberty is more appreciated by some cultures and less appreciated by other cultures, but no culture has a monopoly on liberty and neither does liberty itself have a monopoly on any culture.
America has the best liberty culture in the world.
If you allow in unlimited numbers of people from cultures with a lower affinity (or even a negative affinity) your country will drop to their level.
Immigration should be restricted to those cultures with a similar level of liberty and the number of immigrants must be limited so that they assimilate into liberty instead of pulling us down to their level.

[5Points]

Liberty is part of culture,

No it's not. Liberty transcends culture. Property ownership is universal because it is based on how man was created.

These are the simple foundational ethics that you need, to have a worldview that can sustain freedom.

[Swordsmyth]

Quick question because I just hit this on my way out because i have to run again. But would I be correct in already knowing and talking to you at length for years at the DP? I am sensing a familiarity. I hung with Jake Towne, Jack Pelham, and the hated by most Steve Parent. Jack had a fantastic thing happening and I was helping him do leg work for that concept. If it had more support, it would have changed politics as we know it for the better.
Gunny is Glenn Bradley.

[Swordsmyth]

No it's not. Liberty transcends culture. Property ownership is universal because it is based on how man was created.

These are the simple foundational ethics that you need to have a worldview that can sustain freedom.
It absolutely is, some cultures believe in strongmen and others believe in collectivism while some believe in limited government and liberty.
Liberty can be part of any culture just like eating corn or potato dishes can be but each culture has it to some extent or does not.
People bring their culture with them and only assimilate very slowly on the average, it usually takes generations.

[Zippyjuan]

America has the best liberty culture in the world.
If you allow in unlimited numbers of people from cultures with a lower affinity (or even a negative affinity) your country will drop to their level.
Immigration should be restricted to those cultures with a similar level of liberty and the number of immigrants must be limited so that they assimilate into liberty instead of pulling us down to their level.

If we allow freedom, we will have less freedom! We must restrict freedom to promote it! (we don't have unlimited immigration).

[GunnyFreedom]

Quick question because I just hit this on my way out because i have to run again. But would I be correct in already knowing and talking to you at length for years at the DP? I am sensing a familiarity. I hung with Jake Towne, Jack Pelham, and the hated by most Steve Parent. Jack had a fantastic thing happening and I was helping him do leg work for that concept. If it had more support, it would have changed politics as we know it for the better.

I never did much on DP. Most of my online activism has been here and on fedbook. I had an account on DP. Probably posted all of 5 times. Had plenty of friends who preferred DP though. DP always felt weird to me. I could never get attached enough to invest.

[Swordsmyth]

If we allow freedom, we will have less freedom! We must restrict freedom to promote it! (we don't have unlimited immigration).
Immigration is not freedom, it is a privilege.
We must limit it in order to preserve liberty from those who would destroy it.
We do have some limits but they are way too high.

[5Points]

If we allow freedom, we will have less freedom! We must restrict freedom to promote it! (we don't have unlimited immigration).

Exactly.

This is the legacy of the Trump era.

Just as when George W Bush steered conservatives to the deep statism inherent in war, Trump is steering conservatives to the deep statism of nationalism and protectionism.

And just like with Bush, the Trump sheep go right along and never question their masters.

[5Points]

Immigration is not freedom, it is a privilege.
We must limit it in order to preserve liberty from those who would destroy it.
We do have some limits but they are way too high.

Vote harder! That's where your liberty comes from, right? The government?

[Swordsmyth]

Exactly.

This is the legacy of the Trump era.

Just as when George W Bush steered conservatives to the deep statism inherent in war, Trump is steering conservatives to the deep statism of nationalism and protectionism.

And just like with Bush, the Trump sheep go right along and never question their masters.
Coolidge was the best small government President we have ever had and he restricted immigration because too many immigrants from anti-liberty cultures were destroying our liberty culture.

There is no right immigrate and impose your beliefs on another country.

[ATruepatriot]

I never did much on DP. Most of my online activism has been here and on fedbook. I had an account on DP. Probably posted all of 5 times. Had plenty of friends who preferred DP though. DP always felt weird to me. I could never get attached enough to invest.

Lol, it was an absolute insane free for all. Everyone there was a damned nut, including myself, most of the user base, and the owner himself. :)

But... The level of intelligence and status of the active legal professionals and educators who came there to share their knowledge with everyone in the family was just absolutely incredible.

I have yet to find anything like it. :)

Had to ask, thank you, By the way I remember your run. You were supported at length over there whether you knew it or not.

[GunnyFreedom]

Lol, it was an absolute insane free for all. Everyone there was a damned nut, including myself, most of the user base, and the owner himself. :)

But... The level of intelligence and status of the active legal professionals and educators who came there to share their knowledge with everyone in the family was just absolutely incredible.

I have yet to find anything like it. :)

Had to ask, thank you, By the way I remember your run. You were supported at length over there whether you knew it or not.
I did, and I appreciated it. I had lots of friends on DP.

[ATruepatriot]

No it's not. Liberty transcends culture. Property ownership is universal because it is based on how man was created.

These are the simple foundational ethics that you need, to have a worldview that can sustain freedom.

So? Someone finally figured out that 5 points was an existing user here screwing around? lol

[Swordsmyth]

So? Someone finally figured out that 5 points was an existing user here screwing around? lol
Or the site staff just didn't take kindly to being called racists.

[ATruepatriot]

I did, and I appreciated it. I had lots of friends on DP.

Wish we could have sent you over the bar man. Thank you for giving the liberty values a good shot friend. Wish more had the balls to get off their ass and do it.

Gotta run, looking forward to catching up what I owe you. Take care and have a great evening sir. :)

[ATruepatriot]

Or the site staff just didn't take kindly to being called racists.

It was someone here screwing around, bet if the IP details are checked and compared with current users it will reflect this. Someone was testing Brian. :)

[GunnyFreedom]

Wish we could have sent you over the bar man. Thank you for giving the liberty values a good shot friend. Wish more had the balls to get off their ass and do it.

Gotta run, looking forward to catching up what I owe you. Take care and have a great evening sir. :)
I won in 2010. Got redistricted out by establishment leadership. That specific redistricting was declared illegal in 2017. So with my County back together I ran in 2018. Got outspent in the primary $5k to $100k. :(

I have never lost a General

[Swordsmyth]

It was someone here screwing around, bet if the IP details are checked and compared with current users it will reflect this. Someone was testing Brian. :)
I suspected as much myself but I'm not sure that he was detected as a sockpuppet by the mods.

[Anti Federalist]

There are more people of Western European stock in the United States than ever before.

I own a white Jeep. If I replace my white Jeep with a black Jeep, how many Jeeps will I own and what colors will they be?

Apples and bowling balls.

Lets use your Jeep analogy correctly:

I own a white Jeep. It functions normally.

The neighbor owns a black Jeep...it just so happens that every 99 out of a hundred built has an annoying habit of blowing the horn for no reason at oh-dark thirty.

The next neighbor buys a white Jeep. It functions normally.

Three more neighbors buy the black Jeep with the horn issue...doesn't seem to bother them for some reason.

Now, the number of white Jeeps that function normally has increased two fold, hasn't it?

But the number of black Jeeps that are blowing their horns all night have increased four fold.

And sleep is impossible now.

That's what's happening and everybody damn well knows it.

[Sammy]

Coolidge was the best small government President we have ever had and he restricted immigration because too many immigrants from anti-liberty cultures were destroying our liberty culture.

There is no right immigrate and impose your beliefs on another country.

Calvin Coolidge is my favorite President.He cut spending,cut taxes,cut immigration & had a Non Interventionist Foreign Policy.:up:

[Sammy]

Republicans want to control your life. They want to steal from you to fund every growing alphabet agency of the federal government. They want to control what medicine you put in your body. If you are a foreigner in the middle east, they want to oppress and murder you.

Wait a second....did some of you Ron Paul folks get suckered back into this political circus...by Trump of all people???

Shame, shame. Go back to your first love.

The Democrats started the Korea war,Vietnam war,Kosovo war,Libya war & they expanded the Afghanistan war!
George W Bush started the Iraq war but he was not a Conservative.
He was RINO Neocon who added 5 trillion to the national debt,expanded medicare,supported Gun Control,supported Amnesty for 11 millon illegal aliens & bailed big Banks out.

[Schifference]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4_4p15iGlU

[TheCount]

Apples and bowling balls.

Lets use your Jeep analogy correctly:

I own a white Jeep. It functions normally.

The neighbor owns a black Jeep...it just so happens that every 99 out of a hundred built has an annoying habit of blowing the horn for no reason at oh-dark thirty.

The next neighbor buys a white Jeep. It functions normally.

Three more neighbors buy the black Jeep with the horn issue...doesn't seem to bother them for some reason.

Now, the number of white Jeeps that function normally has increased two fold, hasn't it?

But the number of black Jeeps that are blowing their horns all night have increased four fold.

And sleep is impossible now.

That's what's happening and everybody damn well knows it.

I notice that you never used the word 'replace' in your example. Wasn't that the whole point?

Has your white Jeep been replaced?

[Anti Federalist]

I notice that you never used the word 'replace' in your example. Wasn't that the whole point?

Has your white Jeep been replaced?

My quiet night has been replaced.

If you're so desperate to pick nits, I'll grant your premise.

Call it instead The Great Overwhelming.

[ATruepatriot]

I won in 2010. Got redistricted out by establishment leadership. That specific redistricting was declared illegal in 2017. So with my County back together I ran in 2018. Got outspent in the primary $5k to $100k. :(

I have never lost a General

Similar happen to Jake Towne, They went and changed the rules just to mess him up.

[Swordsmyth]

My quiet night has been replaced.

If you're so desperate to pick nits, I'll grant your premise.

Call it instead The Great Overwhelming.
Once the overwhelming is done they will start the eliminating.
Then it will have been replacement.