PDA

View Full Version : GOP lawmakers call for ethics investigation of Rep. Joaquin Castro's tweet on Trump donors




Brian4Liberty
08-10-2019, 01:28 PM
GOP lawmakers call for ethics investigation of Rep. Joaquin Castro's tweet on Trump donors (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/09/gop-lawmakers-want-ethics-investigation-joaquin-castro/1970872001/)


WASHINGTON – Several Republican lawmakers on Friday called on the House Ethics Committee to open an investigation into Rep. Joaquin Castro after he tweeted the names and businesses of 44 Texans that donated to President Donald Trump's campaign.

In a letter to House Ethics Committee Chairman Ted Deutch, D-Fla., and ranking member Rep. Kenny Marchant, R-Texas, the lawmakers accused Castro of "violating Rule XXIII of the Code of Official Conduct for publicly posting the names and workplaces of individual donors to" Trump.

"Posting a target list of private citizens simply for supporting his political opponent is anithetical to our principles and serves to suppress the free speech and free association rights of Americans," the letter says.

Republicans Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona, Matt Gaetz of Florida, Jody Hice of Georgia, Debbie Lesko of Arizona, Jeff Duncan of South Carolina, Randy Weber of Texas and Ted Budd of North Carolina all signed the letter.

Castro on Monday criticized 44 donors that donated the maximum amount of $2,000 to Trump, all of which were from San Antonio, his hometown and the district he represents.

He included a screenshot of the names of and their businesses in the tweet.
...
The GOP lawmakers in the letter claimed that publishing a donor list acts "to suppress free speech and the right of Americans to freely associate under the First Amendment is not a new concept."

"By publishing a list of private citizens who donated to his political opponent, Rep. Castro sought to encourage harassment against those citizens simply on the basis of their political beliefs," the letter continues. "It cannot be fairly argued that Rep. Castro had any other purpose in posting that list and telling his activist followers that those individuals were inciting hate. Whether he intended to provoke physical violence or merely verbal harassment, his intent was to chill the free speech and free association rights of Americans.

"This behavior cannot be tolerated by a member of this institution. Rep. Castro took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, yet his actions serve to diminish the constitutional rights of American citizens," the letter concludes. "The defeat of a political opponent can never justify sacrificing our values as a free nation."
...
More: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/09/gop-lawmakers-want-ethics-investigation-joaquin-castro/1970872001/

Brian4Liberty
08-10-2019, 01:38 PM
Many of the donors were in fear and afraid to do interviews after Joaquin Castro put targets on them. Mark Hanrahan did speak out.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-CG0hUnJWw

CCTelander
08-10-2019, 01:49 PM
I'm betting that there will be NO GOP calls for "ethics investigation[s]" into the routine and reprehensible violations of natural rights committed by lawmakers pretty much daily. Just sayin'.

Anti Federalist
08-10-2019, 02:42 PM
I'm betting that there will be NO GOP calls for "ethics investigation[s]" into the routine and reprehensible violations of natural rights committed by lawmakers pretty much daily. Just sayin'.

Not to worry.

This will go nowhere.

;)

Brian4Liberty
08-10-2019, 03:14 PM
This actually raises serious problems with elections. Are election votes anonymous and private?

In this case, a donation is seen as a proxy for a vote. Essentially Castro is targeting votes. If Castro had his way, he’d probably tweet out the name of everyone who voted for Trump. “How did you vote, comrade? Never mind, we already know.”

Anti Federalist
08-10-2019, 03:16 PM
This actually raises serious problems with elections. Are election votes anonymous and private?

In this case, a donation is seen as a proxy for a vote. Essentially Castro is targeting votes. If Castro had his way, he’d probably tweet out the name of everyone who voted for Trump.

That's page one, out of the Bolshevik/Jacobin playbook.

Literally.

And the limp, low T, feckless GOP still tries to appease and appeal to reason.

Worthless.

CCTelander
08-10-2019, 03:35 PM
Not to worry.

This will go nowhere.

;)


At least we can rest assured that they'll continue to propose "assault weapons" bans and "red flag" laws in their unceasing efforts to keep us safe. And our liberty loving president will sign any they manage to pass. We're so very fortunate to have the whole lot in our corner. :sarcasm:

Swordsmyth
08-10-2019, 05:08 PM
This actually raises serious problems with elections. Are election votes anonymous and private?

In this case, a donation is seen as a proxy for a vote. Essentially Castro is targeting votes. If Castro had his way, he’d probably tweet out the name of everyone who voted for Trump. “How did you vote, comrade? Never mind, we already know.”


That's page one, out of the Bolshevik/Jacobin playbook.

Literally.

And the limp, low T, feckless GOP still tries to appease and appeal to reason.

Worthless.
Maybe we should just have public votes and get the civil war started.
It would help eliminate fraud and get the frog to jump out of the pot.
We can't continue to live side by side with people who are so deranged.