Project Veritas : Google Exec Insider exposes plans to censor & prevent another Trump election

[eleganz]

Surprised this wasn't posted already but then again Youtube removed this video 2 hours after it was uploaded.

This only confirms what we all already knew was happening. Bad move on them, you don't censor content about your own company, it just makes the news bigger.

I'm going to put a direct link to youtube at the bottom for anybody that is really just that lazy but going to link to Veritas' website first so we can support them.


CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT PROJECT VERITAS
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whistle-exec-reveals-google-plan-to-prevent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/







Click here to SUPPORT YOUTUBE????
Found a re-uploaded direct link but who knows how long before this gets flagged and youtube takes it down. I've been looking for a good alternative to switch to lately...I'm done with youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wo6iOWlDXA

[Swordsmyth]

Texas Republican congressman Louie Gohmert, a Freedom Caucus stalwart, said that Google must have its immunity against class-action lawsuits stripped following Project Veritas’ expose of the tech giant’s political bias against President Donald Trump’s supporters and information that could help Trump win the 2020 election. Anti-trust suits are already forming (https://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-enemies-gear-up-to-make-antitrust-case-11561368601) ahead of an anti-Google coalition’s meeting with the Trump Department of Justice. Republican Senator Josh Hawley is launching a concerted effort to get rid of Google and Facebook’s Section 230 protections which they gained all the way back in 1996 (https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2018/03/21/591622450/section-230-a-key-legal-shield-for-facebook-google-is-about-to-change).
“This video shows Google’s biases are now a threat to a free and fair election, all while they hide behind the immunity given by Congress years ago when they were supposed to be a simple ‘town square’ where everyone’s voice could be heard without biased results,” Gohmert stated.
“In fact, Google references a significant role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections. This discovery should set off alarm bells throughout the country. It is no secret that Google has a political agenda. Multiple brave tech insiders have stepped forward and exposed Google’s censorship of content and specialized algorithms. This media giant’s ‘social justice narrative’ should distress all Americans who value a free and open society. Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped and to be properly pursued by class action lawsuits by those they have knowingly harmed,” Gohmert said.
BLP reported (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/google-executive-admits-they-are-thought-police-and-will-be-intervening-to-stop-trump-in-2020/): Investigative journalist James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas has released hidden camera videos (https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whistle-exec-reveals-google-plan-to-prevent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/) showing a Google executive explaining how preventing Trump and similar leaders is at the top of the monolithic corporation’s list of priorities.


“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that,” said Jen Gennai, who works as Google’s Head of Responsible Innovation.
Project Veritas notes that Gennai is in charge of the division of Google that is responsible for implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. This includes making sure that political outcomes unfavorable for liberals cannot be reached.
“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again,” Gennai added.
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?” she asked.

Gennai is proud of her organization’s push for thought control, and the “Machine Learning Fairness” guidelines that have been introduced following Donald Trump’s presidential victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016.
“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it,” Gennai said.
The Project Veritas story also includes testimony and leaks from Google insiders documenting how the Big Tech corporation is working to fix the problem of “algorithmic unfairness,” which means thought control to stifle access to ideas that are not politically correct. Another euphemism they use is “unconscious bias” to justify their Orwellian machinations. Their censorship practices also apply to YouTube as well.
The entire video can be seen here (https://vimeo.com/344068138). This information may prove relevant in anti-trust lawsuits (https://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-enemies-gear-up-to-make-antitrust-case-11561368601) that are being developed against Google right now.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/louie-...tion-lawsuits/ (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/louie-googles-immunity-must-be-stripped-to-allow-class-action-lawsuits/)

[AngryCanadian]

This censoring of right wingers, and others wont help the liberals win elections.

[timosman]

When did it become ok to discuss politics at work? :confused:

[eleganz]

This censoring of right wingers, and others wont help the liberals win elections.

Maybe not in the long run but if done at a mass scale in a short period of time so the opposition has no chance to organize, you can steal the next one, and thats the one they want most.

[donnay]

When did it become ok to discuss politics at work? :confused:

So long as it about hating the right and taking down Donald J. Trump at any cost.

[Anti Globalist]

Unfortunately for Google all their censoring won't stop Trump winning his reelection.

[Brian4Liberty]

It’s unfortunate that web searches have been hopelessly compromised. The options are limited, and they all have essentially the same agenda. Feel free to post a search engine that is not biased.

These changes may have some side effects. People are going to have to start visiting websites like Project Veritas directly. People will only be able to find these links via email, text messages or web forums.

[timosman]

It’s unfortunate that web searches have been hopelessly compromised. The options are limited, and they all have essentially the same agenda.

Bias should be adjustable via preferences between Stalin and Hitler. :tears:

[revgen]

Feel free to post a search engine that is not biased.


DuckDuckGo?

[Swordsmyth]

DuckDuckGo?
It's run by leftists.
I use it but you still have to be careful and you may need to use multiple different search engines to find things.

Yandex is Russian and may be significantly different than western leftists, Qwant lets you use Bing without being tracked* and Startpage lets you use google without being tracked*.


*At least that is what they claim.

[timosman]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1YENAvOveE

[eleganz]

DuckDuckGo?


I've adjusted all of my defaults to Duck Duck Go since 2016, a good search engine that claims to be privacy first.


It's run by leftists.
I use it but you still have to be careful and you may need to use multiple different search engines to find things.

Yandex is Russian and my be significantly different than western leftists, Qwant lets you use Bing without being tracked* and Startpage lets you use google without being tracked*.


*At least that is what they claim.

Which leftists run DuckDuck Go?

[Swordsmyth]

I've adjusted all of my defaults to Duck Duck Go since 2016, a good search engine that claims to be privacy first.



Which leftists run DuckDuck Go?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wePMUqnBn0...

[Danke]

It's run by leftists.
I use it but you still have to be careful and you may need to use multiple different search engines to find things.

Yandex is Russian and my be significantly different than western leftists, Qwant lets you use Bing without being tracked* and Startpage lets you use google without being tracked*.


*At least that is what they claim.

I remember in the "old days' when I did a search all kinds of non-mainstream websites would appear. Now, just the same liberal crap pops up. They have censored the Internet effectively.

[Stratovarious]

As most are probably aware,
the most useful and honest tool google had was eliminated 7 to 10 years ago, that was the
tool that allowed you to define the timeline in the search.

What has resulted, is the prefect environment for revisionism, they can re interpret and
literally rewrite history , no one is the wiser, the archived stories of the day, from the
times they occurred, are GOOONNNEEEE.......... evaporated.



'History is written by the victor''


///

[Swordsmyth]

I remember in the "old days' when I did a search all kinds of non-mainstream websites would appear. Now, just the same liberal crap pops up. They have censored the Internet effectively.
Yup.

But don't worry, "private" tyranny is OK.:sarcasm:

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

https://i.redd.it/yro4sbwviy201.jpg

[eleganz]

...

This is good to know. Although I block ads so I'm not sure if DDG is making any money off me. Im more inclined to switch to a new search engine now but how do we know qwant/startpage aren't leftists either.

[Swordsmyth]

This is good to know. Although I block ads so I'm not sure if DDG is making any money off me. Im more inclined to switch to a new search engine now but how do we know qwant/startpage aren't leftists either.
Qwant is run by french leftists and you just get Bing search results and I don't know who runs startpage but you just get Google search results.
That's why I still use DDG as my default (I block ads too).

[Stratovarious]

I've adjusted all of my defaults to Duck Duck Go since 2016, a good search engine that claims to be privacy first.



Which leftists run DuckDuck Go?


It's hard to say who really runs startpage as sword' mentioned, but I use it 99% of the time,
it's all google, of course, but not tracked, so they say .

I tried DDG , waste of time for me , it was nothing different than google and way too slow.

[AngryCanadian]

This same Google Exec Insider is now claiming that she lied and she only meant foreign interference of Russia lol. She is now defending herself in a article.

[eleganz]

This same Google Exec Insider is now claiming that she lied and she only meant foreign interference of Russia lol. She is now defending herself in a article.

Here it is, perhaps written by Google's crisis management reps?

https://medium.com/@gennai.jen/this-is-not-how-i-expected-monday-to-go-e92771c7aa82


I’ve spent the last 12 hours travelling back from Dublin to San Francisco, unaware of what was happening on the ground. When I touched down today, and I turned on my phone, I received the shock of my life. I had received an enormous collection of threatening calls, voicemails, text messages and emails, from people I’d never met.

Someone wrote “Your ideology will be shredded to pieces, just moments before you got executed for treason…you are living lended time, enjoy till then”. There were plenty more threats like this. I’ve never been so fearful.

So why did this happen?

In late May, I accepted an invitation to meet with a few people who claimed to be from “2 Step Tech Solutions”. They said they wanted to chat to me about a mentoring program for young women of color in tech, an area I’ve long been passionate about. We went for dinner at a restaurant in the Mission, San Francisco.

Unfortunately, I now know that these people lied about their true identities, filmed me without my consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online. I now know they belong to a group called “Project Veritas”, which has done this to numerous other people working in the tech and other sectors.

Why did they do this to me? It seems they found that I had spoken publicly at Google I/O on Ethics, and they wanted someone who would give them juicy soundbites about tech’s alleged bias against conservatives. Over the course of a two hour dinner, I guess they think I delivered.

Project Veritas has edited the video to make it seem that I am a powerful executive who was confirming that Google is working to alter the 2020 election. On both counts, this is absolute, unadulterated nonsense, of course. In a casual restaurant setting, I was explaining how Google’s Trust and Safety team (a team I used to work on) is working to help prevent the types of online foreign interference that happened in 2016. Google has been very public about the work that our teams have done since 2016 on this, so it’s hardly a revelation.

The video then goes on to stitch together a series of debunked conspiracy theories about our search results, and our other products. Google has repeatedly been clear that it works to be a trustworthy source of information, without regard to political viewpoint. In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings. And everything I have seen backs this up. Our CEO has said ”We do not bias our products to favor any political agenda.” He’s somewhat more powerful and authoritative than me.

But despite what the video may have you believe, I’m not involved in any of these products, just like I’m not involved in any of the other topics Project Veritas baited me into discussing (whether it’s antitrust, Congress, or the dozens of other topics that didn’t appear in the video, on which I presumably didn’t say anything that could be twisted to their advantage). I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.

I don’t expect this post will do anything to deter, or convince, the people who are sending me abusive messages. In fact, it will probably encourage them, give them oxygen and amplify their theories.

But maybe a few people will read it and realize that I’m not the cartoon cut-out villain that Project Veritas would have you believe.

Maybe someone will read it, be more skeptical about a dinner they’re invited to, and avoid the same trap I fell into.

And maybe some people will take a pause and reflect on how toxic and menacing our online discourse has become, about how quick we are to believe the worst of each other, and think about the human cost of demonizing and doxxing people, the way that Project Veritas has done to me.

[Origanalist]

Don't know how to post bitchute..
https://seed21.bitchute.com/ZofFQQoDoqYT/q9UDd4IuIh34.mp4

[timosman]

https://twitter.com/RepDanCrenshaw/status/1143695620185743361

1143695620185743361

[donnay]

...

Startpage

[donnay]

Qwant is run by french leftists and you just get Bing search results and I don't know who runs startpage but you just get Google search results.
That's why I still use DDG as my default (I block ads too).

Startpage was promoted by Dr. Katherine Albrecht who is a Consumer Privacy Expert.

[specsaregood]

I tried DDG , waste of time for me , it was nothing different than google and way too slow.

That is strange as DDG doesn't use google. Last I checked, they use a hybrid of a number of systems; bing search api, Yandex, their own crawler, and more.

Me, I just use bing. I find everything I am looking for and they pay me to use it.

[specsaregood]

Me, I just use bing. I find everything I am looking for and they pay me to use it.

http://i.imgur.com/Dbjw9H7.png
just saying, no collusion there.


1143882250913812481

[Stratovarious]

That is strange as DDG doesn't use google. Last I checked, they use a hybrid of a number of systems; bing search api, Yandex, their own crawler, and more.

Me, I just use bing. I find everything I am looking for and they pay me to use it.

I was just saying they're no different that google, the results I was getting were not any better
than google , and it was slow as molasses , I'm sticking with startpage for now, it's google but
I don't get data mined , probably watched by NSA like all of us , but at least I'm not 'mined' .

[nikcers]

It's not just tech companies like google doing this. This is happening even at your internet service provider and there is nothing stopping them from doing it there is no net neutrality or regulations that can stop it and they don't give a fuck about your speech.

[Swordsmyth]

The Orwellian censorship by the Big Tech monopolists is spiraling out of control. After YouTube booted Project Veritas’ video that exposed the electoral interference and thought control of Google off of their platform, their competitor Vimeo has now followed suit.

������ BREAKING @Vimeo (https://twitter.com/Vimeo?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) has REMOVED Project Veritas saying: "You cannot upload videos that are hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory." Perhaps we embarrassed @Google (https://twitter.com/Google?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) but NOTHING we said was hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory. They're trying to erase us from the internet. pic.twitter.com/mBfmeHo4i0 (https://t.co/mBfmeHo4i0)
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) June 26, 2019 (https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1143996700543131648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Vimeo could gain market share from exposing the truth about Google’s machinations to undermine the democratic process in the United States. Considering they are one of YouTube’s top competitors, this would be a way for them to gain much-needed market share in a competitive industry.


However, Vimeo is doing the opposite. They are in effect harming their own business and protecting their competition. This action shows that Big Tech corporations are enforcing an agenda of social control, where dissent is to be stomped out by any means necessary.
Project Veritas pointed out the nature of this sinister cartel that works in tandem to enforce Big Brother:

1. @YouTube (https://twitter.com/YouTube?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) bans @Pinterest (https://twitter.com/Pinterest?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) investigation
2. @Twitter (https://twitter.com/Twitter?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) suspends Veritas for Pinterest story
3. @reddit (https://twitter.com/reddit?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) bans Project Veritas
4. @YouTube (https://twitter.com/YouTube?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) bans @Google (https://twitter.com/Google?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) investigation
5. @Vimeo (https://twitter.com/Vimeo?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) removes Project Veritas account
DO THINK BIG TECH IS WORKING TOGETHER?
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) June 26, 2019 (https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1144003696369577985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

The video is still available to be accessed on BitChute (https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/) for the time being. Who knows if BitChute will be targeted by their DNS provider to toss them offline for not imposing censorship, as the unprecedented crackdown against right-wing dissident thought continues.
Project Veritas followed up their hidden camera video with several more disclosures to further expose Google’s biased and deceitful practices.
They exposed YouTube for putting pro-life search terms on a blacklist (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/project-veritas-exposes-youtube-for-electoral-manipulation-prior-to-abortion-vote-in-ireland/) prior to a key Irish abortion referendum. They also showed leaked documents indicating that Google employees’ internal communications had referred to PragerU, Jordan Peterson, and Ben Shapiro (https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/25/breaking-new-google-document-leaked-describing-shapiro-prager-as-nazis-using-the-dogwhistles/) as “nazis using the dog whistles” who should be targeted for potential censorship.

More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/collusion-youtubes-competitor-bans-project-veritas-video-exposing-googles-electoral-interference/

[Danke]

Time to donate again. Sorry Zippy.

[r3volution 3.0]

As most are probably aware,
the most useful and honest tool google had was eliminated 7 to 10 years ago, that was the
tool that allowed you to define the timeline in the search.

What has resulted, is the prefect environment for revisionism, they can re interpret and
literally rewrite history , no one is the wiser, the archived stories of the day, from the
times they occurred, are GOOONNNEEEE.......... evaporated.



'History is written by the victor''


///

You can still do that, FYI.

Tools > Any Time > Custom Range > punch in whatever dates you want

[Anti Federalist]

Unfortunately, I now know that these people lied about their true identities, filmed me without my consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online. I now know they belong to a group called “Project Veritas”, which has done this to numerous other people working in the tech and other sectors.

Boo fucking hoo...cry me a fucking river.

[r3volution 3.0]

[quoting article] Unfortunately, I now know that these people lied about their true identities, filmed me without my consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online. I now know they belong to a group called “Project Veritas”, which has done this to numerous other people working in the tech and other sectors.

Uh oh, sounds like a violation of the "right to privacy."

Surely this will outrage @Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299)

[Swordsmyth]

Uh oh, sounds like a violation of the "right to privacy."

Surely this will outrage @Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299)
Fighting fire with fire.

And I don't see anything about following her around everywhere she goes and selling the info, all I see is someone recording a personal encounter that the other person knew was happening, so it isn't really the same thing at all.

[r3volution 3.0]

Fighting fire with fire.

And I don't see anything about following her around everywhere she goes and selling the info, all I see is someone recording a personal encounter that the other person knew was happening, so it isn't really the same thing at all.

Phew, I thought we were going to have to sick the feds on Project Veritas.

They must conserve their energy for the war of annihilation against social media, after all.

[Stratovarious]

You can still do that, FYI.

Tools > Any Time > Custom Range > punch in whatever dates you want


I tried it many times , its not there unless the reinstated, I doubt it , highly
doubt it , would like to be wrong on this one.

[Swordsmyth]

Project Veritas is back at it Thursday, this time publishing a leaked document (https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/27/leak-new-google-resist-doc-shows-internal-beginners-guide-to-protesting-resistgoogle/) from inside Google which reportedly teaches employees how to protest.
The document (https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/GoogleResist.pdf) flaunts the title “Beginners Guide to Protesting,” and encourages users to contact Resist@Google.com become a part of the company’s social activism program. Though the document does not specifically mention President Donald J. Trump, #Resist has become a buzzword used by those who oppose him.
“This document leak is the fourth in a series of leaks from inside Google and their subsidiary, YouTube,” O’Keefe said. “This new document appears to show internal coordination of political protests which contradicts Google’s public statements that they are politically neutral. More tech insiders are coming forward and we will continue to work with them to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley.”
The document has a “Do’s and Don’ts” section (Do: “Talk to the press and express your views. Don’t: “Escalate”) and a section of recommended chants. The chant are typical of what one hears at anti-Trump and far-left rallies across the nation.


One the chants specifically references the “Muslim ban,” (actually a ban on all immigration from seven majority Muslim nations) which is specifically a Trump policy.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Screen-Shot-2019-06-27-at-2.37.31-PM.png


More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/veritas-okeefe-drops-leaked-internal-google-memo-teaching-employees-to-protest-right-wing-policies/

[eleganz]

Uh oh, sounds like a violation of the "right to privacy."

Surely this will outrage @Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299)

If this was a violation of privacy, Veritas would have 1:1 ratio of lawsuits to videos they put out where they film without the target's permission.

Where is Gennai's lawsuit? Or even a threat of one? Why did she not mention she hired legal counsel? violation of privacy? libel? none of that.


Veritas recently won a libel suit, it was thrown out, the target did NOT have a case and everybody knew it.

[r3volution 3.0]

I tried it many times , its not there unless the reinstated, I doubt it , highly
doubt it , would like to be wrong on this one.

I use it all the time, have for years, looks just like it always has, looking at it right now.

There's a button "tools" on the right side of the search bar.

When you click it, a button "any time" pops up on the left side of the search bar.

Note that the "tools" button only appears on the search results page, not on the landing page.

[nikcers]

I use it all the time, have for years, looks just like it always has, looking at it right now.

There's a button "tools" on the right side of the search bar.

When you click it, a button "any time" pops up on the left side of the search bar.

Note that the "tools" button only appears on the search results page, not on the landing page.

It might just be a difference in the browser he is uses. Websites send you a different page depending on the browser user agent it presents when you request the website. He can probably get the same page as you if he spoofs his user agent or uses a similar browser as you.

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Brings back memories of the Hillary Clinton scandal, where people exposed how rotten of a person she is, but she's not the one in the wrong, they are! lol

[nikcers]

Brings back memories of the Hillary Clinton scandal, where people exposed how rotten of a person she is, but she's not the one in the wrong, they are! lol

Yeah they know that it looks bad for them no matter what, thats why they tried to cover it up and paid all of the social media sites to ban it rather than try to refute it.

[nikcers]

I think the biggest thing that this has proved is that if you have money you can put anything or take anything off the front page of social media sites.

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Yeah they know that it looks bad for them no matter what, thats why they tried to cover it up and paid all of the social media sites to ban it rather than try to refute it.

I wouldn't even know the video existed if people weren't talking about it.

But this dangerous. Sure people can run to alternative sites, but they'll just try to pass legislation to shutdown "hate speech websites" And heck giant companies like google have enough servers to DDOS them permanently

[nikcers]

I wouldn't even know the video existed if people weren't talking about it.

But this dangerous. Sure people can run to alternative sites, but they'll just try to pass legislation to shutdown "hate speech websites" And heck giant companies like google have enough servers to DDOS them permanently

Its hard to compete with youtube its like trying to compete with fedex with one truck and one plane. If enough people get pissed off there could be competition, but right now it would be tough for someone to create a platform that could compete because if enough pepole tried to switch the website would basically be DDOS'd. I think that most people who think that there could be competition don't realize how much traffic goes over google vs the rest of the internet. Plus you would never be able to reach the same amount of people if there were competing platforms it sort of defeats the utility of being able to reach so many people from one platform.

[r3volution 3.0]

It might just be a difference in the browser he is uses. Websites send you a different page depending on the browser user agent it presents when you request the website. He can probably get the same page as you if he spoofs his user agent or uses a similar browser as you.

I use a very common browser and a laptop.

The only explanation I can imagine is that he's using a smartphone/tablet and/or some very exotic browser.

Can you use these features?

[Brian4Liberty]

It’s unfortunate that web searches have been hopelessly compromised. The options are limited, and they all have essentially the same agenda. Feel free to post a search engine that is not biased.

These changes may have some side effects. People are going to have to start visiting websites like Project Veritas directly. People will only be able to find these links via email, text messages or web forums.

I spoke too soon. Your email is filtered for “spam”. Take a look at your spam folder. You will find it filled with political emails, including things you may have signed up to receive.

[Swordsmyth]

I spoke too soon. Your email is filtered for “spam”. Take a look at your spam folder. You will find it filled with political emails, including things you may have signed up to receive.
Yup.

[Brian4Liberty]

You can still do that, FYI.

Tools > Any Time > Custom Range > punch in whatever dates you want

Depends on the device...


Yeah, I have used that feature in the past. It no longer exists on a mobile device though (which includes various pads):


Google is removing the custom date range search filter for mobile users
Mobile searchers on Google will no longer be able to use the custom date range search filter. To access that feature, they need to go to the desktop version of Google.
Barry Schwartz on June 17, 2016
...
https://searchengineland.com/google-removing-custom-date-range-search-filter-mobile-users-252128
...

[r3volution 3.0]

Depends on the device...

Ah, well, that is your penance for using phones in lieu of real computers.