PDA

View Full Version : MONEY BOMB Tulsi Gabbard on 6/26/2019




Rekonn
06-21-2019, 10:49 AM
Tulsi Gabbard is the strongest anti-war, anti military industrial complex candidate running for president, endorsed by Ron Paul on foreign policy. Please donate to her campaign on 6/26/2019, the day she'll be debating others in the Democratic primary. Suggested donation is $26.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/

Learned about money bomb from:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFAQyZq0NqfCwVkRQoXpx0A/community

Tulsi is also against the drug war, pro criminal justice reform, and pro free speech to the point she'll drop charges on Snowden and Assange.

oyarde
06-21-2019, 03:50 PM
Not .

oyarde
06-21-2019, 03:53 PM
Not anti war , not endorsed by Ron Paul . Not a legitimate candidate . As much as all the leftists on RPF wish , it changes nothing , she is no different than any other dem candidate with a freedom score to prove it .

oyarde
06-21-2019, 03:55 PM
You should get your 26.00 to Oyarde , a real champion of freedom . I will spend it on american made precious metals and bourbon and it will do the world greater good .

euphemia
06-21-2019, 04:40 PM
Anti war, unless you count the war on the unborn.

Anti Globalist
06-21-2019, 04:57 PM
No. I don't think I will donate any money to Gabbard.

tfurrh
06-21-2019, 05:21 PM
6/26 is the day after payday for me.

So I'll be broke.

Origanalist
06-21-2019, 05:36 PM
6/26 is the day after payday for me.

So I'll be broke.

What a coincidence.

Anti Federalist
06-21-2019, 08:17 PM
Ummmm...no.

loveshiscountry
06-21-2019, 09:17 PM
We can call it the Authorization for Use of Military Force Money Bomb

Swordsmyth
06-21-2019, 09:26 PM
Anti war, unless you count the war on the unborn.
Or the wars she votes for even though she speaks against them.

unknown
06-22-2019, 02:51 AM
Or the wars she votes for even though she speaks against them.

Which ones did she vote for?

PAF
06-22-2019, 05:36 AM
Cumulative Freedom Index Score: 30%

https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000571


Neocons scoring below 90% cannot get me into the voting booth, so no.

kcchiefs6465
06-22-2019, 07:45 AM
I was considering it but felt the money would be put to better use on cigarettes and cheap beer. Maybe next one.

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 02:25 PM
Which ones did she vote for?
Here are some examples:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000571) - 31%





H RES 397: NATO (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hres397)


Vote Date: June 27, 2017
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll328.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


This legislation (H. Res. 397) “solemnly reaffirms the commitment of the United States to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s principle of collective defense as enumerated in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.” Under Article 5, the member nations of the NATO military alliance “agree that an armed attack against one or more of them ... shall be considered an attack against them all.”

The House passed H. Res. 397 on June 27, 2017 by a lopsided vote of 423 to 4 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because the United States should stay clear of entangling alliances such as NATO, but also because the NATO provision that obligates the United States to go to war if any member of NATO is attacked undermines the provision in the U.S. Constitution that assigns to Congress the power to declare war. Moreover, the number of nations that the United States has pledged to defend under NATO has grown from 11 to 28 over the years, as the alliance itself has grown from 12 member nations (including the United States) when NATO was created in 1949 to 29 today. Although NATO was ostensibly formed to counter the threat from the Soviet bloc of nations, some of the nations the United States is now pledged to defend under NATO were once part of that bloc, including Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic (as part of Czechoslovakia), Hungary, Poland, and Romania.








H R 5293: Authorization for Use of Military Force (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2016/h/330)


Vote Date: June 16, 2016
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll330.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill (H.R. 5293), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to prohibit the use of funds in the bill for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act. Enacted in the wake of 9/11, the AUMF authorized the president to “use all necessary and appropriate force” against the terrorists involved, as well as those who aided or harbored them. It was used as the authorization for U.S. military entry into Afghanistan in 2001, and over the years has also been invoked on other occasions by the executive branch to justify U.S. military intervention abroad.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on June 16, 2016 by a vote of 146 to 274 (Roll Call 330). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”









H R 4909: Use of Military Force (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2016/h/210)


Vote Date: May 18, 2016
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll210.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


During consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that was enacted in 2001 for the purpose of authorizing U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks. Since then, however, the AUMF has been invoked numerous times by the executive branch for U.S. military intervention not only in Afghanistan but elsewhere.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on May 18, 2016 by a vote of 138 to 285 (Roll Call 210). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”




H RES 162: Calling on the President to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hres162)


Vote Date: March 23, 2015
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll131.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Ukraine Military Aid.
House Resolution 162, which calls on the president "to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," allows President Obama to provide Ukraine with defensive weapons to defend against aggression from Russia.

The House adopted H. Res. 162 on March 23, 2015 by a vote of 348 to 48 (Roll Call 131). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because foreign aid is unconstitutional but also because this bill would further interject the United States into a foreign conflict. Allowing the U.S. president to provide lethal arms to Ukraine in order to fight Russia is tantamount to waging a proxy war on Russia without the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war. The House, by giving such power to the president, is relinquishing one of its constitutional responsibilities.




H R 4870: On Agreeing to the Amendment 51 to H R 4870 (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2014/h/328)


Vote Date: June 19, 2014
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll328.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Weapons to Syrian Rebels.
During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill, Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) introduced an amendment that would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to provide weapons to Syrian rebels. Fortenberry noted on the House floor that "the rebel movement is a battleground of shifting alliances and bloody conflicts between groups that now include multinational terrorist organizations," that "sending our weapons into this chaotic war zone could inadvertently help these extremists," and that "it has already happened." He added: "The naive notion that we can deliver weapons to vetted, moderate opposition groups at war with other rebel militias gives no guarantee that our weaponry won't be seized or diverted."

The House rejected Fortenberry's amendment on June 19, 2014 by a vote of 167 to 244 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because arming "moderate" rebels in a foreign country is tantamount to going to war, which would require a declaration of war by Congress. Also, the United States should follow the Founders' advice not to become involved in foreign quarrels

















H R 4152: To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr4152)


Vote Date: April 1, 2014
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll149.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Ukraine Aid.

This bill (H.R. 4152), as amended by the Senate (see Senate vote below), would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine.

[ The Senate version of this legislation - offered in the form of a substitute amendment to the House version, H.R. 4152 - would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that the U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine. ]

The House voted for this legislation on April 1, 2014 by a vote of 378 to 34 (Roll Call 149). We have assigned pluses to the nays because foreign aid is unconstitutional. The rationale for providing U.S. aid to Ukraine is that the country needs our assistance to resist Russian hegemony and build "democracy." Yet the oligarchs wielding power in Ukraine are hardly "democrats," and (because money is fungible) U.S. assistance could effectively be funneled to Russia in the form of Ukrainian energy and debt payments.

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 02:26 PM
Cumulative Freedom Index Score: 30%

https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000571


Neocons scoring below 90% cannot get me into the voting booth, so no.
Those in the mid 70's or above may be a net positive for liberty.

30% is a monster.

PAF
06-22-2019, 05:04 PM
Those in the mid 70's or above may be a net positive for liberty.

30% is a monster.

Every representative should vote 100% to the government’s Law of the Land. While I personally do not deviate when it comes to Bill of Rights, there are portions of the Constitution that I obviously and absolutely do not agree with. Therefore my magic number is 90% in this ridiculous climate. Anything below 90% is a net loss. 70’s and 80’s you are simply pleading for bigger government than it already is. So, as I stated above, NO.

Sound complex? It isn’t really ;-)

oyarde
06-22-2019, 05:08 PM
I was considering it but felt the money would be put to better use on cigarettes and cheap beer. Maybe next one.

This is why we are Great Americans .

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 05:13 PM
Every representative should vote 100% to the government’s Law of the Land. While I personally do not deviate when it comes to Bill of Rights, there are portions of the Constitution that I obviously and absolutely do not agree with. Therefore my magic number is 90% in this ridiculous climate. Anything below 90% is a net loss. 70’s and 80’s you are simply pleading for bigger government than it already is. So, as I stated above, NO.

Sound complex? It isn’t really ;-)
You make it sound as if all good votes only hold the line when they can advance liberty.

I don't start to really like a Congressman until they are in the 80's but those in the mid 70's do some good and certainly slow down anything bad.

We can get more demanding as we get a higher average in Congress but that may take some time.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
06-22-2019, 05:15 PM
LOL. The second assclown to recently resurrect his account after many years to solicit for Gabbard. The other one is here. (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?535539-Tulsi-Gabbard-sounds-like-a-libertarian-leaning-Democrat-(Ron-likes-her!)&p=6811277#post6811277)


I didn't really look, but prolly the same guy.

Krugminator2
06-22-2019, 05:20 PM
I could not think of a less worthy cause. This is the worst part of the original Ron Paul movement.

There are occasionally people who could use help financially on this forum or people who ran for Congress like Brett. Give them money.

"The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act,” would pay for health care by increasing taxes on the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans, create a progressive excise tax on payroll and self-employment, tax unearned income, and also tax stock and bond transactions (not just the gains from those transactions).' https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-does-rep-tulsi-gabbard-believe-where-the-candidate-stands-on-7-issues

I mistakenly said I might not vote for Trump. But statements like this why I will ultimately vote for him. I hate all of these Communists so much. It is cool she likes Snowden. Swell. What about the civil liberties of people who pay taxes.

unknown
06-22-2019, 05:53 PM
Here are some examples:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000571) - 31%





H RES 397: NATO (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hres397)


Vote Date: June 27, 2017
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll328.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


This legislation (H. Res. 397) “solemnly reaffirms the commitment of the United States to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s principle of collective defense as enumerated in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.” Under Article 5, the member nations of the NATO military alliance “agree that an armed attack against one or more of them ... shall be considered an attack against them all.”

The House passed H. Res. 397 on June 27, 2017 by a lopsided vote of 423 to 4 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because the United States should stay clear of entangling alliances such as NATO, but also because the NATO provision that obligates the United States to go to war if any member of NATO is attacked undermines the provision in the U.S. Constitution that assigns to Congress the power to declare war. Moreover, the number of nations that the United States has pledged to defend under NATO has grown from 11 to 28 over the years, as the alliance itself has grown from 12 member nations (including the United States) when NATO was created in 1949 to 29 today. Although NATO was ostensibly formed to counter the threat from the Soviet bloc of nations, some of the nations the United States is now pledged to defend under NATO were once part of that bloc, including Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic (as part of Czechoslovakia), Hungary, Poland, and Romania.








H R 5293: Authorization for Use of Military Force (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2016/h/330)


Vote Date: June 16, 2016
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll330.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill (H.R. 5293), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to prohibit the use of funds in the bill for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act. Enacted in the wake of 9/11, the AUMF authorized the president to “use all necessary and appropriate force” against the terrorists involved, as well as those who aided or harbored them. It was used as the authorization for U.S. military entry into Afghanistan in 2001, and over the years has also been invoked on other occasions by the executive branch to justify U.S. military intervention abroad.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on June 16, 2016 by a vote of 146 to 274 (Roll Call 330). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”









H R 4909: Use of Military Force (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2016/h/210)


Vote Date: May 18, 2016
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll210.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


During consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909), Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that was enacted in 2001 for the purpose of authorizing U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks. Since then, however, the AUMF has been invoked numerous times by the executive branch for U.S. military intervention not only in Afghanistan but elsewhere.

The House rejected Lee’s amendment on May 18, 2016 by a vote of 138 to 285 (Roll Call 210). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because presidents have been able to claim broad authority to go to war whenever or wherever they choose under the AUMF, despite the fact that the Founding Fathers never intended for one man to make this decision, and under the Constitution only Congress may “declare war.”




H RES 162: Calling on the President to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hres162)


Vote Date: March 23, 2015
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll131.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Ukraine Military Aid.
House Resolution 162, which calls on the president "to provide Ukraine with military assistance to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," allows President Obama to provide Ukraine with defensive weapons to defend against aggression from Russia.

The House adopted H. Res. 162 on March 23, 2015 by a vote of 348 to 48 (Roll Call 131). We have assigned pluses to the nays not only because foreign aid is unconstitutional but also because this bill would further interject the United States into a foreign conflict. Allowing the U.S. president to provide lethal arms to Ukraine in order to fight Russia is tantamount to waging a proxy war on Russia without the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war. The House, by giving such power to the president, is relinquishing one of its constitutional responsibilities.




H R 4870: On Agreeing to the Amendment 51 to H R 4870 (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2014/h/328)


Vote Date: June 19, 2014
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll328.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Weapons to Syrian Rebels.
During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill, Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) introduced an amendment that would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to provide weapons to Syrian rebels. Fortenberry noted on the House floor that "the rebel movement is a battleground of shifting alliances and bloody conflicts between groups that now include multinational terrorist organizations," that "sending our weapons into this chaotic war zone could inadvertently help these extremists," and that "it has already happened." He added: "The naive notion that we can deliver weapons to vetted, moderate opposition groups at war with other rebel militias gives no guarantee that our weaponry won't be seized or diverted."

The House rejected Fortenberry's amendment on June 19, 2014 by a vote of 167 to 244 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because arming "moderate" rebels in a foreign country is tantamount to going to war, which would require a declaration of war by Congress. Also, the United States should follow the Founders' advice not to become involved in foreign quarrels

















H R 4152: To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr4152)


Vote Date: April 1, 2014
Vote: AYE (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll149.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Ukraine Aid.

This bill (H.R. 4152), as amended by the Senate (see Senate vote below), would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine.

[ The Senate version of this legislation - offered in the form of a substitute amendment to the House version, H.R. 4152 - would provide $150 million for direct aid to Ukraine. It would also provide for loan guarantees (meaning that the U.S. taxpayers would be stuck holding the bag if the loans are not paid). And it would impose sanctions on Russian and ex-Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for the crisis in the Ukraine. ]

The House voted for this legislation on April 1, 2014 by a vote of 378 to 34 (Roll Call 149). We have assigned pluses to the nays because foreign aid is unconstitutional. The rationale for providing U.S. aid to Ukraine is that the country needs our assistance to resist Russian hegemony and build "democracy." Yet the oligarchs wielding power in Ukraine are hardly "democrats," and (because money is fungible) U.S. assistance could effectively be funneled to Russia in the form of Ukrainian energy and debt payments.



The link references a ton of different votes.

I need a list of the worst ones so I can roast the ******s on reddit.

Do my work slave!

r3volution 3.0
06-22-2019, 06:13 PM
She has a pretty good anti-war/pro-civil-liberties record:

--voted to repeal the 2001 AUMF (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against aiding the Syrian rebels (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against US involvement in Yemen (same as Massie - Amash didn't vote)
--voted to restrict NSA spying (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted to end indefinite detention (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against the last 2 NDAAs (same as Amash and Massie)

https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/22/defense

She also talks the talk.

In light of her economic policies, I certainly won't be supporting her, but I do hope she helps wake the long-sleeping anti-war left.

PAF
06-22-2019, 06:27 PM
You make it sound as if all good votes only hold the line when they can advance liberty.

I don't start to really like a Congressman until they are in the 80's but those in the mid 70's do some good and certainly slow down anything bad.

We can get more demanding as we get a higher average in Congress but that may take some time.

Well, considering I no longer vote national elections, have at it. It is the centralized government, written by centralists, that I oppose. No matter how you slice it, both parties are part of the same government that has been abusing personal liberties and individualism since pen hit the page.

If I see a Rand, Justin, Tom... as I did with Ron, I wish them all the hope. If folks are intent on voting in order to feel USA USA “proud” I at least try to steer them in the right direction, hoping someday they will figure it all out.

Perhaps now you will give me a + REP for this well thought out, truthful and eloquent post ;-)

RonZeplin
06-22-2019, 08:05 PM
Tulsi Gabbard is the strongest anti-war, anti military industrial complex candidate running for president, endorsed by Ron Paul on foreign policy. Please donate to her campaign on 6/26/2019, the day she'll be debating others in the Democratic primary. Suggested donation is $26.

https://www.tulsi2020.com/

Learned about money bomb from:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFAQyZq0NqfCwVkRQoXpx0A/community

Tulsi is also against the drug war, pro criminal justice reform, and pro free speech to the point she'll drop charges on Snowden and Assange.

+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 08:12 PM
+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.
LOL

She attacked Trump for the Syria pullout.

r3volution 3.0
06-22-2019, 08:16 PM
LOL

She attacked Trump for the Syria pullout.

Source?

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 08:23 PM
Source?
CFR Gabbard on Trump ending wars (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?529487-CFR-Gabbard-on-Trump-ending-wars)

oyarde
06-22-2019, 08:25 PM
+rep

Better than Trump, Biden, Weld, Beto & Bernie.

Actually no different than biden , bernie or beto and never be as good as trump or probably even weld .

oyarde
06-22-2019, 08:26 PM
She should be a non factor after two debates .

r3volution 3.0
06-22-2019, 08:27 PM
CFR Gabbard on Trump ending wars (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?529487-CFR-Gabbard-on-Trump-ending-wars)



She said she opposed a hasty withdrawal, not opposed withdrawing altogether.

Who knows what that really means.

How would you explain her vote against arming the rebels?

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 08:33 PM
She said she opposed a hasty withdrawal, not opposed withdrawing altogether.

Who knows what that really means.
That was the Neocon line at the time, it's one of their favorites, somehow it's never the right time to leave a war.


How would you explain her vote against arming the rebels?
When?
She voted to NOT Prohibit arming them in this vote:




H R 4870: On Agreeing to the Amendment 51 to H R 4870 (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2014/h/328)


Vote Date: June 19, 2014
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll328.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Weapons to Syrian Rebels.
During consideration of the Defense Appropriations bill, Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) introduced an amendment that would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to provide weapons to Syrian rebels. Fortenberry noted on the House floor that "the rebel movement is a battleground of shifting alliances and bloody conflicts between groups that now include multinational terrorist organizations," that "sending our weapons into this chaotic war zone could inadvertently help these extremists," and that "it has already happened." He added: "The naive notion that we can deliver weapons to vetted, moderate opposition groups at war with other rebel militias gives no guarantee that our weaponry won't be seized or diverted."

The House rejected Fortenberry's amendment on June 19, 2014 by a vote of 167 to 244 (Roll Call 328). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because arming "moderate" rebels in a foreign country is tantamount to going to war, which would require a declaration of war by Congress. Also, the United States should follow the Founders' advice not to become involved in foreign quarrels




Anything she says and does that is supposed to be anti-war is just a cover story, if elected she would be another hawk. (but probably one that made up excuses)

r3volution 3.0
06-22-2019, 08:45 PM
When?

H Amdt 1141 to H J Res 124 (September 2014), to authorize aid to Syrian rebels, she voted nay

https://votesmart.org/bill/18860/49994/129306/authorizes-aid-to-syrian-opposition

As I mentioned, Amash and Massie voted the same way.


She voted to NOT Prohibit arming them in this vote

Evidently, and a few months before the above vote


Anything she says and does that is supposed to be anti-war is just a cover story, if elected she would be another hawk. (but probably one that made up excuses)

The record is conflicted.

In any event, I don't frankly care whether she really is a dove or not.

It's enough that she appears to be, if that helps revive similar sentiments in the Dem Party.

If she actually won (which we won't), she would at least be no worse than the average Dem/GOPer.

PAF
06-22-2019, 09:40 PM
Ron suggested working with both parties. He believes there is little difference between the two. That does not necessarily mean endorsing or throwing money bombs. While she may have some ideals that align with some of ours, she is still an internal welfare supporter the same way the gop are external welfare supporters.

Her Freedom Index Score is 30% which is far, far, far below even tolerable.

RonZeplin
06-22-2019, 10:01 PM
:warning: Beware the dancing Saudi-Israel Wahhabi Republicans.

https://athenae25.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/addtext_com_mdkwmdqxmtcymq.jpg?w=580&h=287

:collision:

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 10:03 PM
:warning: Beware the dancing Saudi-Israel Wahhabi Republicans.

https://athenae25.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/addtext_com_mdkwmdqxmtcymq.jpg?w=580&h=287

:collision:
Tulsi is worse.

Pauls' Revere
06-22-2019, 10:05 PM
Those in the mid 70's or above may be a net positive for liberty.

30% is a monster.

Is there a list of 70% or higher?

loveshiscountry
06-22-2019, 10:07 PM
She has a pretty good anti-war/pro-civil-liberties record:

--voted to repeal the 2001 AUMF (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against aiding the Syrian rebels (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against US involvement in Yemen (same as Massie - Amash didn't vote)
--voted to restrict NSA spying (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted to end indefinite detention (same as Amash and Massie)
--voted against the last 2 NDAAs (same as Amash and Massie)

https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/22/defense

She also talks the talk.

In light of her economic policies, I certainly won't be supporting her, but I do hope she helps wake the long-sleeping anti-war left.
June 2014 she votes against the AUMF
H Amdt 912 - Prohibits Funds from Being Used Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 - Yea

Same day votes to keep us in Iraq?
H Amdt 908 - Prohibits United States Combat Operations in Iraq - Nay

Amash and Massie voted Yea on 908

Pauls' Revere
06-22-2019, 10:09 PM
Is there a list of 70% or higher?

Christ the entire Congress is f**ked.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution" rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are cumulative scores based on key votes from 1999 to June 2018. Click on a senator's or representative's name to get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.

Current Members of the 116th Congress

Alabama
Sen. Doug Jones - 20%
Sen. Richard Shelby - 64%
Dist.1: Bradley Byrne - 57%
Dist.2: Martha Roby - 55%
Dist.3: Mike Rogers - 55%
Dist.4: Robert Aderholt - 57%
Dist.5: Mo Brooks - 74%
Dist.6: Gary Palmer - 70%
Dist.7: Terri Sewell - 14%

Alaska
Sen. Dan Sullivan - 57%
Sen. Lisa Murkowski - 47%
Dist.: Don Young - 57%

Arizona
Dist.1: Tom O'Halleran - 18%
Dist.2: Ann Kirkpatrick - 22%
Dist.2: Martha McSally - 53%
Dist.3: Raul Grijalva - 31%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert - 77%
Dist.7: Ruben Gallego - 18%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko - 74%
Dist.9: Greg Stanton - N/A
Dist.9: Kyrsten Sinema - 20%

Arkansas
Sen. John Boozman - 56%
Sen. Tom Cotton - 62%
Dist.1: Eric Crawford - 58%
Dist.2: French Hill - 54%
Dist.3: Steve Womack - 54%
Dist.4: Bruce Westerman - 60%

California
Sen. Kamala Harris - 20%
Sen. Dianne Feinstein - 13%
Dist.1: Doug LaMalfa - 61%
Dist.2: Jared Huffman - 26%
Dist.3: John Garamendi - 17%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock - 86%
Dist.5: Mike Thompson - 20%
Dist.6: Doris Matsui - 21%
Dist.7: Ami Bera - 10%
Dist.8: Paul Cook - 55%
Dist.9: Jerry McNerney - 18%
Dist.10: Josh Harder - N/A
Dist.11: Mark DeSaulnier - 18%
Dist.12: Nancy Pelosi - 18%
Dist.13: Barbara Lee - 30%
Dist.14: Jackie Speier - 25%
Dist.15: Eric Swalwell - 22%
Dist.16: Jim Costa - 19%
Dist.17: Ro Khanna - 25%
Dist.18: Anna Eshoo - 21%
Dist.19: Zoe Lofgren - 25%
Dist.20: Jimmy Panetta - 18%
Dist.21: TJ Cox - N/A
Dist.22: Devin Nunes - 54%
Dist.23: Kevin McCarthy - 61%
Dist.24: Salud Carbajal - 14%
Dist.25: Katie Hill - N/A
Dist.26: Julia Brownley - 12%
Dist.27: Judy Chu - 25%
Dist.28: Adam Schiff - 19%
Dist.29: Tony Cardenas - 27%
Dist.30: Brad Sherman - 19%
Dist.31: Pete Aguilar - 12%
Dist.32: Grace Napolitano - 23%
Dist.33: Ted Lieu - 30%
Dist.34: Jimmy Gomez - 26%
Dist.35: Norma Torres - 14%
Dist.36: Raul Ruiz - 16%
Dist.37: Karen Bass - 25%
Dist.38: Linda Sanchez - 25%
Dist.39: Gilbert Cisneros - N/A
Dist.40: Lucille Roybal-Allard - 21%
Dist.41: Mark Takano - 28%
Dist.42: Ken Calvert - 52%
Dist.43: Maxine Waters - 27%
Dist.44: Nanette Barragán - 23%
Dist.45: Katie Porter - N/A
Dist.46: J. Correa - 25%
Dist.47: Alan Lowenthal - 23%
Dist.48: Harley Rouda - N/A
Dist.49: Mike Levin - N/A
Dist.50: Duncan Hunter - 68%
Dist.51: Juan Vargas - 22%
Dist.52: Scott Peters - 9%
Dist.53: Susan Davis - 17%

Colorado
Sen. Michael Bennet - 11%
Sen. Cory Gardner - 61%
Dist.1: Diana DeGette - 21%
Dist.2: Joe Neguse - N/A
Dist.3: Scott Tipton - 66%
Dist.4: Ken Buck - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn - 74%
Dist.6: Jason Crow - N/A
Dist.7: Ed Perlmutter - 17%

Connecticut
Sen. Richard Blumenthal - 14%
Sen. Christopher Murphy - 15%
Dist.1: John Larson - 22%
Dist.2: Joe Courtney - 19%
Dist.3: Rosa DeLauro - 21%
Dist.4: James Himes - 11%
Dist.5: Jahana Hayes - N/A

Delaware
Sen. Chris Coons - 11%
Sen. Thomas Carper - 14%
Dist.: Lisa Blunt Rochester - 10%

Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio - 68%
Dist.1: Matt Gaetz - 75%
Dist.2: Neal Dunn - 52%
Dist.3: Ted Yoho - 74%
Dist.4: John Rutherford - 50%
Dist.5: Al Lawson - 11%
Dist.6: Michael Waltz - N/A
Dist.7: Stephanie Murphy - 13%
Dist.8: Bill Posey - 82%
Dist.9: Darren Soto - 18%
Dist.10: Val Demings - 11%
Dist.11: Daniel Webster - 67%
Dist.12: Gus Bilirakis - 60%
Dist.13: Charlie Crist - 16%
Dist.14: Kathy Castor - 15%
Dist.15: Ross Spano - N/A
Dist.16: Vern Buchanan - 56%
Dist.17: W. Steube - N/A
Dist.18: Brian Mast - 48%
Dist.19: Francis Rooney - 58%
Dist.20: Alcee Hastings - 24%
Dist.21: Lois Frankel - 18%
Dist.22: Theodore Deutch - 17%
Dist.23: Debbie Wasserman Schultz - 14%
Dist.24: Frederica Wilson - 20%
Dist.25: Mario Diaz-Balart - 46%
Dist.26: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell - N/A
Dist.27: Donna Shalala - N/A

Georgia
Sen. David Perdue - 60%
Sen. John Isakson - 54%
Dist.1: Buddy Carter - 56%
Dist.2: Sanford Bishop - 30%
Dist.3: A. Ferguson - 56%
Dist.4: Henry Johnson - 20%
Dist.5: John Lewis - 26%
Dist.6: Lucy McBath - N/A
Dist.7: Rob Woodall - 65%
Dist.8: Austin Scott - 64%
Dist.9: Doug Collins - 61%
Dist.10: Jody Hice - 69%
Dist.11: Barry Loudermilk - 68%
Dist.12: Rick Allen - 58%
Dist.13: David Scott - 21%
Dist.14: Tom Graves - 69%

Hawaii
Sen. Brian Schatz - 12%
Sen. Mazie Hirono - 14%
Dist.1: Ed Case - 22%
Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard - 30%

Idaho
Sen. James Risch - 77%
Sen. Michael Crapo - 68%
Dist.1: Russ Fulcher - N/A
Dist.2: Michael Simpson - 54%

Illinois
Sen. Richard Durbin - 13%
Sen. Tammy Duckworth - 13%
Dist.1: Bobby Rush - 24%
Dist.2: Robin Kelly - 22%
Dist.3: Daniel Lipinski - 20%
Dist.4: Jesús GarcÃ*a - N/A
Dist.5: Mike Quigley - 14%
Dist.6: Sean Casten - N/A
Dist.7: Danny Davis - 25%
Dist.8: Raja Krishnamoorthi - 15%
Dist.9: Janice Schakowsky - 24%
Dist.10: Bradley Schneider - 13%
Dist.11: Bill Foster - 14%
Dist.12: Mike Bost - 52%
Dist.13: Rodney Davis - 55%
Dist.14: Lauren Underwood - N/A
Dist.15: John Shimkus - 53%
Dist.16: Adam Kinzinger - 53%
Dist.17: Cheri Bustos - 15%
Dist.18: Darin LaHood - 58%

Indiana
Sen. Todd Young - 56%
Dist.1: Peter Visclosky - 26%
Dist.2: Jackie Walorski - 53%
Dist.3: Jim Banks - 65%
Dist.4: James Baird - N/A
Dist.5: Susan Brooks - 50%
Dist.6: Greg Pence - N/A
Dist.7: André Carson - 17%
Dist.8: Larry Bucshon - 58%
Dist.9: Trey Hollingsworth - 62%

Iowa
Sen. Charles Grassley - 62%
Sen. Joni Ernst - 56%
Dist.1: Abby Finkenauer - N/A
Dist.2: David Loebsack - 20%
Dist.3: Cynthia Axne - N/A
Dist.4: Steve King - 65%

Kansas
Sen. Jerry Moran - 64%
Sen. Pat Roberts - 60%
Dist.1: Roger Marshall - 56%
Dist.2: Steven Watkins - N/A
Dist.3: Sharice Davids - N/A
Dist.4: Ron Estes - 49%

Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul - 94%
Sen. Mitch McConnell - 59%
Dist.1: James Comer - 58%
Dist.2: Brett Guthrie - 62%
Dist.3: John Yarmuth - 21%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie - 99%
Dist.5: Harold Rogers - 52%
Dist.6: Garland Barr - 55%

Louisiana
Sen. John Kennedy - 53%
Sen. Bill Cassidy - 63%
Dist.1: Steve Scalise - 68%
Dist.2: Cedric Richmond - 22%
Dist.3: Clay Higgins - 61%
Dist.4: Mike Johnson - 65%
Dist.5: Ralph Abraham - 60%
Dist.6: Garret Graves - 65%

Maine
Sen. Angus King - 15%
Sen. Susan Collins - 39%
Dist.1: Chellie Pingree - 27%
Dist.2: Jared Golden - N/A

Maryland
Sen. Chris Van Hollen - 20%
Sen. Benjamin Cardin - 17%
Dist.1: Andy Harris - 76%
Dist.2: C. Ruppersberger - 15%
Dist.3: John Sarbanes - 19%
Dist.4: Anthony Brown - 9%
Dist.5: Steny Hoyer - 16%
Dist.6: David Trone - N/A
Dist.7: Elijah Cummings - 22%
Dist.8: Jamie Raskin - 15%

Massachusetts
Sen. Edward Markey - 23%
Sen. Elizabeth Warren - 16%
Dist.1: Richard Neal - 20%
Dist.2: James McGovern - 26%
Dist.3: Lori Trahan - N/A
Dist.4: Joseph Kennedy - 22%
Dist.5: Katherine Clark - 27%
Dist.6: Seth Moulton - 13%
Dist.7: Ayanna Pressley - N/A
Dist.8: Stephen Lynch - 24%
Dist.9: William Keating - 21%

Michigan
Sen. Gary Peters - 16%
Sen. Debbie Stabenow - 17%
Dist.1: Jack Bergman - 54%
Dist.2: Bill Huizenga - 64%
Dist.3: Justin Amash - 94%
Dist.4: John Moolenaar - 53%
Dist.5: Daniel Kildee - 21%
Dist.6: Fred Upton - 48%
Dist.7: Tim Walberg - 62%
Dist.8: Elissa Slotkin - N/A
Dist.9: Andy Levin - N/A
Dist.10: Paul Mitchell - 53%
Dist.11: Haley Stevens - N/A
Dist.12: Debbie Dingell - 14%
Dist.13: Rashida Tlaib - N/A
Dist.14: Brenda Lawrence - 18%

Minnesota
Sen. Tina Smith - 25%
Sen. Amy Klobuchar - 10%
Dist.1: Jim Hagedorn - N/A
Dist.2: Angie Craig - N/A
Dist.3: Dean Phillips - N/A
Dist.4: Betty McCollum - 21%
Dist.5: Ilhan Omar - N/A
Dist.6: Tom Emmer - 65%
Dist.7: Collin Peterson - 47%
Dist.8: Pete Stauber - N/A

Mississippi
Sen. Roger Wicker - 53%
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith - 34%
Dist.1: Trent Kelly - 62%
Dist.2: Bennie Thompson - 26%
Dist.3: Michael Guest - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Palazzo - 60%

Missouri
Sen. Roy Blunt - 55%
Dist.1: Wm. Clay - 23%
Dist.2: Ann Wagner - 57%
Dist.3: Blaine Luetkemeyer - 62%
Dist.4: Vicky Hartzler - 56%
Dist.5: Emanuel Cleaver - 22%
Dist.6: Sam Graves - 56%
Dist.7: Billy Long - 60%
Dist.8: Jason Smith - 66%

Montana
Sen. Steve Daines - 65%
Sen. Jon Tester - 23%
Dist.: Greg Gianforte - 59%

Nebraska
Sen. Benjamin Sasse - 69%
Sen. Deb Fischer - 62%
Dist.1: Jeff Fortenberry - 56%
Dist.2: Don Bacon - 53%
Dist.3: Adrian Smith - 66%

Nevada
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto - 8%
Dist.1: Dina Titus - 18%
Dist.2: Mark Amodei - 57%
Dist.3: Jacky Rosen - 13%
Dist.3: Susie Lee - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Horsford - 20%

New Hampshire
Sen. Margaret Hassan - 13%
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen - 8%
Dist.1: Chris Pappas - N/A
Dist.2: Ann Kuster - 19%

New Jersey
Sen. Robert Menendez - 18%
Sen. Cory Booker - 16%
Dist.1: Donald Norcross - 14%
Dist.2: Jefferson Van Drew - N/A
Dist.3: Andy Kim - N/A
Dist.4: Christopher Smith - 45%
Dist.5: Josh Gottheimer - 16%
Dist.6: Frank Pallone - 25%
Dist.7: Tom Malinowski - N/A
Dist.8: Albio Sires - 15%
Dist.9: Bill Pascrell - 23%
Dist.10: Donald Payne - 20%
Dist.11: Mikie Sherrill - N/A
Dist.12: Bonnie Watson Coleman - 25%

New Mexico
Sen. Martin Heinrich - 13%
Sen. Tom Udall - 20%
Dist.1: Debra Haaland - N/A
Dist.2: Xochitl Torres Small - N/A
Dist.3: Ben Lujan - 18%

New York
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand - 15%
Sen. Charles Schumer - 14%
Dist.1: Lee Zeldin - 59%
Dist.2: Peter King - 45%
Dist.3: Thomas Suozzi - 18%
Dist.4: Kathleen Rice - 10%
Dist.5: Gregory Meeks - 20%
Dist.6: Grace Meng - 22%
Dist.7: Nydia Velázquez - 26%
Dist.8: Hakeem Jeffries - 23%
Dist.9: Yvette Clarke - 26%
Dist.10: Jerrold Nadler - 24%
Dist.11: Max Rose - N/A
Dist.12: Carolyn Maloney - 22%
Dist.13: Adriano Espaillat - 18%
Dist.14: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - N/A
Dist.15: José Serrano - 24%
Dist.16: Eliot Engel - 19%
Dist.17: Nita Lowey - 15%
Dist.18: Sean Maloney - 18%
Dist.19: Antonio Delgado - N/A
Dist.20: Paul Tonko - 23%
Dist.21: Elise Stefanik - 42%
Dist.22: Anthony Brindisi - N/A
Dist.23: Tom Reed - 57%
Dist.24: John Katko - 50%
Dist.25: Joseph Morelle - N/A
Dist.26: Brian Higgins - 17%
Dist.27: Chris Collins - 53%

North Carolina
Sen. Richard Burr - 57%
Sen. Thom Tillis - 50%
Dist.1: George Butterfield - 17%
Dist.2: George Holding - 64%
Dist.3: Walter Jones - 81%
Dist.4: David Price - 19%
Dist.5: Virginia Foxx - 68%
Dist.6: Bradley Walker - 65%
Dist.7: David Rouzer - 59%
Dist.8: Richard Hudson - 61%
Dist.10: Patrick McHenry - 67%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows - 72%
Dist.12: Alma Adams - 13%
Dist.13: Ted Budd - 73%

North Dakota
Sen. John Hoeven - 52%
Dist.: Kevin Cramer - 53%
Dist.: Kelly Armstrong - N/A

Ohio
Sen. Robert Portman - 50%
Sen. Sherrod Brown - 22%
Dist.1: Steve Chabot - 64%
Dist.2: Brad Wenstrup - 61%
Dist.3: Joyce Beatty - 18%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.5: Robert Latta - 67%
Dist.6: Bill Johnson - 57%
Dist.7: Bob Gibbs - 60%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson - 70%
Dist.9: Marcy Kaptur - 29%
Dist.10: Michael Turner - 49%
Dist.11: Marcia Fudge - 21%
Dist.12: Troy Balderson - 40%
Dist.13: Tim Ryan - 25%
Dist.14: David Joyce - 53%
Dist.15: Steve Stivers - 53%
Dist.16: Anthony Gonzalez - N/A

Oklahoma
Sen. James Lankford - 66%
Sen. James Inhofe - 70%
Dist.1: Kevin Hern - N/A
Dist.2: Markwayne Mullin - 63%
Dist.3: Frank Lucas - 58%
Dist.4: Tom Cole - 53%
Dist.5: Kendra Horn - N/A

Oregon
Sen. Ron Wyden - 18%
Sen. Jeff Merkley - 17%
Dist.1: Suzanne Bonamici - 20%
Dist.2: Greg Walden - 49%
Dist.3: Earl Blumenauer - 23%
Dist.4: Peter DeFazio - 31%
Dist.5: Kurt Schrader - 23%

Pennsylvania
Sen. Patrick Toomey - 67%
Sen. Robert Casey - 11%
Dist.1: Brian Fitzpatrick - 30%
Dist.2: Brendan Boyle - 18%
Dist.3: Dwight Evans - 12%
Dist.4: Madeleine Dean - N/A
Dist.5: Mary Scanlon - N/A
Dist.6: Chrissy Houlahan - N/A
Dist.7: Susan Wild - N/A
Dist.8: Matthew Cartwright - 24%
Dist.9: Daniel Meuser - N/A
Dist.10: Scott Perry - 74%
Dist.11: Lloyd Smucker - 60%
Dist.13: John Joyce - N/A
Dist.14: Guy Reschenthaler - N/A
Dist.15: Glenn Thompson - 61%
Dist.16: Mike Kelly - 56%
Dist.17: Conor Lamb - 27%
Dist.18: Michael Doyle - 29%

Rhode Island
Sen. John Reed - 14%
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse - 12%
Dist.1: David Cicilline - 25%
Dist.2: James Langevin - 19%

South Carolina
Sen. Tim Scott - 69%
Sen. Lindsey Graham - 60%
Dist.1: Joe Cunningham - N/A
Dist.2: Joe Wilson - 59%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan - 80%
Dist.4: William Timmons - N/A
Dist.5: Ralph Norman - 69%
Dist.6: James Clyburn - 21%
Dist.7: Tom Rice - 61%

South Dakota
Sen. Mike Rounds - 47%
Sen. John Thune - 58%
Dist.: Dusty Johnson - N/A

Tennessee
Sen. Lamar Alexander - 51%
Dist.1: David Roe - 68%
Dist.2: Tim Burchett - N/A
Dist.3: Charles Fleischmann - 61%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais - 75%
Dist.5: Jim Cooper - 21%
Dist.6: John Rose - N/A
Dist.7: Marsha Blackburn - 64%
Dist.7: Mark Green - N/A
Dist.8: David Kustoff - 53%
Dist.9: Steve Cohen - 22%

Texas
Sen. John Cornyn - 65%
Sen. Ted Cruz - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert - 78%
Dist.2: Dan Crenshaw - N/A
Dist.3: Van Taylor - N/A
Dist.4: John Ratcliffe - 68%
Dist.5: Lance Gooden - N/A
Dist.6: Ron Wright - N/A
Dist.7: Lizzie Fletcher - N/A
Dist.8: Kevin Brady - 56%
Dist.9: Al Green - 23%
Dist.10: Michael McCaul - 59%
Dist.11: K. Conaway - 60%
Dist.12: Kay Granger - 52%
Dist.13: Mac Thornberry - 54%
Dist.14: Randy Weber - 69%
Dist.15: Vicente Gonzalez - 33%
Dist.16: Veronica Escobar - N/A
Dist.17: Bill Flores - 62%
Dist.18: Sheila Jackson-Lee - 24%
Dist.19: Jodey Arrington - 58%
Dist.20: Joaquin Castro - 23%
Dist.21: Chip Roy - N/A
Dist.22: Pete Olson - 67%
Dist.23: Will Hurd - 54%
Dist.24: Kenny Marchant - 66%
Dist.25: Roger Williams - 67%
Dist.26: Michael Burgess - 69%
Dist.27: Michael Cloud - 67%
Dist.28: Henry Cuellar - 25%
Dist.29: Sylvia Garcia - N/A
Dist.30: Eddie Johnson - 19%
Dist.31: John Carter - 56%
Dist.32: Colin Allred - N/A
Dist.33: Marc Veasey - 23%
Dist.34: Filemon Vela - 25%
Dist.35: Lloyd Doggett - 25%
Dist.36: Brian Babin - 63%

Utah
Sen. Mike Lee - 92%
Dist.1: Rob Bishop - 66%
Dist.2: Chris Stewart - 60%
Dist.3: John Curtis - 58%
Dist.4: Ben McAdams - N/A

Vermont
Sen. Patrick Leahy - 16%
Sen. Bernard Sanders - 28%
Dist.: Peter Welch - 26%

Virginia
Sen. Mark Warner - 11%
Sen. Timothy Kaine - 8%
Dist.1: Robert Wittman - 64%
Dist.2: Elaine Luria - N/A
Dist.3: Robert Scott - 23%
Dist.4: A. McEachin - 8%
Dist.5: Denver Riggleman - N/A
Dist.6: Ben Cline - N/A
Dist.7: Abigail Spanberger - N/A
Dist.8: Donald Beyer - 15%
Dist.9: H. Griffith - 76%
Dist.10: Jennifer Wexton - N/A
Dist.11: Gerald Connolly - 16%

Washington
Sen. Maria Cantwell - 14%
Sen. Patty Murray - 12%
Dist.1: Suzan DelBene - 20%
Dist.2: Rick Larsen - 18%
Dist.3: Jaime Herrera Beutler - 64%
Dist.4: Dan Newhouse - 56%
Dist.5: Cathy McMorris Rodgers - 61%
Dist.6: Derek Kilmer - 18%
Dist.7: Pramila Jayapal - 21%
Dist.8: Kim Schrier - N/A
Dist.9: Adam Smith - 21%
Dist.10: Denny Heck - 15%

West Virginia
Sen. Shelley Capito - 48%
Sen. Joe Manchin - 31%
Dist.1: David McKinley - 60%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney - 73%
Dist.3: Carol Miller - N/A

Wisconsin
Sen. Ron Johnson - 69%
Sen. Tammy Baldwin - 25%
Dist.1: Bryan Steil - N/A
Dist.2: Mark Pocan - 32%
Dist.3: Ron Kind - 23%
Dist.4: Gwen Moore - 25%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner - 77%
Dist.6: Glenn Grothman - 63%
Dist.7: Sean Duffy - 63%
Dist.8: Mike Gallagher - 58%

Wyoming
Sen. Michael Enzi - 69%
Sen. John Barrasso - 71%
Dist.: Liz Cheney - 62%

Swordsmyth
06-22-2019, 10:21 PM
Is there a list of 70% or higher?
Dist.5: Mo Brooks (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=B001274) - 74%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000565) - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=B001302) - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S001183) - 77%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=L000589) - 74%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=M001177) - 86%
Dist.4: Ken Buck (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=B001297) - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=L000564) - 74%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=M001187) - 72%
Dist.13: Ted Budd (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=B001305) - 73%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=J000289) - 81%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=J000289) - 81%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=D000626) - 70%
Dist.8: Bill Posey (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=P000599) - 82%
Sen. James Inhofe (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=I000024) - 70%
Dist.10: Scott Perry (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=P000605) - 74%
Sen. James Risch (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=R000584) - 77%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=D000615) - 80%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=D000616) - 75%
Sen. Ted Cruz (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=C001098) - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000552) - 78%
Sen. Rand Paul (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=P000603) - 94%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=M001184) - 99%
Sen. Mike Lee (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=L000577) - 92%
Dist.1: Andy Harris (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=H001052) - 76%
Dist.9: H. Griffith (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=G000568) - 76%
Dist.3: Justin Amash (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000367) - 94%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=M001195) - 73%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S000244) - 77%
Sen. John Barrasso (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=B001261) - 71%

There are quite a few without enough of a record yet right now but most of them probably won't work out.

Source: https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

r3volution 3.0
06-22-2019, 10:33 PM
June 2014 she votes against the AUMF
H Amdt 912 - Prohibits Funds from Being Used Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 - Yea

Same day votes to keep us in Iraq?
H Amdt 908 - Prohibits United States Combat Operations in Iraq - Nay

Amash and Massie voted Yea on 908

Yea, it's odd.

And, none of these votes were particularly close, so it's not like she was voting the right way only when it didn't matter, as some do.

For the closest one (restricting NSA spying, 12 vote margin), she voted the right way.

RonZeplin
06-22-2019, 11:10 PM
Tulsi is worse.

https://pics.me.me/thumb_yes-trump-needs-to-go-but-dont-forget-that-lindsey-46580385.png

parocks
06-23-2019, 12:59 AM
Every representative should vote 100% to the government’s Law of the Land. While I personally do not deviate when it comes to Bill of Rights, there are portions of the Constitution that I obviously and absolutely do not agree with. Therefore my magic number is 90% in this ridiculous climate. Anything below 90% is a net loss. 70’s and 80’s you are simply pleading for bigger government than it already is. So, as I stated above, NO.

Sound complex? It isn’t really ;-)

It would be great if enough people didn't vote, that would mean that we didn't have a government any more. It would be great if your choices were bad 70s, worse 30s, and no vote = no government. But I haven't heard about any places that work with the no vote = no government system. It's pretty clear that no vote does not = no government, and it's pretty clear that it's either the bad 70s or worse 30s that's going to win.

Anti Federalist
06-23-2019, 01:14 AM
New Hampshire
Sen. Margaret Hassan - 13%
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen - 8%
Dist.1: Chris Pappas - N/A
Dist.2: Ann Kuster - 19%

God that's depressing...literally the worst in the nation.

Three communist broads, and a militant fagggot, communist.

PAF
06-23-2019, 05:22 AM
God that's depressing...literally the worst in the nation.

Three communist broads, and a militant fagggot, communist.

Feel the Bern!

What do you like about Sanders?

He cares about people and we need him.

What floor votes of his do you support or not support?

Well, he’s a democrat and so am I!

Ok, I understand that. What about S.Amdt. 1 to S.Con.Res. 3, did you support his vote on that?

I don’t know what you’re talking about.

It was a vote to balance the budget on the senate floor. Did you support that vote?

Oh def yes!

You know he voted against that?

No he didn’t!

Well it’s on the record.

You’re crazy, that’s why I hate talking politics with idiots like you!

shakey1
06-23-2019, 07:04 AM
Christ the entire Congress is f**ked.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution" rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are cumulative scores based on key votes from 1999 to June 2018. Click on a senator's or representative's name to get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.

Current Members of the 116th Congress

Alabama
Sen. Doug Jones - 20%
Sen. Richard Shelby - 64%
Dist.1: Bradley Byrne - 57%
Dist.2: Martha Roby - 55%
Dist.3: Mike Rogers - 55%
Dist.4: Robert Aderholt - 57%
Dist.5: Mo Brooks - 74%
Dist.6: Gary Palmer - 70%
Dist.7: Terri Sewell - 14%

Alaska
Sen. Dan Sullivan - 57%
Sen. Lisa Murkowski - 47%
Dist.: Don Young - 57%

Arizona
Dist.1: Tom O'Halleran - 18%
Dist.2: Ann Kirkpatrick - 22%
Dist.2: Martha McSally - 53%
Dist.3: Raul Grijalva - 31%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert - 77%
Dist.7: Ruben Gallego - 18%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko - 74%
Dist.9: Greg Stanton - N/A
Dist.9: Kyrsten Sinema - 20%

Arkansas
Sen. John Boozman - 56%
Sen. Tom Cotton - 62%
Dist.1: Eric Crawford - 58%
Dist.2: French Hill - 54%
Dist.3: Steve Womack - 54%
Dist.4: Bruce Westerman - 60%

California
Sen. Kamala Harris - 20%
Sen. Dianne Feinstein - 13%
Dist.1: Doug LaMalfa - 61%
Dist.2: Jared Huffman - 26%
Dist.3: John Garamendi - 17%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock - 86%
Dist.5: Mike Thompson - 20%
Dist.6: Doris Matsui - 21%
Dist.7: Ami Bera - 10%
Dist.8: Paul Cook - 55%
Dist.9: Jerry McNerney - 18%
Dist.10: Josh Harder - N/A
Dist.11: Mark DeSaulnier - 18%
Dist.12: Nancy Pelosi - 18%
Dist.13: Barbara Lee - 30%
Dist.14: Jackie Speier - 25%
Dist.15: Eric Swalwell - 22%
Dist.16: Jim Costa - 19%
Dist.17: Ro Khanna - 25%
Dist.18: Anna Eshoo - 21%
Dist.19: Zoe Lofgren - 25%
Dist.20: Jimmy Panetta - 18%
Dist.21: TJ Cox - N/A
Dist.22: Devin Nunes - 54%
Dist.23: Kevin McCarthy - 61%
Dist.24: Salud Carbajal - 14%
Dist.25: Katie Hill - N/A
Dist.26: Julia Brownley - 12%
Dist.27: Judy Chu - 25%
Dist.28: Adam Schiff - 19%
Dist.29: Tony Cardenas - 27%
Dist.30: Brad Sherman - 19%
Dist.31: Pete Aguilar - 12%
Dist.32: Grace Napolitano - 23%
Dist.33: Ted Lieu - 30%
Dist.34: Jimmy Gomez - 26%
Dist.35: Norma Torres - 14%
Dist.36: Raul Ruiz - 16%
Dist.37: Karen Bass - 25%
Dist.38: Linda Sanchez - 25%
Dist.39: Gilbert Cisneros - N/A
Dist.40: Lucille Roybal-Allard - 21%
Dist.41: Mark Takano - 28%
Dist.42: Ken Calvert - 52%
Dist.43: Maxine Waters - 27%
Dist.44: Nanette Barragán - 23%
Dist.45: Katie Porter - N/A
Dist.46: J. Correa - 25%
Dist.47: Alan Lowenthal - 23%
Dist.48: Harley Rouda - N/A
Dist.49: Mike Levin - N/A
Dist.50: Duncan Hunter - 68%
Dist.51: Juan Vargas - 22%
Dist.52: Scott Peters - 9%
Dist.53: Susan Davis - 17%

Colorado
Sen. Michael Bennet - 11%
Sen. Cory Gardner - 61%
Dist.1: Diana DeGette - 21%
Dist.2: Joe Neguse - N/A
Dist.3: Scott Tipton - 66%
Dist.4: Ken Buck - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn - 74%
Dist.6: Jason Crow - N/A
Dist.7: Ed Perlmutter - 17%

Connecticut
Sen. Richard Blumenthal - 14%
Sen. Christopher Murphy - 15%
Dist.1: John Larson - 22%
Dist.2: Joe Courtney - 19%
Dist.3: Rosa DeLauro - 21%
Dist.4: James Himes - 11%
Dist.5: Jahana Hayes - N/A

Delaware
Sen. Chris Coons - 11%
Sen. Thomas Carper - 14%
Dist.: Lisa Blunt Rochester - 10%

Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio - 68%
Dist.1: Matt Gaetz - 75%
Dist.2: Neal Dunn - 52%
Dist.3: Ted Yoho - 74%
Dist.4: John Rutherford - 50%
Dist.5: Al Lawson - 11%
Dist.6: Michael Waltz - N/A
Dist.7: Stephanie Murphy - 13%
Dist.8: Bill Posey - 82%
Dist.9: Darren Soto - 18%
Dist.10: Val Demings - 11%
Dist.11: Daniel Webster - 67%
Dist.12: Gus Bilirakis - 60%
Dist.13: Charlie Crist - 16%
Dist.14: Kathy Castor - 15%
Dist.15: Ross Spano - N/A
Dist.16: Vern Buchanan - 56%
Dist.17: W. Steube - N/A
Dist.18: Brian Mast - 48%
Dist.19: Francis Rooney - 58%
Dist.20: Alcee Hastings - 24%
Dist.21: Lois Frankel - 18%
Dist.22: Theodore Deutch - 17%
Dist.23: Debbie Wasserman Schultz - 14%
Dist.24: Frederica Wilson - 20%
Dist.25: Mario Diaz-Balart - 46%
Dist.26: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell - N/A
Dist.27: Donna Shalala - N/A

Georgia
Sen. David Perdue - 60%
Sen. John Isakson - 54%
Dist.1: Buddy Carter - 56%
Dist.2: Sanford Bishop - 30%
Dist.3: A. Ferguson - 56%
Dist.4: Henry Johnson - 20%
Dist.5: John Lewis - 26%
Dist.6: Lucy McBath - N/A
Dist.7: Rob Woodall - 65%
Dist.8: Austin Scott - 64%
Dist.9: Doug Collins - 61%
Dist.10: Jody Hice - 69%
Dist.11: Barry Loudermilk - 68%
Dist.12: Rick Allen - 58%
Dist.13: David Scott - 21%
Dist.14: Tom Graves - 69%

Hawaii
Sen. Brian Schatz - 12%
Sen. Mazie Hirono - 14%
Dist.1: Ed Case - 22%
Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard - 30%

Idaho
Sen. James Risch - 77%
Sen. Michael Crapo - 68%
Dist.1: Russ Fulcher - N/A
Dist.2: Michael Simpson - 54%

Illinois
Sen. Richard Durbin - 13%
Sen. Tammy Duckworth - 13%
Dist.1: Bobby Rush - 24%
Dist.2: Robin Kelly - 22%
Dist.3: Daniel Lipinski - 20%
Dist.4: Jesús GarcÃ*a - N/A
Dist.5: Mike Quigley - 14%
Dist.6: Sean Casten - N/A
Dist.7: Danny Davis - 25%
Dist.8: Raja Krishnamoorthi - 15%
Dist.9: Janice Schakowsky - 24%
Dist.10: Bradley Schneider - 13%
Dist.11: Bill Foster - 14%
Dist.12: Mike Bost - 52%
Dist.13: Rodney Davis - 55%
Dist.14: Lauren Underwood - N/A
Dist.15: John Shimkus - 53%
Dist.16: Adam Kinzinger - 53%
Dist.17: Cheri Bustos - 15%
Dist.18: Darin LaHood - 58%

Indiana
Sen. Todd Young - 56%
Dist.1: Peter Visclosky - 26%
Dist.2: Jackie Walorski - 53%
Dist.3: Jim Banks - 65%
Dist.4: James Baird - N/A
Dist.5: Susan Brooks - 50%
Dist.6: Greg Pence - N/A
Dist.7: André Carson - 17%
Dist.8: Larry Bucshon - 58%
Dist.9: Trey Hollingsworth - 62%

Iowa
Sen. Charles Grassley - 62%
Sen. Joni Ernst - 56%
Dist.1: Abby Finkenauer - N/A
Dist.2: David Loebsack - 20%
Dist.3: Cynthia Axne - N/A
Dist.4: Steve King - 65%

Kansas
Sen. Jerry Moran - 64%
Sen. Pat Roberts - 60%
Dist.1: Roger Marshall - 56%
Dist.2: Steven Watkins - N/A
Dist.3: Sharice Davids - N/A
Dist.4: Ron Estes - 49%

Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul - 94%
Sen. Mitch McConnell - 59%
Dist.1: James Comer - 58%
Dist.2: Brett Guthrie - 62%
Dist.3: John Yarmuth - 21%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie - 99%
Dist.5: Harold Rogers - 52%
Dist.6: Garland Barr - 55%

Louisiana
Sen. John Kennedy - 53%
Sen. Bill Cassidy - 63%
Dist.1: Steve Scalise - 68%
Dist.2: Cedric Richmond - 22%
Dist.3: Clay Higgins - 61%
Dist.4: Mike Johnson - 65%
Dist.5: Ralph Abraham - 60%
Dist.6: Garret Graves - 65%

Maine
Sen. Angus King - 15%
Sen. Susan Collins - 39%
Dist.1: Chellie Pingree - 27%
Dist.2: Jared Golden - N/A

Maryland
Sen. Chris Van Hollen - 20%
Sen. Benjamin Cardin - 17%
Dist.1: Andy Harris - 76%
Dist.2: C. Ruppersberger - 15%
Dist.3: John Sarbanes - 19%
Dist.4: Anthony Brown - 9%
Dist.5: Steny Hoyer - 16%
Dist.6: David Trone - N/A
Dist.7: Elijah Cummings - 22%
Dist.8: Jamie Raskin - 15%

Massachusetts
Sen. Edward Markey - 23%
Sen. Elizabeth Warren - 16%
Dist.1: Richard Neal - 20%
Dist.2: James McGovern - 26%
Dist.3: Lori Trahan - N/A
Dist.4: Joseph Kennedy - 22%
Dist.5: Katherine Clark - 27%
Dist.6: Seth Moulton - 13%
Dist.7: Ayanna Pressley - N/A
Dist.8: Stephen Lynch - 24%
Dist.9: William Keating - 21%

Michigan
Sen. Gary Peters - 16%
Sen. Debbie Stabenow - 17%
Dist.1: Jack Bergman - 54%
Dist.2: Bill Huizenga - 64%
Dist.3: Justin Amash - 94%
Dist.4: John Moolenaar - 53%
Dist.5: Daniel Kildee - 21%
Dist.6: Fred Upton - 48%
Dist.7: Tim Walberg - 62%
Dist.8: Elissa Slotkin - N/A
Dist.9: Andy Levin - N/A
Dist.10: Paul Mitchell - 53%
Dist.11: Haley Stevens - N/A
Dist.12: Debbie Dingell - 14%
Dist.13: Rashida Tlaib - N/A
Dist.14: Brenda Lawrence - 18%

Minnesota
Sen. Tina Smith - 25%
Sen. Amy Klobuchar - 10%
Dist.1: Jim Hagedorn - N/A
Dist.2: Angie Craig - N/A
Dist.3: Dean Phillips - N/A
Dist.4: Betty McCollum - 21%
Dist.5: Ilhan Omar - N/A
Dist.6: Tom Emmer - 65%
Dist.7: Collin Peterson - 47%
Dist.8: Pete Stauber - N/A

Mississippi
Sen. Roger Wicker - 53%
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith - 34%
Dist.1: Trent Kelly - 62%
Dist.2: Bennie Thompson - 26%
Dist.3: Michael Guest - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Palazzo - 60%

Missouri
Sen. Roy Blunt - 55%
Dist.1: Wm. Clay - 23%
Dist.2: Ann Wagner - 57%
Dist.3: Blaine Luetkemeyer - 62%
Dist.4: Vicky Hartzler - 56%
Dist.5: Emanuel Cleaver - 22%
Dist.6: Sam Graves - 56%
Dist.7: Billy Long - 60%
Dist.8: Jason Smith - 66%

Montana
Sen. Steve Daines - 65%
Sen. Jon Tester - 23%
Dist.: Greg Gianforte - 59%

Nebraska
Sen. Benjamin Sasse - 69%
Sen. Deb Fischer - 62%
Dist.1: Jeff Fortenberry - 56%
Dist.2: Don Bacon - 53%
Dist.3: Adrian Smith - 66%

Nevada
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto - 8%
Dist.1: Dina Titus - 18%
Dist.2: Mark Amodei - 57%
Dist.3: Jacky Rosen - 13%
Dist.3: Susie Lee - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Horsford - 20%

New Hampshire
Sen. Margaret Hassan - 13%
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen - 8%
Dist.1: Chris Pappas - N/A
Dist.2: Ann Kuster - 19%

New Jersey
Sen. Robert Menendez - 18%
Sen. Cory Booker - 16%
Dist.1: Donald Norcross - 14%
Dist.2: Jefferson Van Drew - N/A
Dist.3: Andy Kim - N/A
Dist.4: Christopher Smith - 45%
Dist.5: Josh Gottheimer - 16%
Dist.6: Frank Pallone - 25%
Dist.7: Tom Malinowski - N/A
Dist.8: Albio Sires - 15%
Dist.9: Bill Pascrell - 23%
Dist.10: Donald Payne - 20%
Dist.11: Mikie Sherrill - N/A
Dist.12: Bonnie Watson Coleman - 25%

New Mexico
Sen. Martin Heinrich - 13%
Sen. Tom Udall - 20%
Dist.1: Debra Haaland - N/A
Dist.2: Xochitl Torres Small - N/A
Dist.3: Ben Lujan - 18%

New York
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand - 15%
Sen. Charles Schumer - 14%
Dist.1: Lee Zeldin - 59%
Dist.2: Peter King - 45%
Dist.3: Thomas Suozzi - 18%
Dist.4: Kathleen Rice - 10%
Dist.5: Gregory Meeks - 20%
Dist.6: Grace Meng - 22%
Dist.7: Nydia Velázquez - 26%
Dist.8: Hakeem Jeffries - 23%
Dist.9: Yvette Clarke - 26%
Dist.10: Jerrold Nadler - 24%
Dist.11: Max Rose - N/A
Dist.12: Carolyn Maloney - 22%
Dist.13: Adriano Espaillat - 18%
Dist.14: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - N/A
Dist.15: José Serrano - 24%
Dist.16: Eliot Engel - 19%
Dist.17: Nita Lowey - 15%
Dist.18: Sean Maloney - 18%
Dist.19: Antonio Delgado - N/A
Dist.20: Paul Tonko - 23%
Dist.21: Elise Stefanik - 42%
Dist.22: Anthony Brindisi - N/A
Dist.23: Tom Reed - 57%
Dist.24: John Katko - 50%
Dist.25: Joseph Morelle - N/A
Dist.26: Brian Higgins - 17%
Dist.27: Chris Collins - 53%

North Carolina
Sen. Richard Burr - 57%
Sen. Thom Tillis - 50%
Dist.1: George Butterfield - 17%
Dist.2: George Holding - 64%
Dist.3: Walter Jones - 81%
Dist.4: David Price - 19%
Dist.5: Virginia Foxx - 68%
Dist.6: Bradley Walker - 65%
Dist.7: David Rouzer - 59%
Dist.8: Richard Hudson - 61%
Dist.10: Patrick McHenry - 67%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows - 72%
Dist.12: Alma Adams - 13%
Dist.13: Ted Budd - 73%

North Dakota
Sen. John Hoeven - 52%
Dist.: Kevin Cramer - 53%
Dist.: Kelly Armstrong - N/A

Ohio
Sen. Robert Portman - 50%
Sen. Sherrod Brown - 22%
Dist.1: Steve Chabot - 64%
Dist.2: Brad Wenstrup - 61%
Dist.3: Joyce Beatty - 18%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.5: Robert Latta - 67%
Dist.6: Bill Johnson - 57%
Dist.7: Bob Gibbs - 60%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson - 70%
Dist.9: Marcy Kaptur - 29%
Dist.10: Michael Turner - 49%
Dist.11: Marcia Fudge - 21%
Dist.12: Troy Balderson - 40%
Dist.13: Tim Ryan - 25%
Dist.14: David Joyce - 53%
Dist.15: Steve Stivers - 53%
Dist.16: Anthony Gonzalez - N/A

Oklahoma
Sen. James Lankford - 66%
Sen. James Inhofe - 70%
Dist.1: Kevin Hern - N/A
Dist.2: Markwayne Mullin - 63%
Dist.3: Frank Lucas - 58%
Dist.4: Tom Cole - 53%
Dist.5: Kendra Horn - N/A

Oregon
Sen. Ron Wyden - 18%
Sen. Jeff Merkley - 17%
Dist.1: Suzanne Bonamici - 20%
Dist.2: Greg Walden - 49%
Dist.3: Earl Blumenauer - 23%
Dist.4: Peter DeFazio - 31%
Dist.5: Kurt Schrader - 23%

Pennsylvania
Sen. Patrick Toomey - 67%
Sen. Robert Casey - 11%
Dist.1: Brian Fitzpatrick - 30%
Dist.2: Brendan Boyle - 18%
Dist.3: Dwight Evans - 12%
Dist.4: Madeleine Dean - N/A
Dist.5: Mary Scanlon - N/A
Dist.6: Chrissy Houlahan - N/A
Dist.7: Susan Wild - N/A
Dist.8: Matthew Cartwright - 24%
Dist.9: Daniel Meuser - N/A
Dist.10: Scott Perry - 74%
Dist.11: Lloyd Smucker - 60%
Dist.13: John Joyce - N/A
Dist.14: Guy Reschenthaler - N/A
Dist.15: Glenn Thompson - 61%
Dist.16: Mike Kelly - 56%
Dist.17: Conor Lamb - 27%
Dist.18: Michael Doyle - 29%

Rhode Island
Sen. John Reed - 14%
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse - 12%
Dist.1: David Cicilline - 25%
Dist.2: James Langevin - 19%

South Carolina
Sen. Tim Scott - 69%
Sen. Lindsey Graham - 60%
Dist.1: Joe Cunningham - N/A
Dist.2: Joe Wilson - 59%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan - 80%
Dist.4: William Timmons - N/A
Dist.5: Ralph Norman - 69%
Dist.6: James Clyburn - 21%
Dist.7: Tom Rice - 61%

South Dakota
Sen. Mike Rounds - 47%
Sen. John Thune - 58%
Dist.: Dusty Johnson - N/A

Tennessee
Sen. Lamar Alexander - 51%
Dist.1: David Roe - 68%
Dist.2: Tim Burchett - N/A
Dist.3: Charles Fleischmann - 61%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais - 75%
Dist.5: Jim Cooper - 21%
Dist.6: John Rose - N/A
Dist.7: Marsha Blackburn - 64%
Dist.7: Mark Green - N/A
Dist.8: David Kustoff - 53%
Dist.9: Steve Cohen - 22%

Texas
Sen. John Cornyn - 65%
Sen. Ted Cruz - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert - 78%
Dist.2: Dan Crenshaw - N/A
Dist.3: Van Taylor - N/A
Dist.4: John Ratcliffe - 68%
Dist.5: Lance Gooden - N/A
Dist.6: Ron Wright - N/A
Dist.7: Lizzie Fletcher - N/A
Dist.8: Kevin Brady - 56%
Dist.9: Al Green - 23%
Dist.10: Michael McCaul - 59%
Dist.11: K. Conaway - 60%
Dist.12: Kay Granger - 52%
Dist.13: Mac Thornberry - 54%
Dist.14: Randy Weber - 69%
Dist.15: Vicente Gonzalez - 33%
Dist.16: Veronica Escobar - N/A
Dist.17: Bill Flores - 62%
Dist.18: Sheila Jackson-Lee - 24%
Dist.19: Jodey Arrington - 58%
Dist.20: Joaquin Castro - 23%
Dist.21: Chip Roy - N/A
Dist.22: Pete Olson - 67%
Dist.23: Will Hurd - 54%
Dist.24: Kenny Marchant - 66%
Dist.25: Roger Williams - 67%
Dist.26: Michael Burgess - 69%
Dist.27: Michael Cloud - 67%
Dist.28: Henry Cuellar - 25%
Dist.29: Sylvia Garcia - N/A
Dist.30: Eddie Johnson - 19%
Dist.31: John Carter - 56%
Dist.32: Colin Allred - N/A
Dist.33: Marc Veasey - 23%
Dist.34: Filemon Vela - 25%
Dist.35: Lloyd Doggett - 25%
Dist.36: Brian Babin - 63%

Utah
Sen. Mike Lee - 92%
Dist.1: Rob Bishop - 66%
Dist.2: Chris Stewart - 60%
Dist.3: John Curtis - 58%
Dist.4: Ben McAdams - N/A

Vermont
Sen. Patrick Leahy - 16%
Sen. Bernard Sanders - 28%
Dist.: Peter Welch - 26%

Virginia
Sen. Mark Warner - 11%
Sen. Timothy Kaine - 8%
Dist.1: Robert Wittman - 64%
Dist.2: Elaine Luria - N/A
Dist.3: Robert Scott - 23%
Dist.4: A. McEachin - 8%
Dist.5: Denver Riggleman - N/A
Dist.6: Ben Cline - N/A
Dist.7: Abigail Spanberger - N/A
Dist.8: Donald Beyer - 15%
Dist.9: H. Griffith - 76%
Dist.10: Jennifer Wexton - N/A
Dist.11: Gerald Connolly - 16%

Washington
Sen. Maria Cantwell - 14%
Sen. Patty Murray - 12%
Dist.1: Suzan DelBene - 20%
Dist.2: Rick Larsen - 18%
Dist.3: Jaime Herrera Beutler - 64%
Dist.4: Dan Newhouse - 56%
Dist.5: Cathy McMorris Rodgers - 61%
Dist.6: Derek Kilmer - 18%
Dist.7: Pramila Jayapal - 21%
Dist.8: Kim Schrier - N/A
Dist.9: Adam Smith - 21%
Dist.10: Denny Heck - 15%

West Virginia
Sen. Shelley Capito - 48%
Sen. Joe Manchin - 31%
Dist.1: David McKinley - 60%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney - 73%
Dist.3: Carol Miller - N/A

Wisconsin
Sen. Ron Johnson - 69%
Sen. Tammy Baldwin - 25%
Dist.1: Bryan Steil - N/A
Dist.2: Mark Pocan - 32%
Dist.3: Ron Kind - 23%
Dist.4: Gwen Moore - 25%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner - 77%
Dist.6: Glenn Grothman - 63%
Dist.7: Sean Duffy - 63%
Dist.8: Mike Gallagher - 58%

Wyoming
Sen. Michael Enzi - 69%
Sen. John Barrasso - 71%
Dist.: Liz Cheney - 62%

:eek: :( :nauseated: :mad:

RonZeplin
06-23-2019, 07:26 AM
:eek: :( :nauseated: :mad:
The reason that congress is so screwed up is simple....

They're 99.9% Republican&Democrat party, IOW America's Worst. :directhit:

It's what the voters demand. The vast majority are totally clueless brainwashed rubes, and damn determined to stay that way. That's "American exceptionalism". :hearteyes:

nikcers
06-23-2019, 07:55 AM
H Amdt 1141 to H J Res 124 (September 2014), to authorize aid to Syrian rebels, she voted nay

https://votesmart.org/bill/18860/49994/129306/authorizes-aid-to-syrian-opposition

As I mentioned, Amash and Massie voted the same way.



Evidently, and a few months before the above vote



The record is conflicted.

In any event, I don't frankly care whether she really is a dove or not.

It's enough that she appears to be, if that helps revive similar sentiments in the Dem Party.

If she actually won (which we won't), she would at least be no worse than the average Dem/GOPer.
She is bad on domestic issues like Medicare for all. Even if she slowly pulled forces out of the middle East the Medicare for all would cost more than Iraq,Afghanistan,Libya,Syria,Yemen wars all combined. I am not defending the wars but she would add more debt than Obama with just that one plan and she probably wouldn't even bring the troops home because she votes like she wants to be involved in the middle East she just thinks she would be better at winning the wars because she wouldn't try to make profits from it.

Anti Globalist
06-23-2019, 08:29 AM
Christ the entire Congress is f**ked.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/freedom-index

"The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution" rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are cumulative scores based on key votes from 1999 to June 2018. Click on a senator's or representative's name to get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.

Current Members of the 116th Congress

Alabama
Sen. Doug Jones - 20%
Sen. Richard Shelby - 64%
Dist.1: Bradley Byrne - 57%
Dist.2: Martha Roby - 55%
Dist.3: Mike Rogers - 55%
Dist.4: Robert Aderholt - 57%
Dist.5: Mo Brooks - 74%
Dist.6: Gary Palmer - 70%
Dist.7: Terri Sewell - 14%

Alaska
Sen. Dan Sullivan - 57%
Sen. Lisa Murkowski - 47%
Dist.: Don Young - 57%

Arizona
Dist.1: Tom O'Halleran - 18%
Dist.2: Ann Kirkpatrick - 22%
Dist.2: Martha McSally - 53%
Dist.3: Raul Grijalva - 31%
Dist.4: Paul Gosar - 80%
Dist.5: Andy Biggs - 90%
Dist.6: David Schweikert - 77%
Dist.7: Ruben Gallego - 18%
Dist.8: Debbie Lesko - 74%
Dist.9: Greg Stanton - N/A
Dist.9: Kyrsten Sinema - 20%

Arkansas
Sen. John Boozman - 56%
Sen. Tom Cotton - 62%
Dist.1: Eric Crawford - 58%
Dist.2: French Hill - 54%
Dist.3: Steve Womack - 54%
Dist.4: Bruce Westerman - 60%

California
Sen. Kamala Harris - 20%
Sen. Dianne Feinstein - 13%
Dist.1: Doug LaMalfa - 61%
Dist.2: Jared Huffman - 26%
Dist.3: John Garamendi - 17%
Dist.4: Tom McClintock - 86%
Dist.5: Mike Thompson - 20%
Dist.6: Doris Matsui - 21%
Dist.7: Ami Bera - 10%
Dist.8: Paul Cook - 55%
Dist.9: Jerry McNerney - 18%
Dist.10: Josh Harder - N/A
Dist.11: Mark DeSaulnier - 18%
Dist.12: Nancy Pelosi - 18%
Dist.13: Barbara Lee - 30%
Dist.14: Jackie Speier - 25%
Dist.15: Eric Swalwell - 22%
Dist.16: Jim Costa - 19%
Dist.17: Ro Khanna - 25%
Dist.18: Anna Eshoo - 21%
Dist.19: Zoe Lofgren - 25%
Dist.20: Jimmy Panetta - 18%
Dist.21: TJ Cox - N/A
Dist.22: Devin Nunes - 54%
Dist.23: Kevin McCarthy - 61%
Dist.24: Salud Carbajal - 14%
Dist.25: Katie Hill - N/A
Dist.26: Julia Brownley - 12%
Dist.27: Judy Chu - 25%
Dist.28: Adam Schiff - 19%
Dist.29: Tony Cardenas - 27%
Dist.30: Brad Sherman - 19%
Dist.31: Pete Aguilar - 12%
Dist.32: Grace Napolitano - 23%
Dist.33: Ted Lieu - 30%
Dist.34: Jimmy Gomez - 26%
Dist.35: Norma Torres - 14%
Dist.36: Raul Ruiz - 16%
Dist.37: Karen Bass - 25%
Dist.38: Linda Sanchez - 25%
Dist.39: Gilbert Cisneros - N/A
Dist.40: Lucille Roybal-Allard - 21%
Dist.41: Mark Takano - 28%
Dist.42: Ken Calvert - 52%
Dist.43: Maxine Waters - 27%
Dist.44: Nanette Barragán - 23%
Dist.45: Katie Porter - N/A
Dist.46: J. Correa - 25%
Dist.47: Alan Lowenthal - 23%
Dist.48: Harley Rouda - N/A
Dist.49: Mike Levin - N/A
Dist.50: Duncan Hunter - 68%
Dist.51: Juan Vargas - 22%
Dist.52: Scott Peters - 9%
Dist.53: Susan Davis - 17%

Colorado
Sen. Michael Bennet - 11%
Sen. Cory Gardner - 61%
Dist.1: Diana DeGette - 21%
Dist.2: Joe Neguse - N/A
Dist.3: Scott Tipton - 66%
Dist.4: Ken Buck - 75%
Dist.5: Doug Lamborn - 74%
Dist.6: Jason Crow - N/A
Dist.7: Ed Perlmutter - 17%

Connecticut
Sen. Richard Blumenthal - 14%
Sen. Christopher Murphy - 15%
Dist.1: John Larson - 22%
Dist.2: Joe Courtney - 19%
Dist.3: Rosa DeLauro - 21%
Dist.4: James Himes - 11%
Dist.5: Jahana Hayes - N/A

Delaware
Sen. Chris Coons - 11%
Sen. Thomas Carper - 14%
Dist.: Lisa Blunt Rochester - 10%

Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio - 68%
Dist.1: Matt Gaetz - 75%
Dist.2: Neal Dunn - 52%
Dist.3: Ted Yoho - 74%
Dist.4: John Rutherford - 50%
Dist.5: Al Lawson - 11%
Dist.6: Michael Waltz - N/A
Dist.7: Stephanie Murphy - 13%
Dist.8: Bill Posey - 82%
Dist.9: Darren Soto - 18%
Dist.10: Val Demings - 11%
Dist.11: Daniel Webster - 67%
Dist.12: Gus Bilirakis - 60%
Dist.13: Charlie Crist - 16%
Dist.14: Kathy Castor - 15%
Dist.15: Ross Spano - N/A
Dist.16: Vern Buchanan - 56%
Dist.17: W. Steube - N/A
Dist.18: Brian Mast - 48%
Dist.19: Francis Rooney - 58%
Dist.20: Alcee Hastings - 24%
Dist.21: Lois Frankel - 18%
Dist.22: Theodore Deutch - 17%
Dist.23: Debbie Wasserman Schultz - 14%
Dist.24: Frederica Wilson - 20%
Dist.25: Mario Diaz-Balart - 46%
Dist.26: Debbie Mucarsel-Powell - N/A
Dist.27: Donna Shalala - N/A

Georgia
Sen. David Perdue - 60%
Sen. John Isakson - 54%
Dist.1: Buddy Carter - 56%
Dist.2: Sanford Bishop - 30%
Dist.3: A. Ferguson - 56%
Dist.4: Henry Johnson - 20%
Dist.5: John Lewis - 26%
Dist.6: Lucy McBath - N/A
Dist.7: Rob Woodall - 65%
Dist.8: Austin Scott - 64%
Dist.9: Doug Collins - 61%
Dist.10: Jody Hice - 69%
Dist.11: Barry Loudermilk - 68%
Dist.12: Rick Allen - 58%
Dist.13: David Scott - 21%
Dist.14: Tom Graves - 69%

Hawaii
Sen. Brian Schatz - 12%
Sen. Mazie Hirono - 14%
Dist.1: Ed Case - 22%
Dist.2: Tulsi Gabbard - 30%

Idaho
Sen. James Risch - 77%
Sen. Michael Crapo - 68%
Dist.1: Russ Fulcher - N/A
Dist.2: Michael Simpson - 54%

Illinois
Sen. Richard Durbin - 13%
Sen. Tammy Duckworth - 13%
Dist.1: Bobby Rush - 24%
Dist.2: Robin Kelly - 22%
Dist.3: Daniel Lipinski - 20%
Dist.4: Jesús GarcÃ*a - N/A
Dist.5: Mike Quigley - 14%
Dist.6: Sean Casten - N/A
Dist.7: Danny Davis - 25%
Dist.8: Raja Krishnamoorthi - 15%
Dist.9: Janice Schakowsky - 24%
Dist.10: Bradley Schneider - 13%
Dist.11: Bill Foster - 14%
Dist.12: Mike Bost - 52%
Dist.13: Rodney Davis - 55%
Dist.14: Lauren Underwood - N/A
Dist.15: John Shimkus - 53%
Dist.16: Adam Kinzinger - 53%
Dist.17: Cheri Bustos - 15%
Dist.18: Darin LaHood - 58%

Indiana
Sen. Todd Young - 56%
Dist.1: Peter Visclosky - 26%
Dist.2: Jackie Walorski - 53%
Dist.3: Jim Banks - 65%
Dist.4: James Baird - N/A
Dist.5: Susan Brooks - 50%
Dist.6: Greg Pence - N/A
Dist.7: André Carson - 17%
Dist.8: Larry Bucshon - 58%
Dist.9: Trey Hollingsworth - 62%

Iowa
Sen. Charles Grassley - 62%
Sen. Joni Ernst - 56%
Dist.1: Abby Finkenauer - N/A
Dist.2: David Loebsack - 20%
Dist.3: Cynthia Axne - N/A
Dist.4: Steve King - 65%

Kansas
Sen. Jerry Moran - 64%
Sen. Pat Roberts - 60%
Dist.1: Roger Marshall - 56%
Dist.2: Steven Watkins - N/A
Dist.3: Sharice Davids - N/A
Dist.4: Ron Estes - 49%

Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul - 94%
Sen. Mitch McConnell - 59%
Dist.1: James Comer - 58%
Dist.2: Brett Guthrie - 62%
Dist.3: John Yarmuth - 21%
Dist.4: Thomas Massie - 99%
Dist.5: Harold Rogers - 52%
Dist.6: Garland Barr - 55%

Louisiana
Sen. John Kennedy - 53%
Sen. Bill Cassidy - 63%
Dist.1: Steve Scalise - 68%
Dist.2: Cedric Richmond - 22%
Dist.3: Clay Higgins - 61%
Dist.4: Mike Johnson - 65%
Dist.5: Ralph Abraham - 60%
Dist.6: Garret Graves - 65%

Maine
Sen. Angus King - 15%
Sen. Susan Collins - 39%
Dist.1: Chellie Pingree - 27%
Dist.2: Jared Golden - N/A

Maryland
Sen. Chris Van Hollen - 20%
Sen. Benjamin Cardin - 17%
Dist.1: Andy Harris - 76%
Dist.2: C. Ruppersberger - 15%
Dist.3: John Sarbanes - 19%
Dist.4: Anthony Brown - 9%
Dist.5: Steny Hoyer - 16%
Dist.6: David Trone - N/A
Dist.7: Elijah Cummings - 22%
Dist.8: Jamie Raskin - 15%

Massachusetts
Sen. Edward Markey - 23%
Sen. Elizabeth Warren - 16%
Dist.1: Richard Neal - 20%
Dist.2: James McGovern - 26%
Dist.3: Lori Trahan - N/A
Dist.4: Joseph Kennedy - 22%
Dist.5: Katherine Clark - 27%
Dist.6: Seth Moulton - 13%
Dist.7: Ayanna Pressley - N/A
Dist.8: Stephen Lynch - 24%
Dist.9: William Keating - 21%

Michigan
Sen. Gary Peters - 16%
Sen. Debbie Stabenow - 17%
Dist.1: Jack Bergman - 54%
Dist.2: Bill Huizenga - 64%
Dist.3: Justin Amash - 94%
Dist.4: John Moolenaar - 53%
Dist.5: Daniel Kildee - 21%
Dist.6: Fred Upton - 48%
Dist.7: Tim Walberg - 62%
Dist.8: Elissa Slotkin - N/A
Dist.9: Andy Levin - N/A
Dist.10: Paul Mitchell - 53%
Dist.11: Haley Stevens - N/A
Dist.12: Debbie Dingell - 14%
Dist.13: Rashida Tlaib - N/A
Dist.14: Brenda Lawrence - 18%

Minnesota
Sen. Tina Smith - 25%
Sen. Amy Klobuchar - 10%
Dist.1: Jim Hagedorn - N/A
Dist.2: Angie Craig - N/A
Dist.3: Dean Phillips - N/A
Dist.4: Betty McCollum - 21%
Dist.5: Ilhan Omar - N/A
Dist.6: Tom Emmer - 65%
Dist.7: Collin Peterson - 47%
Dist.8: Pete Stauber - N/A

Mississippi
Sen. Roger Wicker - 53%
Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith - 34%
Dist.1: Trent Kelly - 62%
Dist.2: Bennie Thompson - 26%
Dist.3: Michael Guest - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Palazzo - 60%

Missouri
Sen. Roy Blunt - 55%
Dist.1: Wm. Clay - 23%
Dist.2: Ann Wagner - 57%
Dist.3: Blaine Luetkemeyer - 62%
Dist.4: Vicky Hartzler - 56%
Dist.5: Emanuel Cleaver - 22%
Dist.6: Sam Graves - 56%
Dist.7: Billy Long - 60%
Dist.8: Jason Smith - 66%

Montana
Sen. Steve Daines - 65%
Sen. Jon Tester - 23%
Dist.: Greg Gianforte - 59%

Nebraska
Sen. Benjamin Sasse - 69%
Sen. Deb Fischer - 62%
Dist.1: Jeff Fortenberry - 56%
Dist.2: Don Bacon - 53%
Dist.3: Adrian Smith - 66%

Nevada
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto - 8%
Dist.1: Dina Titus - 18%
Dist.2: Mark Amodei - 57%
Dist.3: Jacky Rosen - 13%
Dist.3: Susie Lee - N/A
Dist.4: Steven Horsford - 20%

New Hampshire
Sen. Margaret Hassan - 13%
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen - 8%
Dist.1: Chris Pappas - N/A
Dist.2: Ann Kuster - 19%

New Jersey
Sen. Robert Menendez - 18%
Sen. Cory Booker - 16%
Dist.1: Donald Norcross - 14%
Dist.2: Jefferson Van Drew - N/A
Dist.3: Andy Kim - N/A
Dist.4: Christopher Smith - 45%
Dist.5: Josh Gottheimer - 16%
Dist.6: Frank Pallone - 25%
Dist.7: Tom Malinowski - N/A
Dist.8: Albio Sires - 15%
Dist.9: Bill Pascrell - 23%
Dist.10: Donald Payne - 20%
Dist.11: Mikie Sherrill - N/A
Dist.12: Bonnie Watson Coleman - 25%

New Mexico
Sen. Martin Heinrich - 13%
Sen. Tom Udall - 20%
Dist.1: Debra Haaland - N/A
Dist.2: Xochitl Torres Small - N/A
Dist.3: Ben Lujan - 18%

New York
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand - 15%
Sen. Charles Schumer - 14%
Dist.1: Lee Zeldin - 59%
Dist.2: Peter King - 45%
Dist.3: Thomas Suozzi - 18%
Dist.4: Kathleen Rice - 10%
Dist.5: Gregory Meeks - 20%
Dist.6: Grace Meng - 22%
Dist.7: Nydia Velázquez - 26%
Dist.8: Hakeem Jeffries - 23%
Dist.9: Yvette Clarke - 26%
Dist.10: Jerrold Nadler - 24%
Dist.11: Max Rose - N/A
Dist.12: Carolyn Maloney - 22%
Dist.13: Adriano Espaillat - 18%
Dist.14: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - N/A
Dist.15: José Serrano - 24%
Dist.16: Eliot Engel - 19%
Dist.17: Nita Lowey - 15%
Dist.18: Sean Maloney - 18%
Dist.19: Antonio Delgado - N/A
Dist.20: Paul Tonko - 23%
Dist.21: Elise Stefanik - 42%
Dist.22: Anthony Brindisi - N/A
Dist.23: Tom Reed - 57%
Dist.24: John Katko - 50%
Dist.25: Joseph Morelle - N/A
Dist.26: Brian Higgins - 17%
Dist.27: Chris Collins - 53%

North Carolina
Sen. Richard Burr - 57%
Sen. Thom Tillis - 50%
Dist.1: George Butterfield - 17%
Dist.2: George Holding - 64%
Dist.3: Walter Jones - 81%
Dist.4: David Price - 19%
Dist.5: Virginia Foxx - 68%
Dist.6: Bradley Walker - 65%
Dist.7: David Rouzer - 59%
Dist.8: Richard Hudson - 61%
Dist.10: Patrick McHenry - 67%
Dist.11: Mark Meadows - 72%
Dist.12: Alma Adams - 13%
Dist.13: Ted Budd - 73%

North Dakota
Sen. John Hoeven - 52%
Dist.: Kevin Cramer - 53%
Dist.: Kelly Armstrong - N/A

Ohio
Sen. Robert Portman - 50%
Sen. Sherrod Brown - 22%
Dist.1: Steve Chabot - 64%
Dist.2: Brad Wenstrup - 61%
Dist.3: Joyce Beatty - 18%
Dist.4: Jim Jordan - 81%
Dist.5: Robert Latta - 67%
Dist.6: Bill Johnson - 57%
Dist.7: Bob Gibbs - 60%
Dist.8: Warren Davidson - 70%
Dist.9: Marcy Kaptur - 29%
Dist.10: Michael Turner - 49%
Dist.11: Marcia Fudge - 21%
Dist.12: Troy Balderson - 40%
Dist.13: Tim Ryan - 25%
Dist.14: David Joyce - 53%
Dist.15: Steve Stivers - 53%
Dist.16: Anthony Gonzalez - N/A

Oklahoma
Sen. James Lankford - 66%
Sen. James Inhofe - 70%
Dist.1: Kevin Hern - N/A
Dist.2: Markwayne Mullin - 63%
Dist.3: Frank Lucas - 58%
Dist.4: Tom Cole - 53%
Dist.5: Kendra Horn - N/A

Oregon
Sen. Ron Wyden - 18%
Sen. Jeff Merkley - 17%
Dist.1: Suzanne Bonamici - 20%
Dist.2: Greg Walden - 49%
Dist.3: Earl Blumenauer - 23%
Dist.4: Peter DeFazio - 31%
Dist.5: Kurt Schrader - 23%

Pennsylvania
Sen. Patrick Toomey - 67%
Sen. Robert Casey - 11%
Dist.1: Brian Fitzpatrick - 30%
Dist.2: Brendan Boyle - 18%
Dist.3: Dwight Evans - 12%
Dist.4: Madeleine Dean - N/A
Dist.5: Mary Scanlon - N/A
Dist.6: Chrissy Houlahan - N/A
Dist.7: Susan Wild - N/A
Dist.8: Matthew Cartwright - 24%
Dist.9: Daniel Meuser - N/A
Dist.10: Scott Perry - 74%
Dist.11: Lloyd Smucker - 60%
Dist.13: John Joyce - N/A
Dist.14: Guy Reschenthaler - N/A
Dist.15: Glenn Thompson - 61%
Dist.16: Mike Kelly - 56%
Dist.17: Conor Lamb - 27%
Dist.18: Michael Doyle - 29%

Rhode Island
Sen. John Reed - 14%
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse - 12%
Dist.1: David Cicilline - 25%
Dist.2: James Langevin - 19%

South Carolina
Sen. Tim Scott - 69%
Sen. Lindsey Graham - 60%
Dist.1: Joe Cunningham - N/A
Dist.2: Joe Wilson - 59%
Dist.3: Jeff Duncan - 80%
Dist.4: William Timmons - N/A
Dist.5: Ralph Norman - 69%
Dist.6: James Clyburn - 21%
Dist.7: Tom Rice - 61%

South Dakota
Sen. Mike Rounds - 47%
Sen. John Thune - 58%
Dist.: Dusty Johnson - N/A

Tennessee
Sen. Lamar Alexander - 51%
Dist.1: David Roe - 68%
Dist.2: Tim Burchett - N/A
Dist.3: Charles Fleischmann - 61%
Dist.4: Scott DesJarlais - 75%
Dist.5: Jim Cooper - 21%
Dist.6: John Rose - N/A
Dist.7: Marsha Blackburn - 64%
Dist.7: Mark Green - N/A
Dist.8: David Kustoff - 53%
Dist.9: Steve Cohen - 22%

Texas
Sen. John Cornyn - 65%
Sen. Ted Cruz - 75%
Dist.1: Louie Gohmert - 78%
Dist.2: Dan Crenshaw - N/A
Dist.3: Van Taylor - N/A
Dist.4: John Ratcliffe - 68%
Dist.5: Lance Gooden - N/A
Dist.6: Ron Wright - N/A
Dist.7: Lizzie Fletcher - N/A
Dist.8: Kevin Brady - 56%
Dist.9: Al Green - 23%
Dist.10: Michael McCaul - 59%
Dist.11: K. Conaway - 60%
Dist.12: Kay Granger - 52%
Dist.13: Mac Thornberry - 54%
Dist.14: Randy Weber - 69%
Dist.15: Vicente Gonzalez - 33%
Dist.16: Veronica Escobar - N/A
Dist.17: Bill Flores - 62%
Dist.18: Sheila Jackson-Lee - 24%
Dist.19: Jodey Arrington - 58%
Dist.20: Joaquin Castro - 23%
Dist.21: Chip Roy - N/A
Dist.22: Pete Olson - 67%
Dist.23: Will Hurd - 54%
Dist.24: Kenny Marchant - 66%
Dist.25: Roger Williams - 67%
Dist.26: Michael Burgess - 69%
Dist.27: Michael Cloud - 67%
Dist.28: Henry Cuellar - 25%
Dist.29: Sylvia Garcia - N/A
Dist.30: Eddie Johnson - 19%
Dist.31: John Carter - 56%
Dist.32: Colin Allred - N/A
Dist.33: Marc Veasey - 23%
Dist.34: Filemon Vela - 25%
Dist.35: Lloyd Doggett - 25%
Dist.36: Brian Babin - 63%

Utah
Sen. Mike Lee - 92%
Dist.1: Rob Bishop - 66%
Dist.2: Chris Stewart - 60%
Dist.3: John Curtis - 58%
Dist.4: Ben McAdams - N/A

Vermont
Sen. Patrick Leahy - 16%
Sen. Bernard Sanders - 28%
Dist.: Peter Welch - 26%

Virginia
Sen. Mark Warner - 11%
Sen. Timothy Kaine - 8%
Dist.1: Robert Wittman - 64%
Dist.2: Elaine Luria - N/A
Dist.3: Robert Scott - 23%
Dist.4: A. McEachin - 8%
Dist.5: Denver Riggleman - N/A
Dist.6: Ben Cline - N/A
Dist.7: Abigail Spanberger - N/A
Dist.8: Donald Beyer - 15%
Dist.9: H. Griffith - 76%
Dist.10: Jennifer Wexton - N/A
Dist.11: Gerald Connolly - 16%

Washington
Sen. Maria Cantwell - 14%
Sen. Patty Murray - 12%
Dist.1: Suzan DelBene - 20%
Dist.2: Rick Larsen - 18%
Dist.3: Jaime Herrera Beutler - 64%
Dist.4: Dan Newhouse - 56%
Dist.5: Cathy McMorris Rodgers - 61%
Dist.6: Derek Kilmer - 18%
Dist.7: Pramila Jayapal - 21%
Dist.8: Kim Schrier - N/A
Dist.9: Adam Smith - 21%
Dist.10: Denny Heck - 15%

West Virginia
Sen. Shelley Capito - 48%
Sen. Joe Manchin - 31%
Dist.1: David McKinley - 60%
Dist.2: Alex Mooney - 73%
Dist.3: Carol Miller - N/A

Wisconsin
Sen. Ron Johnson - 69%
Sen. Tammy Baldwin - 25%
Dist.1: Bryan Steil - N/A
Dist.2: Mark Pocan - 32%
Dist.3: Ron Kind - 23%
Dist.4: Gwen Moore - 25%
Dist.5: F. Sensenbrenner - 77%
Dist.6: Glenn Grothman - 63%
Dist.7: Sean Duffy - 63%
Dist.8: Mike Gallagher - 58%

Wyoming
Sen. Michael Enzi - 69%
Sen. John Barrasso - 71%
Dist.: Liz Cheney - 62%
Wow. Only five people on that list have a score of 90% or above.

Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie, Mike Lee, and Andy Biggs.

Pauls' Revere
06-23-2019, 09:23 AM
Wow. Only five people on that list have a score of 90% or above.

Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie, Mike Lee, and Andy Biggs.



Wow. Only five people on that list have a score of 90% or above.

Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie, Mike Lee, and Andy Biggs.

I ran some numbers. You beat me to the names. You are correct.

STATES with AVG score of 60% or higher:

Idaho = 66% avg
Kentucky = 63% avg
Nebraska = 61% avg
Oklahoma = 62% avg
Utah = 69% avg
Wyoming = 67% avg


STATES with representative of 90% or higher

Arizona = Andy Biggs 90%
Kentucky = Rand Paul 94%
= Thomas Massie 99%
Michigan = Justin Amash 94%
Utah = Mike Lee 92%

STATES with avg score of 40% or lower

CA = 27%
CT = 17%
DE = 12%
FL = 40%
HI = 20%
IL = 27%
ME 27%
MD = 21%
MN = 34%
NV = 23%
NH = 13%
NJ = 22%
NM = 17%
NY = 28%
OR = 26%
PA = 39%
RI = 18%
VT = 23%
VA = 28%
WA = 29%

STATES with representatives with a score of LESS then 10%

CA = Scott Peters = 9%
VA = A. Mc Eachin = 8%
NH = Jeanne Shaheen = 8%


Perhaps Kentucky is the new New Hampshire? I was surprised that Texas did not make the list for score of 60% or higher.

PAF
06-23-2019, 09:48 AM
I ran some numbers. You beat me to the names. You are correct.

STATES with AVG score of 60% or higher:

Idaho = 66% avg
Kentucky = 63% avg
Nebraska = 61% avg
Oklahoma = 62% avg
Utah = 69% avg
Wyoming = 67% avg


STATES with representative of 90% or higher

Arizona = Andy Biggs 90%
Kentucky = Rand Paul 94%
= Thomas Massie 99%
Michigan = Justin Amash 94%
Utah = Mike Lee 92%

STATES with avg score of 40% or lower

CA = 27%
CT = 17%
DE = 12%
FL = 40%
HI = 20%
IL = 27%
ME 27%
MD = 21%
MN = 34%
NV = 23%
NH = 13%
NJ = 22%
NM = 17%
NY = 28%
OR = 26%
PA = 39%
RI = 18%
VT = 23%
VA = 28%
WA = 29%

STATES with representatives with a score of LESS then 10%

CA = Scott Peters = 9%
VA = A. Mc Eachin = 8%
NH = Jeanne Shaheen = 8%


Perhaps Kentucky is the new New Hampshire? I was surprised that Texas did not make the list for score of 60% or higher.


I was almost going to run numbers to see what the national average index score is but figure the country is so far off the constitutional mark why bother.

Pauls' Revere
06-23-2019, 09:54 AM
I was almost going to run numbers to see what the national average index score is but figure the country is so far off the constitutional mark why bother.

You are correct. states with scores of 40% or lower outnumber states with scores of 60% or higher by almost 4:1. :(

RJB
06-23-2019, 10:00 AM
Perhaps Kentucky is the new New Hampshire? I was surprised that Texas did not make the list for score of 60% or higher.
With the influx of immigrants, Texas is in the process of becoming the next California, as California becomes the next Venezuela, and so goes the country.

"...and that's a good thing."
--Bernie Sanders.

Pauls' Revere
06-23-2019, 12:30 PM
With the influx of immigrants, Texas is in the process of becoming the next California, as California becomes the next Venezuela, and so goes the country.

"...and that's a good thing."
--Bernie Sanders.

and the exodus of Californians to other states expedites this process and California receives federal funding for programs.

How on Earth do we reverse this? I promise you I vote as hard as I can!

PAF
06-23-2019, 01:11 PM
With the influx of immigrants, Texas is in the process of becoming the next California, as California becomes the next Venezuela, and so goes the country.

"...and that's a good thing."
--Bernie Sanders.

Don’t give big-government-MIC-no-bid-contract-pro-surveillance-state republicans an easy pass and other people to blame. Immigrants can not vote outside of maybe local. Immigrants, like Americans are not even aware of the pathetic anti-constitutional votes on the house/senate floor.

Refer to post #45, replace democrat with republican and the same exact conversation applies.

Anti Globalist
06-23-2019, 01:42 PM
God that's depressing...literally the worst in the nation.

Three communist broads, and a militant fagggot, communist.
How is that even possible? Isn't New Hampshire supposed to be a top 5 state in terms of overall freedom?

PAF
06-23-2019, 01:51 PM
How is that even possible? Isn't New Hampshire supposed to be a top 5 state in terms of overall freedom?

Curious indeed. Also, when I resided there, it was not flooded with thousands and thousands of Mexican immigrants. And the list AF provided they are all “Americans”. Something else seems to be going on. Perhaps government workers inherently like government growth, much like companies wanting to expand their businesses. They certainly do not want to work themselves out of a job.

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 02:33 PM
Don’t give big-government-MIC-no-bid-contract-pro-surveillance-state republicans an easy pass and other people to blame. Immigrants can not vote outside of maybe local. Immigrants, like Americans are not even aware of the pathetic anti-constitutional votes on the house/senate floor.

Refer to post #45, replace democrat with republican and the same exact conversation applies.
They do vote and campaign and if every Demoncrat were replaced with even the worst Republicans the average would be significantly higher.

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 02:34 PM
and the exodus of Californians to other states expedites this process and California receives federal funding for programs.

How on Earth do we reverse this? I promise you I vote as hard as I can!
Separation is the best beginning to a solution and if we can't get that there will be civil war.

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 02:36 PM
Don’t give big-government-MIC-no-bid-contract-pro-surveillance-state republicans an easy pass and other people to blame. Immigrants can not vote outside of maybe local. Immigrants, like Americans are not even aware of the pathetic anti-constitutional votes on the house/senate floor.

Refer to post #45, replace democrat with republican and the same exact conversation applies.
They also inflate the census numbers of sanctuary/welfare cities and states and give the Demoncrats a disproportionate number of Representatives.

r3volution 3.0
06-23-2019, 02:40 PM
She is bad on domestic issues like Medicare for all. Even if she slowly pulled forces out of the middle East the Medicare for all would cost more than Iraq,Afghanistan,Libya,Syria,Yemen wars all combined. I am not defending the wars but she would add more debt than Obama with just that one plan and she probably wouldn't even bring the troops home because she votes like she wants to be involved in the middle East she just thinks she would be better at winning the wars because she wouldn't try to make profits from it.

Agreed


In light of her economic policies, I certainly won't be supporting her, but I do hope she helps wake the long-sleeping anti-war left.

PAF
06-23-2019, 03:04 PM
They do vote and campaign and if every Demoncrat were replaced with even the worst Republicans the average would be significantly higher.

I just got telling you not to give republicans easy passes and “blaming others” for their own pathetic floor votes and there you go doing just that.

Sheesh!

It is just like grounding the kid from tv for not doing homework but then letting him watch it because it is Tuesday and that is when his favorite show is on.

:-O

Boy, the deep state loves folks like you lol

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 03:06 PM
I just got telling you not to give republicans easy passes and “blaming others” for their own pathetic floor votes and there you go doing just that.

Sheesh!

It is just like grounding the kid from tv for not doing homework but then letting him watch it because it is Tuesday and that is when his favorite show is on.

:-O

Boy, the deep state loves folks like you lol
I know you just told me to ignore the little man behind the curtain but I'm not that stupid.

PAF
06-23-2019, 03:33 PM
I know you just told me to ignore the little man behind the curtain but I'm not that stupid.

Here’s the difference between you and me:

I printed out stacks of Mike Kelly On the Record (R-Pa-CD3), attended his re-election camping trail and handed them out. Beside the fact that 97% of his constituents became irate with me, crunched them up and pitched them, Mike Kelly chuckled when I told him he’d be a shoe-in on a D ticket. When he actually read the record sheet he and his staff tried to talk me out of passing them out. It was my turn to chuckle. The problem was, he got voted back in anyway and maintained his pathetic record. “Republicans” love that guy. And no, they are not “immigrants”.

Immigrants were not responsible for his pathetic floor votes.

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 03:37 PM
Here’s the difference between you and me:

I printed out stacks of Mike Kelly On the Record (R-Pa-CD3), attended his re-election camping trail and handed them out. Beside the fact that 97% of his constituents became irate with me, crunched them up and pitched them, Mike Kelly chuckled when I told him he’d be a shoe-in on a D ticket. When he actually read the record sheet he and his staff tried to talk me out of passing them out. It was my turn to chuckle. The problem was, he got voted back in anyway and maintained his pathetic record. “Republicans” love that guy. And no, they are not “immigrants”.

Immigrants were not responsible for his pathetic floor votes.

They are responsible for the even worse voting records of many of the Demoncrats who wouldn't be in office without their voting, campaigning and census distorting.

DamianTV
06-23-2019, 03:46 PM
With the influx of immigrants, Texas is in the process of becoming the next California, as California becomes the next Venezuela, and so goes the country.

"...and that's a good thing."
--Bernie Sanders.

As Texas goes, so goes the rest of the country.

PAF
06-23-2019, 03:49 PM
They are responsible for the even worse voting records of many of the Demoncrats who wouldn't be in office without their voting, campaigning and census distorting.

Do you work? Do you have a job? Would you be willing to do whatever it takes to work yourself out of a job, or would you do whatever it takes to expand your business and ensure your own employment?

Someday when you grow up you might catch on.

$4.6 Billion migration “budget”. It’s in that other thread.

euphemia
06-23-2019, 04:22 PM
They do vote and campaign and if every Demoncrat were replaced with even the worst Republicans the average would be significantly higher.

Disagree. I live in Tennessee. Both Senators are Republican, but there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the way they vote and ultra liberal 5th District Democrat Jim Cooper.

Swordsmyth
06-23-2019, 04:27 PM
Disagree. I live in Tennessee. Both Senators are Republican, but there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the way they vote and ultra liberal 5th District Democrat Jim Cooper.
Only one Senator is showing for Tennesse but he is much better than Cooper:
Tennessee

Sen. Lamar Alexander (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000360) - 51%


Dist.5: Jim Cooper (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=C000754) - 21%


I hate people below 60% but 21% is MUCH worse.

Gumba of Liberty
06-23-2019, 07:54 PM
Making the good the enemy of the perfect... smh Ronpaulforums.com

As for me, I will most likely register as a Democrat so I can vote for Tulsi in the primary. Then I’ll switch back to independent. Really no downside the way I look at it. If Tulsi is able to make it through the corporate media disinformation blitz (unlike Dr. Paul) and win the nomination, can you imagine her (non-interventionist vision) debating Trump?

The story sells itself.

The fact that this story articulates the message of peace, prosperity, sovereignty, and non-intervention is icing on the cake.

oyarde
06-23-2019, 08:02 PM
If any dem is elected pres with this dem house they will immediately attempt to bankrupt the country with free college and medicare for all . No prosperity there , ever .

Gumba of Liberty
06-23-2019, 08:05 PM
If any dem is elected pres with this dem house they will immediately attempt to bankrupt the country with free college and medicare for all . No prosperity there , ever .

It’s already bankrupt. August 15th, 1971.

PAF
06-23-2019, 08:07 PM
If Tulsi is able to make it through the corporate media disinformation blitz (unlike Dr. Paul) and win the nomination, can you imagine her (non-interventionist vision) debating Trump?



Yes. Republicans turn warmongers once again. Because, can’t side with the opposition. Right? It happens every election cycle.

Gumba of Liberty
06-23-2019, 08:19 PM
Yes. Republicans turn warmongers once again. Because, can’t side with the opposition. Right? It happens every election cycle.

Elections are mostly beauty pageants for psychopaths but if you can get a (non-compromised) charismatic non-interventionist on stage and in the debates that can have a major impact. Ron Paul made a difference because he had a nationally televised soap box to speak from. I welcome anyone speaking truth to power, not working for the CIA, in the Presidential arena. Btw for those that don’t know: Right = CIA Left = CIA—- Time to Grow Up.

PAF
06-24-2019, 05:39 AM
Elections are mostly beauty pageants for psychopaths but if you can get a (non-compromised) charismatic non-interventionist on stage and in the debates that can have a major impact. Ron Paul made a difference because he had a nationally televised soap box to speak from. I welcome anyone speaking truth to power, not working for the CIA, in the Presidential arena. Btw for those that don’t know: Right = CIA Left = CIA—- Time to Grow Up.

+ Rep

ProBlue33
06-24-2019, 07:16 AM
Let the Democrats fund her.....but I will say this she is the best female candidate on the left right now, she is the equivalent of a Dennis Kucinich in the 2008 race.

PAF
06-24-2019, 07:25 AM
Let the Democrats fund her.....but I will say this she is the best female candidate on the left right now, she is the equivalent of a Dennis Kucinich in the 2008 race.


Dennis is a good man. I do not care for his domestic policy, but would have supported him as VP under Ron Paul. We know what the "repubs" did to Ron, the dems did their share by redistricting to oust Dennis.

Btw, Dennis is on RPI's advisory board.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 04:23 PM
Let the Democrats fund her.....but I will say this she is the best female candidate on the left right now, she is the equivalent of a Dennis Kucinich in the 2008 race.


Dennis is a good man. I do not care for his domestic policy, but would have supported him as VP under Ron Paul. We know what the "repubs" did to Ron, the dems did their share by redistricting to oust Dennis.

Btw, Dennis is on RPI's advisory board.
Kucinich had a 40% rating.

PAF
06-24-2019, 07:53 PM
Kucinich had a 40% rating.

Damn, you briefly rubbed off on me about that 70 percentile comment. I learned my lesson; I will never let you rub off on me again :o

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 07:57 PM
Damn, you briefly rubbed off on me about that 70 percentile comment. I learned my lesson; I will never let you rub off on me again :o
Because I reported Kucinich's rating?

You don't like facts?
(But I already knew that.)

PAF
06-24-2019, 08:05 PM
Because I reported Kucinich's rating?

You don't like facts?
(But I already knew that.)

You should know me by now, Swordy. I only go by facts. What more do you want? I already admitted that I erred when you reminded me of his 40% rating and promised never to let you rub off on me again. That is a fact :D

eleganz
06-24-2019, 08:07 PM
I find it so hilarious that those who will bash Trump for being good on economy/domestic and (arguably good) foreign policy will FLOCK to Gabbard who is good (not great) on foreign policy and piss fkng poor on economy/domestic. But like we all know, TDS is real.

What really is the difference? Trump seems like a net positive over Gabbard, if you scored both of them on metrics of what is claimed to be important to libertarians. Even though both don't claim to be libertarian.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 08:11 PM
You should know me by now, Swordy. I only go by facts. What more do you want? I already admitted that I erred when you reminded me of his 40% rating and promised never to let you rub off on me again. That is a fact :D
:rolleyes:

Gumba of Liberty
06-24-2019, 08:39 PM
Delete

Gumba of Liberty
06-24-2019, 08:40 PM
Because I reported Kucinich's rating?

You don't like facts?
(But I already knew that.)

The problem with the rating system is that it doesn’t take into account true ideologes vs those on Langley’s (and other foreign rogue agencies) payroll. You can disagree yet respect someone principally committed to another ideology. Carpetbaggers & conmen, on the other hand, are the scum of the Earth and the lowest-of-the-low that make it through the DC swamp-gauntlet will have no qualms about sending your sons and daughters to die to increase the size of their back accounts and the attendance at their funeral,

You can understand then why some here were attracted to (non-interventionist) Kucinich.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 08:50 PM
The problem with the rating system is that it doesn’t take into account true ideologes vs those on Langley’s (and other foreign rogue agencies) payroll. You can disagree yet respect someone principally committed to another ideology. Carpetbaggers & conmen, on the other hand, are the scum of the Earth and the lowest-of-the-low that make it through the DC swamp-gauntlet will have no qualms about sending your sons and daughters to die to increase the size of their back accounts and the attendance at their funeral,

You can understand then why some here were attracted to (non-interventionist) Kucinich.
Kucinich was useful as an ally when he agreed with us, I am all for working with anyone on subjects where we agree but one kind of poisonous snake is no better a pet than another and too many people are too willing to accept people like Kucinich into the movement itself.

RonZeplin
06-24-2019, 08:58 PM
Lot's of errors in the "New American" rating system. Biased toward globalist NWO open borders neocon Reconquista Republicans.


Sen. Jeff Flake (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=F000444) - 79%

Dist.1: Joe Scarborough (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S000106) - 75%

Sen. John Ashcroft (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000356) - 72%
:bigpoo::bigpoo::bigpoo:

None or the above progressive Trotskyite libtard neocon Republicans should be above single digit numbers.

Denis Kucinich(D) should be in the high 90% range along with Ron Paul who scores a 97%.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 09:02 PM
Lot's of errors in the "New American" rating system. Biased toward globalist NWO open borders neocon Reconquista Republicans.


:bigpoo::bigpoo::bigpoo:

None or the above progressive Trotskyite libtard Republicans should be above single digit numbers.

Denis Kucinich(D) should be in the high 90% range along with Ron Paul who scores a 97%.
LOL

You get more insane every day.

The New American is extremely anti-illegal and Kucinich was soft on them if I remember correctly, not to mention his evil positions on so much else.

The three you list are not exactly good but they are much better than Kucinich.

RonZeplin
06-24-2019, 11:17 PM
LOL
The three you list are not exactly good but they are much better than Kucinich.
Sen. Jeff Flake (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=F000444) - 79%

Dist.1: Joe Scarborough (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S000106) - 75%

Sen. John Ashcroft (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000356) - 72%

These three above are REAL Republicans, IOW scum like Trump, BushX2, McCain, Romney, Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell, John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, Ruby Giuliani, Eliot Abrams, William Barr, Pompeo & Pence. The list goes on and on...... America's Worst from the R wing.

Denis Kucinich is pro liberty, pro American, and a member of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, Advisory Board. :trophy:

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
ADVISORY BOARD (http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/about-us/)

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/media/2096/dennis-kucinich.jpg DENNIS KUCINICH

Mr. Kucinich, the former US Representative from Ohio’s 10th Congressional district, is a leading antiwar and pro-civil liberties voice.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 11:28 PM
Sen. Jeff Flake (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=F000444) - 79%

Dist.1: Joe Scarborough (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S000106) - 75%

Sen. John Ashcroft (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000356) - 72%

These three above are REAL Republicans, IOW scum like Trump, BushX2, McCain, Romney, Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell, John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, Ruby Giuliani, Eliot Abrams, William Barr, Pompeo & Pence. The list goes on and on...... America's Worst from the R wing.

Denis Kucinich is pro liberty, pro American, and a member of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, Advisory Board. :trophy:

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
ADVISORY BOARD (http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/about-us/)

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/media/2096/dennis-kucinich.jpg DENNIS KUCINICH

Mr. Kucinich, the former US Representative from Ohio’s 10th Congressional district, is a leading antiwar and pro-civil liberties voice.
Kucinich was a gun grabbing communist scumbag.

You reveal yourself as a liberal more and more.

Swordsmyth
06-24-2019, 11:38 PM
Sen. Jeff Flake (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=F000444) - 79%

Dist.1: Joe Scarborough (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=S000106) - 75%

Sen. John Ashcroft (https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=A000356) - 72%

These three above are REAL Republicans, IOW scum like Trump, BushX2, McCain, Romney, Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell, John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, Ruby Giuliani, Eliot Abrams, William Barr, Pompeo & Pence. The list goes on and on...... America's Worst from the R wing.

Denis Kucinich is pro liberty, pro American, and a member of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, Advisory Board. :trophy:

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
ADVISORY BOARD (http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/about-us/)

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/media/2096/dennis-kucinich.jpg DENNIS KUCINICH

Mr. Kucinich, the former US Representative from Ohio’s 10th Congressional district, is a leading antiwar and pro-civil liberties voice.


Kucinich was a gun grabbing communist scumbag.

You reveal yourself as a liberal more and more.

He was also open borders so you expose yourself on that count again:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=K000336



H R 6061: Secure Fence Act of 2006 (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/hr6061)


Vote Date: September 14, 2006
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll446.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Border Fence. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 (H.R. 6061) would authorize the construction of nearly 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The border fence is just the first of a series of border security initiatives that House Republicans intend to merge into the Homeland Security spending bill. If implemented, the 700 miles of fencing along the border would be a good first step toward protecting our borders from the massive influx of illegal immigration facing our country today.

The House passed H.R. 6061 on September 14, 2006 by a vote of 283-138 (Roll Call 446). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because such a border fence would help prevent illegal immigration and further protect our borders.





H R 4437: Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/hr4437)


Vote Date: December 16, 2005
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll661.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Border Security. The House immigration bill (H.R. 4437) would improve border security by authorizing 700 miles of security fence to be built along parts of the U.S.-Mexican border, making unlawful entry into the United States a criminal rather than a civil offense, and increasing penalties for immigrant-related crimes. It would also require employers to verify immigrant status of new employees. It does not include the guest-worker/amnesty provisions found in the Senate bill.

The House passed H.R. 4437 on December 16, 2005 by a vote of 239-182 (Roll Call 661). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because the bill would improve border security. The House-passed bill is very different from the Senate-passed version. For immigration legislation to become law, the House and Senate versions would have to be reconciled and a final version sent back to both houses of Congress for their approval and then to the president for his signature.





And Pro-Abortion so we can dismiss your claims to care about that too:


H.R. 358: Protect Life Act (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr358)


Vote Date: October 13, 2011
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll789.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Abortion Funding. H.R. 358 would prohibit any federal funding to be used to purchase health insurance plans covering abortion. It would also require that any insurance companies offering plans via the ObamaCare-created state exchanges that include abortion coverage offer identical plans minus the abortion coverage.

The House passed H.R. 358 on October 13, 2011 by a vote of 251 to 172 (Roll Call 789). We have assigned pluses to the yeas not only because the government should not be subsidizing the killing of innocent human life, but also because there is no constitutional authority for the government to manage or finance the healthcare sector.






H.Con.Res. 36: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473 (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hconres36)


Vote Date: April 14, 2011
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll271.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Planned Parenthood Defunding. House Concurrent Resolution 36 would direct the House clerk to insert a section in the enrollment of H.R. 1473 (Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011) that would prohibit the use of any funding in the bill for Planned Parenthood.

The House adopted H. Con. Res. 36 on April 14, 2011 by a vote of 241 to 185 (Roll Call 271). We have assigned pluses to the yeas because Planned Parenthood is the nation's largest abortion provider, and government should not subsidize the killing of innocent human life. Moreover, under the Constitution, the federal government should not be subsidizing any private entity in the marketplace.







H R 760: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/hr760)


Vote Date: June 4, 2003
Vote: NAY (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2003/roll242.xml)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/0.jpg
Bad Vote.


Partial-Birth Abortion Ban. This bill (H.R. 760) states: "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both."

The House passed H.R. 760 on June 4, 2003 by a vote of 282 to 139 (Roll Call 242). We have assigned pluses to the yeas on the basis that all forms of abortion constitute the murder of unborn children -- and that the Supreme Court was overstepping its proper authority by "legalizing" abortion in the first place.

RonZeplin
06-25-2019, 07:04 AM
Kucinich was a gun grabbing communist scumbag.

You reveal yourself as a liberal more and more.

You gun grabbing Trumpkin commie, open borders big spending FED Kenysian, NYC progressive Fox News globalist scumbags are full of it.

Bring the troops home, End the FED, enforce existing immigration laws, and quit supporting Hillary&David Hogg's agenda including "Take The Guns"!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkQW62L_DJU

nikcers
06-25-2019, 07:14 AM
You gun grabbing Trumpkin commie, open borders big spending FED Kenysian, NYC progressive Fox News globalist scumbags are full of it.

Bring the troops home, End the FED, enforce existing immigration laws, and quit supporting Hillary's agenda including "Take The Guns"!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkQW62L_DJU

Rand worked with Cory Booker on criminal justice reform, does that mean we should support Cory Booker?