Swordsmyth
06-18-2019, 11:12 PM
In building its case for a lawsuit directly challenging Colorado’s new “national popular vote” law, government watchdog Judicial Watch (JW) is suing (https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-colorado-for-documents-on-electoral-college-change-files-suit-on-behalf-of-reporter-over-states-new-national-popular-vote-interstate-compact/) Colorado’s Secretary of State Jena Griswold. She actively supported passage of the law but has refused to relinquish background papers under a Freedom of Information Act request and so the non-profit watchdog group is suing to obtain them.
JW explained the issue at stake:
Currently, most states award all their Electoral College votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state.
But … when a state, such as Colorado, passes legislation to join the National Popular Vote Compact, it pledges that all of that state’s electoral votes will be given to whichever presidential candidate wins the popular vote nationwide, rather than the candidate who won the vote in just that state….
The Electoral College … balances the interests of citizens in both large and small states by requiring candidates to seek votes in less populous states whose interests might otherwise be ignored.
Under [national popular vote] a state could award its Electoral College votes to a presidential candidate who lost the state’s popular vote.
Tom Fitton, JW’s president, was much more direct about the threat of the National Popular Vote movement to the Republic:
Leftists in Colorado and other states want to undo the Electoral College and the U.S. Constitution in the hopes of guaranteeing control of the presidency. This attack on the Electoral College would give large left-leaning states … an unconstitutionally outsized impact on the outcome of our presidential elections.
At the moment, a similar law has been passed by 15 states possessing 189 electoral votes. In other words, 89 more electoral college votes are necessary before these “popular vote” laws become effective in abolishing the Electoral College.
More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/32626-government-watchdog-to-sue-colorado-over-its-popular-vote-law
JW explained the issue at stake:
Currently, most states award all their Electoral College votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state.
But … when a state, such as Colorado, passes legislation to join the National Popular Vote Compact, it pledges that all of that state’s electoral votes will be given to whichever presidential candidate wins the popular vote nationwide, rather than the candidate who won the vote in just that state….
The Electoral College … balances the interests of citizens in both large and small states by requiring candidates to seek votes in less populous states whose interests might otherwise be ignored.
Under [national popular vote] a state could award its Electoral College votes to a presidential candidate who lost the state’s popular vote.
Tom Fitton, JW’s president, was much more direct about the threat of the National Popular Vote movement to the Republic:
Leftists in Colorado and other states want to undo the Electoral College and the U.S. Constitution in the hopes of guaranteeing control of the presidency. This attack on the Electoral College would give large left-leaning states … an unconstitutionally outsized impact on the outcome of our presidential elections.
At the moment, a similar law has been passed by 15 states possessing 189 electoral votes. In other words, 89 more electoral college votes are necessary before these “popular vote” laws become effective in abolishing the Electoral College.
More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/32626-government-watchdog-to-sue-colorado-over-its-popular-vote-law