PDA

View Full Version : Media hit piece: Trump tells The Sun: Meghan Markle is 'nasty,'




enhanced_deficit
05-31-2019, 11:59 PM
Media again publishing headlines based on MAGA statement without full context:

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/shutterstock-editorial-10231707a-huge-1557501120.jpg



Trump tells The Sun: Meghan Markle is 'nasty,' Boris Johnson would do a 'very good job' as Prime Minister

By Maegan Vazquez and Luke McGee, CNN
Fri May 31, 2019

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump set the stage for his upcoming visit to the United Kingdom, Ireland and France next week during a wide-ranging interview with the British newspaper The Sun, weighing in on everything from outgoing UK Prime Minister Theresa May's handling of Brexit to the contenders vying to replace her to Meghan Markle's dislike of his politics.

The royal family

During his interview with The Sun, Trump was confronted (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9196110/donald-trump-meghan-markle-uk-visit/) by comments made by Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, ahead of the 2016 election.
Speaking on "The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore" in 2016, Markle called Trump misogynistic (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgvV0R1n1W8) and said his politics are divisive, saying she would move to Canada (https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a27594081/meghan-markle-skipping-trump-meeting/) if he won the presidency.
Trump responded, "I didn't know that she was nasty. I hope she is OK. ..." He seemed to bury the hatchet saying, "I am sure she will go excellently (as a royal). She will be very good."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/31/politics/donald-trump-meghan-markle-nasty-boris-johnson-good-prime-minister/index.html






https://media.fox35orlando.com/media.fox35orlando.com/photo/2019/05/28/meghan%20markle%20prince%20harry%20president%20tru mp_1559058133394.png_7318700_ver1.0_1280_720.jpg


Meghan Markle to skip lunch with Prince Harry, Donald Trump and Queen Elizabeth during state visit (http://www.fox5dc.com/news/politics/meghan-markle-to-skip-lunch-with-prince-harry-donald-trump-and-queen-elizabeth-during-state-visit)

Swordsmyth
06-01-2019, 12:01 AM
He seemed to bury the hatchet saying, "I am sure she will go excellently (as a royal). She will be very good."

LOL

He's not burying the hatchet, he's saying the royals are nasty.

And he is right.

enhanced_deficit
06-01-2019, 12:05 AM
LOL

He's not burying the hatchet, he's saying the royals are nasty.

And he is right.


Why you say that, what did they do?

They might not be perfect buy on the surface they seem better for humanity than than Bush-Cheney type leaders/neocons etc.

UWDude
06-01-2019, 12:34 AM
Why you say that, what did they do?



Molest Children, if not them, they have known about it for a long time in the upper eschelons of British Society, and have protected many pedos in politics, sports, the Church, and media. Britain has had multiple major child pedo rings stories explode in the news, then disappear, in the past 20 years. It is one of the worst places for protected pedophiles, aside from the lassez faire way many southeast Asian countries handle child trafficking.

Did you feel a change in the energy today?

Something has happened, hasn't it?

timosman
06-01-2019, 12:51 AM
http://e.lvme.me/phyd4sh.jpg

UWDude
06-01-2019, 12:57 AM
All of them have been shaken.
It is starting to dawn on them the world is far more complex than they ever could have imagined.

So they played as if the world was simple,
While those who knew the complexities, and the seeming impossibilities, we all put our minds together, and began to turn the gears the other way around.

And the MFers are probably torturing Assange to death tonight.

Firestarter
06-02-2019, 08:10 AM
Molest Children, if not them, they have known about it for a long time in the upper eschelons of British Society, and have protected many pedos in politics, sports, the Church, and media. Britain has had multiple major child pedo rings stories explode in the news, then disappear, in the past 20 years. It is one of the worst places for protected pedophiles, aside from the lassez faire way many southeast Asian countries handle child trafficking. Do you have any "evidence" for claims like that?!?

On 3 February 2010, Native American survivor of the notorious Catholic residential schools,
William Arnold Coombes (or “Combes”), testified:

In October, 1964 when I was 12 years old, I was an inmate at the Kamloops school and we were visited by the Queen of England and Prince Phillip. I remember it was strange because they came by themselves, no big fanfare or nothing. But I recognized them and the school principal told us it was the Queen and we all got given new clothes and good food for the first time in months the day before she arrived.

The day the Queen got to the school, I was part of a group of kids that went on a picnic with her and her husband and some of the priests, down to a meadow near Dead Man’s Creek. I remember it was weird because we all had to bend down and kiss her foot, a white laced boot.

After awhile, I saw the Queen leave the picnic with ten children from the school, and those kids never returned. We never heard anything more about them and never met them again even when we were older. They were all from around there but they all vanished.

The group that disappeared was seven boys and three girls, in age from six to fourteen years old. They were all from the smart group in class. Two of the boys were brothers and they were Metis from Quesnel. Their last name was Arnuse or Arnold. I don’t remember the others, just an occasional first name like Cecilia and there was an Edward.

What happened was also witnessed by my friend George Adolph, who was 11 years old at the time and a student there too. But he’s dead now


Coombes, was planned to testify in September 2011 for the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) on the crimes against humanity by Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, but he died before he got the chance: https://arcticcompass.blogspot.com/2014/06/inside-residential-schools.html

I’ve earlier seen a video with William Coombes telling his story, but this has disappeared...
This screenshot is from that video.
https://inpursuitofhappiness.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/william-combes.jpg?w=300

Anti Globalist
06-02-2019, 08:32 AM
Royals by nature are nasty.

UWDude
06-02-2019, 09:46 AM
Do you have any "evidence" for claims like that?!?

On 3 February 2010, Native American survivor of the notorious Catholic residential schools,
William Arnold Coombes (or “Combes”), testified:



Coombes, was planned to testify in September 2011 for the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) on the crimes against humanity by Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, but he died before he got the chance: https://arcticcompass.blogspot.com/2014/06/inside-residential-schools.html

I’ve earlier seen a video with William Coombes telling his story, but this has disappeared...
This screenshot is from that video.
https://inpursuitofhappiness.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/william-combes.jpg?w=300

There was recently (2014?) a huge child sex scandal in Britain involving the Royals and the London police, and in a few days, it was gone. This is common for british child sex scandals, as it has happened before in a house of commons one/house of lords, and a childrens soccer league one. All three were enormous, and included police cover up.

British Press is beholden to the Royal family. So if the Royal family tells them to stop the presses, the press will comply. And it did.

There is also of course Jimmy Saville, which everybody who was anybody knew he was a child rapist, and yet nothing was said until after he died.

And then a couple years ago there was the case of a young child falling to their death naked from one of the windows of Buckingham Palace.

The problem is, I cant even re-ggogle these, (because I tried yesterday, and instantly regretted it), there is a chance I get a bunch of child porn, since it is still quite easy to find.

So these people can get away with it, because investigating it is a crime, (a la Pete Townshend). Whether Pete Townshend was investigating dick in hand or gun in hand, I don't know.

Zippyjuan
06-02-2019, 10:42 AM
Trump denies it but the paper has the audio tape to prove it. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48491602

1135165268261519361


The US former actress has been a vocal critic of Mr Trump.

She supported his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton, in the 2016 election and has referred to him as "divisive" and a "misogynist".

Told of her comments during his interview with the Sun, President Trump said it was the first time he had heard them.

"I didn't know that. What can I say? I didn't know that she was nasty," he said.

He went on to say that he was glad she had joined the royal family and he believed she would make a "very good" princess.

"It is nice, and I am sure she will do excellently," he said.

On Saturday the Sun posted an audio recording of the interview on its website.

Warrior_of_Freedom
06-02-2019, 11:54 AM
She's not even pretty. Ever seen a close up? Rememeber that's WITH makeup. No idea what he saw in her. Could get any girl with his status as a member of an obsolete monarchy.

RonZeplin
06-02-2019, 02:57 PM
Molest Children, if not them, they have known about it for a long time in the upper eschelons of British Society, and have protected many pedos in politics, sports, the Church, and media. Britain has had multiple major child pedo rings stories explode in the news, then disappear, in the past 20 years. It is one of the worst places for protected pedophiles, aside from the lassez faire way many southeast Asian countries handle child trafficking.

Did you feel a change in the energy today?

Something has happened, hasn't it?

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5944c7fd2100002a0033cae5.jpeg?cache=drpg827gpx&ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

Gay Teacher Of The Year Fans LGBTQ Pride In Viral Photo With Donald Trump
Nikos Giannopoulos “celebrates the joy and freedom of gender nonconformity” in a photo with Donald and Melania Trump.

t's disgusting that we now have a President that promotes pedophilia in schools from the Oval Office, at the taxpayers expense.

The previous GOP presidential candidate, Mitt Romney did the same in Mass.

UWDude
06-02-2019, 03:32 PM
t's disgusting that we now have a President that promotes pedophilia in schools from the Oval Office, at the taxpayers expense.

The previous GOP presidential candidate, Mitt Romney did the same in Mass.

I've seen the light, hallelujah!
Orange Man Bad!

UWDude
06-02-2019, 03:37 PM
Trump denies it but the paper has the audio tape to prove it. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48491602

1135165268261519361

He said,

"I dont see why she was so nasty about me"

MSM reports:

OMG Trump said "she was so nasty!"

TheTexan
06-02-2019, 04:20 PM
He said,

"I dont see why she was so nasty about me"

MSM reports:

OMG Trump said "she was so nasty!"

OMG NO HE DIDNT!

UWDude
06-02-2019, 04:23 PM
OMG NO HE DIDNT!

It's always tea-time with the British Press.

TheTexan
06-02-2019, 04:44 PM
It's always tea-time with the British Press.

I guess they were serving LIES with their biscuits.

nikcers
06-02-2019, 04:56 PM
He said,

"I dont see why she was so nasty about me"

MSM reports:

OMG Trump said "she was so nasty!"

They have have a right to say what they want, free speech and free press and all. Since they are basically being controlled by the deep state they should be called freedom lies.

Firestarter
06-03-2019, 08:15 AM
There was recently (2014?) a huge child sex scandal in Britain involving the Royals and the London police, and in a few days, it was gone. This is common for british child sex scandals, as it has happened before in a house of commons one/house of lords, and a childrens soccer league one. All three were enormous, and included police cover up.
I'm not saying that there wasn't, but often completely fake pedo scandals are made into a media hysteria (in the Kingdom of the Netherlands we have the Joris Demmink story, for example, to hide the crimes of the Royals).



There is also of course Jimmy Saville, which everybody who was anybody knew he was a child rapist, and yet nothing was said until after he died. OK, Jimmy Savile is a good one...



And then a couple years ago there was the case of a young child falling to their death naked from one of the windows of Buckingham Palace. I don't know about that one.
I DO remember a hoax video of a nude man climbing from a room in Buckingham Palace with a rope.


Then there’s Jeffrey Epstein, the good friend of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, who ran a pedo ring with Ghislaine Maxwell (daughter of media tycoon Robert Maxwell).
Virginia Roberts has complained that as a child she was molested by Epstein, Maxwell and Prince Andrew. “Randy Andy” has denied.
See him with his arm around 17-year-old Virginia, shortly before he had sex with her (according to Virginia) in 2001. That’s Maxwell standing in the background (this was at her house if I remember correctly).
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/12/2464798E00000578-2906981-Allegations_Ghislaine_Maxwell_is_accused_of_facili tating_Prince_-m-11_1421102177617.jpg

In 2000, Andrew arrived in Florida on Trump’s private plane. Andrew, Epstein, Maxwell and Trump were later hanging out at the Mar-a-Lago.
According to some Trump retards, Epstein was expelled from the Mar-a-Lago in 1999, after Epstein was trying to seduce an underage girl. See Donald, Melania, Jeff and Ghislaine Maxwell, Mar-a-Lago, 12 February 2000.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fz73O4lOaik/WjLSdarfhfI/AAAAAAAAi4I/7mRZkM0TjrQ7S3laA9RNyf7RlpMFCOkYQCLcBGAs/s320/Trump%2BMelania%2BEpstein%2BMaxwell.jpg

Firestarter
06-03-2019, 08:19 AM
t's disgusting that we now have a President that promotes pedophilia in schools from the Oval Office, at the taxpayers expense.
I guess that in the context of your post, it's less disgusting to have a President, who paid organisations that promote gay pedophilia in schools at his own expense?!?

In 2012, Donald Trump donated $20,000 to homosexual activists of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) that promoted: 1) "fisting" to middle school students; 2) books excusing homosexual paedophilia; 3) “homosexuality" to children as early as kindergarten.
“Fisting” is stuffing a fist into the “anus” for sexual reasons.

Kevin Jennings founded GLSEN in 1990. He and (other) homosexual teachers (including Jaki Williams) began indoctrinating children about the LGBT lifestyle from the age of 5.
This included teachers “casually” showing that a “mother a father” for “parents” is just as “normal” as “two dads” or “two moms”.

Jennings has stated that he was “inspired” by Harry Hay, who publicly stated that homosexual statutory rape is “precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world. And they would be welcoming this, and welcoming the opportunity for young gay kids to have the kind of experience that they would need”: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/donald-trump-donated-to-group-that-promotes-homosexuality-in-kindergarten-f
(archived here: http://archive.is/11tpF)

Trump defended this donation, by telling that it wasn’t his own choice. These donations were part of Trump's role in his reality television show, in which Trump would make a matching donation to charities of the choice of the guests on the show.
Aubrey O'Day appeared on “Celebrity Apprentice” and was playing to benefit GLSEN: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trumps-donations-to-lgbt-groups-were-part-of-reality-tv-show-not-private-ph

kahless
06-03-2019, 08:33 AM
She's not even pretty. Ever seen a close up? Rememeber that's WITH makeup. No idea what he saw in her. Could get any girl with his status as a member of an obsolete monarchy.

Virtue signalling is a very powerful motivation for some people and likely in his case part of the sexual attraction.

juleswin
06-03-2019, 08:38 AM
She's not even pretty. Ever seen a close up? Rememeber that's WITH makeup. No idea what he saw in her. Could get any girl with his status as a member of an obsolete monarchy.

Come on people, just because you disagree with someone politically doesn't mean they are not pretty. I bet if AOC or Meghan Markle was spouting pro liberty messages, people around here would consider her to be very pretty inside and out

Warrior_of_Freedom
06-03-2019, 09:37 AM
Come on people, just because you disagree with someone politically doesn't mean they are not pretty. I bet if AOC or Meghan Markle was spouting pro liberty messages, people around here would consider her to be very pretty inside and out

Nope. Horse face, butter face.

Warrior_of_Freedom
06-03-2019, 09:38 AM
Virtue signalling is a very powerful motivation for some people and likely in his case part of the sexual attraction.

It reminds me of the people who said Obama was hot :nauseated:

Superfluous Man
06-03-2019, 10:49 AM
He said,

"I dont see why she was so nasty about me"

MSM reports:

OMG Trump said "she was so nasty!"

What you're claiming is not what's on the audio I heard.

enhanced_deficit
06-03-2019, 11:52 AM
She's not even pretty. Ever seen a close up? Rememeber that's WITH makeup. No idea what he saw in her. Could get any girl with his status as a member of an obsolete monarchy.

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. And above comment is probably going to invite backlash from both lib and conservative quarters.

Roasting of Sarah Huckabee Sanders ignites backlash on Twitter
Watching a wife and mother be humiliated on national television for her looks is deplorable. I have experienced insults about my appearance from the president. All women have a duty to unite when these attacks happen and the WHCA owes Sarah an apology.
— Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) April 29, 2018 (https://twitter.com/morningmika/status/990585968825597954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)








Virtue signalling is a very powerful motivation for some people and likely in his case part of the sexual attraction.

Bit off topic but similar interracial romances are getting more common and trend could accelerate with MAGA's support (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?522859-Media-continues-to-lie-amp-call-Trump-racist-even-when-he-publicly-supports-interracial-romances&p=6636767&viewfull=1#post6636767).

https://pressfrom.info/upload/images/real/2017/08/18/kara-young-a-biracial-model-and-donald-j-trump-at-a-film-screening-in-manhattan-in-1998-the-two-date_800293_.jpg?content=1

Biracial Model Who Dated Donald Trump Says He Said: 'You're like Derek Jeter'

UWDude
06-03-2019, 12:29 PM
What you're claiming is not what's on the audio I heard.

They asked him about her calling him a misogynist and divisive and other things in 2016...

and he replied “I didn’t know that, What can I say? I didn’t know that she was nasty.”

But the president seemed surprised when told he wouldn't be rubbing elbows with Meghan. “I didn’t know that," he said. "I hope she is OK.”

Overall, Trump predicted Meghan will make “a very good” royal, adding that he was "sure she will do excellently."

“She will be very good. I hope she does (succeed)," he said.

He wasn't saying he didn't know she was disgusting and putrid, he was saying he didn't know she had said nasty things about him.

But here comes enhanced_deficit with another huge post full of garbage, pictures of Trump shaking hands with somebody 15 years ago, and innuendo about the jews.

Superfluous Man
06-03-2019, 12:50 PM
They asked him about her calling him a misogynist and divisive and other things in 2016...

and he replied “I didn’t know that, What can I say? I didn’t know that she was nasty.”

But the president seemed surprised when told he wouldn't be rubbing elbows with Meghan. “I didn’t know that," he said. "I hope she is OK.”

Overall, Trump predicted Meghan will make “a very good” royal, adding that he was "sure she will do excellently."

“She will be very good. I hope she does (succeed)," he said.

He wasn't saying he didn't know she was disgusting and putrid, he was saying he didn't know she had said nasty things about him.

But here comes enhanced_deficit with another huge post full of garbage, pictures of Trump shaking hands with somebody 15 years ago, and innuendo about the jews.

Your interpretation makes sense.

But his response was weird if that's the case. Rather than just saying that he was referring to her saying something nasty about him, he said it never happened and challenged anyone to listen to the audio with apparent confidence that his calling her nasty wasn't on the audio at all. The hubris of that is what makes him really look foolish to me, since it's plain to anyone who takes him up on that that he indeed did call her nasty, whatever he meant by it.

UWDude
06-03-2019, 01:03 PM
Your interpretation makes sense.

But his response was weird if that's the case. Rather than just saying that he was referring to her saying something nasty about him, he said it never happened and challenged anyone to listen to the audio with apparent confidence that his calling her nasty wasn't on the audio at all. The hubris of that is what makes him really look foolish to me, since it's plain to anyone who takes him up on that that he indeed did call her nasty, whatever he meant by it.


White people own the media, White people own the banks, white people own the kosher foods and dominate the yarmaluke and diamond industries. The death of six million white people at the hands of Hitler is a lie.

This is an anti-semitic, yet jews are never mentioned.

Words have context.

And the media is the master of taking words out of context

Superfluous Man
06-03-2019, 01:04 PM
This is an anti-semitic, yet jews are never mentioned.

Words have context.

And the media is the master of taking words out of context

Be that as it may, there's no way to spin Trump's response in that Tweet to make it not reflect poorly on him. That's on him, not the media.

UWDude
06-03-2019, 01:09 PM
Be that as it may, there's no way to spin Trump's response in that Tweet to make it not reflect poorly on him. That's on him, not the media.

There is ironic justice coming your way.

Talk about "reflecting on someone poorly"

LoL

The motions were set a couple of days ago.

tfurrh
06-03-2019, 09:59 PM
Nope. Horse face, butter face.

https://i.imgflip.com/32lgw1.jpg

enhanced_deficit
06-05-2019, 08:33 AM
https://i.imgflip.com/32lgw1.jpg

AOC seems to have brainwashed many with her dance moves.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKV04hKtPpY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKV04hKtPpY

nikcers
06-05-2019, 09:02 AM
Some poeple like crazy eyes.

Firestarter
06-06-2019, 08:04 AM
Everybody should know that Donald Trump has always been an a$$-kisser for these Royal degenerates (if he wasn´t he wouldn´t be president)...


President Donald has clarified his “nasty” comments about Meghan, replying to her claims that she would move to Canada if he won (I thought she was living the life of the rich and corrupt in good old England?):
They said some of the things that she said and it’s actually on tape. And I said: ‘Well, I didn’t know she was nasty’.
I wasn’t referring to she’s nasty. I said she was nasty about me. And essentially I didn’t know she was nasty about me
You know what? She’s doing a good job, I hope she enjoys her life... I think she’s very nice.

Donald Trump had nothing but kind words about Prince Harry after rumours that Harry had avoided him during his tour of Buckingham Palace; calling Harry a "great" guy and denied that Harry had been "frosty" towards him, with: "No, no, no, just the opposite”.
Donald Trump claimed that he had a nice conversation with Harry:
I did, I did and I congratulated him and I think he’s a terrific guy. The Royal Family is really nice.

In fact, he spent a lot of time talking to Ivanka and talking to my family. I went up - he couldn’t have been nicer. Couldn’t have been nicer… I think he’s great. https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2019060473799/donald-trump-piers-morgan-interview-prince-harry/