NH governor vetoes state income tax "not now, not ever"

[kona]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Happy for Anti Federalist

[oyarde]

What were they planning on spending it on ?

[Swordsmyth]

:up:

[Anti Globalist]

Great news for the liberty minded people of NH.

[oyarde]

Here the only major problem left is public education . All the property tax and half the state tax are used to fund it and it is protected in the state constitution . Property taxes are capped and any increases in state taxes would never clear the state senate . Sure would be nice to be rid of publicly funded education and eliminate those taxes .

[Zippyjuan]

What were they planning on spending it on ?

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/


By vetoing the bill, Sununu protected New Hampshire workers from a 0.5% tax that would have cost the average worker $267 per year.

That tax would have gone toward a government-mandated paid family leave program providing workers with up to 12 weeks of paid family or medical leave covering 60% of their wages.

In reality, covering the leave that workers say they need would require about five times the proposed 0.5% rate ($1,333/worker). To date, paid family leave taxes in other states have stayed below 1% of pay, but that’s largely because the programs lack awareness and accessibility. In New Jersey, only 1% of workers who were eligible for the program actually used it.

[oyarde]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/

Sounds like a good veto .

[Brian4Liberty]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/

So you are saying that the tax is good?

[Brian4Liberty]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/amp/

Happy for Anti Federalist

And the bad news is that the state Senate and House passed this new tax.

[Swordsmyth]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/

They always start with the thin end of the wedge.


It DOESN'T stay that low EVER.


And an income tax is just a horrible kind of tax that you don't want, the only kind of tax that might be worse is a tax on wealth/assets.

[timosman]

And the bad news is that the state Senate and House passed this new tax.

Can we ask Ron Paul to talk to them? :tears:

[Brian4Liberty]

Can we ask Ron Paul to talk to them? :tears:

I bet he has visited the “Live (kinda) Free or (literally not literally) Die” State.

[Anti Federalist]

And the bad news is that the state Senate and House passed this new tax.

They may have the stroke to override his veto.

A whole slew of "woke" assholes invaded the state house.

[eleganz]

Whats most ironic is Sununu was a major player in fk'ing Ron (and all of us) at the 2012 RNC convention.

Remember, we had enough state delegates to petition for a floor vote, the signatures were done, they just didn't let us do it.

[Brian4Liberty]

They may have the stroke to override his veto.

A whole slew of "woke" assholes invaded the state house.

It seems that the Free State Project was no competition for mass migration.

[ATruepatriot]

It seems that the Free State Project was no competition for mass migration.

Here is how "displacement" becomes a real thing. We are going through this right now in Az.

[Swordsmyth]

It seems that the Free State Project was no competition for mass migration.
Liberty never is, that is why any free society must control immigration.

[Zippyjuan]

Liberty never is, that is why any free society must control immigration.

"Free society" and "Control" really don't go together. You are talking "closed" society.

[Swordsmyth]

"Free society" and "Control" really don't go together. You are talking "closed" society.

The society is free because it controls its membership and they all grant liberty to eachother, the world isn't free to join the society, if the world ever became free the society could remove its membership control.

[Zippyjuan]

The society is free because it controls its membership and they all grant liberty to eachother, the world isn't free to join the society, if the world ever became free the society could remove its membership control.

But no liberty for others. Unless liberty is for all, it is not liberty. It is a privilege only granted to a select few. It is a country club.

[Swordsmyth]

But no liberty for others. Unless liberty is for all, it is not liberty. It is a privilege only granted to a select few.
LOL

The society members grant liberty to everyone in their own lands.
If the whole world was composed of those who would grant liberty to the members they would grant them the liberty of joining the society too but those who won't grant liberty to others lose the liberty to join the society.

[Brian4Liberty]

But no liberty for others. Unless liberty is for all, it is not liberty. It is a privilege only granted to a select few. It is a country club.

Unless it is global, it will not work. Trotsky 101.

[Swordsmyth]

Unless it is global, it will not work. Trotskyite 101.
Satanism 101:

“Do What Thou Wilt Shall be the Whole of the Law” -Aleister Crowley

[Stratovarious]

https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/how-this-governors-emphatic-veto-of-state-income-tax-thwarts-mandate-for-paid-family-leave/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Happy for @Anti Federalist (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=3169)

Fake kudos from me to him;

Everyone that thinks they own their homes there is actually paying rent to the gobt' .

Big liberator.........

:rollingeyes:

[timosman]

But no liberty for others. Unless liberty is for all, it is not liberty. It is a privilege only granted to a select few. It is a country club.

Commie dialectic in progress. :happy:

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

But no liberty for others. Unless liberty is for all, it is not liberty. .


But you're radically opposed to Ron and Rand. So what gives?