PDA

View Full Version : Andrew Napolitano: 'Of Course' Mueller Found 'Some Evidence Of A Conspiracy'




juleswin
03-29-2019, 11:01 AM
https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/1Ke1ShEcgj75GmHVk4yNsg--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9ODAw/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_huffington_post_584/1c9068ee84cedc209c9606ef3ebe5247

Rebecca Shapiro
,HuffPost•March 27, 2019

Donald Trump claimed “total exoneration” after Attorney General William Barr released his summary of the special counsel report on interference in the 2016 U.S. elections. But Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano told viewers Wednesday that the president’s legal troubles are not over.

The former judge said Barr’s summary indicated that “some evidence of a conspiracy” was found during the investigation, which only stokes further interest in the full report.

Barr wrote that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team did not conclude that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russian actors to affect the outcome of the election, but he also said the report did not totally exonerate the president from obstructing justice to interfere with the special counsel’s probe.

“Why would the attorney general reveal any ambivalence on the part of the government about whether or not the president had complied by the law?” Napolitano wondered. “By doing so, he’s invited people to want to dig deeper than the four-page summary.”

Barr wrote that Mueller left the decision of bringing obstruction charges against the president up to him. The attorney general then determined that the evidence gathered during the special counsel’s investigation did not establish that Trump committed a crime.

“When [Barr] said in his four-page letter that the government could not establish the existence of a conspiracy, he meant it could not establish it beyond a reasonable doubt,” Napolitano said. “Did [Mueller] find some evidence of a conspiracy? Of course, they did. If they didn’t, [Barr] would have told us.”

The Fox News analyst predicted that Mueller’s report would inevitably be released, a demand Democrats have been making since Sunday, when Barr submitted his summary of the special counsel’s key findings to Congress.

In a later appearance on host Neil Cavuto’s Fox Business program, Napolitano continued to opine on Trump’s legal battles ahead.

“In the 700-page summary ...
there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice, just not enough evidence ... to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt,” Napolitano said, adding that ethically, prosecutors cannot bring charges unless evidence meets that standard.

“Once the 700 pages come out, the Democrats and other Trump opponents will have a field day with what is in there,” he added. “If there was no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction, the attorney general would have told us so. He didn’t. So there is something in there.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-apos-andrew-napolitano-225037005.html

I guess some people just won't give up on this case, shame :(

Warrior_of_Freedom
03-29-2019, 11:50 AM
I thought it was going to be a joke and say the conspiracy was against Trump, not by Trump, lol. I can't wait to see this "report" is it filled with photos with Trump and Putin framed in the same photograph at multi-national meetings? Maybe shaking hands? lol.

Swordsmyth
03-29-2019, 06:47 PM
Guilty until proven innocent (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?532888-Guilty-until-proven-innocent) Started by susano (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?1515-susano), 03-27-2019

Stratovarious
03-29-2019, 07:13 PM
I've said it here several times, I no longer trust Napolitano, after years of admiration ,
of course I don't trust Trump anymore either, but Russian Collusion, please........

TheTexan
03-29-2019, 07:21 PM
Is Andrew Napolitano colluding with Russia???

juleswin
03-29-2019, 09:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsEwdwVVFiI

AngryCanadian
03-29-2019, 09:51 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsEwdwVVFiI

It would be rather irnoic when they dont find anything again, a report is what a report shows are the leftists really that clueless?

unknown
03-30-2019, 01:16 AM
ETA

So the judge is saying that theres something there but not enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judge seems to be speaking from a legal point of view as opposed to partisan.

Swordsmyth
03-30-2019, 01:18 AM
So the judge is saying that theres something there but not enough to bring charges.

Judge seems to be speaking from a legal point of view as opposed to partisan.
He is speaking from a #NeverTrump fantasy point of view, How would he know what is in it?
He will look pretty stupid when the report is released.

bv3
03-30-2019, 01:21 AM
Maybe it just took them that long to spin a tale around Trump that wouldn't implicate the rest of the world in some way hahahaha.

unknown
03-30-2019, 01:30 AM
He is speaking from a #NeverTrump fantasy point of view, How would he know what is in it?
He will look pretty stupid when the report is released.

Napolitano doesnt hate Trump although its obvious to the Judge that Trump is no libertarian nor a disciple of the Constitution.

Hes just stating the facts.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html


The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Swordsmyth
03-30-2019, 02:59 PM
Napolitano doesnt hate Trump although its obvious to the Judge that Trump is no libertarian nor a disciple of the Constitution.

Hes just stating the facts.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html
He is spewing propaganda and his dedication to the Constitution has slipped recently:

Judge Swamp strikes again (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523218-Judge-Swamp-strikes-again)

juleswin
03-30-2019, 04:10 PM
ETA

So the judge is saying that theres something there but not enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judge seems to be speaking from a legal point of view as opposed to partisan.

You can't just assume there is something there, that is him playing politics. This him wildly speculating that there is something there even though everything from Trumps action shows that he is more hawkish against Russia than Obama could ever dream of.

kahless
03-30-2019, 05:51 PM
Such a shame the Judge became Judge Swamp several years ago. Whenever his name comes up everyone sees it to and comments with the usual what happened to him. Makes you wonder, under orders or under threat or just pure hatred of Trump due to some slight by Trump.

unknown
03-30-2019, 09:59 PM
He is spewing propaganda and his dedication to the Constitution has slipped recently:

Judge Swamp strikes again (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523218-Judge-Swamp-strikes-again)

Wheres the so called propaganda in this case?

As far as I can tell, he said that Trump isnt exonerated but theres not enough to convict him...

Your pro-Trump bias isnt letting you see straight.

unknown
03-30-2019, 10:06 PM
You can't just assume there is something there, that is him playing politics. This him wildly speculating that there is something there even though everything from Trumps action shows that he is more hawkish against Russia than Obama could ever dream of.

Well, I dunno, isnt he basing his comments on Barr's letter?

Although the actual issue is a bit weird from a peace perspective. I would imagine that most of us Ron Paul types were hoping for improved dialogue and relations with Russia.

iirc, Trump asked why we werent supporting Assad and the Russians against ISUS. Of-course Trump changed his stance almost immediately once they threatened to release a tape of him licking a dog's butt.

juleswin
03-30-2019, 10:17 PM
Well, I dunno, isnt he basing his comments on Barr's letter?

Although the actual issue is a bit weird from a peace perspective. I would imagine that most of us Ron Paul types were hoping for improved dialogue and relations with Russia.

iirc, Trump asked why we werent supporting Assad and the Russians against ISUS. Of-course Trump changed his stance almost immediately once they threatened to release a tape of him licking a dog's butt.

See, these sort of points will probably be what Judge Nap is talking about as evidence of conspiracy. Someone from the Trump admin talked to a Russian in private or Trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's email during a public event or Trump said something nice about Putin or Trump tried to do a hotel deal in Moscow. Something along that line is probably what he would count as evidence of conspiracy. Well, I don't think those are real evidence and Robert Mueller would have said something if he though Barr's summary wasn't accurate.

Also, he is such a constitutionalist that he never argues the point that collusion isn't actually a crime. I really want to like Judge Nap and its obvious that I hate Trump, but the witch hunt is over and its time to move on. Trump is not a Putin puppet plus whatever that he did with the Russians is no worse than what other pols do with our other allies. Judge Nap, Rachel Maddow, Adam Schiff and the rest of the hold outs should call it a day.

Swordsmyth
03-30-2019, 10:53 PM
Wheres the so called propaganda in this case?

As far as I can tell, he said that Trump isnt exonerated but theres not enough to convict him...

Your pro-Trump bias isnt letting you see straight.
LOL

You have the bias, he is making anti-Trump claims about what is in it when he hasn't seen it.