PDA

View Full Version : Trump’s Interior Department To Scrap Federal Protections On The Gray Wolf




Swordsmyth
03-08-2019, 10:38 PM
The Department of the Interior (DOI) is expected to propose rolling back federal protections on gray wolf populations in the contiguous United States in the coming days, The Associated Press reports.Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt broke (https://www.apnews.com/b2e0ee9f81da4e1db9672a3725354720) the news Wednesday in a speech at a wildlife and natural resources conference in Denver, Colorado.
“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will soon propose a rule to delist the gray wolf in the lower 48 states and return management of the species back to the states and tribes,” a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) spokesperson told The Daily Caller News Foundation in a statement.
“Recovery of the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a one of our nation’s great conservation successes, with the wolf joining other cherished species, such as the bald eagle, that have been brought back from the brink with the help of the ESA,” the FWS said.
The agency has attempted (https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/28/gop-pushes-bill-to-get-the-non-endangered-gray-wolf-off-the-endangered-species-list/) to delist the gray wolf since 2003 after the animal’s recovery passed the threshold to be considered endangered. Environmental and conservation groups have torpedoed motions to delist the wolf with lawsuits that courts use to block proposed rules.


The federal government placed the gray wolf on the Endangered Species List in 1975 when 1,000 of the animals roamed the U.S. That number has since risen to over 5,000 animals, according to the AP.
The government successfully lifted the protected status from wolves in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana in 2011. Each state controls the resilient animal through trophy hunts to limit the predator’s spread and contact with people and livestock.



Many wolves are killed because they are a danger to people or animals. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department recorded 81 wolves taken, meaning killed, in 2018. Nearly half of that number, 37, were killed in “predator areas” where each animal is considered dangerous and can be killed without a license, a Wyoming Game and Fish Department spokeswoman told TheDCNF.
Farmers and ranchers have complained about the spread of wolves for years, saying the predators are responsible for killing off livestock and threatening people living in rural areas.
The federal government spends (https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/21/endangered-species-cost-billions/) millions to enforce gray wolf protections and fund conservation programs. In 2007, gray wolf conservation cost (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/how-much-did-the-u-s-spend-in-2007-to-protect-endangered-species/) taxpayers $4.3 million, Scientific American reported.

https://truepundit.com/trumps-interior-department-to-scrap-federal-protections-on-the-gray-wolf/

Matt Collins
03-09-2019, 01:22 AM
In the Yellowstone area, the gray wolf wasn't even the natural species that had been eliminated last century but yet they "reintroduced" them anyway. The government screws everything up.

AngryCanadian
03-09-2019, 01:55 AM
In the Yellowstone area, the gray wolf wasn't even the natural species that had been eliminated last century but yet they "reintroduced" them anyway. The government screws everything up.

https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem

It seems Trump enjoys killing precious animals that actually do lot more good then bad for the forests that's a shame.
Wolves only kill humans if they invade their areas. Or foolish camp to close near them.

Swordsmyth
03-09-2019, 02:01 AM
https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem

It seems Trump enjoys killing precious animals that actually do lot more good then bad for the forests that's a shame.
Wolves only kill humans if they invade their areas. Or foolish camp to close near them.
:rolleyes:

Allowing humans to hunt the Elk would have been a better idea.

Even if you like the "reintroduction" of wolves they have established a "healthy" population and must now be kept in check.

Wolves do attack humans and they prey on livestock, "reintroducing" wolves is a globalist plot to deny Americans safe access to our backwoods and harm our rural communities' livelihoods.

TheTexan
03-09-2019, 02:15 AM
I've been really impressed by how well Trump has been protecting our 2nd amendment hunting rights.

Wolf hunting is again in season :cool:

AngryCanadian
03-09-2019, 02:19 AM
:rolleyes:

Allowing humans to hunt the Elk would have been a better idea.

Even if you like the "reintroduction" of wolves they have established a "healthy" population and must now be kept in check.

Wolves do attack humans and they prey on livestock, "reintroducing" wolves is a globalist plot to deny Americans safe access to our backwoods and harm our rural communities' livelihoods.




Allowing humans to hunt the Elk would have been a better idea.
Yes among other endangered animals.


Even if you like the "reintroduction" of wolves they have established a "healthy" population and must now be kept in check.

By letting Nature be Nature with the reintroduction of wolves predators.
Wolves are like guardians of the forests that provide balance without them there would be no balance.

Ender
03-09-2019, 03:19 AM
By letting Nature be Nature with the reintroduction of wolves predators.
Wolves are like guardians of the forests that provide balance without them there would be no balance.

Exactly.

Swordsmyth
03-09-2019, 03:39 PM
Yes among other endangered animals.



By letting Nature be Nature with the reintroduction of wolves predators.
Wolves are like guardians of the forests that provide balance without them there would be no balance.


Exactly.
Man is part of nature and our policies should be designed to serve man.

enhanced_deficit
03-09-2019, 03:49 PM
It's good to see an uplifting http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon14.png story in the midst of recent string of http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon13.png http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon13.png http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon13.png http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/icons/icon13.png stories (Wall Funding Summit/emergency fail, , national debt controversy, Cohen hearings, Coulter-scam call, NK summit fail, Ilhan Omar-AIPAC resign call controversy etc) ahead of 2020. Time will tell how much this Gray Wolf deregulation win could galvanize GOP base but it's a positive flickering in a growing cluster of neg media headlines.

AngryCanadian
03-09-2019, 06:29 PM
Man is part of nature and our policies should be designed to serve man.

You mean designed to serve and kill endangered animals?

Swordsmyth
03-09-2019, 06:30 PM
You mean designed to serve and kill endangered animals?
If that is what is best for men.
And these wolves are no longer endangered.

oyarde
03-09-2019, 06:41 PM
The key here is federal protection . There should not be any . The states can manage these as they see necessary as they do with deer , trout , salmon , turkeys , grouse , quail , pheasants , coyotes , fox etc . The states have biologists etc on the payroll .

Swordsmyth
03-09-2019, 06:43 PM
The key here is federal protection . There should not be any . The states can manage these as they see necessary as they do with deer , trout , salmon , turkeys , grouse , quail , pheasants , coyotes , fox etc . The states have biologists etc on the payroll .
Absolutely, the people of each state can decide better than bureaucrats in DC.