PDA

View Full Version : Multiple 2020 Dems are openly calling to pack the Supreme Court with extra Justices




Swordsmyth
03-02-2019, 08:36 PM
Progressive groups are reaching out to 2020 Democratic presidential candidates to support their push to expand the number of Supreme Court justices in order to diminish the current conservative majority.
So far, the drive by the group named ‘Pack the Courts’ is getting two maybes from Democratic presidential contenders and a no from a likely White House hopeful.

“I don’t think we should be laughing at it,” South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a Democrat, said last week at an event in Philadelphia.


“Because in some ways it’s no more a shattering of norms than what’s already been done to get the judiciary to where it is today,” added Buttigieg, an Afghanistan War veteran who last month launched a presidential exploratory committee.
Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, who’s also launched a presidential exploratory committee, said last month on ‘Pod Save America’ that expanding the court or imposing term limits were “interesting ideas.”
But the move to increase the number of justices on the Supreme Court isn't flying with likely White House contender Rep. Eric Swalwell.
“I wouldn’t. I think nine is good number. It’s worked for our country,” the four-term Democratic congressman from California told Fox News on Monday after he headlined ‘Politics and Eggs,” a must stop for White House hopefuls in New Hampshire.
“I don’t want to let these extraordinary times that President Trump has put us in lead us to too many extraordinary remedies,” the former prosecutor explained. “I’d rather see us go back to a country of following the law, having qualified justices, and depending on the systems of government that we already have in place, just making those systems more accountable and work better.”


‘Pack the Courts’ told Fox News it is meeting with Buttigieg on Monday evening. The group highlighted that it’s in the process of reaching out to Gillibrand, as well as the campaigns of presidential candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kamala Harris of California.
“We’re in the process of reaching to every declared Democratic contender and hope to both enlighten them to the importance of this strategy for taking back the Court and enlist their support for their strategy,” ‘Pack the Court’ campaign manager Kate Kendell said.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2020-dems-being-urged-to-back-push-to-pack-supreme-court

Danke
03-02-2019, 08:57 PM
https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTU3OTYwNzIxMTM5NzcxMDkz/fdr-packed-courtgettyimages-96743822.jpg

Danke
03-02-2019, 08:59 PM
http://ushistoryscene.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/1-new-deal-supreme-court-granger.jpg

During the 2012 presidential election, many Republicans argued that, despite his promises in the 2008 campaign, incumbent President Barrack Obama had been unable to improve the economy in the four years of his presidency. Democrats countered that Obama was unable to change anything with the conservative Republican majority in Congress rejecting all of his plans. ((Tom Cohen. “GOP divide over Obama tax plan goes public,” CNN Politics (November 28, 2012). Accessed December 1, 2012. Cable News Network. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/28/politics/fiscal-cliff/index.html)) While these arguments may seem to apply exclusively to current political affairs, similar partisan issues have affected the American government since the drafting of the Constitution in 1787. When the Founding Fathers distributed governmental power into three distinct branches—the executive, the legislative, and the judiciary—they tried to separate the powers evenly to prevent any one branch from gaining too much control. Designed to give each section of the government its own autonomy, the separation of powers has been one of the defining aspects of American democracy. Although the branches were meant to work together in order to maintain the nation’s domestic and international affairs, throughout the years the bipartisan gridlock in Washington has prevented the passage of much legislation.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, like President Obama, faced a similar challenge in 1937. The Supreme Court rejected many of Roosevelt’s plans to reform the American economy during the Great Depression; they believed that these programs gave too much power to the federal government. To counteract the power of the judicial branch of the government, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced in his Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 that he intended to pack the Supreme Court with like-minded judges. Many politicians and average Americans were horrified as the plan threatened to tip the sacred balance of power between the federal branches. Although Congress did not approve the Bill, the Supreme Court Justices took tentative steps to show their compliance with FDR’s radical reforms. ((Gregory A. Caldeira. “Public Opinion and The U.S. Supreme Court: FDR’s Court-Packing Plan” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 81, No. 4 (1987): 1139-1153. Accessed November 23rd, 2012. American Political Science Association. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962582, 1139-1140)) In doing so, the court-packing scheme indirectly brought Roosevelt closer to his dream of a liberal court and a stronger centralized government.

fedupinmo
03-02-2019, 09:04 PM
It's a wierd planet when Eric Swallowell is the voice of reason.

Swordsmyth
03-02-2019, 09:08 PM
It's a wierd planet when Eric Swallowell is the voice of reason.
He will just threaten to nuke SCOTUS if they don't do what he wants.

timosman
03-02-2019, 09:09 PM
How will this strategy work when Trump wins in 2020? :confused:

fedupinmo
03-03-2019, 10:07 AM
How will this strategy work when Trump wins in 2020? :confused:

http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/66e8e228dc6457bcca4f7c8a945bed88http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/66e8e228dc6457bcca4f7c8a945bed88

Anti Globalist
03-03-2019, 12:49 PM
That's not going to work every well when Trump wins his reelection.