PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Men-Only Military Draft (unconstitutional)




Pauls' Revere
02-24-2019, 11:42 PM
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/men-only-military-draft-is-unconstitutional-federal-judge-rules/ar-BBU0Om9?OCID=ansmsnnews11

A federal judge has ruled that a men-only military draft is unconstitutional, but he stopped short of ordering the Selective Service System to register women.

The Houston judge sided with a San Diego men's advocacy group that challenged the government's practice of having only men sign up for the draft, citing sex discrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment's equal protection clause.

"This case balances on the tension between the constitutionally enshrined power of Congress to raise armies and the constitutional mandate that no person be denied the equal protection of the law," wrote U.S. District Judge Gray Miller of the Southern District of Texas.

The lawsuit was filed in 2013 against the Selective Service System by Texas resident James Lesmeister, who later added San Diego resident Anthony Davis and the San Diego-based National Coalition for Men as additional plaintiffs.

The two men had standing to sue the government because they were within the age range of 18 to 26 in which men in the United States are required to register with Selective Service.

"Forcing only males to register is an aspect of socially institutionalized male disposability and helps reinforce the stereotypes that support discrimination against men in other areas" such as divorce, child custody and domestic violence services, Coalition attorney Marc Angelucci said. "Women are now allowed in combat, so this decision is long overdue. After decades of sex discrimination against men in the Selective Service, the courts have finally found it unconstitutional to force only men to register."

The government asked the judge to dismiss the suit or stay a decision until a national commission studying the issue of women's draft registration reaches a recommendation.

The judge noted that could take years, and even then Congress isn't required to follow the commission's findings.

"Congress has been debating the male-only registration requirement since at least 1980," Miller wrote.

The government referred to a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court decision that the Military Selective Service Act was constitutional as written, to exclude women, because women restricted from combat were not offered similar opportunities that men had.

Miller found that reasoning no longer applicable, since the Department of Defense lifted all gender-based restrictions on military service - including combat roles - in 2015.

The judge likewise disagreed with the government's position that drafting women would be an administrative burden and that far more women than men will be found physically unfit for service after being drafted.

Congress has expressed few concerns about female physical ability, but did focus more on societal consequences of drafting young mothers to go off to war, Miller said.

"If there was ever a time to discuss 'the place of women in the Armed Services,' that time has passed," Miller wrote.

Visit The San Diego Union-Tribune at www.sandiegouniontribune.com


About F****&ing time! I'm not for state conscription but if you are going to have it, then this is the way to go. Get on board ladies.

TheTexan
02-24-2019, 11:49 PM
Makes sense. The women could be deployed to the military's cooking & cleaning divisions.

Pauls' Revere
02-24-2019, 11:51 PM
Makes sense. The women could be deployed to the military's cooking & cleaning divisions.

Ouch,...

Danke
02-25-2019, 02:39 AM
Makes sense. The women could be deployed to the military's cooking & cleaning divisions.

KP duty.

Schifference
02-25-2019, 05:42 AM
What about all those that go either way?

oyarde
02-25-2019, 07:03 PM
My State Constitution will not exempt militia duties so this has no meaning here . There are responsibilities .

Working Poor
02-25-2019, 07:13 PM
I think women in the military are fine but, I don't think women are suited for combat duty. I m not a feminist so my thinking on this issue might not be in keeping with the constitution. But I think women who would want to go into combat are really pretty stupid if they are calling it a "right".

Personally, I don't want to be equal to men.

dannno
02-25-2019, 07:32 PM
Personally, I don't want to be equal to men.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jze7b5cG8dw

euphemia
02-25-2019, 07:33 PM
Equality means equality. What will happen next is that conscription will end. Selective Service will go away, which is a good thing.

enhanced_deficit
02-25-2019, 07:39 PM
That is a major shift and would have far reaching implications if adopted as policy in future.

Looking at draft related dynamics during last Prseidential races, had this "unconstitutional" policy been reversed 50 years ago, political campaigns would have been more even and balanced. Hillary would not have avoided any draft related scrutiny while MAGA was being attacked by likes of Iraq war hero McCain as 'cadet bone spurs'.

Pauls' Revere
02-25-2019, 08:21 PM
Equality means equality. What will happen next is that conscription will end. Selective Service will go away, which is a good thing.

:up: