PDA

View Full Version : Trump Lies To Nation While Concealing Budget Bill That Encourages Child Trafficking




RonZeplin
02-15-2019, 05:33 PM
Trump Lies To Nation While Concealing Budget Bill That Encourages Child Trafficking (https://www.alipac.us/f8/trump-lies-nation-while-concealing-budget-bill-encourages-child-trafficking-369997/)

For National Release | February 15, 2019
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/12/a8/23/12a823d2354a515791243a7b5478f362.jpg

President Trump lied to the nation today by falsely claiming his administration stopped multiple illegal alien caravans, (https://youtu.be/FFIcGqjkORk)when in truth, he let them into the USA. Speaking for 40 minutes, he never mentioning he just signed the dastardly and secretive budget bill which incentivizes illegal immigration and child trafficking.

Trump just signed into a law a bill that 99% of Americans know nothing about which contains Amnesty for millions of illegals, incentives for child trafficking, an expansion of Trump's deadly catch and release policies, less detention space for illegals, reductions of interior immigration law enforcement, new buildings and buses to bring more illegals into the US, raising of legal immigration levels, a measly 1.3 billion for border fences, and severe restrictions on where border barriers can be built.

The vast majority of Trump's voters oppose the measures the immigration policies he just secretively signed into law.

Trump lied without challenge from the media when he claimed they were stopping caravan illegals from entering (https://youtu.be/FFIcGqjkORk)America (https://youtu.be/FFIcGqjkORk), when in truth Trump is letting the caravans in, which inspires more larger caravans to form. (View documentation 1 (https://www.alipac.us/f8/trump-lets-caravan-illegals-into-usa-inspiring-more-caravans-form-369614/)) .. (View Documentation 2 (https://www.alipac.us/f12/u-s-will-let-just-20-migrants-per-day-new-caravan-cross-into-texas-369731/))

No member of the White House press corps bothered to ask Trump about the budget bill or even if he had signed it.

Trump wore a Democrat blue tie and paraded Angel Families who have lost loved ones to illegal immigration crimes after signing a bill that will increase both illegal immigration and the number of Americans killed by illegals.

Trump obfuscated and talked about trade agreements, law enforcement, the border, and his plan to declare a state of emergency for more than 40 minutes (View Video (https://youtu.be/FFIcGqjkORk)), but never admitted to the national audience that he signed the budget bill that a majority of his supporters despise.

"I know without a doubt that President Trump is a liar, he is deceptive, and intentionally manipulating his supporters to lead them to their own doom through Amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. Trump is a Judas Goat!" said William Gheen (https://www.alipac.us/William-Gheen/), President of ALIPAC. "It is clear to me that Trump is not the man he campaigns to be and he is complicit in passing a major policy bill in a disgusting way that prevented 99% of Americans from learning what is in the bill until after he made it a law, just like Obamacare. In truth, Trump shares Obama's tactics and immigration positions. The American patriots who see through Trump's lies and those who are upset by his signature on the Amnesty budget bill today are the Americans we want to represent and give voice to at ALIPAC."

ALIPAC is launching a new effort to reach out to Angel Moms and provide them with information proving that Trump lies and is using the families of victims of illegal aliens to promote a globalist and open-borders agenda while pretending to be a nationalist.

Trump successfully used the Angel Families to convey that he has their support on his actions today, which includes the budget bill filled with Amnesty and benefits for the very illegal aliens that slaughtered their loved ones.

Perhaps Trump's past experience as an actor in professional wrestling matches prepared him for the grand deception he is pulling on tens of millions of American who deeply oppose illegal immigration and Amnesty.

It is truly ironic that Americans elected Trump because he claimed he opposed open borders and Amnesty for illegal aliens. Trump lied when he promised all illegals including DACA Amnesty recipients had to go home.

ALIPAC is now tracking 11 broken campaign promises by Trump on immigration issues. (View List (https://www.alipac.us/f8/trumps-base-rejects-wall-amnesty-deal-368455/))

Many Trump voters are deeply upset by President Trump's conduct in this matter, and those are the Americans ALIPAC seeks to represent.

https://www.alipac.us/f8/trump-lies-nation-while-concealing-budget-bill-encourages-child-trafficking-369997/

spudea
02-15-2019, 06:05 PM
Sponsors are required to be US citizens or valid green card holders. This section literally does nothing to prevent ICE from doing their job, and to make the bold headline claim that this "encourages child trafficking" is a lie.

Swordsmyth
02-15-2019, 06:18 PM
Sponsors are required to be US citizens or valid green card holders. This section literally does nothing to prevent ICE from doing their job, and to make the bold headline claim that this "encourages child trafficking" is a lie.

That ‘amnesty’ claim is based on section 224 of the budget -- which appears, on first glance, to block the deportation of many people who are illegally in the U.S.
That’s because it states that no funds may be used to detain or deport any "sponsor" or "potential sponsor" of an "unaccompanied alien child." It adds that even any "member of a household" of a "potential sponsor" is now immune from deportation.
But a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation.


For example, to be a "potential sponsor" according to the DHS regulations, one must file significant paperwork -- such as showing ID (U.S. or foreign) and proof of residency. The adult applying must also submit documents about the child.
Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US.
That would significantly limit the number of people to whom the no-deportation provision applies.


Chris Chmielenski, the deputy director of NumbersUSA, which fights for lower immigration levels and which urged President Trump to veto the budget, told Fox News that the provision is still problematic despite DHS’s clarifications.
“We still have some serious concerns about the provision,” Chmielenski told Fox News. “It still protects these sponsors and/or relatives who make it into the US. That’s not a precedent we should be setting.”
He noted that, despite the paperwork DHS demands of someone to become a “potential sponsor,” some might still try to game the system and that it could still encourage “unaccompanied” kids to be sent over the border.


“We would prefer this wasn't in there. We would also hope this is something that expires at the end of fiscal year,” he said.
The provision in the budget will be replaced by whatever the next budget says.
Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall.
The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.”
But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences.
Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted.

Trump allies say that the information from DHS shines light on why Trump ultimately signed the bill after reviewing it. Some warned about “disinformation” on Thursday.
“Just spoke with the White House. There will be NO Amnesty and NO path to citizenship,” Sebastian Gorka, a former deputy assistant to President Trump and a Fox News contributor, tweeted Thursday.
Other criticisms of the budget Trump signed include that it allows the Department of Homeland Security to more than double the number of guest worker visas, from 65,000 to 135,000. However, the law merely allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to make such an increase; it would only happen if the secretary authorizes it.
Another matter of contention is that the budget authorizes 45,000 ICE detention beds; an increase from the past budget which paid for 40,520 beds, but less than the number of detention beds ICE actually has.
However, the number of beds authorized by Congress does not actually force ICE to reduce its number of beds, as they can use money from other parts of the budget.
Gorka says the claims of the sky falling are overblown, and also told Fox News that it was silly to call anything in the budget “amnesty” because it’s just an annual budget.
“How is a funding bill that expires before the end of the fiscal year able to create conditions for a lasting ‘amnesty?’” Gorka said.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-official-border-security-bill-does-not-contain-amnesty-poison-pills

RonZeplin
02-15-2019, 06:50 PM
Sponsors are required to be US citizens or valid green card holders. This section literally does nothing to prevent ICE from doing their job, and to make the bold headline claim that this "encourages child trafficking" is a lie.Why does the Trump bill protect "Sponsors" from being deported? Because they're illegal aliens, or at best immigrants who have not yet become naturalized US citizens, thus eligible for deportation.

Non US Citizens & Illegal Aliens shouldn't be allowed to sponsor anyone for US citizenship. Deport them so that they can sponsor someone for citizenship in their own country, if they like.

Deport first, is US immigration law. Trump refuses to obey his oath of office to enforce the law, and "Protect the States Against Invasion" in accordance with the US Constitution, but he loves "catch & release" illegal aliens for the cheap labor and votes. Run of the mill Reconquista Republican/Democrat globalist, America Last president, like Obongo & dubya.

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_waves_mexican_flag.gif

Swordsmyth
02-15-2019, 06:54 PM
Deport first, is US immigration law. Trump refuses to obey his oath of office to enforce the law, and "Protect the States Against Invasion" in accordance with the US Constitution, but he loves "catch & release" illegal aliens for the cheap labor and votes. Run of the mill Reconquista Republican/Democrat globalist, America Last president, like Obongo & dubya.

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_waves_mexican_flag.gif
That is not true, current law places many restrictions on Trump's ability to deport them and he has cracked down on catch and release by making asylum seekers wait in Mexico.

spudea
02-15-2019, 07:03 PM
Why does the Trump bill protect "Sponsors" from being deported? Because they're illegal aliens, or at best immigrants who have not yet become naturalized US citizens, thus eligible for deportation.

Non US Citizens & Illegal Aliens shouldn't be allowed to sponsor anyone for US citizenship. Deport them so that they can sponsor someone for citizenship in their own country, if they like.

Deport first, is US immigration law. Trump refuses to obey his oath of office to enforce the law, and "Protect the States Against Invasion" in accordance with the US Constitution, but he loves "catch & release" illegal aliens for the cheap labor and votes. Run of the mill Reconquista Republican/Democrat globalist, America Last president, like Obongo & dubya.

You literally don't know what you are talking about. This is a funding bill that lasts only to the end of the fiscal year, i.e. September. All agencies have a small amount of unallocated funds left over from prior budgets they can reallocate for any purpose. This bill doesn't change that, so if DHS needs to deport someone they can identify funding to pay for it that is separate from this bill.

RonZeplin
02-15-2019, 07:10 PM
That is not true, current law places many restrictions on Trump's ability to deport them and he has cracked down on catch and release by making asylum seekers wait in Mexico.

The truth is that President Trump seeks out any excuse to avoid deporting illegal aliens and he loves sleazy lawyers and the rulings of corrupt judges. Rudy Giuliani is his personal lawyer, enough said.


Giuliani was a strong defender of illegal immigrants' rights as mayor, fighting for them to be allowed to use public services and attend public schools. But he has changed some of his position on the 2007 campaign trail.[94]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-immigration-94)
As Mayor of New York City, Giuliani encouraged hardworking illegal immigrants to move to New York City.[95] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-nyimmigrant-95) He said:

Some of the hardest-working and most productive people in this city are undocumented aliens. If you come here and you work hard and you happen to be in an undocumented status, you're one of the people who we want in this city. You're somebody that we want to protect, and we want you to get out from under what is often a life of being like a fugitive, which is really unfair.[95] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-nyimmigrant-95)


He pressed for $12 million to start a city agency which would help immigrants gain citizenship. He defended the city's policy of not allowing police and hospital workers to ask about citizenship status.[96] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-immigrationswitch-96)

In 1996, Giuliani said, "Indeed, the whole process of immigration is something the Republican Party should embrace."[97] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-97) In the same year, at a public talk at the John F. Kennedy School of Government (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_School_of_Government) he said, "We're never, ever going to be able to totally control immigration in a country that is as large as ours." He went on to say, "If you were to totally control immigration into the United States, you might very well destroy the economy of the United States, because you'd have to inspect everything and everyone in every way possible."[98] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-98)

Giuliani sued the federal government on October 11, 1996 for what he called unconstitutional provisions against immigrants.[99] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-99)[100] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-100) In announcing his lawsuit he said,

"I believe the anti-immigration movement in America is one of our most serious public problems." He added: "I am speaking out and filing this action because I believe that a threat to immigration can be a threat to the future of our country."[101] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-101)[102] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-102)


Giuliani said that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service) "do nothing with those names but terrorize people." His lawsuit against the new immigration law claimed that the new federal requirement to report illegal immigrants violated the Tenth Amendment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution) . He said that the law, as well as the Welfare Reform Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act), were "inherently unfair."[103] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-103) He pursued this lawsuit to the U.S. Supreme Court (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Supreme_Court), but he lost the case.[104] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-104) [105] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-105)

In 1996 Giuliani voiced his support for New York City's sanctuary city (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_city) policy saying:

[it] protects undocumented immigrants in New York City from being reported to the INS while they are using city services that are critical for their health and safety, and for the health and safety of the entire city ... There are times when undocumented immigrants must have a substantial degree of protection.[106] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-106)


In 1997, Giuliani signed a statement of principles which read, "The new laws recently passed by Congress and signed into law by the President unfairly target immigrants in the United States by severely limiting their access to many federal benefits which citizens are entitled to receive." and "Since legal immigrants work and pay taxes like American citizens, they should be entitled to temporary assistance when they fall into personal difficulty. Furthermore, the denial of federal assistance to legal immigrants in need is patently unfair and arguably unconstitutional and inhumane."[107] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-107) In 1998, Giuliani argued for expanding Medicare, SSI and foodstamp benefits to legal immigrants and also, "Providing full Medicaid coverage to Prucol (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prucol) aliens with HIV/AIDS and other chronic illnesses"[108] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#cite_note-108)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Rudy_Giuliani#Immigration

Swordsmyth
02-15-2019, 07:14 PM
The truth is that President Trump seeks out any excuse to avoid deporting illegal aliens and he loves sleazy lawyers and the rulings of corrupt judges. Rudy Giuliani is his personal lawyer, enough said.

:rolleyes:

RonZeplin
02-15-2019, 07:47 PM
:rolleyes:

https://azqev28564.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/39755i30E3F802FD37AEDD?v=1.0

Swordsmyth
02-15-2019, 07:48 PM
https://azqev28564.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/39755i30E3F802FD37AEDD?v=1.0

:sleeping:

enhanced_deficit
02-15-2019, 11:48 PM
:sleeping:

YOu should get some sleep LOL