PDA

View Full Version : Illinois bill would require potential gun buyers to reveal their social media histories




aGameOfThrones
02-07-2019, 07:21 PM
An Illinois bill would require potential gun buyers to reveal their public social media accounts to state police before being approved for firearm licenses.

The bill, sponsored by two Democratic lawmakers, aims to keep weapons out of the hands of people who have made threatening or alarming comments on social media, CBS 2 Chicago reported Wednesday.

“A lot of people who are having mental health issues will often post on their social media pages that they’re about to hurt themselves or others,” Rep. Daniel Didech (D) said. “We need to give those people the help they need.”

The bill is similar to one proposed in New York state that would allow police to recover the entire browsing history of a gun license applicant.

Officials said Nikolas Cruz posted “very disturbing” images on social media sites before allegedly opening fire inside a high school in Parkland, Fla., last year.

Robert Bowers reportedly wrote “jews are the children of satan” on his Gab.com account before he allegedly shot 11 people inside a Pittsburgh synagogue last year.

Didech told the outlet that his bill is less intrusive.

“It gives Illinois State Police additional tools to make sure that dangerous weapons aren’t getting into the hands of dangerous people,” he said.

Gun groups, however, have vowed to fight against the legislation.

“When people look at this everyone who has a Facebook account or email account or Twitter account will be incensed or should be,” Richard Pearson with the Illinois State Rifle Association told the outlet.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/429059-illinois-bill-would-require-potential-gun-buyers-to-reveal-their-social

Dr.3D
02-07-2019, 07:55 PM
I wonder what they would do if the person didn't have any social media accounts.

Swordsmyth
02-07-2019, 07:59 PM
I wonder what they would do if the person didn't have any social media accounts.
Deny permission.
Only weirdos don't have social media accounts.;)

Anti Globalist
02-07-2019, 08:13 PM
They just want to know every detail about you don't they?

Origanalist
02-07-2019, 09:53 PM
Deny permission.
Only weirdos don't have social media accounts.;)

You know that's coming. "I'm sorry but you're not having any social media accounts is considered anti-social behavior, what are you trying to hide?"

oyarde
02-07-2019, 10:09 PM
Illinois should not be punished for these vile aggressions against the people .

Swordsmyth
02-07-2019, 10:14 PM
Illinois should not be punished for these vile aggressions against the people .

:confused:

oyarde
02-07-2019, 10:15 PM
:confused:

Ya , that was a joke . Of course they should be punished .

Swordsmyth
02-07-2019, 10:17 PM
Ya , that was a joke . Of course they should be punished .

Do something Danke.

aGameOfThrones
02-07-2019, 10:18 PM
Turn over all your writings so we can investigate if you can exercise your 2A.

Swordsmyth
02-07-2019, 10:23 PM
Turn over all your writings so we can investigate if you can exercise your 2A.
And they will find something to use against you if they want to, it will be about as fair as Facebook, Youtube and Twiiter are.

DamianTV
02-08-2019, 05:05 AM
They just want to know every detail about you don't they?

ANY excuse to deny Permission to buy a gun.

This is quite important as the conversion from Liberty to Communism means to first convert Rights to Privileges, then to DENY those Privileges by DEFAULT. A Right is a Right, it does not come with Conditions. The words "unless" and "agree to" are conditional statements.

This is also a VIOLATION of DUE PROCESS. They are convicting people before ANY crime has been committed. Guess what assholes, CRIMINALS DO NOT GET BACKGROUND CHECKS.

Thus, yet again it is the LAW ABIDING CITIZEN that pays the price. Criminals, including those in high positions of power will NEVER give up their guns and will ALWAYS demand that YOU GIVE UP YOURS. They are going out of their way to PUNISH THE INNOCENT.

John Adams once said:

“It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished.

But if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemned, perhaps to die, then the citizen will say, ‘whether I do good or whether I do evil is immaterial, for innocence itself is no protection,’ and if such an idea as that were to take hold in the mind of the citizen that would be the end of security whatsoever.”