Ginsburg Misses Day Two at SCOTUS [Archive] - Ron Paul Forums / Liberty Forest

brushfire

01-09-2019, 11:25 PM

Judge Swamp strikes again (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523218-Judge-Swamp-strikes-again)

Pointing out that firing Sessions and McCabe could be perceived as obstruction? This makes Judge Nap "judge swamp"... Am I understanding correctly?

I recall the good Judge being given some time off (seriously risking his career at fox) as Judicial correspondent, for talking deep state/wire taping on the Trump campaign - the media dismissed it as conspiracy bullsh!t. The guy still stood by Trump, and continued to advise Trump - crazy, I know.

Dont get me wrong, I'm fine with being critical of Nap - even I disagree with him on his constitutional interpretation in favor of anchor babies, and probably a hand full of other constitutional interpretations. I'm also disgusted by how nice he could be to that a$$fk Charlie Rangel... But Nap is easily the last person I would call "judge swamp".

Curious: while you were looking up Nap's history, did you take a look at Trump's? What kind of friend has Trump been to liberty? What are his net contributions to freedom - or the clintons for that matter? Just curious, as I see Nap, with every blemish, as being constitutional divinity when compared to trump. How is it that trump is excused, and ol Nap to be hung by his ballz as "judge swamp"? Just how does that work?

Swordsmyth

01-09-2019, 11:31 PM

Pointing out that firing Sessions and McCabe could be perceived as obstruction? This makes Judge Nap "judge swamp"... Am I understanding correctly?

I recall the good Judge being given some time off (seriously risking his career at fox) as Judicial correspondent, for talking deep state/wire taping on the Trump campaign - the media dismissed it as conspiracy bullsh!t. The guy still stood by Trump, and continued to advise Trump - crazy, I know.

Dont get me wrong, I'm fine with being critical of Nap - even I disagree with him on his constitutional interpretation in favor of anchor babies, and probably a hand full of other constitutional interpretations. I'm also disgusted by how nice he could be to that a$$fk Charlie Rangel... But Nap is easily the last person I would call "judge swamp".

Curious: while you were looking up Nap's history, did you take a look at Trump's? What kind of friend has Trump been to liberty? What are his net contributions to freedom - or the clintons for that matter? Just curious, as I see Nap, with every blemish, as being constitutional divinity when compared to trump. How is it that trump is excused, and ol Nap to be hung by his ballz as "judge swamp"? Just how does that work?
The judge has taken quite a few positions repugnant to the Constitution and the law beyond the ones you mentioned.

I never trusted Trump and I still don't completely but he has exceeded my expectations and improved while Napolitano has failed my expectations and is decaying.

Trump is the least of all possible goods and I would replace him with someone better given the opportunity but he has actual power and is doing better with it than any other president in living memory, Judge Nap has no power and he is already proving that he can't be trusted with it and would sell out to the worst faction around.

dannno

01-09-2019, 11:49 PM

Pointing out that firing Sessions and McCabe could be perceived as obstruction? This makes Judge Nap "judge swamp"... Am I understanding correctly?

I recall the good Judge being given some time off (seriously risking his career at fox) as Judicial correspondent, for talking deep state/wire taping on the Trump campaign - the media dismissed it as conspiracy bullsh!t. The guy still stood by Trump, and continued to advise Trump - crazy, I know.

Dont get me wrong, I'm fine with being critical of Nap - even I disagree with him on his constitutional interpretation in favor of anchor babies, and probably a hand full of other constitutional interpretations. I'm also disgusted by how nice he could be to that a$$fk Charlie Rangel... But Nap is easily the last person I would call "judge swamp".

Curious: while you were looking up Nap's history, did you take a look at Trump's? What kind of friend has Trump been to liberty? What are his net contributions to freedom - or the clintons for that matter? Just curious, as I see Nap, with every blemish, as being constitutional divinity when compared to trump. How is it that trump is excused, and ol Nap to be hung by his ballz as "judge swamp"? Just how does that work?

If Swordsmyth had been around the last 10 years and following him this whole time like you and I have, he would have been a huge fan of Nap at least all the way going into the Trump Presidency. I remember Nap sticking up for Trump quite a bit on msm back in the day. But ever since he started meeting with Trump and giving him advice on the Supreme Court, which Trump utilized with the Gorsuch pick, Nap went back on the news and started taking the opposing side to Trump - almost every time.. the only reason I can think of that he is doing this is because Trump may appoint him some day to something, possibly the Supreme Court, and he can use all of this to show that he is neutral on Russia, the investigation and Trump as a whole. If Nap was out defending Trump constantly, he would have a much more difficult time being confirmed.

So I see it all as positive.

Swordsmyth

01-09-2019, 11:55 PM

If Swordsmyth had been around the last 10 years and following him this whole time like you and I have, he would have been a huge fan of Nap at least all the way going into the Trump Presidency. I remember Nap sticking up for Trump quite a bit on msm back in the day. But ever since he started meeting with Trump and giving him advice on the Supreme Court, which Trump utilized with the Gorsuch pick, Nap went back on the news and started taking the opposing side to Trump - almost every time.. the only reason I can think of that he is doing this is because Trump may appoint him some day to something, possibly the Supreme Court, and he can use all of this to show that he is neutral on Russia, the investigation and Trump as a whole. If Nap was out defending Trump constantly, he would have a much more difficult time being confirmed.

So I see it all as positive.
I'm sure I would have been a fan before, from what I've seen of his older work my only objection would have been that he is an AnCap and I think that would be too little government and would result in tyranny when it failed.

What worries me more than his Trump positions is his position on things like the Christian baker case where he said allowing businesses to choose who they would serve was "Dangerous".

As always I will believe your theory when Trump appoints him to something, AG would have been a good choice when Sessions left but Trump still didn't pick him.

fedupinmo

01-10-2019, 09:05 AM

Pointing out that firing Sessions and McCabe could be perceived as obstruction? This makes Judge Nap "judge swamp"... Am I understanding correctly?

I recall the good Judge being given some time off (seriously risking his career at fox) as Judicial correspondent, for talking deep state/wire taping on the Trump campaign - the media dismissed it as conspiracy bullsh!t. The guy still stood by Trump, and continued to advise Trump - crazy, I know.

Dont get me wrong, I'm fine with being critical of Nap - even I disagree with him on his constitutional interpretation in favor of anchor babies, and probably a hand full of other constitutional interpretations. I'm also disgusted by how nice he could be to that a$$fk Charlie Rangel... But Nap is easily the last person I would call "judge swamp".

Curious: while you were looking up Nap's history, did you take a look at Trump's? What kind of friend has Trump been to liberty? What are his net contributions to freedom - or the clintons for that matter? Just curious, as I see Nap, with every blemish, as being constitutional divinity when compared to trump. How is it that trump is excused, and ol Nap to be hung by his ballz as "judge swamp"? Just how does that work?

Canadian born Rafael is a natural born citizen, despite owing his citizenship exclusively to naturalization statute
Trump doesn't have the power to limit foreigners from certain nations from entering our country despite statutes SPECIFICALLY giving the pres that power

And for Batty Ginsburg,

http://1ue0vq2ip2m91b3g7z258a5v.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Let-It-Rot.jpg

angelatc

01-10-2019, 10:22 AM

TMZ has a video of her being helped from her apartment to a car yesterday, which was day 3. (http://m.tmz.com/#!2019/01/09/ruth-bader-ginsburg-video-lung-cancer-frail-supreme-court-rbg/)

I wonder if the real reason she has not resigned is that she wanted to be on record as the oldest justice or something.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 01:56 PM

Canadian born Rafael is a natural born citizen, despite owing his citizenship exclusively to naturalization statute
Trump doesn't have the power to limit foreigners from certain nations from entering our country despite statutes SPECIFICALLY giving the pres that power

And for Batty Ginsburg,

http://1ue0vq2ip2m91b3g7z258a5v.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Let-It-Rot.jpg

You must spread some reputation around..........

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 04:18 PM

Petition: Appoint Mike Lee as next Supreme Court Justice (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?528738-150-need-to-sign-to-go-public!-Petition-Appoint-Mike-Lee-as-next-Supreme-Court-Justice)
The White House has been reaching out to political allies and conservative activist groups to discuss preparations for an ailing Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's possible death or departure from the bench, according to Politico (https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/10/trump-white-house-urging-allies-to-prepare-for-possible-rbg-departure-1096102).
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/gins%202_1.jpg
Ginsburg has been absent from Supreme Court arguments this week following the removal of two malignant cancerous growths from her left lung on Dec. 21.

The outreach began after Ginsburg, 85, on Monday missed oral arguments at the court for the first time in her 25 years on the bench. The justice, who was nominated to the court by President Bill Clinton in 1993, announced in late December that she underwent a surgical procedure to remove two cancerous growths from her lungs. -Politico (https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/10/trump-white-house-urging-allies-to-prepare-for-possible-rbg-departure-1096102)
According to a source familiar with the discussions, the White House "is taking the temperature on possible short-list candidates, reaching out to key stakeholders, and just making sure that people are informed on the process. They're doing it very quietly, of course, because the idea is not to be opportunistic, but just to be prepared so we aren't caught flat-footed."

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-10/white-house-prepares-ginsburg-supreme-court-vacancy-report

We need Rand to start talking to Trump NOW.
Bryan you know Rand, please contact him and ask him to get involved so we can get a decent pick.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 05:50 PM

No he would not, he has turned swamp and even if you disagree he is too old.

Mike Lee, his brother or Barrett would be much better.

"He has turned swamp" because you haven't bumped into him while swinging from Trump's nut sack.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 05:53 PM

"He has turned swamp" because you haven't bumped into him while swinging from Trump's nut sack.
Another lefty who resorts to insults when he can't win the argument.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 05:54 PM

If Swordsmyth had been around the last 10 years and following him this whole time like you and I have

No, he's only been around since '16 (funny, that) and starts/comments in/on 7,000 threads a day, like he doesn't have time for ANYTHING else (funny, that).

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 05:55 PM

Another lefty who resorts to insults when he can't win the argument.

There is no argument...

ETA:

*criticizes me for name-calling...* / *calls me a name*

:smirking:

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 05:57 PM

There is no argument...
Yes there is, the link to it is in this thread but I will repost it for you:

Judge Swamp strikes again (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523218-Judge-Swamp-strikes-again)

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 05:57 PM

Ooh, neg rep in-bound from Swordsmyth.

Muh feelin's...

Anti Globalist

01-10-2019, 05:59 PM

Day 3 and no Ginsburg?

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:01 PM

*criticizes me for name-calling...* / *calls me a name*

:smirking:
I call a spade a spade and YOU started the insults, YOU also were much more insulting.

Cry me a river.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:04 PM

Yes there is, the link to it is in this thread but I will repost it for you:

Judge Swamp strikes again (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523218-Judge-Swamp-strikes-again)

Riiiight. Andrew Napolitano has been in this movement - and let's face it, you're not in THIS movement - for literally decades, and did more to promote Ron Paul's candidacies than anyone else that occupied a spot on an MSM outlet, but you disagree with him on a couple of items related to his take regarding - wait for it - Donald Trump (I just can't believe it), and suddenly he's Judge Swamp?

So I really don't give a shit what you think of him.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:07 PM

Riiiight. Andrew Napolitano has been in this movement - and let's face it, you're not in THIS movement - for literally decades, and did more to promote Ron Paul's candidacies than anyone else that occupied a spot on an MSM outlet, but you disagree with him on a couple of items related to his take regarding - wait for it - Donald Trump (I just can't believe it), and suddenly he's Judge Swamp?

So I really don't give a $#@! what you think of him.
There are serious problems with positions he has taken that have nothing to do with Trump and other members of this site see them and agree with me.

He is either a sleeper that was activated when Trump won or he is being blackmailed but he is pro-Swamp now.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:09 PM

I call a spade a spade and YOU started the insults, YOU also were much more insulting.

Cry me a river.

I'm not complaining, just noting the irony.

And seriously, is it really an insult to point out that you swing from Trump's nuts? I mean, seriously!? You start like a dozen threads a day about the guy... and most of them are from a positive point-of-view. You don't REALLY consider him the "least of all evils", or whatever bullshit line you trot out when someone calls you on your pathetic dangling. I can recognize someone who considers him the least of evils when I see it - that would be more like someone like AF, who also has a very well established record here. You showed up in the middle of your boy's campaign, and ever since, you've been here to recruit and/or portray RP/the liberty movement/libertarians as Trumpists, and if I had my guess, you're being paid for it - at least you should be, considering the amount of time you spend on it.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:16 PM

I'm not complaining, just noting the irony.

And seriously, is it really an insult to point out that you swing from Trump's nuts? I mean, seriously!? You start like a dozen threads a day about the guy... and most of them are from a positive point-of-view. You don't REALLY consider him the "least of all evils", or whatever bull$#@! line you trot out when someone calls you on your pathetic dangling. I can recognize someone who considers him the least of evils when I see it - that would be more like someone like AF, who also has a very well established record here. You showed up in the middle of your boy's campaign, and ever since, you've been here to recruit and/or portray RP/the liberty movement/libertarians as Trumpists, and if I had my guess, you're being paid for it - at least you should be, considering the amount of time you spend on it.

My position is very close to AF's and my early posts were almost all ant-Trump until he started exceeding my expectations and I am often the first or only source of posts about bad things he does.

But you just keep on being a crude jackass, that aught to sway everyone to side with you.:rolleyes:

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:21 PM

My position is very close to AF's and my early posts were almost all ant-Trump until he started exceeding my expectations and I am often the first or only source of posts about bad things he does.

I'd go dig that up, but who has time to look through 30K posts (in under 3 years)?

ETA: Your position vis-a-vis AF's? Yeah, when I see AF starting a dozen or so pro- or defend-Trump threads a day, I guess you'd be accurate. Until then, I see him begrudgingly acknowledging Trump. That's not you. That's NOWHERE NEAR you.

But you just keep on being a crude jackass, that aught to sway everyone to side with you.:rolleyes:

Well I certainly can't compete with you... not when you're being paid per post.

And your activism here is FAR MORE crude than pointing it out with some off-color comments. Grow a set.

dannno

01-10-2019, 06:22 PM

Riiiight. Andrew Napolitano has been in this movement - and let's face it, you're not in THIS movement - for literally decades, and did more to promote Ron Paul's candidacies than anyone else that occupied a spot on an MSM outlet, but you disagree with him on a couple of items related to his take regarding - wait for it - Donald Trump (I just can't believe it), and suddenly he's Judge Swamp?

So I really don't give a shit what you think of him.

Swordsmyth has made some pretty compelling arguments that what the Judge has been saying lately is unconstitutional, that is beyond just being anti-Trump... and that is not like the Judge at all.. which is why I think he is being anti-Trump on purpose so he can more easily be confirmed for something after being nominated by Trump.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:24 PM

I'd go dig that up, but who has time to look through 30K posts (in under 3 years)?

Well I certainly can't compete with you... not when you're being paid per post.

And your activism here is FAR MORE crude than pointing it out with some off-color comments. Grow a set.
You are the one who needs to grow a set, you are such a snowflake that you can't handle someone daring to have different opinions than you.
It pains you so much that you start throwing around insults and baseless accusations.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:25 PM

Swordsmyth has made some pretty compelling arguments that what the Judge has been saying lately is unconstitutional, that is beyond just being anti-Trump... and that is not like the Judge at all.. which is why I think he is being anti-Trump on purpose so he can more easily be confirmed for something after being nominated by Trump.

The guy AVERAGES 1.25 POSTS PER HOUR.

You better start thinking about who's behind the keyboard before you accept "compelling arguments" from him/them.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:26 PM

You are the one who needs to grow a set, you are such a snowflake that you can't handle someone daring to have different opinions than you.
It pains you so much that you start throwing around insults and baseless accusations.

NO YOU ARE

:rolleyes:

There's nothing baseless about my accusation. The volume you generate here is suspicious in itself, but when the content is considered, and the number of threads started that are pro- or defend-Trump such that the highest volume subforum (this one) looks like a digital Trump campaign rally... yeah, there's nothing baseless about my accusation.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:28 PM

The guy AVERAGES 1.25 POSTS PER HOUR.

You better start thinking about who's behind the keyboard before you accept "compelling arguments" from him/them.
Typical leftist.

It doesn't matter what the argument is or how compelling it is, what matters is who makes it.:rolleyes:

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:32 PM

Typical leftist.

It doesn't matter what the argument is or how compelling it is, what matters is who makes it.:rolleyes:

Right. The counter-argument hasn't been made by the libertarians that you haven't managed to strategically run out of here at all.

And it's funny, you average 1.25 posts per hour [ETA: per 24 hour day, by the way. You guys must work shifts, I guess], but we're supposed to run around countering everything or we're just "attacking the poster". Sorry, I have a job that doesn't involve posting at this forum.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:51 PM

Back on topic:

Raja Flores, the chief of the division of thoracic surgery at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, told CNBC that Ginsburg’s post-operative recovery could take several weeks, but she could be back at work sometime in February. Ginsburg, who is now 85 years old, has reportedly been given transcripts of oral arguments, and case briefs to read at home during her recovery. She was seen this week being helped from a wheelchair into an automobile, but it was not revealed where she was being taken.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31152-what-ginsburg-s-cancer-could-mean-for-the-court-and-the-nation

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:55 PM

It's amazing how you have all these articles all cued up and ready to post.

This is like the 4th I've seen in a few threads in like a half-hour...

So not only do you have time to average 1.25 posts/hour (assuming 24 hours in a day - you know, no sleep, no eat, no sex [obv], no job... well...ahem), yet you ALSO have time to read all these articles!? And not only read them, but have links and text ready to - BOOM - slam into your latest post here at RPF's?!? AMAZING!

And all while just coincidentally showing up here in April '16!?

That's just something, isn't it?!

lol

You're more obvious than Zippy.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 06:56 PM

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 06:58 PM

:sleeping:

Like you have TIME to sleep...

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:03 PM

Like you have TIME to sleep...
:sleeping:

You claim to not have time to "waste" responding to my arguments but you have plenty of time to waste attacking the messenger over and over?

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 07:15 PM

:sleeping:

You claim to not have time to "waste" responding to my arguments but you have plenty of time to waste attacking the messenger over and over?

lol "attacking the messenger"? You poor thing.

You seem awfully upset that the near-impossibility of the amount of time you've spent here over not even 3 years yet is being pointed out.

Just watching this forum over the past hour or two, it's really impressive... not only in the number of posts you manage to make, but - again - having articles linked that one would assume you've read, and the content NEARLY singularly pro- or defend-Trump...

1.25 posts per hour, assuming 24 hours in a day, for 33 months. That pace is INSANE, when you start taking out things like sleep, a job and/or school - something that should take you away from the forums for at least SOME time during a given day - eating dinner... and that's just within a given day; that doesn't account for days you're not in front of a computer, or vacations, or any of the other things ACTUAL people do in their lives. You start subtracting that stuff out and your posts/hour average would go up significantly. And again, we're not taking into account time spent reading all those articles you read, then snip, then link in many of your posts.

In all seriousness, it's all too obvious what's going on with your "contribution" here.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:18 PM

lol "attacking the messenger"? You poor thing.

You seem awfully upset that the near-impossibility of the amount of time you've spent here over not even 3 years yet is being pointed out.

Just watching this forum over the past hour or two, it's really impressive... not only in the number of posts you manage to make, but - again - having articles linked that one would assume you've read, and the content NEARLY singularly pro- or defend-Trump...

1.25 posts per hour, assuming 24 hours in a day, for 33 months. That pace is INSANE, when you start taking out things like sleep, a job and/or school - something that should take you away from the forums for at least SOME time during a given day - eating dinner... and that's just within a given day; that doesn't account for days you're not in front of a computer, or vacations, or any of the other things ACTUAL people do in their lives. You start subtracting that stuff out and your posts/hour average would go up significantly. And again, we're not taking into account time spent reading all those articles you read, then snip, then link in many of your posts.

In all seriousness, it's all too obvious what's going on with your "contribution" here.

:sleeping:

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 07:22 PM

:sleeping:

https://media.giphy.com/media/13Zh9drdSWAeSQ/giphy.gif

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:24 PM

https://media.giphy.com/media/13Zh9drdSWAeSQ/giphy.gif
:sleeping:

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 07:28 PM

:sleeping:

WAKE UP!

You still got some shillin' to do today!

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:35 PM

WAKE UP!

You still got some shillin' to do today!
I can't help it, your brainless posts are boring me to sleep.

specsaregood

01-10-2019, 07:41 PM

I suspect that a sane, loving, normal person at her age on her 3rd bout with cancer would retire and try to spend her remaining time with family, kids, grandkids, etc.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:43 PM

I suspect that a sane, loving, normal person at her age on her 3rd bout with cancer would retire and try to spend her remaining time with family, kids, grandkids, etc.
If she was even one of those she would.

Gumba of Liberty

01-10-2019, 07:48 PM

Just for the record, I don’t trust any of you guys #strangerdanger

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 07:54 PM

Just for the record, I don’t trust any of you guys #strangerdanger
A wise outlook.

A Son of Liberty

01-10-2019, 08:10 PM

A wise outlook.

said the snake.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 08:20 PM

said the snake.
Projection.

Slave Mentality

01-10-2019, 09:36 PM

A Son of Liberty

I have not been on RPFs that long, but did indeed notice Swordsmyth’s rampant uptick in posting. I mostly look at this site on my phone (quite regularly, but don’t post much) and am amazed at how much is posted, how many new threads each day, and the consistent “ don’t like Trump, buuuuuut he is da best ever” drum beats.

Swordsmyth I ain’t calling you a shill brah, but may suggest that you pick up a hobby. You would literally need to spend 8 hours a day (with a half hour lunch) reading and copypastaing all that shit. Get a bike or something.

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 09:59 PM

@A Son of Liberty (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=25847)

I have not been on RPFs that long, but did indeed notice Swordsmyth’s rampant uptick in posting. I mostly look at this site on my phone (quite regularly, but don’t post much) and am amazed at how much is posted, how many new threads each day, and the consistent “ don’t like Trump, buuuuuut he is da best ever” drum beats.

Swordsmyth I ain’t calling you a shill brah, but may suggest that you pick up a hobby. You would literally need to spend 8 hours a day (with a half hour lunch) reading and copypastaing all that $#@!. Get a bike or something.

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.
You have your hobbies and I have mine.
Kicking zippy's ass is a bonus.

dannno

01-10-2019, 10:10 PM

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.

If anything the fact he is here so much is probably a sign he isn't getting paid and is doing it because it is something he is just really passionate about.. pretty sure zippy and thecount have a laundry list of other forums to keep on lockdown.

CaptainAmerica

01-10-2019, 10:11 PM

Ginsburg is a turd sandwich on legs.

timosman

01-10-2019, 10:28 PM

Projection.

The libs are projecting like hell lately. I personally find it disgusting. :D

Swordsmyth

01-10-2019, 11:12 PM

According to Kathleen Arberg, public information officer for the Supreme Court: “Two nodules in the lower lobe of her left lung were discovered incidentally during tests performed at George Washington University Hospital to diagnose and treat rib fractures sustained in a fall on November 7. [2018]” According to the surgeon who operated on the justice, Dr. Valerie Rusch, both nodules removed during surgery were found to be malignant. However, “post-surgery, there was no evidence of any remaining disease. Scans performed before surgery indicated no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body. Currently, no further treatment is planned.”
Thus, from published reports from reputable sources, we know the following:
1. She had non-metastatic colon cancer removed in 1999
2. She had non-metastatic pancreatic cancer removed in 2010.
3. She had a stent placed in her coronary arteries in 2014
4. She fell in November of 2018 and broke three ribs.
5. She had surgery in December of 2018 and had two malignant nodules removed from her lungs.
6. Scans found no other cancer in her body.
7. She is 85 years old and has no history of being a smoker.
The most significant words from above are “two malignant nodules.” What does this mean?
First of all, malignant nodules are fancy words for small tumors, in general one that is about an inch or smaller in size. When a nodule is removed during surgery, it is quickly examined under the microscope by a pathologist. These doctors rarely see patients; rather they examine tissues and determine the cause of disease. Pathologists can usually determine quickly whether a nodule is benign or malignant, but in order to determine the actually type of cancer (that is the tissue source of the cancer), special preparation is required before microscopic examination. This can take several days or weeks to complete. At the time of this writing, we have no published reports stating the results of these tests – or even if they were ever done.
But since there were “two malignant nodules,” the odds are is that this is Stage IV or metastatic cancer – meaning that it has spread to the lungs from another organ system. Even with today’s modern technology, it is difficult to pinpoint small primary tumors. Otherwise we would be screening everyone to catch cancer earlier when it is easier to cure.
As noted above, Justice Ginsburg had colon cancer and pancreatic cancer in the past. Again, it is unlikely that these cancers are the source of her possible lung metastases. These cancers do not lie dormant for years. What is much more likely is that a small primary cancer exists – either a new one in the colon or pancreas, or another from another organ such as the liver, kidney or breast. If this is the case, her prognosis is poor, as summarized in the chart below.
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/cancer%20survival.png
This chart is not as complicated as in looks. For example, if 100 patients are diagnosed with metastatic colon cancer (meaning the cancer is not only in the colon but in another organ), 50 of those patients will still be alive and 50 will not be alive two years later. By five years, 12 will be alive and 88 will not. Keep in mind that these numbers vary according to various academic studies and oncologists (cancer doctors) may quibble as to their exact accuracy. Also keep in mind that there are other types of metastatic cancer that are not listed here. These are simply the more common ones.
However, there another more optimistic possibility: that the tumors removed are primary lung tumors. This is obviously what her doctors hoped for, or else they would not have subjected this frail-appearing 85-year-old woman to this brutal surgery. But it is unusual for there to be two primary tumors in the lungs at once – especially in a non-smoker. But if these are primary tumors and they have been completely excised, her prognosis could be excellent, up to a 92% 5-year survival.
But if this were the case, there should have been published reports stating that the pathology reports showed this to be a type of primary lung cancer. At the time of this writing, this has not occurred. Furthermore Justice Ginsburg appears to be so incapacitated that she cannot attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court – but this could be because she needs more time to recover from her surgery, not because she has cancer.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-10/justice-ginsburg-probably-quite-ill

Swordsmyth

01-12-2019, 12:20 AM

Among those reportedly on Trump’s short list of candidates is 7th Circuit Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett, whose name was floated last year as a potential pick for the seat that Kavanaugh eventually got. Coney Barrett was harassed last year (https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31156-democrat-legislator-chastises-her-own-party-for-religious-bigotry) in her confirmation hearing for the Circuit Court by Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) who, referencing Barrett’s Catholic faith, said, “The dogma lives loudly within you.”
Also reportedly on Trump’s short list of candidates are Joan Larsen of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Raymond Kethledge of the 6th Circuit Court, Britt Grant of the 11th Circuit, and Thomas Hardiman of the 3rd Circuit.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31167-white-house-begins-to-prepare-for-another-supreme-court-nomination

Petition: Appoint Mike Lee as next Supreme Court Justice (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?528738-150-need-to-sign-to-go-public!-Petition-Appoint-Mike-Lee-as-next-Supreme-Court-Justice)

Swordsmyth

01-15-2019, 06:19 PM

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been given a clean bill of health by doctors, and her cancer is reportedly in remission, but she will miss at least one more week of work, according to the New York Daily News (https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-news-ginsburg-scotus-absence-20190111-story.html).

The 85-year-old Justice is reportedly "progressing fine, and no further treatment is planned" the outlet says, and the two cancerous growths the justice had removed from her lungs last month represented the extent of the disease. The cancer has not returned, though Ginsburg will remain under observation.
“Her recovery from surgery is on track,” Ginsburg's spokeswoman told media. “Post-surgery evaluation indicates no evidence of remaining disease, and no further treatment is required.”
Ginsburg missed a full week of work on the Supreme Court bench last week, preferring to analyze cases in front of the court through pleadings and transcripts of oral arguments. Ginsburg's staff assured the Supreme Court and well-wishers that the Justice was simply resting comfortably at home and that she is confident she can give the same attention to her cases, despite being outside of the courtroom.
Despite reassurances of Ginsburg's improving health, the Trump administration is taking the justice's repeated absences seriously. After all, last week was the first time Ginsburg missed an oral argument in her nearly 25 years on the bench. "Working from home" is not unheard of for Supreme Court Justices — former Chief Justice William Rehnquist used the privilege while recovering from illness as well — but it is extremely rare.

More at: https://www.dailywire.com/news/42151/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-will-miss-another-week-emily-zanotti

Swordsmyth

01-16-2019, 06:36 PM

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has canceled a public appearance scheduled for January 29 after missing two weeks of oral arguments at the Supreme Court.
Tuesday evening the Skirball Center announced the cancellation of "An Evening with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg," part of an ongoing exhibit by the Cultural Center titled: "Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg."

Update: An Evening with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is CANCELED. The Justice regrets that she is unable to visit the Skirball on 1/29. She is curtailing travel and focusing on her work while recuperating from recent surgery. Thank you for your understanding.
— SkirballCulturalCtr (@Skirball_LA) January 15, 2019 (https://twitter.com/Skirball_LA/status/1085310068541870081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/ginsburg%20cancelled.png
While her exact condition is unknown, "top cancer surgeons (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/09/cancer-surgeons-expect-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-to-recover-in-weeks.html)" told CNBC they expect the 85-year-old Justice to be back on the bench in less than six weeks after fracturing three ribs and undergoing surgery to remove two cancerous nodules from her left lung over a two-month span.
Ginsburg's January 29 appearance was announced on December 20 - one day before her lung surgery. She was released from the hospital four days later. On January 7, Chief Justice John Roberts said Ginsburg was "unable to be present doay," adding that she would still participate from home. A court spokesperson said earlier that day that Ginsburg would participate in cases "on the basis of briefs, filings and transcripts."
(h/t The Gateway Pundit (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancels-public-appearance-in-los-angeles-set-for-january-29/))
Weekend at Ruth's?
Ginsburg's absence from the bench - and now her late-January event cancellation, has stoked rumors over social media that the oldest Supreme Court Justice is actually dead, with doubters demanding proof-of-life under hashtags such as #WeekendAtRuths, a reference to the popular 1989 film Weekend At Bernie's.

A little humor to start Tuesday off right. #RuthBaderGinsburg (https://twitter.com/hashtag/RuthBaderGinsburg?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) #WeekendAtRuths (https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeekendAtRuths?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) pic.twitter.com/nvGpkmyoZ5 (https://t.co/nvGpkmyoZ5)
— Matt Locke, A LEGEND IN MY OWN MIND (@TheCartelMatt) January 8, 2019 (https://twitter.com/TheCartelMatt/status/1082623560357761026?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
She already is, liberals are just pulling a #WeekendAtRuths (https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeekendAtRuths?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) pic.twitter.com/7D4VCJgdvg (https://t.co/7D4VCJgdvg)
— Kevin Bunk Shaner (@BunkShaner) January 12, 2019 (https://twitter.com/BunkShaner/status/1083928663207350272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
I know this is cruel, but sorry, we need proof of life in regards to Justice Ginsburg. It isn't beyond the Left, and Deep State, to hide that she passed on. She also must be coherent. To just claim she is working at home, is not going to cut it.
— Jens Johnson (@JensJohnson2) January 11, 2019 (https://twitter.com/JensJohnson2/status/1083811964378365952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Am I the only one who thinks Ruth Bader Ginsburg is actually dead but the media won’t report it bc they don’t want Trump nominating anyone else? #WeekendAtRuths (https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeekendAtRuths?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
— Bregman’s Wheelbarrow (@newguymeltz) January 7, 2019 (https://twitter.com/newguymeltz/status/1082423184316616704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

That said, video purporting to be Ginsburg emerging from her Washington D.C. apartment was reported by TMZ (https://www.tmz.com/2019/01/09/ruth-bader-ginsburg-video-lung-cancer-frail-supreme-court-rbg/).

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Emerges First Time Since Lung Cancer Surgery https://t.co/fdyYOrTBSI
— TMZ (@TMZ) January 10, 2019 (https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1083317604939386883?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) This wasn't enough to satisfy some critics who pointed to the fact that you can't see her face in the video, as noted by the Daily Dot (https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/ruth-bader-ginsburg-conspiracy-theories/)'s Mike Rothschild.
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/is%20she%20alive.png

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-16/ginsburg-cancels-late-january-appearance-skeptics-demand-proof-life

Rand needs to demand proof of life and mental capacity.

RJB

01-16-2019, 07:26 PM

It's like 1980s Soviet Russia. A leader would disappear and they would announce, "Great Leader has mild cold. In good health."
Then a few months later news would leak out that there was a new great leader and the old one had been dead for a while.

Swordsmyth

01-16-2019, 11:07 PM

A zerohedge comment:

Anyone suspect that the Nancy Pelosi attempt at stopping the State Of The Union Address is to hide how serious Ginsburg's medical condition is. As we all know the SCOTUS Justices attend the SOTU. If Ginsburg doesn't/can't attend then it will create a whirlwind of news around her ability to continue to sit on the SCOTUS.

The calls will come loud and clear. Come out, come out wherever you are Ruthy.

UWDude

01-16-2019, 11:12 PM

A zerohedge comment:

Yup, Pelosi is trying to buy time. Not that it matters. The media will just ignore the empty seat. It will not even be shown, and the captive left social media sphere will never even talk about it. Some other scandal will liven up the news day after Trumps state of the Union.

Anti Globalist

01-17-2019, 06:14 AM

I'm starting to think shes actually dead.

shakey1

01-17-2019, 07:20 AM

Makes ya wonder, donut?

Swordsmyth

01-18-2019, 05:33 PM

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has pulled out of two upcoming speaking engagements as she recovers from cancer surgery in December, according to reports. The 85-year-old Ginsburg was slated to appear January 29 at the Skirball Cultural Center in Los Angeles. A February 6 event featuring Ginsburg and private equity titan and philanthropist David Rubenstein in New York City was also canceled.
“Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regrets that she is unable to attend the talk with David Rubenstein at 92Y on February 6,” 92nd Street Y told (https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2019/01/16/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-skirball-canceled-surgery/) CNN. “She is curtailing travel and focusing on her work while recuperating from recent surgery.”

More at: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/16/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancels-upcoming-speaking-engagements/

Anti Globalist

01-18-2019, 07:36 PM

Won't be long now. The grim reaper is getting closer. Itching to take her life with his scythe.

Swordsmyth

01-18-2019, 09:19 PM

There is a rumor that she has pneumonia:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-contracted-pneumonia/

Or she may just be dead.

Swordsmyth

01-18-2019, 09:27 PM

Last September, the Santa Monica Observor (SMO) was the first to report that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had developed cancer.
For that, SMO was slimed as fake news by Snopes, but Snopes was wrong (https://www.smobserved.com/story/2018/12/20/news/snopes-decries-observer-as-fake-news-for-posting-story-that-justice-ginsburg-has-cancer-sadly-we-were-right/3766.html).
On December 21, 2018, Ginsburg underwent surgery to remove two cancerous growths on her left lung. She had had two previous bouts of cancer: she was treated in 1999 for colon cancer and had surgery in 2009 for pancreatic cancer.
Although Ginsburg’s people insisted that Ginsburg was recovering nicely from the surgery, she had not returned to the bench since.
The Trump administration evidently has better knowledge than the Hate America MSM.
It was reported (https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/trump-white-house-prepares-for-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-departure-from-supreme-court)on January 10, 2019, that the Trump White House was reaching out to politicalallies and conservative activistgroups to prepare for Ginsburg’s death or departure from the Supreme Court.
Five days later, on January 15, San Diego Monitor once again is the first to break the news.
In a report that reads like an obituary, SDM‘s Stan Greene writes (https://www.smobserved.com/story/2019/01/07/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-will-retire-from-the-us-supreme-court-in-january-2019/3658.html) that 85-year-old Ginsburg is “stricken with pneumonia” and “will retire from the U.S. Supreme Court in January 2019,” and that “President Donald J Trump will be replacing Notorious RBG, the lovechild of the left, and so will remake the Supreme Court for a generation.”

More at: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-pneumonia-and-will-retire-from-supreme-court-this-month

Swordsmyth

01-18-2019, 09:33 PM

Stricken with Pneumonia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cancels Event Set for January 29, 2019 (https://www.smobserved.com/story/2019/01/07/news/stricken-with-pneumonia-ruth-bader-ginsburg-about-to-retire-from-supreme-court/3780.html)

timosman

01-21-2019, 01:08 PM

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/1087338735446966272
1087338735446966272

Schifference

01-21-2019, 01:12 PM

Pneumonia is a killer. Especially for the elderly.

Brian4Liberty

01-21-2019, 02:17 PM

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/1087338735446966272
1087338735446966272

Seems prudent. That graphic will be good for another 11 months.

shakey1

01-21-2019, 02:28 PM

:D

Smart Call: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Been Dead On The Supreme Court Bench For 3 Months, But Democrats Are Febrezing Her Every Day In Hopes That No One Notices (https://news.clickhole.com/smart-call-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-been-dead-on-the-su-1825122480)
If there’s anything this wild year in Washington has shown us, it’s that the traditional rules of politics no longer apply. After months of Republicans defying all the usual conventions of bureaucracy to win unprecedented power in government, it looks like the Democrats are finally responding in kind. According to sources, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been dead for over three months, but Democrats have been spraying Febreze on her every day in hopes that no one else notices she’s no longer alive.

Well played, Dems. Well played.
One of just four reliably liberal jurists on the court, Ginsburg is key to maintaining a bipartisan balance in federal law, and Democrats are showing that they won’t let her death diminish any of her influence over policy. Spritzing her corpse up real good with Febreze every morning and taping her eyes open in a lifelike expression, left-wingers from all over Washington have been pitching in to give the now-deceased justice the appearance of sentience so as not to forfeit her seat to a conservative appointment.

“She’s definitely got a stink to her, but we simply can’t afford to back down on this,” said a high-ranking Senate Democrat speaking on condition of anonymity. “It’s an unprecedented strategy, but as long as we keep masking Ruth with Febreze, we should be able to hang onto her seat.”
“One of her eyeballs keeps falling out,” the source added.

Moved to and from hearings on a rolling chair by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer, Ginsburg’s corpse has been present for all judicial obligations in recent months, and slight lurching movements caused by the escape of bodily gasses have created the illusion of spirited participation, making her appear at least as engaged in deliberations as her famously reticent colleague Clarence Thomas. However, as the stench of decomposition wafting from her cadaver grows increasingly ripe, some party leaders are starting to worry that Febreze won’t cut it for four more years.
“We might eventually have to laminate her or something,” said one congressional source who likened the smell of Ginsburg’s body to that of an old rotisserie chicken that’s been sitting at the bottom of a trash can for a while. “Or maybe we could stuff her with air fresheners. We’re gonna have to figure out something if we don’t want to lose serious ground in the judicial branch.”
While it’ll undoubtedly be a tough ruse to keep up for the entirety of Donald Trump’s presidency, you have to hand it to Democrats for finally stepping up and doing what it takes to survive in this new era of guerrilla politics. Knowing what an iconoclast RBG was, you just know having her corpse regularly doused in Febreze is exactly what she would’ve wanted.

https://news.clickhole.com/smart-call-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-been-dead-on-the-su-1825122480