PAF
12-31-2018, 11:15 AM
https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/constitution-free-zones.jpg
Golf courses, farms, communities, parks, businesses... the Wall is not a solution or just an inconvenience, it leads to bankruptcies, devestated communities and the potential to add even more people to the Welfare system. It requires Eminent Domain, taking land from rightful property and business owners and Fed control of public land. Remember BLM/Bundy.
As many of you know, TSA announced a Domestic blueprint across all 50 states. This will also require Eminent Domain. Of course I reject TSA, but I feel the Wall is merely a gauge to see how many Americans will accept the buy-in.
Government only knows how to take and tax. Government solutions have never solved anything. I will not be responsible for supporting a costly Wall that will affect farms and businesses, cities going belly up, or other Rights, “private property” being just one of them.
What is an economical, Constitutional solution? Here is one:
BluesStringer:
remove the fence that bifurcates private property, business and even towns, and leave the Rio Grande as the natural barrier it' always been. A small easement between the private property and the Northern shores of the river for CBP to patrol would certainly be acceptable to more, if not all, of the property owners currently adversely affected by the "no man's land"
Or just leave the whole perimeter of the United States as a Constitution-Free zone for 100 miles inland from the border. Think that's a better "solution?"
Please watch this video to gain some insight, and think to yourselves if you would be ok with Walls in your community. Sacrificing liberty for a false sense of security always, always leads to tyranny.
https://youtu.be/Nr6wiT3ElVo
Golf courses, farms, communities, parks, businesses... the Wall is not a solution or just an inconvenience, it leads to bankruptcies, devestated communities and the potential to add even more people to the Welfare system. It requires Eminent Domain, taking land from rightful property and business owners and Fed control of public land. Remember BLM/Bundy.
As many of you know, TSA announced a Domestic blueprint across all 50 states. This will also require Eminent Domain. Of course I reject TSA, but I feel the Wall is merely a gauge to see how many Americans will accept the buy-in.
Government only knows how to take and tax. Government solutions have never solved anything. I will not be responsible for supporting a costly Wall that will affect farms and businesses, cities going belly up, or other Rights, “private property” being just one of them.
What is an economical, Constitutional solution? Here is one:
BluesStringer:
remove the fence that bifurcates private property, business and even towns, and leave the Rio Grande as the natural barrier it' always been. A small easement between the private property and the Northern shores of the river for CBP to patrol would certainly be acceptable to more, if not all, of the property owners currently adversely affected by the "no man's land"
Or just leave the whole perimeter of the United States as a Constitution-Free zone for 100 miles inland from the border. Think that's a better "solution?"
Please watch this video to gain some insight, and think to yourselves if you would be ok with Walls in your community. Sacrificing liberty for a false sense of security always, always leads to tyranny.
https://youtu.be/Nr6wiT3ElVo