PDA

View Full Version : High tax exodus




Pauls' Revere
12-29-2018, 11:23 AM
Not sure if I'd call it an exodus but possible that some states may lose some representation

https://www.wsj.com/articles/high-tax-state-exodus-11546037709

These population shifts mean that several states including New York, Illinois and Minnesota are likely to lose House seats after the 2020 reapportionment. States that have been rapidly adding population like Arizona, Florida and Texas are likely to increase their representation. It’d be nice to think this would finally prompt Democratic politicians to rethink their anti-growth policies. But with state political cultures dominated by public unions and welfare spending, they probably require a much deeper crisis to face reality.

America as a whole can thank the Founders for creating a federalist system that allows the economic and political safety valve of interstate policy competition.

Not sure why you need a federalist system to create interstate policy competition?

oyarde
12-29-2018, 12:13 PM
NY , Minnesota and ill inois do not need house seats anyway . They are to irresponsible to be voting on things that effect others . illinois cannot even run illinois .

Zippyjuan
12-29-2018, 02:45 PM
Too early to say but one estimate of the changes: https://www.insightsassociation.org/article/states-expected-gain-or-lose-congressional-seats-after-2020-census


States Gaining Districts (6 or 7)

Arizona +1 (from 9 to 10)
Colorado +1 (from 7 to 8)
Florida +2 (from 27 to 29)
Montana even or +1 (from At-large to 2)
North Carolina +1 (from 13 to 14)
Oregon +1 (from 5 to 6)
Texas +3 (from 36 to 39)
States Losing Districts (9)

Alabama -1 (from 7 to 6)
Illinois -1 or -2 (from 18 to 17 or 16)
Michigan -1 (from 14 to 13)
Minnesota -1 or even (from 8 to 7 or none)
New York -1 (from 27 to 26)
Ohio -1 (from 16 to 15)
Pennsylvania -1 (from 18 to 17)
Rhode Island -1 (from 2 to 1)
West Virginia -1 (from 3 to 2)

https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/ie4PRuXFfG_g/v2/-1x-1.jpg