PDA

View Full Version : South Dakotans may soon be able to carry concealed handguns without a permit




Swordsmyth
11-26-2018, 06:33 PM
After years of unsuccessful attempts, supporters of legislation that would allow people to carry concealed handguns without a permit in South Dakota anticipate revived prospects once GOP Gov.-elect Kristi Noem takes office in January.The legislation languished under retiring Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard, but Noem in her campaign offered support for a so-called constitutional carry law. GOP state Sen.-elect Lynne DiSanto, who as a member of the state House of Representatives sponsored a permitless concealed carry bill that Daugaard vetoed, said such legislation is likely in the upcoming session and she's optimistic about its prospects.
"There are a lot of Republicans that are very excited to have a conservative governor," said DiSanto. "I think under a new governor it's very likely to pass."

Noem in January urged passage of a permitless carry bill.
At the time Noem didn't endorse a specific plan, though her campaign said she supported the policy "in principle." Transition team spokeswoman Kristin Wileman said in a statement this week that Noem won't commit to legislation until she can review its text, but said she's a strong 2nd Amendment supporter and thinks provisions like constitutional carry can "protect and even strengthen this right for South Dakotans."
"The governor-elect will work to find a way that law enforcement and gun-right proponents can come together around a solution," Wileman said.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/south-dakotans-may-soon-be-able-to-carry-concealed-handguns-without-a-permit

Anti Globalist
11-26-2018, 06:46 PM
Good.

PAF
11-26-2018, 07:00 PM
Article VI § 24 Right to bear arms. The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be denied.

I can't see where it says "but only if permission is granted via a piece of paper". It also says shall not, not should not.

Interesting that legislation is sought/needed to "allow" what is already in their constitution. Which means it can also be taken away.

Of course, those seeking "permission" will consider it a win.

http://sdlegislature.gov/Statutes/Constitution/DisplayStatute.aspx?Statute=0N-6&Type=Statute

Anti Federalist
11-26-2018, 07:34 PM
Thanks to the Tidi Bowl Wave in NH, we are looking forward to having CC, which was enacted two years ago, rescinded by the new mob of Bolsheviks taking over the House and Senate and Executive Council.

It's supposedly at the top of their list.