Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized after fall breaks three ribs

[Anti Federalist]

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized After Fracturing Three Ribs

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/08/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-hospitalized-after-fracturing-three-ribs/

8 Nov 2018

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, was rushed to a hospital after fracturing three ribs in a fall at the court.

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fell in her office at the Court last evening. She went home, but after experiencing discomfort overnight, went to George Washington University Hospital earlier this morning,” a statement via from the Supreme Court reads. “Tests showed that she fractured three ribs on her left side and she was admitted for observation and treatment.”

The justice’s health has long been a matter of concern. In 2014, Ginsburg had a stent placed in her right coronary artery and has survived cancer multiple times. Ginsburg in 2012 fractured two ribs in a fall and remained mum about the incident for several months. She also was hospitalized after a bad reaction to medicine in 2009.

Appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1993, Ginsburg rebuffed suggestions from some liberals that she should step down in the first two years of President Barack Obama’s second term, when Democrats also controlled the Senate and would have been likely to confirm her successor.

She already has hired clerks for the term that extends into 2020, indicating she has no plans to retire.

Ginsburg leads the court’s liberal wing.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

[CaptUSA]

Where was Hillary?

[acptulsa]

Well, at least it wasn't her hip. I hope her recovery goes well. I also hope visions of retirement are dancing in her head.


Where was Hillary?

Wait. Did I miss something? Did Bader-Ginsberg commit suicide by stabbing herself 37 times?

[donnay]

Poor thing that is certainly a painful injury. I wish her well.

[CaptUSA]

Wait. Did I miss something? Did Bader-Ginsberg commit suicide by stabbing herself 37 times?

Good point. This sloppiness isn't really her style. Where was Bill?

[Anti Federalist]

Good point. This sloppiness isn't really her style. Where was Bill?

Wait, you mean committed suicide by shooting herself eight times in the back of the head while being stuffed inside a car trunk?

[acptulsa]

Those Clintons sure are inspirational. No one in history has been moved to commit suicide in such creative and downright acrobatic ways as their enemies.

[CaptUSA]

Those Clintons sure are inspirational. No one in history has been moved to commit suicide in such creative and downright acrobatic ways as their enemies.
Except, maybe, their friends.

[Danke]

6199

[RonZeplin]

Where was Rene Boucher?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4A7I7-6snCs/hqdefault.jpg

The rib cracka

[smtwngrl2]

Ok, I know it's a joke, but where's the logic? Why would Hillary want another conservative in the Supreme Court?

[CaptUSA]

Ok, I know it's a joke...

Are you sure? :confused:

[acptulsa]

Ok, I know it's a joke, but where's the logic? Why would Hillary want another conservative in the Supreme Court?

If someone were to cross Clinton, I sincerely doubt she'd let a little thing like partisanship stop her from sending in the dogs.

Does she not have more Democratic than Republican victims to date?

[specsaregood]

Ok, I know it's a joke, but where's the logic? Why would Hillary want another conservative in the Supreme Court?

Because the Clintons and Trump are secretly best friends and he promised her an appointment to the Sc.

[phill4paul]

Krissanne Hall for replacement! Either that or as the new AG. I'm willing to compromise on one or the other.

[dannno]

Ok, I know it's a joke, but where's the logic? Why would Hillary want another conservative in the Supreme Court?

Ya, probably, but she also essentially said that the Kavanaugh circus the Dems created was deplorable.

[Swordsmyth]

Many happy returns!

Heaven is sending her a message, I hope it is a final warning.

[CCTelander]

Because the Clintons and Trump are secretly best friends and he promised her an appointment to the Sc.


Secretly?

[Origanalist]

Because the Clintons and Trump are secretly best friends and he promised her an appointment to the Sc.

You mean he's not going to send her to prison?

[acptulsa]

You mean he's not going to send her to prison?

I held my breath waiting for that.

I woke up with one hell of a headache.

[Anti Globalist]

Hope she has a speedy recovery. As much as I want her gone, I don't want it to end this way.

[Swordsmyth]

Hope she has a speedy recovery. As much as I want her gone, I don't want it to end this way.
A firing squad?
Thrown out of a helicopter?
Suffocated with a pillow?
Hung?
The electric chair?
I'll take any of those or death by hospital. (Pneumonia, antibiotic-resistant infection, etc.)
Just as long as she is gone and Trump gets to replace her with Lee or someone else. (Almost anyone will be an improvement)

[smtwngrl2]

Because the Clintons and Trump are secretly best friends and he promised her an appointment to the Sc.

Gasp! :astonished: :tears:

[smtwngrl2]

Hope she has a speedy recovery. As much as I want her gone, I don't want it to end this way.

You know, I don't think I'm in a hurry to have her gone. As nice as it is to have more conservatives on the Supreme Court, I think it's good to still have some balance. Remember all the attacks in the Constitution that came during Bush's presidency. Right now we have all the leftist craziness (but not from RBG). But there may come a time we wouldn't want all of one party (either party) on the Supreme Court.

Ok. and before someone points out that it's unlikely we would ever have all of one party, don't take it too literally. If we had only one or two of one party (or maybe even 3), it would be almost like having all of one party.

[Swordsmyth]

The nature of the fall — in her office, not on a slippery sidewalk — raises questions as to her ongoing stability health-wise. Falls such as these are often a precursor to more serious health concerns in older adults. Justice Ginsburg may not be able to serve those five more years she spoke of in July.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30601-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-injured-in-fall-hospitalized

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not on the bench Tuesday for a session, after sustaining a fall last week and fracturing three ribs.
The high court met for a non-argument session Tuesday morning, less than one week after the 85-year-old justice fell in her Supreme Court office.
“Justice Ginsburg will not be on the Bench this morning for the non-argument session,” the Court said in a statement Tuesday. “She continues to improve and is working from home this morning.”
The court did not hear arguments on Tuesday, but took the bench for other routine business.
Ginsburg, the court’s oldest justice, was admitted to George Washington University Hospital last Thursday “for observation and treatment” following the fall.
Ginsburg has dealt with a series of health concerns in recent years, but has yet to miss a single day of oral arguments in her tenure on the highest court in the land, according to The Washington Post.
Ginsburg broke two ribs in 2012, and previously battled two bouts of cancer. She also had a stent implanted in her heart to open a blocked artery in 2014.

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ginsburg-misses-supreme-court-session-while-recovering-from-fall

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Deals Unanimous, Welcome Blow to Administrative State in Frog Case (https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/supreme-court-decision-dusty-gopher-frog-administrative-state/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=nationalreview.com&utm_term=68938&utm_content=2316296)
The 8–0 ruling was doubly beneficial.


Who was missing?

[dannno]

Supreme Court Deals Unanimous, Welcome Blow to Administrative State in Frog Case (https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/supreme-court-decision-dusty-gopher-frog-administrative-state/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=nationalreview.com&utm_term=68938&utm_content=2316296)


The 8–0 ruling was doubly beneficial.


Who was missing?

Kavanaugh


The eight justices (the case was argued before Brett Kavanaugh joined the court)

[Swordsmyth]

Kavanaugh

[/FONT][/COLOR]
Drat.

[Pauls' Revere]

Supreme Court Deals Unanimous, Welcome Blow to Administrative State in Frog Case (https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/supreme-court-decision-dusty-gopher-frog-administrative-state/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=nationalreview.com&utm_term=68938&utm_content=2316296)
The 8–0 ruling was doubly beneficial.



Who was missing?

[sic] The eight justices (the case was argued before Brett Kavanaugh joined the court) rejected both the government’s justification for its designation, and the government’s argument that its action should have received judicial deference, not judicial review.

[Anti Globalist]

Now that I think about it, why don't the other supreme court justices get together and tell Ginsburg that she needs to retire? Are justices not allowed to say those things? If I was a justice and asked about her, I straight up say she needs to retire.

[aGameOfThrones]

Holding a seat just because she hates the President.

[Anti Federalist]

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer

https://www.npr.org/2018/12/21/679065534/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery-for-lung-cancer

December 21, 201812:22 PM ET

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg underwent surgery Friday for early stage lung cancer, a Supreme Court spokesperson tells NPR. Doctors at Memorial Sloan Kettering hospital in New York performed a lobectomy, removing one of the five lobes of the lung.

Short of complications in recovery, doctors say prospects look good for a full recovery for Ginsburg, 85. She hopes to be back on the court for the start of the next argument session in early January.

The cancer was discovered after Ginsburg fell, fracturing several ribs in November. In taking CT scans of her ribs, doctors noticed an abnormality in one lobe of the lung. Subsequent biopsies and other initial tests revealed two non-small cell cancerous lesions, with no lymph node involvement detectable.

[dannno]

Now that I think about it, why don't the other supreme court justices get together and tell Ginsburg that she needs to retire? Are justices not allowed to say those things? If I was a justice and asked about her, I straight up say she needs to retire.

I guess they don't want to be called names, like Putin's bitch or some nonsense.

[Brian4Liberty]

Since Ginsberg is so enthralled with the Constitution of South Africa, it would probably be prudent for all memorial services and funerals be moved there.

[Mach]

Some Democrats were trying to get her to retire back in the middle of Obama's last term.

Of course she refused.... I think she is putting herself before anything, or anybody else, very selfish.


This is from after her fall, but before her lesions went public.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVidYw-AI5A

[Swordsmyth]

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer

https://www.npr.org/2018/12/21/679065534/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery-for-lung-cancer

December 21, 201812:22 PM ET

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg underwent surgery Friday for early stage lung cancer, a Supreme Court spokesperson tells NPR. Doctors at Memorial Sloan Kettering hospital in New York performed a lobectomy, removing one of the five lobes of the lung.

Short of complications in recovery, doctors say prospects look good for a full recovery for Ginsburg, 85. She hopes to be back on the court for the start of the next argument session in early January.

The cancer was discovered after Ginsburg fell, fracturing several ribs in November. In taking CT scans of her ribs, doctors noticed an abnormality in one lobe of the lung. Subsequent biopsies and other initial tests revealed two non-small cell cancerous lesions, with no lymph node involvement detectable.
It won't be long now.

:D

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, underwent a lung procedure on Friday to remove two malignant nodules in her left lung, the Supreme Court said in a release (https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_12-21-18).

The court said that she is "resting comfortably" at the hospital, although the addition of "malignant" to the diagnosis probably leaves a dismal outlook to her chances.


Full SCOTUS release below (https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_12-21-18):

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg underwent a pulmonary lobectomy today at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. Two nodules in the lower lobe of her left lung were discovered incidentally during tests performed at George Washington University Hospital to diagnose and treat rib fractures sustained in a fall on November 7. According to the thoracic surgeon, Valerie W. Rusch, MD, FACS, both nodules removed during surgery were found to be malignant on initial pathology evaluation. Post-surgery, there was no evidence of any remaining disease. Scans performed before surgery indicated no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body. Currently, no further treatment is planned. Justice Ginsburg is resting comfortably and is expected to remain in the hospital for a few days.
We would imagine the 'Left' is about to start panicking since the GOP's gains in the Senate during the Midterms would only ease any new SCOTUS nominees going forward.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-21/ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-procedure-remove-malignant-cancerous-growths-her-lung

:D

[UWDude]

No 85 year old woman breaks 3 ribs in a fall, and then survives a surgery for lung cancer a few weeks later. No surgeon would even consider it, unless the risk of the lung cancer spreading rapidly was greater then the risk of her dying from complications of three broken ribs.

It must have been extremely fast spreading, for them to decide to do surgery on her LUNGS while she was recovering from 3 broken 85 YEAR OLD RIBS.

They will find more, or the surgery was a last ditch effort to save her from likely hemorrhaging and growing infections.
Either way, I will get my pay.

By the way. remember when revolution3.0 was confused about what happened to the dude who broke Rand Paul's ribs? remember, he had no idea that the guy was given a slap on the wrist for trying to kill rand? He just assumed the guy got hard prison time, because he is that childlike in his worldview?

I am not of the martyr blood line. There is no more turning of the cheek.

[UWDude]

By the way, coming this Christmas to a theater near you, (no joke)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28dHbIR_NB4

In the fight for equality, she had no equal. Felicity Jones is Ruth Bader Ginsburg in #OnTheBasisOfSex, featuring the new original song by Kesha, “Here Comes The Change.” In theaters this Christmas!

[Pauls' Revere]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery/ar-BBRh3Kl?OCID=ansmsnnews11

There is no evidence of any remaining disease, says a court spokesperson, nor is there evidence of disease elsewhere in the body.

The 85-year-old justice was hospitalized last month after a fall in her office, in which she fractured three ribs.

In 1999, Ginsburg underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, and 10 years later she was treated for early stages of pancreatic cancer.

The senior-most liberal justice, Ginsburg has said that she'll continue to serve on the Supreme Court as long as she's able to do the job.

"I said I will do this job as long as I can do it full steam," Ginsburg said Sunday

[Swordsmyth]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery/ar-BBRh3Kl?OCID=ansmsnnews11

There is no evidence of any remaining disease, says a court spokesperson, nor is there evidence of disease elsewhere in the body.

The 85-year-old justice was hospitalized last month after a fall in her office, in which she fractured three ribs.

In 1999, Ginsburg underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, and 10 years later she was treated for early stages of pancreatic cancer.

The senior-most liberal justice, Ginsburg has said that she'll continue to serve on the Supreme Court as long as she's able to do the job.

"I said I will do this job as long as I can do it full steam," Ginsburg said Sunday
She is too old to survive much longer after having two major traumas so close together.
Remember that she fell while in her office NOT while going up or down stairs.

[Anti Globalist]

Next thing you know they'll report that she is now paralyzed from the neck down.

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/ruth-bader-ginsburg) voted against President Donald Trump’s proposed immigrant asylum (https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/politics/Supreme-Court-Rejects-Trump-Appeal-Asylum-Ban-503341731.html) restrictions from the hospital where she had cancer surgery Friday, according to media reports.

More at: https://news.yahoo.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-voted-hospital-084106767.html

How is that even legal?

[dannno]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/ruth-bader-ginsburg) voted against President Donald Trump’s proposed immigrant asylum (https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/politics/Supreme-Court-Rejects-Trump-Appeal-Asylum-Ban-503341731.html) restrictions from the hospital where she had cancer surgery Friday, according to media reports.

More at: https://news.yahoo.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-voted-hospital-084106767.html

How is that even legal?


https://theinfosphere.org/images/thumb/0/06/Ginsberg_and_Bjork.png/225px-Ginsberg_and_Bjork.png

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/ruth-bader-ginsburg) voted against President Donald Trump’s proposed immigrant asylum (https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/politics/Supreme-Court-Rejects-Trump-Appeal-Asylum-Ban-503341731.html) restrictions from the hospital where she had cancer surgery Friday, according to media reports.

More at: https://news.yahoo.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-voted-hospital-084106767.html

How is that even legal?


https://theinfosphere.org/images/thumb/0/06/Ginsberg_and_Bjork.png/225px-Ginsberg_and_Bjork.png

Why did they need to do this?
They couldn't have waited a few days for her to leave the hospital?
Is she dying and this is their way of milking one last ruling out of her?

[UWDude]

Why did they need to do this?
They couldn't have waited a few days for her to leave the hospital?
Is she dying and this is their way of milking one last ruling out of her?

No, as I stated before.
They are going to pretend she is in intensive care, and act outraged for proof of life.
Just like after Woodrow Wilson's stroke. Shadow government ran the show.
If she is not dead, she soon will be, and somebody will be writing her opinions for her.

[Swordsmyth]

No, as I stated before.
They are going to pretend she is in intensive care, and act outraged for proof of life.
Just like after Woodrow Wilson's stroke. Shadow government ran the show.
If she is not dead, she soon will be, and somebody will be writing her opinions for her.
I think you may be right, Trump needs to do something about this.

[Swordsmyth]

On Friday, surgeons in New York removed the lower lobe of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s left lung. According to a statement from the Supreme Court, two nodules—which had been discovered in a CT scan after Ginsburg broke three ribs last month—were determined to be malignant.

Images before the surgery showed no evidence of cancer elsewhere in her body, and doctors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center reported that there was “no evidence of any remaining disease” after the procedure. According to the statement, no further treatment is planned.

What does this mean?
First, there’s a mandatory caveat in any such circumstance: A prognosis is impossible even for Ginsburg’s doctors to predict perfectly, and very limited information has been made public. Nevertheless, Ginsburg is a public figure whose health status is of particular consequence to American citizens, and readers of the Supreme Court’s statement are likely to draw conclusions. It is possible to add some context to the statement and to determine that this is neither a clean bill of health nor a clear sign of imminent peril.

After the news, I tweeted: “If you’re 85 and you break a rib and get a CT, the radiologist will very likely find pulmonary nodules. Most aren’t removed. Since hers are now out and there’s apparently no evidence of metastatic disease, the primary issue is recovery from the procedure.”
Most readers took this as good news. Though I didn’t mean to imply that she’s cleared. It’s true that nodules are very common—and a nodule is different from a mass, the distinction being the size. A nodule is, by definition, fewer than 3 centimeters (around an inch) in diameter. These two nodules are now gone, and there are apparently no others remaining.
But the word that makes the statement more complicated and concerning is two.
Pulmonary nodules are indeed extremely common, and most are benign. To find two malignant nodules in a person who smokes would not be especially surprising. However, if you have two separate malignant nodules in your lung and you do not smoke, doctors worry that this means they represent metastatic disease from a cancer somewhere else.
This is especially true if the patient has a history of cancer, as Ginsburg does. She had early-stage colon and pancreatic cancers removed in 1999 and 2009, respectively.
Lung nodules are generally removed when they are deemed suspicious for malignancy, meaning they either showed signs of growth or were not seen on prior oncologic screening. “Growing pulmonary nodules can be primary lung cancers, and synchronous ones do appear,” says Howard Forman, a radiologist and professor at Yale. “But in a patient with two primary known malignancies, we would need to know the pathology of the nodules before believing she is cured.”
The pathology report can tell us if the malignant cells are lung cancer—meaning a rare case of two simultaneous new lung cancers in a nonsmoker—or if they represent a recurrence of metastatic colon or pancreatic cancer, or if they are of some other origin. If this is the case, it would raise concern that although current scans showed no evidence of metastatic disease elsewhere, there could be yet-undetectable cancer cells already seeded in Ginsburg’s body.
The fact that the statement says the nodules are indeed malignant means that at least a preliminary pathology report has been done, but this crucial detail—what type of malignancy?—was either unclear or withheld from the statement. It reads only: “According to the thoracic surgeon, Valerie W. Rusch, MD, FACS, both nodules removed during surgery were found to be malignant on initial pathology evaluation.” (I emailed Rusch, who told me, “We have no additional information on the pathology at the present time.”)
“It all depends on the pathology report,” says the pathologist Anirban Maitra, the scientific director of the Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research at MD Anderson Cancer Center. “Cancer in the lung is not the same as primary lung cancer, especially in a person with a history of colon and pancreatic cancer. Right now it’s best for the medical community to wait for more details.”
“They might need to run special stains to distinguish lung versus colon versus pancreatic,” Maitra adds. “That could take a couple days and may or may not be conclusive.”
In any case, expect that Ginsburg will be monitored closely in coming years for metastatic disease. In the immediate term, recovery from a lobectomy can be a significant undertaking for an 85-year-old, and that is indeed the relevant health issue for the foreseeable future.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/12/rbg-cancer/578869/

[Schifference]

Each and every person lives one moment at a time. The older one gets the more likely they will drop dead the next moment.

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is up and working as she recuperates from cancer surgery.A spokeswoman for the court, Kathy Arberg, also says that Ginsburg remained in New York at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center on Sunday. No information has been released on when Ginsburg might return home.

The court next meets on Jan. 7.

More at: https://news.yahoo.com/court-says-justice-ginsburg-working-surgery-001307358--politics.html

[RJB]

Well no new news. Based on Facebook memes, some people will be disappointed that their Christmas wish didn't come true. Others are probably praying she hangs on for two more years.

People live sad lives these days. Merry Christmas.

[Anti Globalist]

Ginsburg is just a hard working lady. She's got more knowledge in her pinky than we have in our entire bodies.

[nbhadja]

I hope this treasonous witch drops dead soon. She is a disgrace to this country and morality. She once argued that the age of consent should be lowered from 16 to 12. 6-3 sounds nice. Stephen Breyer is 80 years old.....so 7-2 sounds better!!

[Grandmastersexsay]

Ginsburg is just a hard working lady. She's got more knowledge in her pinky than we have in our entire bodies.

Unfortunately knowledge does not result in wisdom.

[Swordsmyth]

Unfortunately knowledge does not result in wisdom.
Or virtue which is more to the point.

[Schifference]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is up and working as she recuperates from cancer surgery.A spokeswoman for the court, Kathy Arberg, also says that Ginsburg remained in New York at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center on Sunday. No information has been released on when Ginsburg might return home.

The court next meets on Jan. 7.

More at: https://news.yahoo.com/court-says-justice-ginsburg-working-surgery-001307358--politics.html

The incredible power of prayer.

[Swordsmyth]

The incredible power of prayer the dark side.

fixed it.

[Swordsmyth]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg left the hospital on Christmas after doctors removed two cancerous nodules from her left lung last Friday.
The 85-year-old is now recuperating at home after spending the past several days at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
Ginsburg was treated for colon cancer in 1999 with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. She was later diagnosed with
pancreatic cancer 10 years later which was removed surgically.
A surgery expert interviewed by CBS said it was possible that slow-moving cancer cells spread to her lungs from one of those cases.
“As Ginsburg does not have a history of smoking, he said a lung cancer diagnosis was unlikely,” CBS reported (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-lung-cancerous-nodules-surgery-mean/). “Pathology tests, which he said are typically complete within a couple of weeks after the procedure, will determine where the cancer came from.”

https://www.infowars.com/ginsburg-discharged-from-hospital-after-cancer-operation/

[Swordsmyth]

Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
ID: 38db44
No.4627556 (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4626734.html#4627556)

Jan 6 2019 12:32:35 (EST) (https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/#t1546795955) [RBG]
Why was she 'selected'?
Who appointed her?
Remember [her] history.
Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Highlights:
>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)
>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)
>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)
>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)
>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)
>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)
>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/
Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.

Q

[Grandmastersexsay]

>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.”(Page 218)


Agreed.




>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

This one is iffy. I have no problem with it as long as they are postpubesent, and they are both of a somewhat similar age. The latter part being a social construct I picked up in life. The whole intellectual maturity based on age is nonsense. There are plenty of 25 year old girls running around with the intellectual maturity of a rock. If a woman's body has matured to the point where they can give birth, I dont see the issue. That's how we did it for 40,000 years. It's only been different for the last 200-300 years, I'm guessing due to the Puritans. Very few girls are post pubescent at 12, but it does happen. 14 years would seem less shocking.

[Anti Federalist]

Ginsburg missing Supreme Court arguments for 1st time

https://www.apnews.com/b1d7eb8384ef44099d63fde057c4172c

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is missing arguments for the first time in more than 25 years as she recuperates from cancer surgery last month.

Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said Monday the 85-year-old Ginsburg is continuing to recuperate and work from home after doctors removed two cancerous growths from her left lung odn Dec. 21.

Ginsburg was discharged from a New York hospital on Christmas day.

Ginsburg had two earlier cancer surgeries in 1999 and 2009 that did not cause her to miss court sessions. She also has broken ribs on at least two occasions.

The court said doctors found the growths on Ginsburg’s lung when she was being treated for fractured ribs she suffered in a fall at her office on Nov. 7.

[specsaregood]

Ginsburg missing Supreme Court arguments for 1st time

https://www.apnews.com/b1d7eb8384ef44099d63fde057c4172c

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is missing arguments for the first time in more than 25 years as she recuperates from cancer surgery last month.

Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said Monday the 85-year-old Ginsburg is continuing to recuperate and work from home after doctors removed two cancerous growths from her left lung odn Dec. 21.

Ginsburg was discharged from a New York hospital on Christmas day.

Ginsburg had two earlier cancer surgeries in 1999 and 2009 that did not cause her to miss court sessions. She also has broken ribs on at least two occasions.

The court said doctors found the growths on Ginsburg’s lung when she was being treated for fractured ribs she suffered in a fall at her office on Nov. 7.

Is she allowed to rule on cases she can't attend? If so, I'd like to see evidence that SHE is the one doing any work or decisions, not unnominated underlings.

[Anti Federalist]

Is she allowed to rule on cases she can't attend? If so, I'd like to see evidence that SHE is the one doing any work or decisions, not unnominated underlings.

I'd like that as well.

[Swordsmyth]

Agreed.
Those may be libertarian positions but RBG doesn't advocate for them because she wants to reduce government, she advocates for them because she wants to destroy public morality.
And the draft shouldn't apply to women, it shouldn't apply to men either but there are differences between men and women and if you have a draft it shouldn't apply to women, there are other ways men and women aren't the same too.





This one is iffy. I have no problem with it as long as they are postpubesent, and they are both of a somewhat similar age. The latter part being a social construct I picked up in life. The whole intellectual maturity based on age is nonsense. There are plenty of 25 year old girls running around with the intellectual maturity of a rock. If a woman's body has matured to the point where they can give birth, I dont see the issue. That's how we did it for 40,000 years. It's only been different for the last 200-300 years, I'm guessing due to the Puritans. Very few girls are post pubescent at 12, but it does happen. 14 years would seem less shocking.
The law must draw a line somewhere and while some adults may be as immature as children no children are intellectually mature, there is also the rights of the parents to consider.
Where I do agree with you is that when two children fool around it is different than if an adult preys on a child, there should be an exception for when the age difference is less than X years between the parties involved.

[Swordsmyth]

Ginsburg missing Supreme Court arguments for 1st time

https://www.apnews.com/b1d7eb8384ef44099d63fde057c4172c

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is missing arguments for the first time in more than 25 years as she recuperates from cancer surgery last month.

Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said Monday the 85-year-old Ginsburg is continuing to recuperate and work from home after doctors removed two cancerous growths from her left lung odn Dec. 21.

Ginsburg was discharged from a New York hospital on Christmas day.

Ginsburg had two earlier cancer surgeries in 1999 and 2009 that did not cause her to miss court sessions. She also has broken ribs on at least two occasions.

The court said doctors found the growths on Ginsburg’s lung when she was being treated for fractured ribs she suffered in a fall at her office on Nov. 7.
Tick........Tock........

:D

I wonder if she is even really still alive.

[Swordsmyth]

Is she allowed to rule on cases she can't attend?
I don't see how she could be but I wouldn't put it past them to try.



If so, I'd like to see evidence that SHE is the one doing any work or decisions, not unnominated underlings.
We need proof of life every few weeks as well.

[Anti Federalist]

Tick........Tock........

:D

I wonder if she is even really still alive.

https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/400/804/8804400.jpg

[Grandmastersexsay]

Those may be libertarian positions but RBG doesn't advocate for them because she wants to reduce government, she advocates for them because she wants to destroy public morality.
And the draft shouldn't apply to women, it shouldn't apply to men either but there are differences between men and women and if you have a draft it shouldn't apply to women, there are other ways men and women aren't the same too.

No, there shouldn't be a draft, but if there is, women should be included too. Women vote more than men. Why should we be forced to fight their wars while they sit on the sidelines? In fact, having women eligible for a draft makes it less likely there is one.


The law must draw a line somewhere and while some adults may be as immature as children no children are intellectually mature, there is also the rights of the parents to consider.

Why must the line be age? Surely there are better ways to determine physical maturity than by age. Perhaps simply looking at them? You've heard the term jail bate. Underage girls that look indistinguishable from a sexually mature woman above the age of consent.

When I was in my late teens early twenties, when a lot of guys get in trouble with this kind of thing, I was chasing girls in their late 20/early 30s, but I've known people where this became an issue. The temptation is too strong for young men. They're programmed to respond to women who look like that especially when the women themselves encourage it. I dont mean encourage them by what they are wearing, but actively try to get the guy to have sex with them. A lot of men's lives have been ruined by age of consent laws, where common sense would normally prevail. A judge or jury should be given leeway to decide on the sexual maturity of a woman.

[Swordsmyth]

No, there shouldn't be a draft, but if there is, women should be included too. Women vote more than men. Why should we be forced to fight their wars while they sit on the sidelines? In fact, having women eligible for a draft makes it less likely there is one.
There are other ways that men and women are different than warfighting that should be beneficial to men but the best solution is to end the draft because it is immoral to enslave someone and doubly immoral to risk that enslaved person's life against their will.
Notice that that isn't RBG's position.





Why must the line be age? Surely there are better ways to determine physical maturity than by age. Perhaps simply looking at them? You've heard the term jail bate. Underage girls that look indistinguishable from a sexually mature woman above the age of consent.

When I was in my late teens early twenties, when a lot of guys get in trouble with this kind of thing, I was chasing girls in their late 20/early 30s, but I've known people where this became an issue. The temptation is too strong for young men. They're programmed to respond to women who look like that especially when the women themselves encourage it. I dont mean encourage them by what they are wearing, but actively try to get the guy to have sex with them. A lot of men's lives have been ruined by age of consent laws, where common sense would normally prevail. A judge or jury should be given leeway to decide on the sexual maturity of a woman.
There must be an age line because people below a certain age aren't mentally mature enough to make that decision, it doesn't matter that some people who are older than that also are immature, EVERYONE below a certain age isn't mature enough.

I also said that there should be an exemption for cases where the two parties are close in age so that two kids fooling around isn't considered criminal, perhaps there should also be a "she looks old enough" defense allowed in cases where it can't be proven that the adult knew the age of the child.

[angelatc]

Is she allowed to rule on cases she can't attend? If so, I'd like to see evidence that SHE is the one doing any work or decisions, not unnominated underlings.


I'd like that as well.

From Scotusblog: (http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/the-justices-return-without-ginsburg-or-any-new-grants/)


The justices returned to the bench today for the first arguments of the new year. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had surgery on December 21 to remove two cancerous growths from her lungs, was not on the bench this morning; a court spokeswoman indicated that she would still participate in today’s cases based on the briefs and transcripts.

[Swordsmyth]

From Scotusblog: (http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/the-justices-return-without-ginsburg-or-any-new-grants/)


[/B]
I thought they might try something like that.

We need to demand proof of life and keep demanding it.

[specsaregood]

From Scotusblog: (http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/the-justices-return-without-ginsburg-or-any-new-grants/)

The justices returned to the bench today for the first arguments of the new year. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had surgery on December 21 to remove two cancerous growths from her lungs, was not on the bench this morning; a court spokeswoman indicated that she would still participate in today’s cases based on the briefs and transcripts.


So it is reasonable to believe that underlings could actually do all the "work" and pretend it is her doing it.

[Swordsmyth]

So it is reasonable to believe that underlings could actually do all the "work" and pretend it is her doing it.
They could put her on ice and keep it up for years if they are allowed to get away with it.

There needs to be a public outcry for regular proof of life and proof of assent to the votes issued in her name.

[RJB]

https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/400/804/8804400.jpg

That may seem so far fetched as to be humorous, but they tried to accuse a man of multiple gang rapes with absolutely no evidence. I seriously wouldn't put it past them. They see this as war.

[Swordsmyth]

That may seem so far fetched as to be humorous, but they tried to accuse a man of multiple gang rapes with absolutely no evidence. I seriously wouldn't put it past them. They see this as war.
It is war now and they are the ones who made it so.

The best possible outcomes all contain bloodshed now and the worst contain even more.

[Swordsmyth]

https://www.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/rbg-supremecourt2.jpg

[timosman]

By the way, coming this Christmas to a theater near you, (no joke)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28dHbIR_NB4

In the fight for equality, she had no equal. Felicity Jones is Ruth Bader Ginsburg in #OnTheBasisOfSex, featuring the new original song by Kesha, “Here Comes The Change.” In theaters this Christmas!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28dHbIR_NB4