PDA

View Full Version : Here’s Why ICE Is ‘Mass Releasing’ Immigrant Families From Detention Centers




Zippyjuan
11-03-2018, 11:04 AM
https://rewire.news/article/2018/10/30/heres-why-ice-is-mass-releasing-immigrant-families-from-detention-centers/
After criticizing "catch and release", that is what the administration is now doing.

https://fivedotoh.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/bc31ab53-d90c-4530-a985-eca104822ae3.jpeg?w=636


The Trump administration is releasing an unusual number of migrants, with little to no warning to the communities taking them in, in an effort to scare and sway white Republican voters, advocates say.

Federal immigration authorities are quietly releasing an unusual number of immigrant families from detention centers, “dumping [them] on border city streets” and leaving some stranded at bus stations in the middle of the night.

The Trump administration’s “mass release” of immigrant families is in anticipation of hundreds of asylum-seeking families coming to the U.S.-Mexico border in the coming weeks.

Advocates along the border in California and Texas told Rewire.News that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is releasing the families it has detained for at least 20 days from the two family detention centers in Texas, and that immigration officials are not detaining newly apprehended families, but rather are quickly processing them for release.

Immigration officials are affixing parents with electronic monitoring devices and giving them “notices to appear,” a document that outlines when they must appear in immigration court. Customs and Border Protection typically holds migrant families apprehended at the border or who present themselves at ports of entry in processing centers before officials transfer them to ICE detention centers. ICE routinely subjects families in federal immigration custody to prolonged detention, despite the existence of the Flores Settlement Agreement which, among other basic protections, dictates that children cannot be detained in detention centers for more than 20 days.

News outlets from San Diego to El Paso are reporting that the Trump administration has begun “shifting the burden” of managing immigrant families on the border “to local organizations and cities across the southwest border,” as the Los Angeles Times reported. On Thursday, the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (RAICES), the largest immigration legal services provider in Texas, reported that 20 people who’d been released from detention centers were forced to sleep at a bus station in San Antonio because local shelters were full and they were left there by ICE after the last bus had left the station. On Friday in El Paso, ICE agents dropped off more than 100 Central American migrants at a Greyhound bus station without notice to local advocacy organizations. Usually, local organizations are given notice by federal immigration authorities so that they can help coordinate transportation and shelter for migrants released from custody.

Officials with Greyhound reportedly called the police on the Central American migrants at the bus station.

A source in Texas working closely with these formerly-detained immigrant families told Rewire.News there’s no “rhyme or reason” related to which families are released from custody. They said that at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas, otherwise known as Dilley, “intakes are down 50 percent.” However, some families detained there longer than 20 days, in violation of the Flores agreement, are feeling “extra anxious” about why they remain detained. Advocates have no answer for them.

Overall, apprehensions are below what they were in 2014 when President Obama declared there was a “urgent humanitarian situation” at the border. However, there has been an increase in the number of families and unaccompanied children migrating to the United States to seek asylum. According to numbers from CBP, Border Patrol apprehended more than 16,600 family members in September, the most recorded in a single month since the agency began tracking family arrivals in fiscal year 2013.

A spokesperson from ICE told Rewire.News that in response to the rising arrest numbers, the federal agency has increased the number of releases from Texas’ family detention centers and that the agency is “diverting local resources” to accommodate what they anticipate to be an “increased operational workflow” once asylum seekers as part of the “migrant caravan” arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border, many of whom are parents and children.

The ICE spokesperson blamed the “inaction of Congress” for its inability to “detain and promptly remove families with no legal basis to remain in the United States,” though it is only the job of asylum officers conducting credible fear interviews to determine whether members of a migrant family have legal grounds for remaining in the country.

“To mitigate the risk of holding family units past the time frame allotted to the government, ICE began curtailing all reviews of post-release plans from families apprehended along the southwest border starting on Tuesday, October 23,” the spokesperson told Rewire.News. “Family units that are released will be enrolled in a form of ICE’s Alternatives to Detention or released on another form of supervision. Aliens will be issued a Notice to Appear in immigration court, as appropriate. ICE continues to work with local and state officials and [nongovernmental organization (NGO)] partners in the area so they are prepared to provide assistance with transportation or other services.”

Organizations in border towns are reporting the opposite. Ruben Garcia, founder and director of El Paso’s Annunciation House, told Texas Monthly that immigration officials are no longer contacting the relatives or friends of the migrants they release, or providing bus tickets or other forms of transportation. These functions will now “be left to NGOs, churches, or shelters.” This was echoed by Sister Norma Pimentel, executive director of the Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley, which oversees the Humanitarian Respite Center. Pimentel told Texas Monthly that her group is handling as many as 500 people a day and that there are many they simply cannot accommodate because they don’t have the space or resources.

In San Diego, where the releases have not been as large, Lilian Serrano, chair of the San Diego Immigrant Rights Consortium, told Rewire.News in a statement that organizations in the city are “more than ready” to help asylum-seeking families and provide them with support.

When a family was in custody at the southwest border, it was part of ICE’s job to review their plans for living in the United States, including calling the person whom the family planned to live with and helping with travel arrangements. This is no longer the case under the Trump administration’s new policy, rolled out weeks before midterm elections in which Republicans are facing a range of electoral challenges.

Jennifer Apodaca, an organizer with El Paso’s Detained Migrant Solidarity Committee (DMSC), told Rewire.News this is all part of a “manufactured escalation” under the Trump administration. It is intended to rile up Trump’s anti-immigrant base and push through some of his administration’s more inhumane policies, including proposed rule changes overriding Flores that would subject children to prolonged detention.

DMSC is one of 50 immigrant rights advocacy groups that filed an amicus brief Monday condemning Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ move to remove power from immigration judges so only ICE agents can determine which immigrants, including asylum seekers, should be released from detention.

In September, Sessions announced he would overturn a precedent by the Board of Immigration Appeals in the decision known as “Matter of X-K,” which held that immigration judges have the power to release certain migrants on bond at a hearing.

Apodaca said the southwest border has received “caravans” of migrants for years, as many migrants travel together in groups for safety. There are organizations at the border that provide food, shelter, and transportation to migrants released from federal custody, but they were not prepared for the Trump administration’s apparent mass releases that began last week. Something similar happened in 2016 under the Obama administration, which left many immigrant families stranded in the streets.

While Apodaca does contend the reported 7,000 Honduran asylum seekers headed for the U.S.-Mexico border is much larger than usual, the “media frenzy” around it is playing into the Trump administration’s hands, she said.

“There’s no nice way to put this, but this is about scaring white Americans into believing that the administration has been ‘forced’ to release ‘angry migrant hordes’ into the street because of another large group of brown people they’re afraid of coming to the border, or because they want to say they are constrained by current policies that ‘force’ them to release children after 20 days, even when we know they detain children much longer than that pretty regularly,” Apodaca said. “Right now, you have the border being blocked by agents holding assault rifles, a possible [executive] order banning asylum seekers, and the military being deployed. Even though this was all created by the Trump administration, they will use it as evidence to close the border.”

More at link.

Chester Copperpot
11-03-2018, 11:51 AM
oh good this will help more trump supporters getting to the polls on election day

RonZeplin
11-03-2018, 03:19 PM
Trump is your run of the mill Reconquista Republican like !Jeb! :biohazard: Comprehensive Immigration Reform, DACA amnesty soon. :bigpoo::bigpoo:

http://cashmccall.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Act-A-Love-Bros-1.jpg

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_waves_mexican_flag.gif

2004 Presidential Campaign

Swordsmyth
11-03-2018, 03:40 PM
:confused:
I thought Trump was evil for detaning them.




The only sources I see cited are left wing activists and media, why should I believe them?

RonZeplin
11-03-2018, 05:31 PM
:confused:
I thought Trump was evil for detaning them.

The only sources I see cited are left wing activists and media, why should I believe them?

The good old days, Ike Eisenhower's 1954 Operation Wetback. Ike just enforced immigration law, and never blamed congress for not passing DACA amnesty. Over 1M illegal aliens either deported directly, or self-deported because they knew that he was serious about the rule of law. It's been a long time since we had a law abiding president. Not at all likely that we'll ever have one again, as long as we keep electing Republicans & Democrats.



https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Immigration_Enforcement_1940-1960.png/1280px-Immigration_Enforcement_1940-1960.png

United States immigration enforcement actions, 1940–1960, data from Dept. of Homeland Security.

http://jacobsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Dwight-D.-Eisenhower.jpg

Swordsmyth
11-03-2018, 05:37 PM
The good old days, Ike Eisenhower's 1954 Operation Wetback. Ike just enforced immigration law, and never blamed congress for not passing DACA amnesty. Over 1M illegal aliens either deported directly, or self-deported because they knew that he was serious about the rule of law. It's been a long time since we had a law abiding president. Not at all likely that we'll ever have one again, as long as we keep electing Republicans & Democrats.



http://jacobsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Dwight-D.-Eisenhower.jpg
Trump ended DACA and the courts are trying to interfere.

The state of politics these days is much worse than back then as are our immigration/asylum laws.

ICE is deporting many more people on its own but the "sanctuary" craze has cut back the number of deportations overall.

RonZeplin
11-03-2018, 07:33 PM
Trump ended DACA and the courts are trying to interfere.

The state of politics these days is much worse than back then as are our immigration/asylum laws.

ICE is deporting many more people on its own but the "sanctuary" craze has cut back the number of deportations overall.

If the DOJ & the President were pushing for enforcement and deportation as required by law, the vast majority of "Catch & Release" administrative procedures/court actions could be gotten rid of rather quickly. It's much more to do with scofflaw tradition, than any actual "law". The President needs to pick up the phone and inform the DOJ & ICE that there's a new policy in effect, obey the law/enforce the law! Trump has NOT ended DACA. He eventually stopped accepting new applications, but he's still providing sanctuary for them. They're not being deported unless they rack up a serious criminal conviction. That goes for run of the mill illegal alien invaders too.

He's not doing his job and enforcing immigration law, and he's trying to blame congress, the other wing of the party, and anyone but the one person who is the chief executive in charge, Donald J. Trump.

He's a slacker, and scofflaw just like Obama, George W. Bush and the rest of the presidents all the way back to JFK/LBJ.

Zippyjuan
11-04-2018, 01:01 PM
The good old days, Ike Eisenhower's 1954 Operation Wetback. Ike just enforced immigration law, and never blamed congress for not passing DACA amnesty. Over 1M illegal aliens either deported directly, or self-deported because they knew that he was serious about the rule of law. It's been a long time since we had a law abiding president. Not at all likely that we'll ever have one again, as long as we keep electing Republicans & Democrats.



http://jacobsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Dwight-D.-Eisenhower.jpg

Meanwhile the Bracero program was bringing in millions more due to labor shortages (some 4.6 million over the course of the program). Kicking them out on one hand, letting them in on the other (yes, the program did not begin under Eisenhower but he did continue it).

RonZeplin
11-04-2018, 01:20 PM
Meanwhile the Bracero program was bringing in millions more due to labor shortages (some 4.6 million over the course of the program). Kicking them out on one hand, letting them in on the other (yes, the program did not begin under Eisenhower but he did continue it).

"Labor shortage" = wage shortage

Big ag just wants cheap labor, if they paid what the job is worth they'd have plenty of workers.

Zippyjuan
11-04-2018, 03:09 PM
"Labor shortage" = wage shortage

Big ag just wants cheap labor, if they paid what the job is worth they'd have plenty of workers.

How much would they have to pay? How much would you be willing to do that kind of labor for? Agriculture is already a low profit business. Can they afford to pay high wages? Even if they did, would Americans be willing to do the work?

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-06-01/u-s-farms-need-more-immigrant-workers


In a study published in 2013, economist Michael Clemens analyzed 15 years of data on North Carolina’s farm-labor market and concluded, “There is virtually no supply of native manual farm laborers” in the state. This was true even in the depths of a severe recession.


In 2011, with 6,500 available farm jobs in the state, only 268 of the nearly 500,000 unemployed North Carolinians applied for these jobs. More than 90 percent (245 people) of those applying were hired, but just 163 showed up for the first day of work. Only seven native workers completed the entire growing season, filling only one-tenth of 1 percent of the open farm jobs.

Mechanization is not the answer either — not yet at least. Production of corn, cotton, rice, soybeans and wheat have been largely mechanized, but many high-value, labor-intensive crops, such as strawberries, need labor. Even dairy farms, where robots currently do only a small share of milking, have a long way to go before they are automated.

As a result, farms have grown increasingly reliant on temporary guest workers using the H-2A visa to fill the gaps in the agricultural workforce. Starting around 2012, requests for the visas rose sharply; from 2011 to 2016 the number of visas issued more than doubled.

The H-2A visa has no numerical cap, unlike the H-2B visa for nonagricultural work, which is limited to 66,000 annually. Even so, employers frequently complain that they aren’t allotted all the workers they need. The process is cumbersome, expensive and unreliable. One survey found that bureaucratic delays led H-2A workers to arrive on the job an average of 22 days late. And the shortage is compounded by federal immigration raids, which remove some workers and drive others underground.

Petitioning each year for laborers — and hoping the government provides enough, and that they arrive on time — is no way to run a business. In a 2012 survey by the California Farm Bureau, 71 percent of tree-fruit growers and nearly 80 percent of raisin and berry growers said they were short of labor. Some western growers have responded by moving operations to Mexico. Without reliable access to a reliable workforce, more growers will be tempted to move south.