Racist NYT: "We Can Replace Them" (whites)

[kahless]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/29/opinion/stacey-abrams-georgia-governor-election-brian-kemp.html

In Georgia, a chance to rebuke white nationalism.....Georgia is less than 53 percent non-Hispanic white. “Georgia is a blue state if everybody votes,” DuBose Porter, chairman of the Democratic Party of Georgia, told me.

Right now America is tearing itself apart as an embittered white conservative minority clings to power, terrified at being swamped by a new multiracial polyglot majority.

Essentially the bigots at NYT are calling all white people, "white nationalists" and associates of the KKK. Can you imagine if someone said we have to end "Black Nationalism" or "Hispanic Nationalism" and compared these groups as all part of some hate group?

When will white politicians grow a backbone and call out the anti-white bigots at NYT? Where was the discussion or debate to ensure whites are no longer a majority in the US? Why is this so important to Democrats and NYT that whites be in the minority?

What a disgusting display of anti-white bigotry by NYT as has ever been seen.

[Champ]

Trump isn't calling it out either. No one that I have seen thus far is. It's just accepted. We are just supposed to take it and all of the hatred and racism being hurled towards the Euro-Americans indefinitely.

Years ago, if you had piped up about this topic, you would be called a racist, a white supremacist, a Nazi, a KKK member.

Now, if you say anything, you may be labeled a white nationalist, but at this point, just being called "white" suffices in order to indicate excessive privilege and inherent innate racism.

[Anti Federalist]

Need a link to the OP.

[Anti Federalist]

Trump isn't calling it out either. No one that I have seen thus far is. It's just accepted. We are just supposed to take it and all of the hatred and racism being hurled towards the Euro-Americans indefinitely.

No, we're not.

Being silent and "taking it" will not be enough.

At some point we'll be eliminated.

[kahless]

Trump isn't calling it out either. No one that I have seen thus far is. It's just accepted. We are just supposed to take it and all of the hatred and racism being hurled towards the Euro-Americans indefinitely.

Years ago, if you had piped up about this topic, you would be called a racist, a white supremacist, a Nazi, a KKK member.

Now, if you say anything, you may be labeled a white nationalist, but at this point, just being called "white" suffices in order to indicate excessive privilege and inherent innate racism.

The article author is Michelle Goldberg.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Goldberg

Goldberg lives in...Brooklyn She is a self-described secular Jew.

Most Jews are not rabidly anti-white and believe her racist views are repugnant. We see this time and time again, Jews in the mainstream media stoking racial division as standard operating procedure.

How are people like this defined? Simply Progressive Jews in the news media or simply Progressives that simply happen to be Jewish? We have an inordinate amount of Jews in the media promoting Progressive ideology.

I suppose kind of like most Catholics I know are Conservative and abhor abortion. Yet we see prominent Catholic politicians supporting the opposite. Perhaps it is simply Progressive ideology crosses all religious boundaries and these people are misusing their religious ideology to promote Progressive ideology?

[AuH20]

Simply not being anti-white makes one a 'white nationalist' these days. That's low the bar has been reduced.

[kahless]

No, were not.

Being silent and "taking it" will not be enough.

At some point we'll be eliminated.

We are not only silent we punish our own for speaking out. Some love that little bit of Oxytocin from the pat on the head for all that virtue signalling.

[kahless]

Need a link to the OP.

Could of swore it was there. Thx, added.

[dannno]

We have an inordinate amount of Jews in the media promoting Progressive ideology.

There are an inordinate amount of Jewish people in the media in general, because they have a really high verbal IQ.

[timosman]

There are an inordinate amount of Jewish people in the media in general, because they have a really high verbal IQ.

Or so we are led to believe. :tears:

[dannno]

Or so we are led to believe. :tears:

No joke, their average IQ is about 20 points higher - and it is weighted very heavily in the verbal IQ category. It's like 2 standard deviations higher than average, it's crazy.

It all happened in the last 1000 years in Eastern European Jewish communities. In their communities, it was customary and encouraged for rich men and Rabbis to have a lot of children.

In Christian societies, on the other hand, the smartest folks went into the Priesthood and were not encouraged to have children.