PDA

View Full Version : Dianne Feinstein Acknowledges Having A Secret Brett Kavanaugh Document




phill4paul
09-13-2018, 01:04 PM
Getting ready to Judge Roy Moore him?


“I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court," Feinstein said. "That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.”

BuzzFeed News contacted the woman believed to be the subject of the letter at her home last week. She declined to comment. BuzzFeed News has not been able to confirm the contents of the letter.

The lawyer believed to be representing the woman was seen leaving Capitol Hill Wednesday evening shortly after the Intercept story dropped and just as Judiciary Committee Democrats were huddling in the Senate lobby. The lawyer, Debra Katz, has not confirmed that she is representing the woman. She also declined to comment Wednesday, saying “there’s nothing to say.”



Multiple sources have told HuffPost that the document in question is a letter sent to Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) that concerns potential sexual misconduct involving Kavanaugh and a woman when they were both in high school.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dianne-feinstein-acknowledges-having-secret-170246446.html

CaptUSA
09-13-2018, 01:09 PM
In high school??!!

I mean, they always told me about things going on my "permanent record", but I always thought it was a threat. Damn, these Dems have lost their minds.

Origanalist
09-13-2018, 01:13 PM
Desperation always looks bad.

jllundqu
09-13-2018, 01:13 PM
They're going to try and RoyMoore him with #MeToo.... it'll be a bogus accusation, but that's all you need is an accusation.

shakey1
09-13-2018, 01:16 PM
Oh FFS!... & Feinstein is as pure as the driven snow, eh?

Swordsmyth
09-13-2018, 01:30 PM
LOL

I don't care how this turns out, if Kavanaugh survives it will drive the left nuts and he will be better than most SCOTUS justices and if he goes down it will energize Republican turnout and we will get someone better like Lee hopefully.

specsaregood
09-13-2018, 01:41 PM
They're going to try and RoyMoore him with #MeToo.... it'll be a bogus accusation, but that's all you need is an accusation.

Wouldn't a "Clarence Thomas" him be more apropos?

dannno
09-13-2018, 02:09 PM
LOL

I don't care how this turns out, if Kavanaugh survives it will drive the left nuts and he will be better than most SCOTUS justices and if he goes down it will energize Republican turnout and we will get someone better like Lee hopefully.

Send in the clowns..

"One time we were making out in the back of his car in high school and he touched my *HONK!!*"

Origanalist
09-13-2018, 02:33 PM
Send in the clowns..

"One time we were making out in the back of his car in high school and he touched my *HONK!!*"

Front hole?

Swordsmyth
09-13-2018, 02:38 PM
Front hole?

The "*HONK!!*" is to keep you from hearing that the word is "Elbow".

Origanalist
09-13-2018, 03:15 PM
I have received information concerning Dianne Feinstein. I will not inform you of the nature of this information, the source of the information, or pretty much anything about it. Suffice it to say she eats small children.

(I stole that one)

EBounding
09-13-2018, 06:27 PM
LOL

1040385723541676032

Swordsmyth
09-13-2018, 06:53 PM
According to the Washington Post, The FBI won't investigate the allegations lodged against Kavanaugh, so he'll simply be tainted with the spectre of a nebulous accusation for the rest of his career. Perhaps we can read about it someday the alleged victim's book.
***

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-13/hail-mary-kavanaugh-now-has-metoo-accuser-who-wont-come-forward

RonZeplin
09-13-2018, 07:06 PM
If you were locked in a room with Aqua Buddha, you wouldn't think this is so funny.

timosman
09-13-2018, 07:35 PM
1040313400176390144

devil21
09-13-2018, 07:47 PM
Make sure you stay on the right side of the reservation and support the torture loving warmonger Jesuit. Cuz Feinstein.


(Gosh, it sure is easy to get people to back terrible politicians and justices. Just tell them that the Dems hate the candidate/nominee and suddenly the candidate/nominee is an instant beacon of conservatism! Everything of substance about the candidate/nominee goes out the window.)

KEEF
09-13-2018, 07:54 PM
Make sure you stay on the right side of the reservation and support the torture loving warmonger Jesuit. Cuz Feinstein.


(Gosh, it sure is easy to get people to back terrible politicians and justices. Just tell them that the Dems hate the candidate/nominee and suddenly the candidate/nominee is an instant beacon of conservatism! Everything of substance about the candidate/nominee goes out the window.)
So true^^^^

Aratus
09-13-2018, 08:22 PM
If you were locked in a room with Aqua Buddha, you wouldn't think this is so funny.

True...

Swordsmyth
09-13-2018, 08:32 PM
Democrats know they don’t have the votes to oppose Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, so they’re throwing whatever they can at the him, hoping something sticks.
The latest “Hail Mary” from the opposition party comes in the form of follow-up questions submitted by lawmakers (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/judiciary-committee-democrats-submit-written-questions-to-kavanaugh-after-confirmation-hearing) after Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate.
It’s normal for lawmakers to present Supreme Court nominees with written requests for clarification following the candidate's spoken testimony. It’s also normal for the nominee to be given a week to submit written responses.

What’s not normal is for the nominee to be asked 1,278 follow-up questions.
The number of post-hearing inquiries submitted to Kavanaugh is greater than the combined total for every Supreme Court justice in U.S. history, according to Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
Of the 1,278 questions asked of Kavanaugh, only nine came from members of the Republican Party. Grassley asked eight questions. Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., asked one.
In contrast, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., asked 241 follow-up questions. That’s more than the Senate asked of either Justice Elena Kagan or Justice Sonia Sotomayor during their respective confirmations.
The number of follow-ups asked of Kavanaugh is four times greater than the number asked of Justice Neil Gorsuch when he was being confirmed to the Supreme Court. Heck, even the late Robert Bork, whose confirmation was torpedoed ruthlessly by Democrats, was asked only 15 follow-up questions.
Regarding Kavanaugh's situation, some of the submitted questions are interesting. The great majority of them are not.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., for example, tried his best to get Kavanaugh to admit to having a gambling addiction.

You can read all 1,278 questions here (https://www.scribd.com/document/388486021/Kavanaugh-Responses-to-Questions-for-the-Record#from_embed).

More at: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/democrats-send-brett-kavanaugh-1-278-follow-up-questions-most-of-which-are-idiotic

specsaregood
09-13-2018, 08:37 PM
Well, didn't see this one coming:

1040412547294392321

Swordsmyth
09-13-2018, 08:46 PM
Well, didn't see this one coming:

1040412547294392321

“The way it was, was right. The way it is, is wrong,” the 85-year-old justice said during a discussion at George Washington University Law School, prompting a round of applause.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed to the bench by a Senate vote of 96-3, just two months after she was nominated by former President Bill Clinton. The openly liberal justice said Wednesday that the “atmosphere” back then was “truly bipartisan.”
“The vote on my confirmation was 96-3, even though I had spent about 10 years of my life litigating cases under the auspices of the ACLU,” she said.
“No senator asked me any questions — not about that,” she said.
She also made note that the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0 despite his conservative views.
“Think of Justice Scalia, who’s certainly a known character in, what was it? 1986,” she said. “The vote was unanimous, every Democrat and every Republican voted for him.
“That’s the way it should be, instead of what it’s become, which is a highly partisan show. The Republicans move in lockstep, and so do the Democrats. I wish I could wave a magic wand and have it go back to the way it was,” she added.
In a rare comment Donald Trump Jr. also agreed with Justice Ginsberg.
I never thought I'd say this, but I agree with the notorious RBG! Dems take a hint and vote for Kavanaugh en masse!
Justice Ginsburg Criticizes 'Highly Partisan' Confirmation Process; https://t.co/3shg2TKotq via @cnsnews (https://twitter.com/cnsnews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) September 13, 2018 (https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1040258265429536783?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



They have sown the wind with their voters and now they will reap the wild wind.

CaptUSA
09-14-2018, 06:48 AM
Make sure you stay on the right side of the reservation and support the torture loving warmonger Jesuit. Cuz Feinstein.


(Gosh, it sure is easy to get people to back terrible politicians and justices. Just tell them that the Dems hate the candidate/nominee and suddenly the candidate/nominee is an instant beacon of conservatism! Everything of substance about the candidate/nominee goes out the window.)

Pretty sure most of us aren't saying that - only that this attempt is shady as all hell. All through the confirmation hearings not-a-one of the Dems (or repugs, for that matter) made an issue of his support of the surveillance state or trashing of the 4th Amendment. I mean, they have more than enough ammo on this guy based on his judicial rulings and other expressed opinions, but they're not touching those - because they're all part of the government party. So they play the soap opera kabuki theater game.

Philhelm
09-14-2018, 12:24 PM
Oh FFS!... & Feinstein is as pure as the driven snow, eh?

I know a guy who was raped by her in the Penn State locker room back in '96.

Swordsmyth
09-14-2018, 04:43 PM
A woman is accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/brett-kavanaugh) of attempting to sexually assault her by locking her in a room and forcing himself on her at a party while they were both in high school.
Kavanaugh, in a statement to The New Yorker, which broke the details of the encounter (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-sexual-misconduct-allegation-against-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress), denied the claim.
“I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation,” he said. “I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”
The woman, whose identity is still not public, sent Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) a letter in the summer, after Kavanaugh was nominated, sharing her concerns about him.
From The New Yorker:


The allegation dates back to the early nineteen-eighties, when Kavanaugh was a high-school student at Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda, Maryland, and the woman attended a nearby high school. In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself. Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result.
The classmate who was reportedly with Kavanaugh said he has “no recollection” of the incident.
CNN also reported that Kavanaugh allegedly tried to remove the woman’s clothes and that she later sought medical treatment (https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/politics/kavanaugh-letter-assault-supreme-court/index.html):


Both men were drunk, she said, and Kavanaugh attempted to remove her clothes.
At one point, Kavanaugh was on top of her laughing as the other male in the room periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh held his hand over her mouth at one point, and she said she felt her life was inadvertently in danger.
She said she was able to leave the room and go into a hallway bathroom. After Kavanaugh and the other male began talking to others in the house, she went home.
There is no indication the woman reported the incident to law enforcement at the time, but she said she has received medical treatment regarding the alleged assault.
Rumors of this letter and sexual misconduct allegations have been swirling for weeks on Capitol Hill, with reporters and other Democratic senators pressing Feinstein, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, to share the information.


Republicans dismissed the revelation about the letter on Thursday. And on Friday, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) retweeted someone who was mocking it as a game of telephone.

Theme song for this #BreakingNews (https://twitter.com/hashtag/BreakingNews?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) yesterday:
"Heard it from a friend who, heard from a friend who, heard it from another....." #Kavanaugh (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kavanaugh?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)#Feinstein (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Feinstein?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)https://t.co/0Pzl3yYvsy
— Ronda Kay Moreland (@ProducerRondaK) September 14, 2018 (https://twitter.com/ProducerRondaK/status/1040613130781552640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also released a letter Friday morning from 65 women (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-14%2065%20Women%20who%20know%20Kavanaugh%20from%20 High%20School%20-%20Kavanaugh%20Nomination.pdf) who said they supported Kavanaugh.
The offices of Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who are considered possible “no” votes against Kavanaugh, did not immediately return a request for comment.
The White House put out a statement on Thursday, calling the controversy an “11th hour attempt to delay” Kavanaugh’s confirmation. The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh on Sept. 20.

More at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/woman-alleges-brett-kavanaugh-attempted-145025772.html

spudea
09-16-2018, 12:49 PM
Once again it is the WaPo that is able to line up the necessary funding for a woman from 35 years ago to come forward with an unprovable allegation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.b2410af03e7f

euphemia
09-16-2018, 03:15 PM
Make sure you stay on the right side of the reservation and support the torture loving warmonger Jesuit. Cuz Feinstein.


(Gosh, it sure is easy to get people to back terrible politicians and justices. Just tell them that the Dems hate the candidate/nominee and suddenly the candidate/nominee is an instant beacon of conservatism! Everything of substance about the candidate/nominee goes out the window.)

If the issue was his qualifications that would be a different matter. They are not discussing that. They are making up some nonsense that they want people to believe happened back in high school. That’s pretty close to slander.

euphemia
09-16-2018, 03:32 PM
They would do the same, or worse, to a judge that passes muster with us.

Swordsmyth
09-16-2018, 06:11 PM
They would do the same, or worse, to a judge that passes muster with us.

And they wouldn't do as much to one who was sufficiently worse than Kavanaugh, I want someone better if he goes down be we could have gotten much worse.

phill4paul
09-16-2018, 06:58 PM
Once again it is the WaPo that is able to line up the necessary funding for a woman from 35 years ago to come forward with an unprovable allegation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.b2410af03e7f

And Gloria Allred that advises her.

enhanced_deficit
09-16-2018, 07:32 PM
Drudge headlines are suggesting K may get derailed:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DnPQOEKUwAARbmm.jpg
CHRISTINE VS. BRETT (http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/406938-allegations-throw-kavanaugh-confirmation-into-turmoil) https://www.drudgereport.com/i/logo9.gif (https://www.drudgereport.com)




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jke_kb1vBF8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jke_kb1vBF8

Is GOP facing 'Roy Moore' type derailment all over again, albeit without help of Jarvanka in this case?




Related

Roy Moore Loses Senate To Dems: Trump Train De-Railed? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?517710-Roy-Moore-Loses-Senate-To-Dems-Trump-Train-De-Railed&)

Allegations throw Kavanaugh confirmation into turmoil
By Jordain Carney - 09/16/18Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — who could become Judiciary Committee chairman next year — said that he aligned himself with the statement “about the substance and process regarding the allegations in this latest claim.”
Graham became the first Republican to open the door to a hearing from Ford, saying he would “gladly listen to what she has to say and compare that against all other information we have received about Judge Kavanaugh.”
But he caveated that the testimony should happen within the current timeline for confirming Kavanaugh, “so the process can continue as scheduled.”
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/406938-allegations-throw-kavanaugh-confirmation-into-turmoil

Swordsmyth
09-16-2018, 07:39 PM
A key Republican joined Democrats in demanding further investigation of a woman’s allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually attacked her decades ago in high school before a crucial Judiciary committee vote to move the nomination forward.
President Donald Trump won’t withdraw the nomination, a White House official said Sunday, as a court choice that had appeared on track for quick confirmation days earlier was engulfed by new questions on the judge’s fitness for the post.
One Judiciary Committee Republican, Jeff Flake of Arizona, told Politico he is "not comfortable voting yes" on the nomination until he hears more about Ford’s allegation. "We need to hear from her. And I don’t think I’m alone in this," Politico quoted him as saying. Flake’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request to verify the comments.

More at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-16/democrats-seek-kavanaugh-vote-delay-after-accuser-comes-forward

Flake the flake strikes again, of all the reasons he could oppose Kavanaugh he chose this?

enhanced_deficit
09-16-2018, 08:05 PM
Flake the flake strikes again, of all the reasons he could oppose Kavanaugh he chose this?

Fate of Kavan in the end may depend on GOP moderates like Flake, Lindsey Graham, Ivanka etc.

If GOP moderates struck again leading to defeats for Kavan in SCOTUS and DeSantis in FL on the heels of Roy Moore getting struck by Ivanka Trump in AL, GOP conservative base may get bit demoralized and find it harder to recover during upcoming midterms.

Swordsmyth
09-16-2018, 08:10 PM
Fate of Kavan in the end may depend on GOP moderates like Flake, Lindsey Graham, Ivanka etc.

If GOP moderates struck again leading to defeats for Kavan in SCOTUS and DeSantis in FL on the heels of Roy Moore getting struck by Ivanka Trump in AL, GOP conservative base may get bit demoralized and find it harder to recover during upcoming midterms.

Or maybe they will turn out to give Trump a bigger Senate Majority so the RINOs can't cause trouble so easily.

devil21
09-16-2018, 09:41 PM
If the issue was his qualifications that would be a different matter. They are not discussing that. They are making up some nonsense that they want people to believe happened back in high school. That’s pretty close to slander.

Its a distraction to get you to fall in line behind a nominee that otherwise you should have serious reservations about. Do you really think Feinstein has a problem with Kavanaugh??? The fact that this is the weak crap they come up with (unsubstantiated bs) to feign opposition, instead of genuine issues as a judge, should be a clue that its meant to direct you to support Kav and ignore his much bigger issues. Besides he already has the votes so its all theater.

Swordsmyth
09-16-2018, 11:21 PM
Its a distraction to get you to fall in line behind a nominee that otherwise you should have serious reservations about. Do you really think Feinstein has a problem with Kavanaugh??? The fact that this is the weak crap they come up with (unsubstantiated bs) to feign opposition, instead of genuine issues as a judge, should be a clue that its meant to direct you to support Kav and ignore his much bigger issues. Besides he already has the votes so its all theater.

Except that Feinstein doesn't oppose him for any reason with which we would agree, she is in favor of all of the positions he holds that we don't like, if she attacked him about the things of substance she does oppose him for it would come out like a paid support commercial to anyone to the right of Lenin, that is why she and the others have to make up this garbage to attack him with.

I didn't want him and I will be pleased at the opportunity to see him replaced by Lee if he gets shot down but there are many worse choices Trump could have made.

euphemia
09-17-2018, 03:38 AM
Its a distraction to get you to fall in line behind a nominee that otherwise you should have serious reservations about. Do you really think Feinstein has a problem with Kavanaugh??? The fact that this is the weak crap they come up with (unsubstantiated bs) to feign opposition, instead of genuine issues as a judge, should be a clue that its meant to direct you to support Kav and ignore his much bigger issues. Besides he already has the votes so its all theater.

So it’s okay to impugn a man’s character to force votes, even if it is a lie?

EBounding
09-17-2018, 07:09 AM
So are they freaking out about Kavanaugh simply because "Teh balance of Power!" is on the line?

devil21
09-17-2018, 01:45 PM
Except that Feinstein doesn't oppose him for any reason with which we would agree, she is in favor of all of the positions he holds that we don't like, if she attacked him about the things of substance she does oppose him for it would come out like a paid support commercial to anyone to the right of Lenin, that is why she and the others have to make up this garbage to attack him with.

I didn't want him and I will be pleased at the opportunity to see him replaced by Lee if he gets shot down but there are many worse choices Trump could have made.

Kav and Feinstein agree on the big issues, like war and spending (but I repeat myself), and banker control and yada yada, all the shit that never changes regardless of which party is in "power" or who's on SCOTUS. But sure, they'll act like they're opposed on emotional triggers like unsubstantiated allegations of sexual assault from 50 years ago. Why? Because it's an emotional manipulation to create an appearance of opposition when there otherwise is none. SCOTUS is made up entirely of 'Catholics' and 'Jewish' (but are all Sabbateans in reality. Google if term is not familiar.)


So it’s okay to impugn a man’s character to force votes, even if it is a lie?

Absolutely. Kavanaugh knows it's theater because he knows what's really going on.

phill4paul
09-17-2018, 01:55 PM
Kav's accuser is a wacko doodle. Pussy hat wearing nevertrumper that tried to scrub her lib bias. Unsuccessful. A lib college professor that student destroyed in their after class reviews. Some saying they doubted her sanity, lol. Kav's mother presided over her parents foreclosure. This was not the surprise the Dems had hoped for.

Swordsmyth
09-17-2018, 02:36 PM
While the allegations are relatively tame by #MeToo era standards (the incident allegedly unfolded when Kavanaugh was 17), it has apparently been enough for Democrats and a handful of turncoat moderate Republicans to successfully shut down a planned Thursday vote of the Judiciary Committee. Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake effectively shut down the vote last night when he revealed that he wanted to hear more from Ford before voting. Without Flake, the Republicans' 11-10 majority on the Judiciary Committee shifts to a 10-11 vote in favor of the Democrats. While Committee Chairman Charles Grassley has said he'd like the vote to proceed as scheduled, media reports say he is quietly working to organize a private call involving Ford and curious Senators in an effort to help mitigate their concerns.

But looking further ahead, Republican leaders might have more difficulty as Tennessee Republican Bob Corker - who is not a member of the Judiciary Committee but could still hold up the final confirmation vote - said Sunday that he'd also like to see Thursday's committee vote delayed.
Here's more from Bloomberg: (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-17/china-u-s-talks-at-risk-amid-trump-s-new-tariff-threat-wsj)

"I’ve made it clear that I’m not comfortable moving ahead with the vote on Thursday if we have not heard her side of the story or explored this further," said Flake, who has the power to stall consideration if all Democrats on the panel join him since Republicans only hold an 11-10 majority on the committee. Flake’s office didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Corker of Tennessee, who isn’t a member of the panel but whose vote is critical to confirmation, also doesn’t want the committee to vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation until Ford’s allegations can be heard, said his spokeswoman, Micah Johnson. The senator wants the allegations to be heard promptly, she said.
The backlash intensified late Sunday when Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski told CNN (https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/406953-murkowski-committee-might-need-to-consider-delaying-kavanaugh-vote) that Thursday's hearing should be delayed.

"Well, I think that might be something they might have to consider, at least having that discussion," Murkowski.
[...]
"This is not something that came up during the hearings. The hearings are now over. And if there is real substance to this it demands a response."
However, at least one of the Senate's reputed moderates has stood up to the Democrats in an interview with the New York Times, (https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/406952-collins-knocks-democrats-over-handling-of-kavanaugh-assault) castigating them for withholding this information until so late in the process (remember: Feinstein justified this decision by saying she had referred Ford's allegations to the FBI, who reportedly added them to his background check file).

"What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both the professor and the judge," Collins told The New York Times.

Collins asked if Democrats believed Ford, "why didn't they surface this information earlier," and if they didn't believe Ford, "why did they decide at the 11th hour to release it?"

"It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled," Collins said.

Collins comments come after Ford spoke publicly about the alleged incident for the first time during an interview with The Washington Post that was published on Sunday.
On Monday, in the latest sign that Ford could appear at an embarrassing public hearing, Ford's attorney, Debra Katz, told "Today" that her client would be willing to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee. "She's a credible person. These are serious allegations. And they should be addressed."

“She has taken a polygraph. She is a credible person. These are serious allegations, and these should be addressed.”

Watch @savannahguthrie (https://twitter.com/SavannahGuthrie?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)’s full interview with Debra Katz, attorney for Kavanaugh accuser pic.twitter.com/AIplgPpgqi (https://t.co/AIplgPpgqi)
— TODAY (@TODAYshow) September 17, 2018 (https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1041651068277538817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) The White House, for its part, is standing by Kavanaugh, and allowing the Senate to sort things out. According to Bloomberg, Kellyanne Conway said Ford should not be "insulted and ignored" in what appears to be an attempt to beat the Democrats at their own virtue-signaling game.
Still, according to a White House spokesperson, Trump isn't giving an inch. Washington Post reporter Seung Min Kim, citing WH spokesperson Kerri Kupec, reported that Judge Kavanaugh "categorically and unequivocally" denied this allegation: "This has not changed. Judge Kavanaugh and the White House both stand by that statement," she said.
In fact, as Axios (https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-strategy-sexual-assault-allegations-5dc354ff-73d6-49f0-b5b4-5971b6a76051.html) reports, Senate Republicans could "play hardball" by calling on Ford to testify before Thursday's scheduled vote. Though Republicans wouldn't surprised if Ford holds a press conference or gives a TV interview, which Axios says "would raise the stakes considerably." Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, has repeatedly called for an FBI investigation and a postponement of the vote.

New White House statement from spox Kerri Kupec: “On Friday, Judge Kavanaugh ‘categorically and unequivocally’ denied this allegation. This has not changed. Judge Kavanaugh and the White House both stand by that statement."
— Seung Min Kim (@seungminkim) September 17, 2018 (https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1041650977621925888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) To be sure, the Democrats' goals here are obvious. After Sen. Corey Booker's "selfless" decision to release unauthorized documents about Kavanaugh's time in the Bush Administration failed to even delay the process, Democrats have now played their Trump card - no pun intended. Their goal: Delay Kavanaugh's confirmation at least until the Oct. 1 mark - the beginning of SCOTUS's next term - to put a halt to any controversial decisions that could reverse important precedents. Of course, their ultimate goal is to stonewall the White House until after Nov. 6, when a few victories in the midterms might allow them to sink Kavanaugh's nomination once and for all.


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-17/she-must-be-heard-republicans-join-fight-delay-kavanaugh-confirmation-vote

Swordsmyth
09-17-2018, 02:38 PM
President Trump on Monday said that he is open to the Senate Judiciary Committee delaying the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh until decades-old allegations of sexual assault can be heard.
"I want the American people to be happy because they’re getting somebody that is great. I want him to go in at the absolute highest level. And I think to do that you have to go through this. If it takes a little delay it'll take a little delay ... I'm sure it will work out very well," said Trump.
Trump was dismissive over whether Kavanaugh should withdraw his nomination, calling it a "ridiculous question."

President Trump comments on Judge Brett Kavanaugh nomination to #SCOTUS (https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).

Q: "Has he offered to withdraw?"

President Trump: "Next question. What a ridiculous question." pic.twitter.com/0ardOFoGKS (https://t.co/0ardOFoGKS)
— CSPAN (@cspan) September 17, 2018 (https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1041774677268553728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Meanwhile, Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway said that the President as well as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee say that Blasey Ford - who says she has passed a polygraph test, "will be heard."
"So, let me make very clear ... I have spoken with the president. I have spoken with Senator Graham and others. This woman will be heard," Conway told Fox and Friends.
In response to the new allegation, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said "Now they choose to introduce this allegation. Not through the standard bipartisan process. Not by advising the judiciary committee colleagues and committee staff through proper channels. Oh, but by leaking it to the press."

McConnell: "Now they choose to introduce this allegation. Not through the standard bipartisan process. Not by advising the judiciary committee colleagues and committee staff through proper channels. Oh, but by leaking it to the press." https://t.co/9edzIJFieK pic.twitter.com/Jk684rLX5Q (https://t.co/Jk684rLX5Q)
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 17, 2018 (https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1041778918322315264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, is throwing a fit on the Senate floor - insisting that the Kavanaugh vote should be delayed until the FBI has had a chance to fully investigate, ostensibly dragging the vote out until after midterms.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-17/trump-kavanaugh-if-it-takes-little-delay-itll-take-little-delay

timosman
09-17-2018, 03:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mbHcHmHFTs

Anti Globalist
09-17-2018, 04:14 PM
How about we get a secret document about Feinstein? I can only imagine what goodies are in that document.

dannno
09-17-2018, 04:15 PM
How about we get a secret document about Feinstein? I can only imagine what goodies are in that document.

Paaassss

spudea
09-17-2018, 04:44 PM
this circus is a national disgrace

Swordsmyth
09-17-2018, 04:56 PM
The Senate Judiciary Committee will proceed to a planned vote on Supreme Court Nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh Thursday, sources tell Breitbart News Monday. Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is, according to these sources, refusing to yield to pressure over allegations of a high school attack revealed by Democrats over the weekend.

The Republican leadership came under intense pressure not only from Senate Democrats, but from moderate Republicans like Sens. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who indicated they would not vote for Kavanaugh without hearing Ford’s accusations out. Democrats like Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) explicitly took this as support for his call to delay the vote.
Two sources close to the confirmation process, however, told Breitbart News that Republicans will not yield to that pressure. One claimed the Thursday vote would occur “no matter what.” The other confirmed that Chairman Grassley remains “completely committed” to the originally scheduled Thursday vote.
Both sources also indicated Judge Kavanaugh will speak on a conference call with the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday night, where he will directly address Ford’s accusations. He has already twice categorically denied he attacked Ford and reports indicate he told (https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/09/17/orrin-hatch-i-think-kavanaugh-accuser-is-mistaken/) Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) Monday that he was not at the party in question.

While some Senate Republicans, like Flake, Graham, and Bob Corker (R-TN) have said Ford must have an opportunity to be heard, and key moderate vote Sen. Susan Collins said (https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/09/17/susan-collins-both-brett-kavanaugh-and-accuser-must-testify-under-oath/) Monday she wants both Ford and Kavanaugh to testify under oath, none have explicitly ruled out a Thursday vote.

More at: https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/17/senate-republicans-stick-with-thursday-kavanaugh-committee-vote/

AuH20
09-17-2018, 05:17 PM
AJ says they have more women coming ala Roy Moore. It's a coordinated attack.

devil21
09-17-2018, 06:31 PM
AJ says they have more women coming ala Roy Moore. It's a coordinated attack.

Won't it be fun when after he is confirmed he casts the deciding vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

Are you entertained yet?

AuH20
09-17-2018, 07:39 PM
Won't it be fun when after he is confirmed he casts the deciding vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

Are you entertained yet?

I'm more entertained that his former Bush friends are throwing him to the wolves.

fedupinmo
09-17-2018, 07:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mbHcHmHFTs

I'm not watching that asshole, but if he loses just a little more hair and dons a bathrobe...

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-dadzzUNq7l4/UOOmuTOqdfI/AAAAAAAAAJo/ouHYe2oVP0s/s1600/Herbert_1.jpg

dannno
09-17-2018, 08:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqaA368IErA

Swordsmyth
09-17-2018, 09:09 PM
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the woman accusing him of sexual crimes will both testify next Monday over her accusation that he sexually assaulted her while they were teenagers in high school.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/blasey%20kavanaugh.jpg
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, confirmed that the public hearing will happen on Monday, September 24. It is unclear whether the vote to confirm Kavanaugh has been delayed, or if the vote will still occur and the testimony will happen anyway. We assume the former.
Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, has a hazy recollection (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html) of the incident, admitting she doesn't specifically remember the year it happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness (who denies the account) were already upstairs when she went up, and how she got home that night.
The announcement of next Monday's testimonies comes after several closed door meetings by Republican members of the panel, with Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) saying: "As I said earlier, anyone who comes forward as Dr. Ford has done deserves to be heard. My staff has reached out to Dr. Ford to hear her account, and they held a follow-up call with Judge Kavanaugh this afternoon. Unfortunately, committee Democrats have refused to join us in this effort. However, to provide ample transparency, we will hold a public hearing Monday to give these recent allegations a full airing."
As The Hill notes, Monday's hearing is sure to be a total circus:

The public hearing will spark a media frenzy around Capitol Hill, where the allegations against have Kavanaugh drawn to the Anita Hill hearings, in which a former colleague of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas testified about allegations of sexual harassment. Thomas was confirmed despite Hill’s testimony, which was carried live on television at the time.
The White House said on Monday that Kavanaugh is ready to testify as soon as Tuesday if the Senate asks him to. -The Hill (https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407113-kavanaugh-accuser-to-testify-publicly-on-monday?userid=47328)
“Judge Kavanaugh looks forward to a hearing where he can clear his name of this false allegation. He stands ready to testify tomorrow if the Senate is ready to hear him,” said White House spokesman Raj Shah.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-17/kavanaugh-and-accuser-will-both-testify-publicly-monday

devil21
09-18-2018, 02:23 AM
I'm more entertained that his former Bush friends are throwing him to the wolves.

I disagree that he's being thrown to the wolves. I think a narrative is being created that will be used to further divide and distract, as per the Jesuit oath. Will you still think he's being thrown to the wolves even after he is confirmed?

nobody's_hero
09-18-2018, 05:56 AM
AJ says they have more women coming ala Roy Moore. It's a coordinated attack.

If you were attacked would you:

A) Immediately call the police

B) Wait until one day your attacker runs for a political office and then say "oh by the way, this guy attacked me."

That's why I will NEVER believe any of these stories that follow this pattern. It doesn't seem rational to me that someone would just sit on a case like this until it becomes politically convenient to do something about it.

Brian4Liberty
09-18-2018, 10:49 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaaeBVOYuCk

timosman
09-18-2018, 11:27 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmiKk58DjVc

timosman
09-18-2018, 11:39 AM
@5:30 Judge Swamp: I know how thorough they are(FBI). I couldn't believe the stuff they've found out about me. :confused:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaaeBVOYuCk

Zippyjuan
09-18-2018, 12:25 PM
I go back to this point:


In high school??!!

I mean, they always told me about things going on my "permanent record", but I always thought it was a threat. Damn, these Dems have lost their minds.

People do stupid things in high school. Whether or not it actually happened it is irrelevant. Unless they can find examples where this behavior is still being committed today.

Brian4Liberty
09-18-2018, 02:52 PM
I go back to this point:

People do stupid things in high school. Whether or not it actually happened it is irrelevant. Unless they can find examples where this behavior is still being committed today.

Worst case: It happened exactly as she described. Still the statute of limitations means that there is no prosecutable “crime” here.

Even if she reported this to the Police at the time it allegedly happened, there probably would have been no prosecution. She was not raped, she was not beaten. It would have been called a case of “he said, she said” drunken teenage foolishness, long before the hysteria of the #metoo political movement.

How do we know her memory of this is accurate? Did she get names mixed up? Did she remember this through some kind of lost memory hypnosis therapy with a quack?

Considered the well-worn sex-related smears by the Democrats, this unsubstantiated, previously unreported, unprosecutable “story” must be viewed with much skepticism. It’s undignified that Senators are talking about this. What’s next? Kavanaugh punched another kid in the 8th grade? He kissed a girl in kindergarten and she screamed? The Vice Principal found a Playboy magazine in his locker in High School while searching lockers for marijuana?

Brian4Liberty
09-18-2018, 03:02 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmiKk58DjVc

Lol. Should we feel sorry for Bill Kristol? The feminazis accused him and he had to spend the rest of the segment trying to appease them before they marched him to the guillotine.

timosman
09-18-2018, 03:41 PM
Lol. Should we feel sorry for Bill Kristol? The feminazis accused him and he had to spend the rest of the segment trying to appease them before they marched him to the guillotine.

He didn't realize his role was to be a punching bag. :cool:

Also a nice way to influence opinion. But it happened to me, so it must be true! Just shut up and listen! Stop mansplaining using logic. Any jury upon hearing this "argument" would have no choice but convince him of being guilty.

RJB
09-18-2018, 04:45 PM
It's one stunt after another.

Alright, Democrats, you lost the 2016 election, you don't get your way, waah fricking waah.

It was amusing at first, but I am getting sick of these circus sideshows of accusations of rape, racism, etc. They need a new script.

Dr.3D
09-18-2018, 04:59 PM
It's one stunt after another.

Alright, Democrats, you lost the 2016 election, you don't get your way, waah fricking waah.

It was amusing at first, but I am getting sick of these circus sideshows of accusations of rape, racism, etc. They need a new script.
Seems like that's all they can do.

A agree, they need a new writer.

AZJoe
09-18-2018, 08:10 PM
https://scontent-sjc3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42087809_2224726007745302_3150574677320007680_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&oh=17509be2562a3cfd4154d38d6d41e362&oe=5C15E124

Swordsmyth
09-18-2018, 08:32 PM
@5:30 Judge Swamp: I know how thorough they are(FBI). I couldn't believe the stuff they've found out about me. :confused:
That could explain some of his deviations from liberty that I have catalogued.

Swordsmyth
09-18-2018, 08:37 PM
Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor claiming Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 35 years ago, late Tuesday demanded a "full investigation" by the FBI before she will attend any congressional hearing or "interrogation" into her accusations.
Republicans repeatedly have invited Ford and Kavanaugh to testify on Monday after delaying a planned Judiciary Committee vote on his confirmation that had been scheduled for Thursday. Kavanaugh accepted the committee's invitation, but Ford stayed mum until Tuesday night (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/feinstein-blames-gop-after-kavanaugh-accuser-stays-mum-admits-cant-say-everythings-truthful.html).
Ford's insistence on an FBI investigation -- which a federal law enforcement official told Fox News was "totally inappropriate" -- throws the entire hearing into doubt: Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Ia., had threatened to nix the proceeding if Ford refused to participate. It was also sure to add fuel to Republican claims that the allegations -- which were known to ranking Judiciary Committee Democrat Dianne Feinstein in July, but only revealed to federal authorities last Thursday -- are part of a concerted effort to stall Kavanaugh's nomination at the last minute.

In response, a federal law enforcement official told Fox News, “It's totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened.”

Because Ford's allegations do not involve any federal crime within the applicable statute of limitations, Fox News has learned that the bureau would require explicit instructions from the White House to conduct any additional probe.

Earlier Tuesday, a key potential swing vote senator, Arizona Republican Jeff Flake, said he would move to push Kavanaugh's nomination forward (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/18/jeff-flake-if-kavanaugh-accuser-fails-to-show-up-ill-vote-to-move-ahead-n2520288) if Ford refused to show up to the hearing planned for Monday.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-demands-full-investigation-by-fbi-before-testifying-in-letter-from-her-lawyers.html

timosman
09-18-2018, 09:06 PM
https://vgy.me/6Dcd7i.jpg

Swordsmyth
09-18-2018, 09:11 PM
https://vgy.me/6Dcd7i.jpg
You must spread some reputation around...

timosman
09-18-2018, 11:54 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htGmvHKcCNY

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 12:20 AM
A New Jersey Senator who has been sharply critical of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh wrote a 1992 column (https://savejersey.com/2018/09/cory-booker-kavanaugh-column-groping/) in which he bragged about groping a high school friend.
“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game,” said Sen. Cory “Spartacus” Booker in the column. “With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.’”
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Screen-Shot-2018-09-18-at-7.29.06-PM.png
Booker admittedly ignored his female friend’s rejection before moving forward in his column called “So Much for Stealing Second.” Apparently “no” means “yes” in Booker’s mind.

More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/cory-booker-bragged-about-fondling-woman-after-she-pushed-away-his-hand/

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 01:25 AM
The woman accusing Democratic National Committee deputy chair and Minnesota attorney general candidate Keith Ellison said she has been "smeared" by the Democratic party.
Karen Monahan, Ellison’s ex-girlfriend, was asked on Twitter how Democrats have treated her versus Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-allegations-ford-palo-alto.html) Christine Blasey Ford. She said she has faced threats and isolation from members of her own party, despite her evidence against Ellison.
"I've been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party. I provided medical records from 2017, stating on two different Dr. Visits, I told them about the abuse and who did it," she wrote on Twitter. "My therapist released records stating I have been dealing and healing from the abuse."
"Four people, including my supervisor at the time, stated that I came to them after and shared the exact story I shared publicly, I shared multiple text between me and Keith, where I discuss the abuse with him and much more," she added. "I knew I wouldn't be believed."
"I didn't break my silence for validation or any outcome," she concluded. "I did it for my own internal freedom and to stand w/ other survivors. I have nothing to prove to anyone, I simply shared my story."

Despite the accusations, Ellison won (https://freebeacon.com/politics/ellison-wins-attorney-general-primary-denies-abuse-allegations/) the Democratic primary for Minnesota attorney general.

More at: https://freebeacon.com/politics/keith-ellison-accuser-says-she-has-been-smeared-by-her-party/

timosman
09-19-2018, 03:08 AM
Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor claiming Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 35 years ago, late Tuesday demanded a "full investigation" by the FBI before she will attend any congressional hearing or "interrogation" into her accusations.
Republicans repeatedly have invited Ford and Kavanaugh to testify on Monday after delaying a planned Judiciary Committee vote on his confirmation that had been scheduled for Thursday. Kavanaugh accepted the committee's invitation, but Ford stayed mum until Tuesday night (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/feinstein-blames-gop-after-kavanaugh-accuser-stays-mum-admits-cant-say-everythings-truthful.html).
Ford's insistence on an FBI investigation -- which a federal law enforcement official told Fox News was "totally inappropriate" -- throws the entire hearing into doubt: Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Ia., had threatened to nix the proceeding if Ford refused to participate. It was also sure to add fuel to Republican claims that the allegations -- which were known to ranking Judiciary Committee Democrat Dianne Feinstein in July, but only revealed to federal authorities last Thursday -- are part of a concerted effort to stall Kavanaugh's nomination at the last minute.

In response, a federal law enforcement official told Fox News, “It's totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened.”

Because Ford's allegations do not involve any federal crime within the applicable statute of limitations, Fox News has learned that the bureau would require explicit instructions from the White House to conduct any additional probe.

Earlier Tuesday, a key potential swing vote senator, Arizona Republican Jeff Flake, said he would move to push Kavanaugh's nomination forward (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/18/jeff-flake-if-kavanaugh-accuser-fails-to-show-up-ill-vote-to-move-ahead-n2520288) if Ford refused to show up to the hearing planned for Monday.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-demands-full-investigation-by-fbi-before-testifying-in-letter-from-her-lawyers.html

1042224308167290883

Schifference
09-19-2018, 04:22 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6ue8oSw

spudea
09-19-2018, 06:55 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6ue8oSw

Wow very powerful, especially "some people will have a lot to answer for".

Kavanaugh worked with Ken Starr to impeach Bill Clinton. I'd wager the HRC is behind this accuser.

shakey1
09-19-2018, 07:17 AM
Wow very powerful, especially "some people will have a lot to answer for".

Kavanaugh worked with Ken Starr to impeach Bill Clinton. I'd wager the HRC is behind this accuser.

good point

Madison320
09-19-2018, 08:36 AM
People do stupid things in high school. Whether or not it actually happened it is irrelevant. Unless they can find examples where this behavior is still being committed today.

Wow. I didn't think I ever see a post from Zippy defending a conservative. Damn. Have to give you a + rep.

Madison320
09-19-2018, 08:40 AM
In high school??!!

I mean, they always told me about things going on my "permanent record", but I always thought it was a threat. Damn, these Dems have lost their minds.

The irony is that many of these same liberals want to force businesses to hire people with a criminal record.

timosman
09-19-2018, 08:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euxKBF9Jf0I

CaptUSA
09-19-2018, 09:18 AM
Wow. I didn't think I ever see a post from Zippy defending a conservative. Damn. Have to give you a + rep.

Well, to be fair, he's defending Kavanaugh... Not really a "Conservative".

timosman
09-19-2018, 09:53 AM
Well, to be fair, he's defending Kavanaugh... Not really a "Conservative".

Zippy simply likes to throw us a bone once in a while to avoid accusations of bias. :cool:

Brian4Liberty
09-19-2018, 10:35 AM
Well, to be fair, he's defending Kavanaugh... Not really a "Conservative".

Kavanaugh is as swampy as they come.

timosman
09-19-2018, 10:39 AM
Kavanaugh is as swampy as they come.

Who isn't? :tears:

Brian4Liberty
09-19-2018, 10:40 AM
Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor claiming Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 35 years ago, late Tuesday demanded a "full investigation" by the FBI before she will attend any congressional hearing or "interrogation" into her accusations.

“Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz once trapped me in a room at a Clinton Foundation event and did unspeakable things to me. They took pictures and stashed them away on multiple computers, servers and portable devices. I will be willing to testify only after a full investigation by the FBI and FEC.”

timosman
09-19-2018, 10:53 AM
“Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz once trapped me in a room at a Clinton Foundation event and did unspeakable things to me. They took pictures and stashed them away on multiple computers, servers and portable devices. I will be willing to testify only after a full investigation by the FBI and FEC.”

Note the constant use of Dr. or professor when referring to Ford. :cool:

Madison320
09-19-2018, 12:08 PM
Zippy simply likes to throw us a bone once in a while to avoid accusations of bias. :cool:

That lowers his "slant" rating to 99.99998%

AuH20
09-19-2018, 12:42 PM
1042465097061462016

dannno
09-19-2018, 01:26 PM
4:50

Wonkette founder claims what is important is whether Kavanaugh takes her pain "seriously", "whether or not he agrees this happened with her", "does he take her pain seriously.."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r69PoZivDiY

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 02:10 PM
The Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is offering in a letter to lawyers for Brett Kavanaugh's accuser to have his panel's investigators interview her wherever she wants.
That includes having aides interview Christine Blasey Ford in California, where she lives, according to a person speaking anonymously because they weren't authorized to discuss the plans publicly.
Chairman Chuck Grassley is also setting deadlines. His letter to Ford's lawyers says his committee's hearing on her allegations of sexual abuse will begin Monday morning. He says if she intends to testify, she must submit written testimony by Friday morning.


President Donald Trump says "we'll have to make a decision" if Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's sexual-assault accuser "makes a credible showing" before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
He said Wednesday it would be "very interesting."
Trump calls Kavanaugh an "outstanding man" and says it's "very hard" for him to imagine anything happened.



More at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-anita-hill-says-fbi-investigation-needed-115445547--politics.html

Brian4Liberty
09-19-2018, 02:12 PM
4:50

Wonkette founder claims what is important is whether Kavanaugh takes her pain "seriously", "whether or not he agrees this happened with her", "does he take her pain seriously.."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r69PoZivDiY

These people are mentally ill. And no matter how much Lawrence O’Donnell speaks in hushed, somber and reverent tones, the first thing out the guest’s mouth is “I’m gonna push back on that”. “Sorry, suck-up, you are a male pig no matter how much you cower and fawn. Now shut your pie-hole, swine.”

Brian4Liberty
09-19-2018, 02:17 PM
Note the constant use of Dr. or professor when referring to Ford. :cool:

You must believe her, no matter what. It requires faith. The use of a title helps to engender unquestioning faith. “Doctor” is very good, as it implies logic, knowledge and education. “Saint” has recently been bestowed upon St. McCain, so it’s too early for her to be given the title of “Saint”.

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 02:25 PM
“Saint” has recently been bestowed upon St. McCain, so it’s too early for her to be given the title of “Saint”.
The canonization is invalid since they failed to even appoint a token devil's advocate.

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 02:52 PM
Hours after Hillary Clinton sidestepped a question involving her husband's rape allegations, one of Bill Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick, demanded an FBI investigation into her claim that the former President committed a "forcible, brutal rape" in a Little Rock, Arkansas hotel room on April 25, 1978 in which she says Clinton nearly bit her lip off.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/bill%20hillary%20clinton%20broadderick.png
Broaddrick described the incident in a 2016 interview:

And he grabbed me again, very forcefully. And started biting on my top lip. And this was extremely painful. I thought he was going to bite my lip off. And that’s when he pushed me back onto the bed.
...
I was completely dressed. I had a skirt and a blouse. He tore the waist of my skirt. And then he ripped my pantyhose. And he raped me. It was very vicious. I was just pinned down… I did not know what to do. I was so frightened. -Juanita Broaddrick, 2016
The former nursing home administrator also claimed in January 2016 that Hillary Clinton "tried to silence (https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/264988-bill-clinton-rape-accuser-hillary-tried-to-silence-me)" her:

I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73....it never goes away.
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) January 6, 2016 (https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/684822324227379200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Hillary dodges the question...
Appearing on MSNBC with host Rachel Maddow Tuesday night to discuss an 11th hour accusation levied against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Clinton completely ignored the question over whether we have learned anything about "due process" in the aftermath of the Bill Clinton rape allegations.
Maddow questioned, "Your husband when he was president faced allegations that were not the same as this, certainly, but had connections to these kinds of old allegations from years ago. And I know you had concerns at the time. Your husband certainly had concerns at the time that he never really had due process to defend himself from allegations like this. Have we learned anything over the years about due process not just for the accusers but also for the accused?"
Clinton - who once tweeted that "every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported," promptly changed the focus from her husband to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of an attempted rape 35 years ago - saying that Ford's due process rights are paramount.
Hours later, Broaddrick tweeted: "If you want the FBI to go back that far @HillaryClinton @MSNBC to investigate Ford’s allegations.... let’s investigate my RAPE allegations against Bill Clinton, too. Seems only fair."

If you want the FBI to go back that far @HillaryClinton (https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) @MSNBC (https://twitter.com/MSNBC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) to investigate Ford’s allegations.... let’s investigate my RAPE allegations against Bill Clinton, too. Seems only fair.
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1042237963848110080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/broadd.jpg

My case has NEVER BEEN litigated or investigated. My records are still sealed. Only NBC investigated. https://t.co/DzDocz5FxE
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1042405357988012032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Yeah, Eric, I agree......just like they swooped in and investigated my Rape Allegations against Bill Clinton.....NOT! https://t.co/7y8wRXBdKa
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1042380665558327297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Amen. https://t.co/lW9CK90XZC
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1042238549087670272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
If Hillary Clinton was President right now, and was trying to push a Merrick Garland vote, and a woman came out of the woodwork and made 35 year old allegations about him, the left would attack HER character relentlessly.

Just how Hillary Clinton did here. pic.twitter.com/CBdWEbNZnm (https://t.co/CBdWEbNZnm)
— Mike (@Fuctupmind) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/Fuctupmind/status/1042409411589877760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Broaddrick went on record in October, 2016 with Breitbart (https://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/09/breitbart-news-exclusive-video-interview-bill-clinton-accuser-juanita-broaddrick-breaks-describing-brutal-rapes/), during which the obviously shaken Clinton accuser offered vivid details of the 1970's encounter with the then Governor of Arkansas that left her traumatized for decades.


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-19/bill-clinton-accuser-wants-fbi-probe-violent-rape-claim-after-hillary-bobbles

DamianTV
09-19-2018, 03:25 PM
The irony is that many of these same liberals want to force businesses to hire people with a criminal record.

I'd like tod evans to weigh in on this...

Cant force any Behavior from anyone.

Two sides on that. First is the freedom to hire the best candidate free of govt interference. That means some discrimination against ex felons. I would not want to be forced to hire someone with a pattern and history of aggravated assault either. Other side is Three Felonies Per Day. Some people are just flat out unlucky in dealing with cops. They (like me) get arrested for retarded shit. Like making a snowman on christmas in my friends front yard and being charged with Violation of Curfew.

I think a real solution here requires multiple corrections. First, get rid of the Plea Bargain. People are pleading guilty to charges when they are truly innocent just to avoid longer sentences. Bully says "give me your lunch money". You usually respond with a prompt "fuck off". Then they bloody your face, and say "give me your lunch money" again. Youre more likely to give them your lunch money after each successive punch.

Next big correction to our justice system is to get Govt the fuck out of hiring practices. Cant discriminate. Cant hire someone without a license. Must hire someone that is unable to do a job. This is also a double edged sword, as we have a genuine need to have some discrimination, which I think is one of many things needed to quit giving illegal immigrants American jobs. Cant speak english should be valid cause to not hire someone. Remember always that the Govt Solution to ANY problem is far too often WORSE than the original problem itself.

Next, we have an issue with "Criminal History". If a person goes to jail for a crime, and they have paid their debt to society, then they have paid their fucking debt. This is more cultural than legal. If someone goes to jail for something, and "did their time", then its done, its over, let it be and move on and look to the future. I think we will have much better results even if we have a risk of discrimination for ANY reason, including looking at Criminal History, with reasonable exceptions. The other side of hiring people that have gone to jail for a "Crime" again relates to Three Felonies Per Day because our Corrections Facilities do exactly jack and shit for actually "Correcting", and Jack left town. People who have spent any significant time in prison come out heavily changed, and havent been corrected AT ALL. They've never been shown a better path. Would any drug dealer in their right mind actually think that working for Minimum Wage at McDonalds will open up more opportunities than going back to dealing drugs?

Tod - I'd like you to weigh in on the District Attorneys and Plea Bargains. May want to split the thread tho because my post is exceptionally off topic of the OP and I dont want to derail...

tod evans
09-19-2018, 05:36 PM
I'd like tod evans to weigh in on this...

Cant force any Behavior from anyone.

Two sides on that. First is the freedom to hire the best candidate free of govt interference. That means some discrimination against ex felons. I would not want to be forced to hire someone with a pattern and history of aggravated assault either. Other side is Three Felonies Per Day. Some people are just flat out unlucky in dealing with cops. They (like me) get arrested for retarded shit. Like making a snowman on christmas in my friends front yard and being charged with Violation of Curfew.

I think a real solution here requires multiple corrections. First, get rid of the Plea Bargain. People are pleading guilty to charges when they are truly innocent just to avoid longer sentences. Bully says "give me your lunch money". You usually respond with a prompt "fuck off". Then they bloody your face, and say "give me your lunch money" again. Youre more likely to give them your lunch money after each successive punch.

Next big correction to our justice system is to get Govt the fuck out of hiring practices. Cant discriminate. Cant hire someone without a license. Must hire someone that is unable to do a job. This is also a double edged sword, as we have a genuine need to have some discrimination, which I think is one of many things needed to quit giving illegal immigrants American jobs. Cant speak english should be valid cause to not hire someone. Remember always that the Govt Solution to ANY problem is far too often WORSE than the original problem itself.

Next, we have an issue with "Criminal History". If a person goes to jail for a crime, and they have paid their debt to society, then they have paid their fucking debt. This is more cultural than legal. If someone goes to jail for something, and "did their time", then its done, its over, let it be and move on and look to the future. I think we will have much better results even if we have a risk of discrimination for ANY reason, including looking at Criminal History, with reasonable exceptions. The other side of hiring people that have gone to jail for a "Crime" again relates to Three Felonies Per Day because our Corrections Facilities do exactly jack and shit for actually "Correcting", and Jack left town. People who have spent any significant time in prison come out heavily changed, and havent been corrected AT ALL. They've never been shown a better path. Would any drug dealer in their right mind actually think that working for Minimum Wage at McDonalds will open up more opportunities than going back to dealing drugs?

Tod - I'd like you to weigh in on the District Attorneys and Plea Bargains. May want to split the thread tho because my post is exceptionally off topic of the OP and I dont want to derail...

Good God, what a lot to address.....

First off government mandates never work for anyone but government...

So absolutely no more mandates/laws/quotas/diversity/ equality or any other words for government interference in private business.

DA's.............The lowest form of life bar none...

DA's must be corralled, neutered and dehorned before trying to domesticate them. Right now they're viewed on par with the canine "officer" in that they're not responsible when they tear the throat out of the poor doper on the corner....

To neuter them their own livelihood must be at stake when they file charges and the citizenry must hold them accountable...Not every X number of years at the ballot box, that doesn't work.... Every charge filed must be justified, I'd suggest 3 people of the victims choosing, 3 of the accused choosing and 3 from the local diner chosen at will....If 5 people of the 9 disagree with any charge filed then the DA must be liable to the accused in both time and money....5 offences in a year would be a lifetime loss of legal licence and forcible eviction from the county..

To dehorn a DA simply say every case must be heard by a jury of 12 people who have no family members receiving a check from the government for any reason, that would include cousins and inlaws.

AZJoe
09-19-2018, 07:55 PM
Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, has a hazy recollection (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html) of the incident, admitting she doesn't specifically remember the year it happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness (who denies the account) were already upstairs when she went up, and how she got home that night.
... More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-17/kavanaugh-and-accuser-will-both-testify-publicly-monday

https://scontent-sjc3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42101576_2021882594528984_7397578278229245952_n.jp g?_nc_cat=0&oh=9febf67f1bec4aa399af7f318c94c0cf&oe=5C2DAB83

Swordsmyth
09-19-2018, 10:33 PM
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Wednesday unloaded a torrent of criticism on Sen. Dianne Feinstein for her handling of the sexual assault accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, telling the ranking Democrat on the committee, "I cannot overstate how disappointed I am."
Saying Feinstein "chose to sit on the allegations until a politically opportune moment," Grassley demanded she immediately turn over an unredacted copy of the letter from Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, that Feinstein received July 30.
Feinstein, D-Calif., shared the letter with federal authorities and other senators only last week, days before a key Judiciary Committee vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation, after a leak about the letter was published in The Intercept. Republicans have accused (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/17/feinstein-faces-gop-heat-for-sitting-on-kavanaugh-accusers-claims.html) Democrats of orchestrating that leak.
Grassley, R-Iowa, who called the document a "significant piece of evidence in Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation process," said that despite multiple requests, he still has access only to a redacted copy of the letter included in supplemental background materials provided by the FBI to a select group of senators.

He asserted that he needs the full version of the document in order to "prepare for Monday's hearings" into the allegations against Kavanaugh.

Meanwhile, Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill tweeted Wednesday night that she would not vote for Kavanaugh. In her message (https://twitter.com/clairecmc/status/1042548533952430081/photo/1), she explicitly wrote that his legal rulings and ideology, and not the allegations by Ford, were the reason for her decision. McCaskill is locked in a tight re-election race (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/12/fox-news-poll-mccaskill-up-in-missouri-senate-race-by-whisker.html) in a red state that Trump won handily in 2016.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/grassley-demands-feinstein-turn-over-letter-from-kavanaugh-accuser-cannot-overstate-how-disappointed-am.html

timosman
09-20-2018, 03:21 AM
As Collins Appears to Side With Kavanaugh Over Assault Allegation, Group Issues Warning: Women Won't Forget

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/09/19/collins-appears-side-kavanaugh-over-assault-allegation-group-issues-warning-women




https://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/headlines/screen_shot_2017-12-04_at_2.56.06_pm.png
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said Wednesday that Christine Blasey Ford's decision not to testify at the Senate hearing on her assault allegations would be "not fair" to Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Women's rights advocates and critics on social media shared their disgust on Wednesday after Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) appeared to side with U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh regarding sexual assault allegations against him, and chastise his accuser for indicating that she would likely not testify at a hearing on the matter.

In an interview with WVOM, a radio station in Maine, Collins said Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's failure to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify about her claim that Kavanaugh assaulted her when they were both in high school would be "not fair" to the federal judge.

"It's not fair for Judge Kavanaugh for her not to come forward and testify" either in a private session with the panel or publicly, Collins said. "I just don't understand why the hearing shouldn't go forth."

1042497288436949003

"It is both extremely disturbing and a grave insult to women in Maine and across the country that Senator Collins is buying into the Trump tactic of undermining survivors and trying to bully Dr. Blasey Ford," said Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL, in a statement. "Every shred of evidence points to the fact that Dr. Ford, who has everything to lose and nothing to gain from this vicious process, is telling the truth, and that Brett Kavanaugh has lied over and over again."

Senate Democrats, women's rights groups, and Ford herself have called for an FBI investigation into her allegations of sexual assault—but the Republican-led Judiciary Committee has revealed its intention of pushing through a hearing as quickly as possible, forcing Ford to choose between telling her story to the nation without a federal investigation backing up her claims, or not telling it at all.

Ford has said she is open to testifying before the committee—but not until the FBI conducts an investigation of her claim, which she first sent to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) in July just after Kavanaugh was nominated.

A probe by federal investigators should be "the first step" before Ford is put "on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident," her lawyers said this week.

"If it's truly Senator Collins' intention to side with Brett Kavanaugh over Dr. Blasey Ford, she will never again be able to claim the mantle of an ally to women or survivors, and that is not something that women will ever forget—not next week, not next month, and not in 2020 when she's up for reelection," said Hogue.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujii2nnvObg

Madison320
09-20-2018, 08:02 AM
I'd like tod evans to weigh in on this...

Cant force any Behavior from anyone.

Two sides on that. First is the freedom to hire the best candidate free of govt interference. That means some discrimination against ex felons. I would not want to be forced to hire someone with a pattern and history of aggravated assault either. Other side is Three Felonies Per Day. Some people are just flat out unlucky in dealing with cops. They (like me) get arrested for retarded $#@!. Like making a snowman on christmas in my friends front yard and being charged with Violation of Curfew.

I think a real solution here requires multiple corrections. First, get rid of the Plea Bargain. People are pleading guilty to charges when they are truly innocent just to avoid longer sentences. Bully says "give me your lunch money". You usually respond with a prompt "$#@! off". Then they bloody your face, and say "give me your lunch money" again. Youre more likely to give them your lunch money after each successive punch.

Next big correction to our justice system is to get Govt the $#@! out of hiring practices. Cant discriminate. Cant hire someone without a license. Must hire someone that is unable to do a job. This is also a double edged sword, as we have a genuine need to have some discrimination, which I think is one of many things needed to quit giving illegal immigrants American jobs. Cant speak english should be valid cause to not hire someone. Remember always that the Govt Solution to ANY problem is far too often WORSE than the original problem itself.

Next, we have an issue with "Criminal History". If a person goes to jail for a crime, and they have paid their debt to society, then they have paid their $#@!ing debt. This is more cultural than legal. If someone goes to jail for something, and "did their time", then its done, its over, let it be and move on and look to the future. I think we will have much better results even if we have a risk of discrimination for ANY reason, including looking at Criminal History, with reasonable exceptions. The other side of hiring people that have gone to jail for a "Crime" again relates to Three Felonies Per Day because our Corrections Facilities do exactly jack and $#@! for actually "Correcting", and Jack left town. People who have spent any significant time in prison come out heavily changed, and havent been corrected AT ALL. They've never been shown a better path. Would any drug dealer in their right mind actually think that working for Minimum Wage at McDonalds will open up more opportunities than going back to dealing drugs?

Tod - I'd like you to weigh in on the District Attorneys and Plea Bargains. May want to split the thread tho because my post is exceptionally off topic of the OP and I dont want to derail...

Yeah, I agree it sucks to make one mistake and have that lower your chances for employment for the rest of your life. Or not even a mistake, just a bad law or cop. But as you said the solution is not to outlaw discrimination, that just makes it way worse. One way to help the situation would be to reform the liability laws for employers. Employers can be sued for things their employees do that they have no control over. Which really sucks for the employer because at the same time the government wants them to hire people with criminal records. Then they get sued when an employee beats up a customer. Smaller government in general would help a lot because there'd be more jobs.

DamianTV
09-20-2018, 02:43 PM
Yeah, I agree it sucks to make one mistake and have that lower your chances for employment for the rest of your life. Or not even a mistake, just a bad law or cop. But as you said the solution is not to outlaw discrimination, that just makes it way worse. One way to help the situation would be to reform the liability laws for employers. Employers can be sued for things their employees do that they have no control over. Which really sucks for the employer because at the same time the government wants them to hire people with criminal records. Then they get sued when an employee beats up a customer. Smaller government in general would help a lot because there'd be more jobs.

Agreed. And all the time, like you said, a bad cop, they are NEVER held accountable!

devil21
09-20-2018, 03:31 PM
As Collins Appears to Side With Kavanaugh Over Assault Allegation, Group Issues Warning: Women Won't Forget


https://i.imgflip.com/159h94.jpg

Be sure to remember this when Roe v Wade is overturned!

Anti Federalist
09-20-2018, 03:45 PM
Seems like the only witness to this incident has retracted her claim...she claims that Ford told everybody at the time it happened and Ford claims she told no one until 2012.

Woemen.

Anti Federalist
09-20-2018, 03:51 PM
As Collins Appears to Side With Kavanaugh Over Assault Allegation, Group Issues Warning: Women Won't Forget

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/09/19/collins-appears-side-kavanaugh-over-assault-allegation-group-issues-warning-women

LOL and now the Bolsheviks are calling her office in droves...

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/09/18/angry-calls-threats-thousands-hangers-susan-collins-middle-political-firestorm/EO1XqIK0cUCyYV8jbxhf5J/story.html

Swordsmyth
09-20-2018, 06:46 PM
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a party 36 years ago, is willing to testify next week in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, US media reported on Thursday.Blasey Ford's lawyers have told the committee she cannot appear at its hearing scheduled for Monday, calling the date Republicans set "arbitrary", according to the Washington Post and New York Times.
Both cited an email the lawyers sent to the committee seeking to negotiate a new date for the hearing, after committee chairman Chuck Grassley set a deadline of Friday morning to agree to appear on Monday.
The Monday date "is not possible and the committee's insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event," Blasey Ford's lawyers said.
"As you are aware, she has been receiving death threats, which have been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and she and her family have been forced out of their home," it said.
"She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."
They asked to hold discussions with the committee to set up a new date and conditions for the hearing.


More at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-willing-testify-us-senate-reports-194216356.html

This time next year would probably suit her.

Swordsmyth
09-20-2018, 08:29 PM
Judge Brett Kavanaugh will be exonerated of wrongdoing and will be confirmed to his post on the US Supreme Court, according to Ed Whelan - a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and current president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/kavanaugh1_0.png
Amid a series of cryptic and not-so-cryptic tweets in the last 48 hours, Whelan says: "By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him."

By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him.
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 18, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042180930620796928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Wahlen then followed up with a series of tweets suggesting that the accusation may have even been made in good-faith.
"It’s precisely b/c sexual assault is so terrible that it is deeply unjust when someone is mistakenly (even good-faith mistakenly) accused of having committed it," he said. "Everyone should rejoice when the mistake is found."

Sexual assault is a terrible thing. Its victims suffer grievously. It's precisely b/c sexual assault is so terrible that it is deeply unjust when someone is mistakenly (even good-faith mistakenly) accused of having committed it. Everyone should rejoice when the mistake is found.
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 20, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042591331741249537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
And the sooner the mistake is discovered, the better. https://t.co/szL3dPuyMw
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 20, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042592127304298497?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) As Law and Crime (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/fmr-scalia-law-clerk-makes-bombshell-claim-compelling-evidence-will-exonerate-kavanugh-soon/) notes:

Is Whelan implying that Christine Ford has mistaken Kavanaugh for someone else ? Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) recently suggested, to the dismay of some, that this might be the case when he said Ford might be “mixed up.” (https://nypost.com/2018/09/17/orrin-hatch-says-kavanaugh-accuser-may-be-mixed-up/)
Whelan did link to a Yahoo story saying this may be a case (https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-tells-hatch-accusation-may-201746510.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw) of “mistaken identity.”

Meant to link to this item yesterday presenting this account. https://t.co/cY6whTwQaZ
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042392539129622530?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Whelan also says that Senator Feinstein "will soon be apologizing to Judge Kavanaugh."

Senator Feinstein will soon be apologizing to Judge Kavanaugh. https://t.co/FeeuDmQNz1
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 18, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042183227740446725?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Impressive decency and generosity in the face of terrible suffering that will be shown to have been deeply unjust. https://t.co/rI08S3IPRU
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042202149755777024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/fmr-scalia-clerk-expects-compelling-evidence-exonerate-kavanaugh-next-week

Swordsmyth
09-20-2018, 11:56 PM
Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford, who claims — without any evidence — that Kavanaugh inappropriately touched her at a drunken party while in high school, turns out to have ties to an abortion pill pharmaceutical company called Corcept Therapeutics. This discovery brings to light an obvious conflict of interest in Blasey’s story, revealing that she works for a pharmaceutical company that manufacturers an abortion pill drug, whose profits could be strongly impacted by future Supreme Court decisions on abortion rights. Corcept Therapeutics (Corcept.com) manufacturers and markets an abortion pill drug called mifepristone, and Christine Blasey Ford is a co-author of at least eight published scientific papers produced by the pharmaceutical giant to promote its pills. You can see Blasey’s name listed on several publications at this Corcept.com web page detailing their research papers (http://www.corcept.com/publications.html).
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., a $166 billion market cap company (stock symbol CORT) reportedly has current annual sales of $216 million. The company offers just one drug, mifepristone, which is widely known as an “abortion pill” or RU-486. Many drugs have multiple uses, and mifepristone — brand name “Korlym” at Corcept — is currently marketed by the company for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. (h/t to The Gateway Pundit (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/christine-blasey-ford-published-eight-studies-about-abortion-pill-and-worked-for-company-that-produces-it/) for initial work on this breaking story.)

Like all FDA-approved drugs, mifepristone is frequently prescribed off-label, meaning doctors prescribe it for conditions that it has never been approved to treat. It is well known throughout the medical industry that doctors routinely prescribe this drug to terminate unwanted pregnancies. It is a covert “abortion drug,” in other words.
If Kavanaugh were to be confirmed on the U.S. Supreme Court and be part of a decision that overturns Roe vs. Wade, it would make the prescribing of Corcept’s drug for abortion illegal, directly impacting the bottom line profits of the company for which Christine Blasey works.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-exposed-for-ties-to-big-pharma-abortion-pill-maker-effort-to-derail-kavanaugh-is-plot-to-protect-abortion-industry-profits/

timosman
09-21-2018, 12:52 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxMi-R5Kmn4

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 01:26 AM
Judge Brett Kavanaugh will be exonerated of wrongdoing and will be confirmed to his post on the US Supreme Court, according to Ed Whelan - a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and current president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/kavanaugh1_0.png
Amid a series of cryptic and not-so-cryptic tweets in the last 48 hours, Whelan says: "By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him."
By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him.
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 18, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042180930620796928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Wahlen then followed up with a series of tweets suggesting that the accusation may have even been made in good-faith.
"It’s precisely b/c sexual assault is so terrible that it is deeply unjust when someone is mistakenly (even good-faith mistakenly) accused of having committed it," he said. "Everyone should rejoice when the mistake is found."
Sexual assault is a terrible thing. Its victims suffer grievously. It's precisely b/c sexual assault is so terrible that it is deeply unjust when someone is mistakenly (even good-faith mistakenly) accused of having committed it. Everyone should rejoice when the mistake is found.
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 20, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042591331741249537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

And the sooner the mistake is discovered, the better. https://t.co/szL3dPuyMw
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 20, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042592127304298497?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
As Law and Crime (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/fmr-scalia-law-clerk-makes-bombshell-claim-compelling-evidence-will-exonerate-kavanugh-soon/) notes:
Is Whelan implying that Christine Ford has mistaken Kavanaugh for someone else ? Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) recently suggested, to the dismay of some, that this might be the case when he said Ford might be “mixed up.” (https://nypost.com/2018/09/17/orrin-hatch-says-kavanaugh-accuser-may-be-mixed-up/)
Whelan did link to a Yahoo story saying this may be a case (https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-tells-hatch-accusation-may-201746510.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw) of “mistaken identity.”


Meant to link to this item yesterday presenting this account. https://t.co/cY6whTwQaZ
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042392539129622530?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Whelan also says that Senator Feinstein "will soon be apologizing to Judge Kavanaugh."
Senator Feinstein will soon be apologizing to Judge Kavanaugh. https://t.co/FeeuDmQNz1
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 18, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042183227740446725?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

Impressive decency and generosity in the face of terrible suffering that will be shown to have been deeply unjust. https://t.co/rI08S3IPRU
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 19, 2018 (https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042202149755777024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/fmr-scalia-clerk-expects-compelling-evidence-exonerate-kavanaugh-next-week

A new theory has emerged in the case of whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted accuser Christine Blasey Ford roughly 35 years ago; it was Kavanaugh's high school look-alike, whose high school house better fits Ford's description, and who kept in touch with the other guy allegedly in the room, Mark Judge.
The theory was presented Thursday afternoon by Ed Whelan, a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggests that Kavanaugh's high school doppelgänger, Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford's recollection of the alleged incident.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/kav%20garrett.jpg
Brett Kavanaugh (left), Chris Garrett (right)
Earlier t (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/fmr-scalia-clerk-expects-compelling-evidence-exonerate-kavanaugh-next-week)his week, Whelan tweeted "By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him."
Update: Ford, who has had trouble remembering specifics about the alleged encounter, dismissed Whelan’s theory in a statement late Thursday according to the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-vows-to-move-ahead-with-kavanaugh-vote-if-his-accuser-doesnt-testify-monday/2018/09/20/a7132ee8-bcf5-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?utm_term=.3e4ec53980ee): "I knew them both, and socialized with" the other classmate, Ford said, adding that she had once visited him in the hospital. "There is zero chance that I would confuse them."


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/was-kavanaugh-accuser-almost-raped-his-doppelganger-new-theory-emerges

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 01:36 AM
Warren Smears Kavanaugh With Doctored Video (https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30121-warren-smears-kavanaugh-with-doctored-video)

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 02:26 AM
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, is reportedly willing to publicly testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee next Thursday.
Lawyers for Ford told committee staffers during a call Thursday evening to negotiate details of a potential hearing that she wanted Kavanaugh to testify before her and she does not want to be in the same room as him, according to multiple (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-vows-to-move-ahead-with-kavanaugh-vote-if-his-accuser-doesnt-testify-monday/2018/09/20/a7132ee8-bcf5-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?utm_term=.b51979ab6050) reports (https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-dle/index.html).
A source told CNN that Ford's lawyers are also opposed to an outside counsel being used to question her during a hearing, something that was being discussed by Republican senators (https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407328-gop-mulls-having-outside-counsel-question-kavanaugh-ford) to avoid the optics of 11 male GOP senators questioning Ford.

More at: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407714-ford-could-testify-thursday-report

What is the point of him testifying first? How can he respond to her accusations if she hasn't made them yet?..............................Oh, Yeah, that's the point isn't it?

Schifference
09-21-2018, 03:02 AM
I saw a news clip last evening about 2 teenage girls that were crazy drunk and acting stupid. They claim they must have been drugged. Why is it if a guy get stupid drunk he gets stupid drunk and has to accept responsibility for what he did or did not do and if a female gets stupid drunk she must have been drugged?

tod evans
09-21-2018, 03:04 AM
I saw a news clip last evening about 2 teenage girls that were crazy drunk and acting stupid. They claim they must have been drugged. Why is it if a guy get stupid drunk he gets stupid drunk and has to accept responsibility for what he did or did not do and if a female gets stupid drunk she must have been drugged?

Misogynist!

timosman
09-21-2018, 07:38 AM
1042779865076953088

phill4paul
09-21-2018, 08:28 AM
1042779865076953088

Yeah, we all know how well the FBI would investigate Hillary. :rolleyes:

Valli6
09-21-2018, 09:01 AM
Why don't they subpoena her? Since when does the accuser get to dictate all the terms? Who's in charge here?!
Are they ignoring the fact that they can subpoena because of the whole "careful - don't make ALL the woman angry" shtick? This is ridiculous and insulting to reality-based women.

On a lighter note:
SC congressman jokes that Ruth Bader Ginsburg claims she was groped by Abraham Lincoln.

S.C. Congressman Ralph Norman, a Republican up for re-election, told a crowd of people at a debate Thursday in Rock Hill, that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an associate justice of the Supreme Court, said she had been assaulted by Abraham Lincoln.
https://www.heraldonline.com/latest-news/article218735465.html

timosman
09-21-2018, 12:51 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flIM3AUyQ3A

Anti Federalist
09-21-2018, 01:03 PM
Are they ignoring the fact that they can subpoena because of the whole "careful - don't make ALL the woman angry" shtick?

Too late...but the best course of action is to just ignore it.

There is no logic, reason or words that will assuage that.

timosman
09-21-2018, 01:04 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/21/politics/christine-blasey-ford-kavanaugh-fbi-threats/


September 21, 2018

Washington (CNN)Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, will speak to the FBI on Friday in San Francisco about the death threats against her, a source close to Ford tells CNN.

The FBI investigation pertains only to the threats Ford has received since coming public with her allegations last weekend; it is not about the assault accusations against the Supreme Court nominee.
Ford has alleged that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the early 1980s by pushing her into a bedroom at a party and attempting to remove her clothes. Kavanaugh has categorically denied the allegation.
Democrats, and Ford, have pressed for an FBI investigation into the alleged incident, while Republicans and the White House have resisted calls for an FBI inquiry and have said that the Senate Judiciary Committee can handle an investigation into the allegations.
Lawyers for Ford told Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley in a letter earlier this week that she has faced death threats that have compelled her family to leave their home.
"She has been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats. As a result of these kind of threats, her family was forced to relocate out of their home. Her email has been hacked, and she has been impersonated online," the letter said.
CNN has previously reported that Kavanaugh and his family have also received death threats.

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 05:41 PM
The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman threatened to vote Monday on Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination unless the woman who has accused the nominee of sexual assault agrees to terms for her testimony by Friday night.
The committee and the woman’s lawyers have been at an impasse in negotiations over the terms of her appearance before the committee. The head of the panel, Senator Chuck Grassley, said he would give her until 10 p.m. Friday to respond.
The committee’s Republicans proposed a Wednesday hearing on a sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh, a day earlier than his accuser is seeking, as both sides stepped up pressure over the terms of what would be explosive testimony. They rejected conditions sought by accuser Christine Blasey Ford, including her request to call other witnesses in addition to her and Kavanaugh.
“I’m providing a notice of a vote to occur Monday in the event that Dr. Ford’s attorneys don’t respond or Dr. Ford decides not to testify,” Grassley said in a statement. “In the event that we can come to a reasonable resolution as I’ve been seeking all week, then I will postpone the committee vote to accommodate her testimony. ”

More at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-21/gop-is-said-to-offer-wednesday-hearing-on-kavanaugh-allegations

phill4paul
09-21-2018, 06:11 PM
2 hrs. ...tick, tick, tick....

phill4paul
09-21-2018, 08:22 PM
Minutes before a 10 p.m. deadline set by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, an attorney for Christine Blasey Ford asked for another day to decide. Lawyer Debra Katz said the time limit’s “sole purpose is to bully Dr. Ford and deprive her of the ability to make a considered decision that has life-altering implications for her and her family.”

https://apnews.com/8f5fc89473d8429f90af397ce0ae6b97/GOP,-Kavanaugh-accuser-in-standoff-over-her-Senate-testimony

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 08:28 PM
https://apnews.com/8f5fc89473d8429f90af397ce0ae6b97/GOP,-Kavanaugh-accuser-in-standoff-over-her-Senate-testimony

They better not give her another day, she blew it.

Her only goal this whole time has been to cause delays, she has already succeeded too well, there is no reason to let her get away with any more nonsense.

phill4paul
09-21-2018, 08:31 PM
They better not give her another day, she blew it.

Her only goal this whole time has been to cause delays, she has already succeeded too well, there is no reason to let her get away with any more nonsense.

Yup. Coached by her resistance lawyer....


Debra Katz, one of the attorneys representing Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, attended a resistance rally against the president in 2017 and promised to “fight back.”

The lawyer has numerous ties to the resistance against Trump, and was caught on camera at a protest in February 2017 after Jeff Sessions was confirmed as the administration’s attorney general.

“We are going to fight back,” she told a reporter. “We are going to resist. We will not be silenced.”

Katz was identified only as a “protester” by ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

The Gargoyle, the alumni magazine for the University of Wisconsin Law School, profiled Katz on August 9, 2018 and found her to be just as committed to fighting the president as she was at the 2017 protest.

“The resistance is not going away, says Katz, and she is committed to being part of it,” the Gargoyle wrote.

“When I go to a march on behalf of Dreamers, I hear young people making connections between DACA and Islamophobia,” Katz told the magazine. “I hope that energy continues, to retake our democracy that is truly at risk now.”

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/kavanaugh-lawyer-debra-katz-resist-rally/

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 08:58 PM
Perhaps another factor bolstering GOP steadfastness on the issue is the Friday revalation that Ford's current political adviser - former Obama and Clinton White House official Ricky Seidman, had allegedly been working on Ford's situation since July (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-21/kavanaugh-accusation-orchestrated-hit-involving-fmr-anita-hill-adviser-new-audio) - outlining a plan on a newly released audio tape to use the allegation as political fodder to derail Kavanaugh's confirmation, and if unsuccessful, at least politically harm Republicans during midterms.
One might think that Ford, an ostensibly intelligent PhD, would have considered the likelihood of her eventual Congressional testimony the moment she decided to involve California legislators in her claims prior to the 11th hour of Kavanaugh's confirmation.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-21/kavanaugh-accuser-misses-deadline-demands-day-decide-ball-grassleys-court-monday

Swordsmyth
09-21-2018, 11:36 PM
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley late Friday night granted another extension to Christine Blasey Ford to decide on whether she will testify to the committee.
The new deadline was unclear, but Ford had requested that a 10 p.m. ET Friday deadline be extended until Saturday.
Ford has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, citing an incident that she said occurred decades ago, when both were in high school.
Grassley issued his latest extension decision in a tweet addressed to Kavanaugh, adding that he hopes the judge can “understand” his reasoning behind the delay.

Judge Kavanaugh I just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w the statement she made last week to testify to the senate She shld decide so we can move on I want to hear her. I hope u understand. It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive
— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) September 22, 2018 (https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1043344767684366336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Just before midnight ET, Grassley tweeted: “Judge Kavanaugh I just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w the statement she made last week to testify to the senate She shld decide so we can move on I want to hear her. I hope u understand. It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive.”

With all the extensions we give Dr Ford to decide if she still wants to testify to the Senate I feel like I’m playing 2nd trombone in the judiciary orchestra and Schumer is the conductor
— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) September 22, 2018 (https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1043348132657025025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Grassley later added: “With all the extensions we give Dr Ford to decide if she still wants to testify to the Senate I feel like I’m playing 2nd trombone in the judiciary orchestra and Schumer is the conductor.”
The Friday 10 p.m. ET deadline was itself an extension of a previous Friday morning deadline before Grassley issued the latest postponement.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/22/grassley-grants-kavanaugh-accuser-another-extension.html

:down:

Swordsmyth
09-22-2018, 12:15 AM
U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono, who told men to “just shut up and step up” in the wake of sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, might have some explaining to do about her campaign cash.
Data show that Hawaii's Hirono has taken money from a fellow Democrat who has admitted hitting his wife.
U.S. Sen. Tom Carper’s First State PAC donated (https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2018&data_type=processed&committee_id=C00363648&recipient_name=hirono&min_date=01%2F01%2F2017&max_date=09%2F21%2F2018) $1,000 to Hirono’s political campaign in June, despite the Delaware lawmaker’s confession of abuse.

Also receiving donations (https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2018&data_type=processed&committee_id=C00363648&recipient_name=feinstein&min_date=01%2F01%2F2017&max_date=09%2F21%2F2018) from Carper’s group was U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will decide if Kavanaugh is appointed to the nation's highest court. Feinstein has received $5,000 from the PAC so far in 2018.

Carper admitted hitting his wife -- an allegation he pushed back against after it was first reported during his 1982 run for U.S. Congress -- in a 1998 interview with a local journalist Celia Cohen who published a book “Only in Delaware” that is sold by the state of Delaware on its official website, the Washington Free Beacon (https://freebeacon.com/politics/tom-carper-admitted-to-hitting-his-wife-in-1998-interview/) reported.


The New York Post was the first newspaper to allege that Carper hit his wife. The story stemmed from a taped deposition the lawmaker gave as part of a child custody battle. He was accused of hitting his wife “so hard he gave her a black eye” while his children were allegedly “slapped around and bruised by Carper for doing such things as leaving the family dog on the bed.”
Carper, 71, won Delaware's Democratic primary earlier this month as he seeks a fourth Senate term.


More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/21/anti-kavanaugh-voices-hirono-feinstein-took-campaign-cash-from-dem-colleague-who-admitted-hitting-his-wife.html

Swordsmyth
09-22-2018, 12:37 PM
http://magaimg.net/img/67yy.jpg

Swordsmyth
09-22-2018, 01:59 PM
http://magaimg.net/img/67yy.jpg

Christine Blasey Ford has accepted the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request to testify on Ford’s allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school, Ford’s attorneys told Senate Republicans on Saturday. Her decision came just ahead of a looming 2:30pm deadline: Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley had given Ford's lawyers until Saturday afternoon to decide whether she would proceed with testifying.
Still, her answer is nebulous because as on previous occasions, the exact terms and timing of her testimony remain unclear, as negotiations between Ford's lawyers and staff for the Senate Judiciary Committee remain ongoing.
In the email Ford's lawyers said she had accepted the panel's "request to provide her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh's sexual misconduct next week" even though the legal team said it found that many of the "aspects of the [Committee's] proposal... are fundamentally inconsistent with the Committee's promise of a fair, impartial investigation."
The email also didn't specifically say that Ford was agreeing to a Wednesday hearing date, which is what the Judiciary Committee has proposed. And Debra Katz, Ford's lawyer, explicitly said that "she is hopeful that we can reach an agreement on the details."
"This an ask to continue 'negotiations' without committing to anything. It's a clever way to push off the vote Monday without committing to appear Wednesday," a senior White House official said Saturday quoted by The Hill (https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407925-kavanaugh-accuser-agrees-to-testify-next-week?userid=47328).
For the past week, both sides had been wrangling over the exact day and conditions for Ford's testimony.
Commenting on the constant back and forth, conservative commentator Laura Ingraham said last week (https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/1042880450082091008)that "those who appear before a Senate Committee don’t set the terms. This is ludicrous and must be stopped. Terrible precedent."
Grassley has agreed to limit television coverage of next week’s hearing, provide adequate police security and timely breaks. But he has rejected a request from Ford’s lawyers that outside witnesses, such as Kavanaugh’s high school friend Mark Judge, be called to testify.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-22/kavanaugh-accuser-agrees-testify-next-week

Swordsmyth
09-23-2018, 01:36 AM
http://magaimg.net/img/67yy.jpg

After a brief call late Saturday, the lawyers and aides to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, planned to talk again Sunday morning to continue negotiations over the conditions of the testimony, according to three people familiar with the call.
Negotiations could still falter over the details, which include who will question the woman, Christine Blasey Ford. But in tentatively agreeing to a Thursday hearing, Republicans made a significant concession that suggested they were working to ensure that the session occurred after several days of uncertainty.
If no final deal is made, Grassley will be left to decide whether to move ahead with a committee vote on Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination scheduled for Monday. Kavanaugh, who has vigorously denied the allegations, has repeatedly expressed his desire to testify.
The move by Ford, 51, a research psychologist in Palo Alto, came after an extended back-and-forth between her lawyers and top Judiciary Committee aides. Grassley had set 2:30 p.m. Saturday as a final deadline for Ford to agree or decline to appear.
The tentative deal came as White House officials and Republicans on Capitol Hill were growing increasingly frustrated at what they said was a ploy to delay Monday’s vote. Republicans had been pressing for Ford, if she were to agree to testify, to do so Wednesday.

More at: https://www.sfchronicle.com/nation/article/Christine-Blasey-Ford-willing-to-testify-about-13250440.php

:down:

devil21
09-23-2018, 01:15 PM
Hmm...does this Dr. Ford even exist? There's no record of her on any of the professional listings for her field and only the one circulated photo. I've already posted that this seems like a big psyop but this lame drama that's unfolding, combined with a major lack of evidence of Dr. Ford even existing makes me wonder if she even exists outside of news rooms and Capitol Hill.

Zippyjuan
09-23-2018, 01:21 PM
Hmm...does this Dr. Ford even exist? There's no record of her one any of the professional listings for her field and only the one circulated photo. I've already posted that this seems like a big psyop but this lame drama that's unfolding, combined with a major lack of evidence of Dr. Ford even existing makes me wonder if she even exists outside of news rooms and Capitol Hill.

I think professionally, she is using her maiden name of Blasey. https://www.paloaltou.edu/faculty/christine-blasey

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christine_Blasey

devil21
09-23-2018, 01:49 PM
I think professionally, she is using her maiden name of Blasey. https://www.paloaltou.edu/faculty/christine-blasey

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christine_Blasey

Well that's something, at least. The constant use of a different name in the media is still questionable and the fact that she's alleged to be in the psy field doesn't help the psyop case at all. She doesn't show up under any professional license holding sites for the state of CA.

Zippyjuan
09-23-2018, 01:52 PM
Well that's something, at least. The constant use of a different name in the media is still questionable and the fact that she's alleged to be in the psy field doesn't help the psyop case at all. She doesn't show up under any professional license holding sites for the state of CA.

Professors need a license?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Blasey_Ford


is an American psychologist and professor of statistics at Palo Alto University.[6] Widely published in her field,[7][8] she specializes in designing statistical models for research projects.


Career
Ford began teaching at Stanford University in 1988.[19] She works at Palo Alto University teaching students clinical trial design and data analysis.[14] She participates in educational programs with the Stanford University School of Medicine as a member of a consortium group with Palo Alto University.[8][14][19] Through this consortium group, called the Pacific Graduate School of Psychology (PGSP), Ford teaches subjects including psychometrics, study methodologies, and statistics.[8][11] She performed consulting work for multiple pharmaceutical companies.[20] Ford worked as the director of biostatistics at Corcept Therapeutics, and collaborated with FDA statisticians.[18] Ford is widely published within her field

devil21
09-23-2018, 02:00 PM
Professors need a license?

Not specifically but one would assume she'd have, at some point, relevant experience as a psych doc, instead of solely educational experience in the all-too-fitting-given-the-nature-of-the-drama field of statistical psychology. Maybe not, just being a PhD, but I'm still not convinced this Dr. Ford character isn't fictitious. I'm aware of the "name game" of how names do not identify physical men and women.

Zippyjuan
09-23-2018, 02:06 PM
Not specifically but one would assume she'd have, at some point, relevant experience as a psych doc, instead of solely educational experience in the all-too-fitting-given-the-nature-of-the-drama field of statistical psychology. Maybe not, just being a PhD, but I'm still not convinced this Dr. Ford character isn't fictitious. I'm aware of the "name game" of how names do not identify physical men and women.

I don't see any sort of clinical experience in her background.

Schifference
09-23-2018, 04:53 PM
Local NBC in SC is reporting the encounter was attempted rape.

Swordsmyth
09-23-2018, 05:25 PM
The Washington Post has been busted by WSJ columnist Kimberly Strassel for intentionally withholding information from their reporting of Christine Blasey Ford's claim that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a high school party in the early 1980s, which "further undercuts the Ford accusation."
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/kav%20blasey_0.jpg
Strassel obtained a copy of the email WaPo sent to Mark Judge, one of the teenagers Ford claims was at the party - revealing that the Post knew the names of those at the alleged party, as well as the fact that one of them was a woman - Ford's "longtime" friend Leland Keyser (then Ingham).
Publicly, the Post reported that there were four boys at the party the same day they revealed to Judge that they knew there was a girl.
What's more, WaPo now writes: "Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware."
And instead of reporting this, the Post allowed Ford's claim tha there were four boys at the party stand until word of Keyser's alleged attendance became public knowledge late last week.


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-23/wapo-concealed-kavanaugh-party-claim-public-after-coordinating-accuser-strassel

Swordsmyth
09-23-2018, 05:37 PM
A new woman who is a ‘Never Trumper’ is about to become Brett Kavanaugh’s second accuser, Matt Drudge is reporting tonight.
According to the story, which is about to be published in the New Yorker, the accuser’s friend says “she never told me!”

The latest episode of Swamp… pic.twitter.com/sskvoUAMww (https://t.co/sskvoUAMww)
— MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) September 23, 2018 (https://twitter.com/DRUDGE/status/1043995456886525954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



More at: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-second-kavanaugh-accuser-is-a-never-trumper/

Swordsmyth
09-23-2018, 05:48 PM
On Saturday night, Leland Ingham Keyser, a classmate of Ford's at the all-girls school Holton-Arms and her final named witness, denied any recollection of attending a party with Brett Kavanaugh.
"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," lawyer Howard J. Walsh said in a statement sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

CNN reports that " Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's (https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html)."

Keyser previously coached golf at Georgetown University (https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003113454222) and is now executive producer of Bob Beckel's podcast. Keyser is the ex-wife of Beckel, (https://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/01/leland-keyser-bob-beckel-ex-wife-ingham-golf-kids-family-the-five-fox-news-married/) a former Democratic operative and commentator. A search on OpenSecrets.org (https://www.opensecrets.org/search?q=beckel%2C+leland&type=donors) reveals Keyser's only political donation has been to former Democratic senator Byron Dorgan.
Keyser's denial, as a female lifelong friend and Ford's last named witness, is the most consequential development that has occurred since Ford publicly stepped forward last Sunday and detailed her allegations to the Washington Post. Ford's allegation of the 1982 incident was told to no one until a 2012 therapy session, when Kavanaugh was first touted in the media as the most likely GOP Supreme Court nominee. (https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1042080685178216450)
All of Ford's named witnesses of the party, both male and female, have now denied any recollection of attending such a party.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/blasey-fords-female-classmate-her-last-alleged-witness-denies-ever-attending-party-with-kavanaugh

Zippyjuan
09-23-2018, 06:02 PM
A new woman who is a ‘Never Trumper’ is about to become Brett Kavanaugh’s second accuser, Matt Drudge is reporting tonight.
According to the story, which is about to be published in the New Yorker, the accuser’s friend says “she never told me!”

The latest episode of Swamp… pic.twitter.com/sskvoUAMww (https://t.co/sskvoUAMww)
— MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) September 23, 2018 (https://twitter.com/DRUDGE/status/1043995456886525954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



More at: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-second-kavanaugh-accuser-is-a-never-trumper/

Related? Posted within the hour:

1044006928416825344

Swordsmyth
09-23-2018, 06:06 PM
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
No.294 (https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#294)

Sep 23 2018 18:43:32 (EST)
(https://qanon.pub/#t1537746212) NEW

TRUST GRASSLEY.
Q

Zippyjuan
09-23-2018, 06:29 PM
The New Yorker article is now out. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?526762-Senate-Democrats-Investigate-a-New-Allegation-of-Sexual-Misconduct-from-Brett-Kavanaugh%92s-Col&p=6684744#post6684744

fedupinmo
09-23-2018, 07:08 PM
Related? Posted within the hour:

1044006928416825344

Desperation is setting in with your kind. Can't wait to see them burn for it, except for Republican weakness standing in the way.

devil21
09-23-2018, 11:51 PM
I don't see any sort of clinical experience in her background.

LOL perhaps it's all an experiment in her field of statistical psychology. Dr. Blasey examining the effectiveness of large scale propaganda about "Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh" on the people.

eta: even the names of all of these characters are a lil too fitting for the story. "Christ"ine. Mark "Judge". Leyland "Keys"er. When do we get to meet classmates Ronald Pope and Lucy Farr?

Grassley already said he has the votes lined up so what's the hold-up? Get on with it.
Today, McConnell said they have the votes also so they're delaying it for some other reason. Building up some narrative for the midterms, maybe. Otherwise, the delays based on this lame story don't make sense.

Schifference
09-24-2018, 03:25 AM
Trump should nominate a female and have men lined up with their accusations.

phill4paul
09-24-2018, 07:33 AM
12:10 a.m.

The lawyer for a woman who Brett Kavanaugh's accuser has said attended the 1980s party at which he allegedly molested her has told Senate Republican investigators that the woman doesn't recall such a gathering or know the Supreme Court nominee.

The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.

A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.

But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.

That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-latest-deadline-looms-kavanaugh-accuser-151503689--politics.html

___

dannno
09-24-2018, 11:04 AM
AJ says they have more women coming ala Roy Moore. It's a coordinated attack.

AJ is a smart and well connected man.




The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.

A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.

But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.

That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.

Swordsmyth
09-24-2018, 10:10 PM
Senator Ted Cruz, supporter of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, was verbally assaulted by a group of protesters at a DC restaurant Monday night, as seen in a video posted by twitter account Smash Racism DC.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/cruz%20and%20wife%201.jpg
At one point the protesters chanting "we believe survivors" blocked Cruz's wife from exiting the restaurant, prompting the Texas Senator to ask them to "let my wife through."


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-24/ted-cruz-and-wife-chased-out-dc-restaurant-anti-kavanaugh-protesters

Schifference
09-25-2018, 01:56 AM
Trump should nominate a female and have men lined up with their accusations.

Imagine the uproar from Crying Chuck Slimy Shumer and all the Democrats.

not.your.average.joe
09-25-2018, 02:48 PM
On Saturday night, Leland Ingham Keyser, a classmate of Ford's at the all-girls school Holton-Arms and her final named witness, denied any recollection of attending a party with Brett Kavanaugh.
"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," lawyer Howard J. Walsh said in a statement sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

CNN reports that " Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's (https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html)."

Keyser previously coached golf at Georgetown University (https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003113454222) and is now executive producer of Bob Beckel's podcast. Keyser is the ex-wife of Beckel, (https://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/01/leland-keyser-bob-beckel-ex-wife-ingham-golf-kids-family-the-five-fox-news-married/) a former Democratic operative and commentator. A search on OpenSecrets.org (https://www.opensecrets.org/search?q=beckel%2C+leland&type=donors) reveals Keyser's only political donation has been to former Democratic senator Byron Dorgan.
Keyser's denial, as a female lifelong friend and Ford's last named witness, is the most consequential development that has occurred since Ford publicly stepped forward last Sunday and detailed her allegations to the Washington Post. Ford's allegation of the 1982 incident was told to no one until a 2012 therapy session, when Kavanaugh was first touted in the media as the most likely GOP Supreme Court nominee. (https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1042080685178216450)
All of Ford's named witnesses of the party, both male and female, have now denied any recollection of attending such a party.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/blasey-fords-female-classmate-her-last-alleged-witness-denies-ever-attending-party-with-kavanaugh

The thing that I don't understand about this is how poorly constructed it all is. The government has had 100 years (from the sinking of the Lusitania) to perfect the art of deceiving the people. So many lies have been sold to the people in the last century, from JFK to Nixon and 9/11, and now they can't come up with ONE convincing lie. They gave themselves the loosest limitations on what the lie could be (it was 35 years ago, no one remembers what happened) and, gathering from this thread, EVERY single aspect of their lie has come crashing down around them. Has it always been this simple? Has all we have ever needed been a man who didn't rape a girl (which is just about every man)?

devil21
09-25-2018, 03:34 PM
The thing that I don't understand about this is how poorly constructed it all is. The government has had 100 years (from the sinking of the Lusitania) to perfect the art of deceiving the people. So many lies have been sold to the people in the last century, from JFK to Nixon and 9/11, and now they can't come up with ONE convincing lie. They gave themselves the loosest limitations on what the lie could be (it was 35 years ago, no one remembers what happened) and, gathering from this thread, EVERY single aspect of their lie has come crashing down around them. Has it always been this simple? Has all we have ever needed been a man who didn't rape a girl (which is just about every man)?

I think they're building up a narrative. Getting certain gullible and easily emotionally manipulated segments of the population all riled up for something in particular. Otherwise, the delays and the lameness of this story overall don't make any sense. They could have already confirmed Kav and moved on to other business. It's probably also a good time to watch what stuff Congress may be trying to slip in under the radar while this big distraction is ongoing.

Working Poor
09-25-2018, 05:12 PM
a good time to watch what stuff Congress may be trying to slip in under the radar while this big distraction is ongoing.
Exactly what I have been thinking.

Swordsmyth
09-25-2018, 07:26 PM
The thing that I don't understand about this is how poorly constructed it all is. The government has had 100 years (from the sinking of the Lusitania) to perfect the art of deceiving the people. So many lies have been sold to the people in the last century, from JFK to Nixon and 9/11, and now they can't come up with ONE convincing lie. They gave themselves the loosest limitations on what the lie could be (it was 35 years ago, no one remembers what happened) and, gathering from this thread, EVERY single aspect of their lie has come crashing down around them. Has it always been this simple? Has all we have ever needed been a man who didn't rape a girl (which is just about every man)?
Arrogance breeds intellectual laziness, the RINOs have been collaborating with the left for so long that they think they can get away with anything, they are also pushing the envelope to condition people to submit to the party line no matter how ludicrous it is, they want people to accept 2+2=5 if the MSM/DNC say so, it is way too early for that to succeed but that brings us back to arrogance again.

devil21
09-25-2018, 07:59 PM
Exactly what I have been thinking.

Oh, and the gov't needs another giant spending bill passed and signed by friday to avoid a shutdown.

Swordsmyth
09-26-2018, 01:37 AM
Senator Ted Cruz, supporter of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, was verbally assaulted by a group of protesters at a DC restaurant Monday night, as seen in a video posted by twitter account Smash Racism DC.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/cruz%20and%20wife%201.jpg
At one point the protesters chanting "we believe survivors" blocked Cruz's wife from exiting the restaurant, prompting the Texas Senator to ask them to "let my wife through."


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-24/ted-cruz-and-wife-chased-out-dc-restaurant-anti-kavanaugh-protesters

(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://bigleaguepolitics.com/smash-racism-d-c-founded-by-professor-who-wants-mike-pence-to-be-assassinated/&t=Leader+of+Ted+Cruz+Dinner+Assailants+Wants+Mike+ Pence+Dead)The organization that chased Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) out of a Washington D.C. restaurant Monday night is led by a professor who advocates for killing police and Trump administration officials, as reported (https://farleftwatch.com/antifa-leader-is-professor-who-jokes-about-dead-cops-and-executing-students/) by Far Left Watch.
“Reminder that if Trump does end up winning this stupid thing to assassinate Mike Pence *first*,” said Mike Isaacson on election day in 2016.


Isaacson is a founding member of Smash Racism D.C., which harassed Cruz and his wife Heidi Monday night, forcing them to exit a restaurant where they were dining. The Tweet – which apparently does not violate Twitter’s Terms of Service – is still live.
Katie Bo Williams first wrote (https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/350524-antifa-activists-say-violence-is-necessary) in The Hill about Isaacson’s affiliation with the group:

The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, who is one of the founders of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.
Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism.
“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.
“I don’t think anyone should think that someone who is intent on politically organizing for the sake of creating a state-sponsored genocide — I don’t think is something that we should protect.”


Of course, no one is advocating for “state-sponsored genocide.”
Far Left Watch reported reported (https://farleftwatch.com/antifa-leader-is-professor-who-jokes-about-dead-cops-and-executing-students/) in depth on Isaacson’s anti-police Tweets prior to last night’s incident involving Cruz.
“Some of y’all might think it sucks being an anti-fascist teaching at John Jay College but I think it’s a privilege to teach future dead cops,” he said in August 2017.

"Weren't you my econ professor?"
"See? You had the opportunity."
*blade drops*
— Mike Isaacson (@VulgarEconomics) August 23, 2017 (https://twitter.com/VulgarEconomics/status/900401092340699137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)



More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/smash-racism-d-c-founded-by-professor-who-wants-mike-pence-to-be-assassinated/

Swordsmyth
09-26-2018, 02:22 AM
After the video went viral and began trending on Twitter, the group behind the stunt, Smash Racism DC, tweeted the following;
“This is a message to Ted Cruz, Bret Kavanaugh, Donald Trump and the rest of the racist, sexist, transphobic, and homophobic right-wing scum: You are not safe. We will find you. We will expose you. We will take from you the peace you have taken from so many others.” https://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/tweet2.jpg

The tweet is clearly a violation of Twitter’s rules (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules) on targeted harassment, which state, “You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so.”
Alex Jones was permanently banned by Twitter for being rude to a CNN reporter. I was suspended by Twitter for posting a video of the confrontation.
If Twitter deems that to be “targeted harassment,” the actual harassment of Cruz and the follow up tweet vowing to harass others clearly violates Twitter’s rules.
The group also tweeted out a phone number purporting to belong to Gavin McInnes, which is clearly an example of doxxing. https://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/tweet1.jpg
The Smash Racism DC’s banner image features an Antifa flag, a group that has been designated (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/01/antifa-charlottesville-violence-fbi-242235) a domestic terror organization by the DHS and the FBI.
https://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/background.jpg

Will anything happen to Smash Racism DC’s Twitter account?

More at: https://www.infowars.com/leftist-group-that-harassed-ted-cruz-vows-you-are-not-safe-we-will-find-you/

AZJoe
09-27-2018, 08:27 PM
https://scontent-sjc3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42678822_1880078742113402_1004886914060255232_n.jp g?_nc_cat=111&oh=05f85183b51998328eeb569968468382&oe=5C202FD6

fedupinmo
10-01-2018, 07:35 AM
Mitchell's report:

https://i.imgur.com/ZQrsDub.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/NcFxMWM.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XSQkNxx.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/skqrvpC.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/i7ZT0tI.jpg