PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton Was Not Formally Under FBI Investigation at Any Time in 2015-2016




Swordsmyth
06-19-2018, 03:31 PM
House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) came out swinging Tuesday in a a joint hearing held by the House Oversight and House Judiciary Committees.




Gowdy ripped into Comey in his opening statement (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/19/gowdy-scorches-comey-in-blistering-opening-statement-at-ig-hearing.html), stating, “we can’t survive with a justice system we don’t trust.”
Investigative journalist Paul Sperry reported Horowitz dropped a bombshell in his testimony.
Horowitz revealed the FBI never named a target or even a subject in the Clinton email probe!
Sperry tweeted: BREAKING: IG Horowitz revealed in Senate testimony FBI never named a target or even subject in Clinton probe. Not Mills, Abedin, Combetta or Clinton herself. “Nobody was listed as a subject of this investigation at any point in time,” adding this was “surprising” for a crim probe

More at: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/horowitz-drops-bombshell-hillary-clinton-was-not-formally-under-fbi-investigation-at-any-time-in-2015-2016/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=thegatewaypundit.com&utm_term=68731&utm_content=1

spudea
06-19-2018, 03:49 PM
Thank you Mr. President for firing James Comey. Even if Trump is impeached over it, it was worth it just for that.

thoughtomator
06-19-2018, 03:54 PM
All these scandals would have been buried forever, the perpetrators getting away with it and being rewarded, if Donald Trump were not our President.

Always the first thing that comes to mind when some deranged anti-Trumper cuts loose.

nbhadja
06-19-2018, 04:00 PM
All these scandals would have been buried forever, the perpetrators getting away with it and being rewarded, if Donald Trump were not our President.

Always the first thing that comes to mind when some deranged anti-Trumper cuts loose.

Nafta is dead, Trump exposed the fake media, and many more good things under Trump....but a big percent of this board on election night was like "It makes no difference if Trump or Hillary wins" and it shows why Libertarians are so inept and incompetent politically and why they will never accomplish anything until someone else accomplishes it for them. They don't know how the game is played. They suck at chess.

timosman
06-19-2018, 04:01 PM
Nafta is dead, Trump exposed the fake media, and many more good things under Trump....but a big percent of this board on election night was like "It makes no difference if Trump or Hillary wins" and it shows why Libertarians are so inept and incompetent politically and why they will never accomplish anything until someone else accomplished it for them.

Principles!

thoughtomator
06-19-2018, 05:11 PM
Nafta is dead, Trump exposed the fake media, and many more good things under Trump....but a big percent of this board on election night was like "It makes no difference if Trump or Hillary wins" and it shows why Libertarians are so inept and incompetent politically and why they will never accomplish anything until someone else accomplishes it for them. They don't know how the game is played. They suck at chess.

I could not agree more. These people are SO bad at it that regardless of the purity of intent, they are a liability to associate with.

So I'm fine with them joining forces with Antifa which seems to be about, ideologically, where many of them are at. They will be a liability for whatever malicious force they choose to adhere to, as they have been to us.

Schifference
06-20-2018, 06:02 AM
All these scandals would have been buried forever, the perpetrators getting away with it and being rewarded, if Donald Trump were not our President.

Always the first thing that comes to mind when some deranged anti-Trumper cuts loose.

All these scandals would have been buried forever had they not pursued Russiagate.

shakey1
06-20-2018, 06:32 AM
Slick Hilly.:cool:

jkr
06-20-2018, 02:10 PM
W
T
a
F
?!?!?!?!?!?!

Swordsmyth
06-20-2018, 05:29 PM
James Comey hit back at Hillary Clinton after the former secretary of state sniped at him over a Justice Department inspector general report which revealed that the former FBI director used a private email address to conduct official business - while his FBI was investigating Hillary for her own use of private systems.

But my emails. https://t.co/G7TIWDEG0p
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 14, 2018 (https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1007376361101582336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) In an interview with the German newspaper Die Zeit, Comey refused to apologize to Clinton - stressing the difference between his personal use of email for unclassified information vs. her use, which involved classified information.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-20/comey-hits-back-hillary-she-doesnt-understand-what-her-case-was-about

Aratus
06-21-2018, 09:56 AM
Thank you Mr. President for firing James Comey. Even if Trump is impeached over it, it was worth it just for that.

Comey getz to cut a really big book deal, Donald Trump actually then becomes the central
focal point celebrity star of his own reality tv series/show for once, Mike Pence getz blessed
by the Good Lord and the Radical Left gets a new lease on life. Win/Win all the way around!

Swordsmyth
06-21-2018, 07:52 PM
Analysis –Crooked Comey Reopened Hillary Email Case In October 2016 Because Good Cops In The FBI Leaked Info To Congress – Comey Later Fired The Good Cops

https://www.teaparty.org/analysis-crooked-comey-reopened-hillary-email-case-october-2016-good-cops-fbi-leaked-info-congress-comey-later-fired-good-cops-310232/

JUNE 20, 2018

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-comey.jpg

Fired and Corrupt FBI Head James Comey said that he only heard about Hillary’s emails located on Anthony Weiner’s laptop in late October of 2016. But then he said that he was scared that the FBI in New York would release the emails if he didn’t reopen the investigation.

After performing another fake review of the emails, the FBI again exonerated Hillary a few days before the November election.

Now Chairman Devin Nunes from the House reports that they had received the emails before the 2016 election. It looks more probable that the emails were leaked to Congress and that is why Comey reopened the case.

No worries, Comey made sure it doesn’t happen again as FBI Agents in New York were later fired as noted by corrupt FBI Agent Peter Strzok in a text to his corrupt FBI attorney girlfriend Lisa Page.

The FBI Director in Charge (ADIC) of New York Office William Sweeney was told about the discovery of huge numbers of Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop on September 28, 2016. Weiner was a perp who was married to Hillary’s top aide Huma Abedin and was Senator Chuck Schumer’s protégé. He was under investigation for sexting an underage girl.



ADIC Sweeney also told two other senior New York officials and one of them confirms that they also informed McCabe about the Clinton/Weiner emails.



Then nothing happened for 21 days. It is unclear why or who all knew about the emails, but former FBI Head McCabe appears to be the fall guy for delaying doing anything with the emails.



Then the story goes that McCabe contacted the team that worked to exonerate Hillary from her email crimes on October 27 , 2016, and called for a meeting.



On October 27th, Comey says that he was then told that Weiner’s laptop contained hundreds of thousands of emails but we really aren’t sure if this was the first time he heard of them. In his book he suggests that this is the case but who knows – was this just another lie from Comey?



Comey opened up the Clinton email case again in late October 2016. According to far left US News and World Report in January of this year, the environment at the FBI was a mess because of Comey –


In fact, internal bureau dissension was part of the context in which Comey made the decision to forego standard FBI practice regarding announcements that could affect elections and disclose the new emails to Congress. “FBI Director James Comey was driven in part by a fear of leaks from within his agency when he decided to tell Congress the FBI was investigating newly discovered emails related to Hillary Clinton, law enforcement sources said on Thursday,” Reuters’ Mark Hosenball reported in November 2016. And as ProPublica and The New Yorker put it last May: “There was another motivation for Comey’s decision to ‘speak’: FBI officials feared that news of the new emails would leak out, damaging the Bureau and its director. The primary source of anxiety was the FBI’s own New York field office, which was handling the Weiner case and harbored deep pockets of anti-Clinton sentiment. … Comey’s deputy also made clear [to a Justice Department official protesting his plan to release the information] that the FBI director was ‘very concerned’ about a leak — that the news ‘was coming out anyway.’’

The fact that Comey was scared of individuals within his department leaking the information on the emails is clearly the real reason Comey released the news about the emails and opened up the Clinton email case again just before the election.

Corrupt and criminal FBI Agent Peter Strzok was assigned again to the case. He worked and somehow performed miracles on “1,355,980 electronic files (pg 389), containing 350,000 emails and 344,000 Blackberry communications [that] were reviewed between October 30th and the morning of November 6th, 2016.”

As reported previously, the problem is that there were only three people in the Mid-Year-Event team granted authority to physically do the Clinton email review. FBI Agent Peter Strzok was one of them and he said that they were able to review the number of emails through the use of “some amazing things to rapidly de-duplicate” the emails.

The New York FBI case agent assigned to the Weiner investigation, a certified Digital Extraction Technician, as well as the FBI forensics team in Quantico say it was impossible to use the conflicted metadata to “de-duplicate” the emails. Therefore someone in the FBI is lying again.

We now know that some good cops at the FBI did provide information to Congress about Weiner emails.



We also know that Peter Strzok in a text with Lisa Page noted that FBI Agents in New York were later fired. This was important enough that they noted it with each other and also the FBI redacted part of the text messages about these individuals being fired. Clearly there is more to this text that will be cleared up when unredacted.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Strzok-text-FBI-Agents-Fired.jpg

So in summary – Comey was forced to reopen the Hillary email scandal due to some good cops in the FBI who leaked the information to Congress. Later Comey fired these good cops for leaking.
And also – What in the hell is in the Weiner emails?

...

Swordsmyth
06-22-2018, 11:10 PM
The Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Hillary Clinton have a HUGE Weiner problem (http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/fbi-doj-and-hillary-clinton-weiner-problem/) that is even bigger than we first realized.

According to the recently released inspector general report (https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download), on September 28 and 29, 2016 the New York office of the FBI immediately reported to the Washington headquarters its discovery of, first, 141,000 and then 350,000 emails on the laptop of Anthony Weiner — also known as “Carlos Danger,” a now-convicted sex offender. Mr. Weiner is the husband of Hillary Clinton’s inseparable aide Huma Abedin.
Now we know by October 4, the New York office had found 700,000 emails. The New York agents had seen and reported to FBI leadership they had seen email headers, all domain names (http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/fbi-doj-and-hillary-clinton-weiner-problem/), Mrs. Clinton’s initials on one sensitive but not classified document, and the missing BlackBerry backups.
The New York agents described it as the “entire file” of all Hillary Clinton emails from 2006 until 2016, including the BlackBerry messages that Comey himself had referred to as “the golden emails.”
The “mid-year team” of FBI agents investigating the email issues had been told by Clinton’s staff and lawyers that there was a complete archive on both a thumb drive and a laptop, but remarkably, no one seemed to have them. At least some on the mid-year team were frustrated and believed Clinton’s attorneys were lying. Others, including Comey, claimed they were looking for those under every “stone” but no one could find them.
Remember: Hillary Clinton’s attorneys produced approximately 30,000 of her emails, and they appear to have claimed that was the entirety of her work-related emails. Mrs. Clinton, staff and technical support had deliberately deleted approximately 33,000 emails that were just about “yoga” and “wedding plans.” They produced nothing from the beginning of her tenure as Secretary of State. Then, her server was wiped with “BleachBit.”
Yet, lo and behold, here so many emails were. Hundreds of thousands of emails, the “entire file” — everything Clinton — including data from the BlackBerrys and other devices for which the FBI and DOJ decided not to run search warrants because they “assumed” they had been destroyed.
So what did the FBI do with this “explosive” “bomb” including the “golden emails” on the BlackBerry that everyone knew was missing from the production?
Nothing — at least nothing to obtain evidence.
There was a flurry of activity at Headquarters. Strzok-Page texts show that Strzok, McCabe and Priestap discussed the Weiner laptop among themselves shortly after the “bomb” dropped in the video conference that day. In fact, Priestap and Strzok were waiting outside McCabe’s office to discuss it while McCabe was with Comey. There were also two calls between Comey and McCabe that evening.
Does anyone really think they were not having their own “oh shit” moment (http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/fbi-doj-and-hillary-clinton-weiner-problem/)?
The FBI case agent in New York sure had one.
Remarkably, McCabe, Comey, Priestap, Strzok,and then Mary McCord at DOJ have little recollection of much of this at all. It just kind of “fell off the radar.” They were “busy.” it was probably “duplicates,” and their focus was on the “Russia” investigation to which they gave priority. And after all, they did not expect any information on the laptop to “change the outcome of the case.”
Of course they did not, but the only reason for that is that the outcome that she would not be prosecuted was a foregone conclusion from the beginning
Obama and Hillary had both declared it.
Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and others gave various reasons for sitting on the “entire file” of Clinton’s emails for a month. The inspector general examines — and resoundingly rejected —each of them.
For one, they all asserted that they expected and hoped that the emails were simply duplicates of ones they had already reviewed. This is clearly impossible.
First, just do the math. There were 675,000 of them—at least 350,000 of which they knew from the video call of September 28. Clinton produced approximately 30,000 emails — claiming that included all her work-related emails. Supposedly, her staff culled 33,000 emails that were purely personal.
Combined, that is more than 600,000 emails short of this colossal find, which is ten times the total number of emails Clinton and company claimed existed.
Second, the agents and Comey all knew they had no BlackBerry messages from Mrs. Clinton’s production. But from Weiner’s laptop, they knew from the headers and dates, they had all of those — the first two months of her tenure as secretary of state.
This was the motherlode of Clinton culpability — the answers to everything they did not want anyone to know.
And there’s more.
As early as October 3, the Weiner case agent was “agitated” over the sound of “crickets” from headquarters and the “inaccurate” statements of Director Comey regarding the number of emails they possessed. He felt compelled to push the issue in New York, all the way up to U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.
The case agent himself recognized that the FBI had 10 times the number of Clinton emails that the director had reported on the record, and they had the significant BlackBerry messages as well. He could not believe someone in New York had not called him to get the hard drive.
Extremely concerned, the case agent went to the U.S. attorneys for the Southern District of New York. An assistant United States attorney told the inspector general the agent believed “somebody was not acting appropriately, somebody was trying to bury this.” The attorneys were concerned the agent might “act out.”
“Act out” means blow the whistle.
United States Attorney Bharara was so sufficiently aware of the deafening silence from Washington that he instructed his chief counsel to document everything his office had done — “with a hundred percent accuracy.” “Things seemed unusual” to him, and he wanted a record of their actions, including their recovery of more than 700,000 emails.
Bharara instructed his deputy to call the Justice Department directly in case “something had fallen through the cracks.” That call (http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/fbi-doj-and-hillary-clinton-weiner-problem/) made it impossible for the FBI and DOJ to continue to keep this “trove” buried. The same day, October 21, Agent Strzok wrote to Lisa Page: Toscas at DOJ was “now aware NY has hrc-huma emails via weiner invest.”
Finally, [I]five days later, on October 26, the New York case agent was able to talk directly to the mid-year agents. (“Mid-year” is the name the FBI gave the investigation.) The case agent reported again: “Based on the number of emails, we could have every email that Huma and Hillary ever sent each other.” [315].
On October 30, the Department of Justice finally got in gear to get a warrant — to include everything dealing during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure with the State Department and all devices — and especially the Comey-denominated “golden emails” from the BlackBerrys and all the messages sent to Abedin to be given to Mrs. Clinton, right?
Nope.
Shocker #1: Despite everyone’s recognition of the importance of the “explosive” “bomb,” and the “golden emails” on the Weiner laptop, the FBI never even sought to review the “golden” emails.
Shocker #2: They deliberately ignored the emails between Huma Abedin and others — despite knowing she was a proxy for the Secretary and had lied to them in her interview.
Federal investigators knew people would email Abedin, and she would print things out for Clinton. Abedin admitted it was easier for her to print things from home in Brooklyn.
Logically then, it appears it was Abedin who deliberately stripped classified markings from emails to forward the information to Mrs. Clinton so she could then deny ever receiving anything marked classified. It’s called “plausible deniability,” and it was a deliberate and illegal scheme for handling classified information.
Shocker #3: Over analysts’ objections, the FBI never reviewed the Weiner laptop to determine if it had been compromised by foreign agents despite finding that Huma Abedin had forwarded classified information to it. Those were flagrant violations of 18 U.S.C. §793.
There are important conclusions from these facts in the inspector general’s report.
The Weiner laptop almost certainly contains the answers to the public’s questions about all things Clinton — her scandals, the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play, obstruction of justice and also possible espionage act violations.
The FBI’s claim to have reviewed all the relevant Clinton emails is obviously false.
The inspector general’s report belies the FBI’s claim to have left no stone unturned.
The Weiner laptop and content of all iCloud accounts must be immediately obtained and preserved by an independent counsel in whom the public can have confidence.
Justice requires both a full investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s multiple potential crimes and of the efforts of agents of the FBI and the Department of Justice to cover it all up.
Multiple high-ranking officials including Barack Obama were emailing Mrs. Clinton directly or through Huma Abedin. The Weiner laptop and iCloud account had it all. It was the full archive they were supposedly searching for.
Who else among the high-powered elite are the FBI and DOJ protecting by their cover-up?

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/22/fbi-ignored-golden-emails-and-abedin-messages/