Congressional Candidate In Virginia Admits He’s A Pedophile

[Swordsmyth]

Nathan Larson, a 37-year-old accountant from Charlottesville, Virginia, is running for Congress as an independent candidate in his native state. He is also a pedophile, as he admitted to HuffPost on Thursday, who has bragged in website posts about raping his late ex-wife.
In a phone call, Larson confirmed that he created the now-defunct websites suiped.org and incelocalypse.today ― chat rooms that served as gathering places for pedophiles and violence-minded misogynists like himself. HuffPost contacted Larson after confirming that his campaign website shared an IP address with these forums, among others. His sites were terminated by their domain host on Tuesday.


On the phone, he was open about his pedophilia and seemingly unfazed about his long odds of attaining government office.
“A lot of people are tired of political correctness and being constrained by it,” he said. “People prefer when there’s an outsider who doesn’t have anything to lose and is willing to say what’s on a lot of people’s minds.”
When asked whether he’s a pedophile or just writes about pedophilia, he said, “It’s a mix of both. When people go over the top there’s a grain of truth to what they say.”
Asked whether there was a “grain of truth” in his essay about father-daughter incest and another about raping his ex-wife repeatedly, he said yes, offering that plenty of women have rape fantasies.
According to Larson’s campaign manifesto (http://archive.fo/9Lvao), his platform as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” candidate includes protecting gun ownership rights, establishing free trade and protecting “benevolent white supremacy,” as well as legalizing incestuous marriage and child pornography.

More at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/congressional-candidate-virginia-admits-pedophile-011921211.html


We have found the LP's next presidential contender.:mad:

[Anti Globalist]

Now he needs to sell out all the other pedophiles hes acquainted with.

[FvS]

Here come the guilt by association smears, as if the Democrat ranks are free of pedophiles. Nevertheless, these people need to be ostracized and denounced by the libertarian movement.

http://www.pacificpundit.com/2017/05/26/de-blasio-democrat-staffer-caught-with-kiddie-porn/

[TheCount]

For context, the daughter that he says he wants to fuck is 3.

[Brian4Liberty]

Why doesn't he call himself a neoclassical Democrat?

[Brian4Liberty]

Here come the guilt by association smears, as if the Democrat ranks are free of pedophiles. Nevertheless, these people need to be ostracized and denounced by the libertarian movement.


"Denounced". I like the sound of that. Would we use baseball bats when we "denounce" him?

[FvS]

"Denounced". I like the sound of that. Would we use baseball bats when we "denounce" him?

Ideally :). Luckily, the Libertarian Party in Virginia kicked him out a year ago.

[FvS]

Quote from a Washington Post commenter.


This is what "Libertarians" really are, beneath all that nonsense about how they are for more freedom for everyone. The fact is, they are for more freedom for themselves alone; and that "freedom" entails limiting or ignoring the rights, well-being and safety of everyone else. This guy is what the Koch brothers and their entourage would be if they did not have a lot of money at stake and had much less of a sense of PR. These people are monsters, and we need to stop them.

[Wooden Indian]

Quote from a Washington Post commenter.

Most likely a paid .gov goon, not a legit person's thoughts....

And they updated their Employee Handbooks just in time for this allegedly "Libertarian" pedo (that no one has heard of), to get his big media attention. Shocking!


I'm very open and transparent about my Libertarian-minded views with everyone, and never has anyone had an argument to make against the "philosophy" ( for lack of a better word )of Liberty, or thought it was a way for people to bang sheep, cats, or kids.

The strongest, or most common case against the application of Libertarianism is that "WE need" government oversights in order to not be overrun by terrorists and rampant poverty.

So I'm calling BS on this whole thing.

edit- typos

[FvS]

Don't forget to remind them of this.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268399/every-democrat-presidential-candidate-25-years-had-daniel-greenfield

[Zippyjuan]

In a truely Libertarian world, shouldn't you be able to have sex with anybody you want (as long as both agree)?

[nikcers]

In a truely Libertarian world, shouldn't you be able to have sex with anybody you want (as long as both agree)?

Libertarianism is anarchy liberal memes on rpf??

[Wooden Indian]

In a truely Libertarian world, shouldn't you be able to have sex with anybody you want (as long as both agree)?

Assuming both parties are of sound mind?
Of course. Who wants or needs big bro in their bedroom?

To the extremes... If some random jackass has a jackass of a mother, father, sister, or brother, all of sound mind, and they wanna do the twister-tango, that's their business. But don't expect me to approve of the act or to accept it as "normal" behavior.

[Swordsmyth]

In a truely Libertarian world, shouldn't you be able to have sex with anybody you want (as long as both agree)?

There are age of consent laws for a reason.

Zippy is defending pedophilia AGAIN.

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

his platform as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” candidate includes protecting gun ownership rights, establishing free trade and protecting “benevolent white supremacy,” as well as legalizing incestuous marriage and child pornography.
Oh gooooood! What a fucking clown show this movement is. Could it get any worse? Not content to smear libertarianism, this degenerate has to drag NRx into it too. What a sorry state of affairs. This guy should be executed if he's fucking 3-year-old girls.

[dannno]

In a truely Libertarian world, shouldn't you be able to have sex with anybody you want (as long as both agree)?

No - an adult having sex with an innocent child is a fraudulent agreement because the child doesn't have the capacity to understand the terms of the agreement and the adult does.

[Swordsmyth]

Oh gooooood! What a $#@!ing clown show this movement is. Could it get any worse? Not content to smear libertarianism, this degenerate has to drag NRx into it too. What a sorry state of affairs. This guy should be executed if he's $#@!ing 3-year-old girls.

You must be doing something right when they target you for this kind of blackwashing.

[dannno]

Anybody here of this guy before? He sounds like a Fed.

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

Anybody here of this guy before? He sounds like a Fed.
I haven't, but I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. The internet has caused so many unhinged, deranged, degenerate people to come out of the woodwork to seek "legitimacy". This guy's beliefs aren't even all that surprising, especially if you're familiar with darker parts of even the surface web. The sad thing is that dissident ideas tend to cluster, so you have people with good non-mainstream opinions who are also completely crazy or depraved.

[enhanced_deficit]

Why doesn't he call himself a neoclassical Democrat?

There are democrats linked news buried in media too but making those headlines might not fit media's agenda.

http://images.gawker.com/uvi9p2abfpwgxvl5znav/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.jpg

(https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/fbi-epstein-files-say-gave-info-does-explain-sweetheart-deal/NdgitAifci1k6dJgpLV63O/) FBI Epstein files say he gave info. Does it explain sweetheart deal? (https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/fbi-epstein-files-say-gave-info-does-explain-sweetheart-deal/NdgitAifci1k6dJgpLV63O/)
Wednesday, May 30, 2018


8 days ago


Salacious trial involving Jeffrey Epstein delayed by appeals court (https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/crime--law/salacious-trial-involving-jeffrey-epstein-delayed-appeals-court/bDv87LbNCEN6Uv1qOC7EYO/)
4th District Court of Appeal issues stay in what promises to be a salacious trial involving allegations that Epstein had sex with teens.














We have found the LP's next presidential contender.:mad:


BTW, is the position of GOP base on this issue same as was during Bush/Obama years or any change ahead of crucial 2018 midterms?



Texas GOP warns gay marriage could lead to incest, pedophilia

08/07/14 01:12 PM

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/texas-gop-warns-gay-marriage-could-lead-incest-pedophilia




Related

With GOP dropping to 3rd place in California, how damaging is "President Trump and Same-Sex Marriage" report ? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?522853-With-GOP-at-3rd-place-in-Cali-how-damaging-is-quot-President-Trump-and-Same-Sex-Marriage-quot-report&)

[TheTexan]

his platform as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” candidate includes protecting gun ownership rights, establishing free trade and protecting “benevolent white supremacy,” as well as legalizing incestuous marriage and child pornography.

So, the pedo rapist is also a libertarian. Why am I not surprised.

[trey4sports]

Gary Johnson is going to get a run for his money....

[timosman]

No - an adult having sex with an innocent child is a fraudulent agreement because the child doesn't have the capacity to understand the terms of the agreement and the adult does.

Now Zippy will be thinking if he has a standing and should call a lawyer. :cool:

[Occam's Banana]

So, the pedo rapist is also a libertarian. Why am I not surprised.

Does he criticize cops, too? 'Cause that would be the depravity trifecta right there - pedo rapist, libertarian, criticizes cops.

I bet he criticizes cops ...

[Suzanimal]

I just read his manifesto.

This guy is insane.


Many drug dealers who don't consume their product are nonetheless dependent on the drug money that funds the lifestyle they have grown accustomed to. With the money they get from selling drugs, they can feed any number of non-drug-related addictions, such as to sex, gambling, 23-inch rims, etc.


An example of how feminism adversely affects black-led families may be seen in the O. J. Simpson "murder" case. Simpson was merely trying to use a reasonable amount of force to correct his wife's misbehavior, but the police intervened to stop him, in response to her 911 calls. Prohibited in this manner from keeping discipline and order in his family, Simpson had to resort to the use of a blade to end his marriage in a way that wouldn't leave him vulnerable to losing half his property and custody of his kids in divorce proceedings. In this way, Simpson protected his kids from having to be exposed to their mother's immoral behavior, and taught them by example how men have a right to respond to wives who are flagrantly disrespecting, or otherwise displeasing, them; or who have generally become more of a liability than an asset to have around.


In many marriages, the husband and wife bicker constantly because he lacks the power to use his pimp hand to put her in her place.


Another way in which guns save lives is that they give terrorists a way to kill people without using bombs.


Convicts who are too dangerous to ever be allowed gun rights after being released from prison should probably simply be euthanized


The idea is that a wealthy, dominant man with fertile, submissive women will be able to produce a large number of offspring, some of whom will have a combination of traits for high fitness. The rest can be culled.



Even Hillary Clinton's rise to the Democratic presidential nomination was preceded by her husband's, who paved the way for her. And female politicians like Maggie Thatcher and Angela Merkel had men around to advise them and tell them what to do. They're not like Adolf Hitler, who came up with his own theories and implemented them. They're not creative geniuses of that same caliber.


If there needs to be a Jewish state, then it should be in a more easily defensible location. Perhaps we could just cede the Zionists the entirety of New Jersey for the establishment of a Jewish state on the North American continent. New Jersey is a shithole by American standards, but still represents an upgrade in living conditions compared to Palestine, so letting the Jews take that state off our hands would be a win-win.


Sorry, Jews. You lost. You weren't able to achieve what we could achieve. All you can do now is give us your young Jewesses to impregnate so that maybe some of those offspring can become a new hybrid race that will be more capable than either the white or Jewish genetic lines existing in isolation from the other.


I don't even consider Barack Obama the first black President. He is, rather, the first mulatto President, or the first oreo President.



There were three TV rooms in our unit, and when I first got there, each of the three major races (Latinos, whites, and blacks) occupied one of them. That way, each TV could be devoted to programming in the language spoken by the race in question (viz., Spanish, English, or ebonics, respectively).


Essentially what had happened was that the white prisoners had lost their will to rule, and degenerated from convicts to cuckvicts.


The Filipinas know that, since their country has done everything it could to copy western ways and still hasn't risen to first world status, their only remaining hope is to improve their stock with some white genetics. Therefore, they are eager to open their legs to the white tourists to their country, in hopes of having lighter-skinned babies with some white intellectual and personality traits. These can perhaps finally be the leaders who will bring their families and their country to greatness.


Hitler went to war against Poland because he was unwilling to let Germany get cucked out of its territory in Danzig and the Polish corridor.


Many Indian business students still read Mein Kampf because they regard Hitler as a management guru. A bookstore owner in New Delhi explains, "We like Hitler because he was a Hindu. He was a vegetarian and used the Swastika as a symbol for good luck. He was one of us."


Some might argue that Hitler was not a libertarian. This is true, but Hitler probably would have adopted libertarianism if he had thought it would serve the nation's purposes.



Some might ask, "Why do we need non-whites in this country at all?" We don't really need them, but the alternative to having them around would be to have a white proletarian class fulfill the same roles in the economy that non-whites fulfill. The mentality of some white ethnicities is similar to that of certain non-white races. For example, Slavic women in many ways are as scheming as Jewesses. They have often used their beauty and intellect to attract white men and then destroyed them. They need to be kept on leashes just like any other women, to keep them out of mischief.


Far from being exploitative, forced marriage (or as we perhaps should call it, arranged marriage) furthers many worthy goals that are for the benefit of all.
Even a Muslim society's birth rate will collapse when feminism is introduced. In Afghanistan, the Taliban did not allow girls to go to school, and endorsed child marriage (or as we perhaps should call it, early marriage).


The Catholic church bans abortion and birth control as a way to help ensure the continuance of the species and of the church. When women get pregnant outside of marriage, they can either try to trap the father into marrying them (or otherwise entering into a long-term relationship with them), or give the kid up for abortion (typically to a conservative Christian couple who will raise the kid in that tradition)


While I support Roman Catholicism's goal of subordinating women as sex slaves and baby factories for their husbands, it seems that Comstock does not take patriarchal ideas to their logical conclusions to address many of the social ills about which she has expressed concern. For example, she often talks about the need to put a stop to workplace sexual harassment, including on Capitol Hill. The problem is that young, attractive women are in the workplace, where they encounter high-status men who have a natural desire to want to mate with them. It would be better if those girls got married no later than their early teens, so that they could spend their young womanhood in the marital home under the protection of their husbands. Men will often have no qualms about behaving in a sexually aggressive way toward women who are single (also known as unowned or abandoned property, since their fathers have left them to be taken by the first comer), but they will think twice about risking the consequences of trespassing on another man's property.


since getting gang-raped by a number of high-status men is a common female fantasy


One might argue, women should have freedom to choose their own mates (rather than have the choice made for them by their fathers) and then leave them, if they feel unhappy in the relationship. One of the first legal reforms that feminists typically try to make in a patriarchist country is to permit women to file for divorce. The problem with this is that it allows women to perpetrate fraud, in which they break the marital contract which obligates them to stay with their husbands and raise their kids together. Fraud is an initiation of force; it is a violation of the nonaggression principle. And it leads to other forms of aggression, as the fatherless sons are more likely to become criminals themselves. When a man's wife attempts to leave and take the children with her, he has a right to use retaliatory force in defense of his rights, so that he can preserve the family unit.


I am for legalization of child pornography possession and distribution, because important truths about the human condition, and human sexuality in particular, might be revealed in this art form. This is especially true given that child porn tends to be created by amateurs who have a relationship, such as a familial tie, with each other. The Vicky series would be an example of this. (Although some in the alt-right might claim that incest is a degeneracy that Jewish leftists are trying to promote, in reality, Jewish feminist psychiatrists such as Judith Lewis Herman, author of Father-Daughter Incest, crusaded against letting fathers have power to do as they wished with their daughters.) The Justice Department even admits that child porn "images may depict children that appear complacent." Leftists used child pornography laws as a tool to try to destroy Kevin Alfred Strom's career and reputation, and a 2012 U.S. Sentencing Commission study found that 89.9 percent of those convicted of child pornography possession are white, so it does seem like these laws are being used to target white America for persecution.


Although "incel" literally means "involuntarily celibate," the incel movement also contains some men who could get sex but remain voluntarily celibate because they don't like the idea that the high marriageable age gives Chad the droit du seigneur over the girls they would like to have. As Jim's Blog notes, "ninety percent of men never get to pop a virgin. Every man, except for a rather small handful of men, are getting sloppy seconds."


Boylovers claim in "The Parable of the Automobile" that man-boy sex is only harmful because society prohibits it. This is a hypothesis that perhaps should be tested in one of our laboratories of democracy.


Legalizing barbiturates, heavy machine guns, etc. makes available reliable and peaceful means of suicide for those who need them. Who commits suicide with a heavy machine gun?:confused:

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

I just read his manifesto.

This guy is insane.

Hmm. I think I'm changing my mind, This guy is either a Fed or a very committed troll.

[timosman]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KguLrvJj8gM

[parocks]

I just read his manifesto.

This guy is insane.





















































Who commits suicide with a heavy machine gun?:confused:

This candidate used the word "Chad". This means that the candidate spends time at 4 chan, or 8 chan or any other chan. The candidate is enjoying himself. There might be lulz in it for him.

[parocks]

Yeah, this guy is a 4 Chan /pol/ candidate.

Incel, Chad, Hitler.

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/catalog

Over on 4chan/pol they use the word "unironically" a lot. And they use that term a lot to distinguish from everyone else, who is speaking ironically. They don't like Hitler there, they say they do, because they know it pissed people off, and what they get lulz from, is pissing people off.

If you get the 4chan mindset, it's easy to see how a bunch of people, for the lulz, got together and came up with some 4channish stuff.

See also Patrick Little, who is pushing hard against Jews and is putting "no more money for Israel, give that money we would've given to Israel to the blacks because reparations." That's not quite 4channish boilerplate, but it's close and 4chan loves Patrick Little right now. Little is running for US Senate in California against Feinstein.

[Brian4Liberty]

Hmm. I think I'm changing my mind, This guy is either a Fed or a very committed troll.

Yeah, looks that way. Funny thing that he is false flagging as a "libertarian". That would tend to mean that he is actually opposed to libertarianism, and is some sort of statist with an agenda. Or a demented troll. In the infamous words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference at this point does it make?"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuW_7sktdBc

[timosman]

Yeah, looks that way. Funny thing that he is false flagging as a "libertarian". That would tend to mean that he is actually opposed to libertarianism, and is some sort of statist with an agenda. Or a demented troll. In the infamous words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference at this point does it make?"

A big difference. FF would mean the government is out of control.

[fisharmor]

In the infamous words of Hillary Clinton, "what difference at this point does it make?"

That's a really good question.
Right now, it doesn't matter at all.

Nobody cares about libertarianism - least of all the LP.
The Ron Paul movement ended exactly six years ago this Wednesday.
It was killed, and nobody has picked up the pieces and tried to make something of it.
The LP has gone out of its way to spurn liberty principles.

It doesn't matter if they poison the word 'libertarian'. We sure as hell aren't using it.

[nikcers]

That's a really good question.
Right now, it doesn't matter at all.

Nobody cares about libertarianism - least of all the LP.
The Ron Paul movement ended exactly six years ago this Wednesday.
It was killed, and nobody has picked up the pieces and tried to make something of it.
The LP has gone out of its way to spurn liberty principles.

It doesn't matter if they poison the word 'libertarian'. We sure as hell aren't using it.
The Ron Paul movement ended six years ago when it died, but it hasn't had its second death yet.

[Brian4Liberty]

A big difference. FF would mean the government is out of control.

In my use of the term "false flag", it doesn't have to be an official government employee. Could be anyone who wants to make someone or some group look bad.

And it doesn't matter, serious or troll, he gets the boot.

[timosman]

In my use of the term "false flag", it doesn't have to be an official government employee. Could be anyone who wants to make someone or some group look bad.

And it doesn't matter, serious or troll, he gets the boot.

This shows how weak the party is.

[nikcers]

In my use of the term "false flag", it doesn't have to be an official government employee. Could be anyone who wants to make someone or some group look bad.

And it desn't matter, serious or troll, he gets the boot.
This is my favorite conspiracy because I think there are some real libertarians out there that do a good enough job at discrediting the libertarian platform and party, its just super obvious when they create headlines and narratives to push the idea it becomes almost entertaining because it makes me almost think that they are doing it out of fear. Like when they put that million dollar political ad against Rand Paul the day he announced he was running for president. That to me was a sign that he was a threat and therefore making progress. The fact that Trump was tweeting out that Ron Paul has good ideas meant that he wanted Ron Paul people to vote for him, he wouldn't campaign on Ron Paul's ideas if they weren't popular.

[Pauls' Revere]

Isn't this how Rome collapsed?