PDA

View Full Version : America's Newest Nuclear-Powered Aircraft Carrier Suffers Breakdown At Sea




Swordsmyth
05-11-2018, 05:52 PM
A significant manufacturing error on the U.S. Navy’s newest multi-billion dollar nuclear-powered aircraft carrier abruptly ended the vessel’s shakedown cruise at the beginning of this year, Bloomberg reports (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-08/carrier-suffers-new-failure-at-sea-as-u-s-navy-seeks-more-funds).
In January, the $12.9 billion USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) aircraft carrier experienced a propulsion system failure, during a period of intense performance tests. The shakedown cruise simulates working conditions for the vessel, which is typical for new ships. According to an internal Navy memo obtained by Bloomberg, the ship’s crew noticed a temperature increase of “92 degrees Fahrenheit above the trust bearing temperature setpoint.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/gettyimages-666333580-1525807056-600x379.jpg
A thrust bearing is a critical component of the propulsion system of a vessel. It transfers the propulsive energy from the propeller to the ship’s hull, allowing the propeller to push the boat forward. According to the memo, “after securing the equipment to prevent damage, the ship safely returned to port.”
In other words, the +90,000 ton, nuclear-powered vessel experienced a catastrophic failure of its propulsion system. Luckily, the failure occurred on a shakedown cruise and not in enemy waters, because, the ship would have been a sitting duck. The memo said “prevent damage,” that is an indication that engineers advised the captain to shut off the propeller that was connected to the malfunctioning thrust block. This would have resulted in a tremendous reduction of speed as the vessel returned to port.


Interesting enough, the breakdown occurred in Janurary, but recently disclosed after Bloomberg uncovered an internal memo from Naval Sea Systems Command.

“Navy officials didn’t disclose the problem during budget hearings before Congress in recent weeks and House and Senate lawmakers didn’t ask about it,” Bloomberg observed.
According to the memo, Huntington Ingalls, the shipbuilding company responsible for manufacturing USS Gerald R. Ford, expressed to the Navy that the propulsion system breakdown was triggered by a “manufacturing defect” and “not an improper operation” by the crew aboard the ship. Huntington Ingalls declined to state who was responsible for the defective thrust bearing, but Bloomberg noted that an inspection of the parts inside the affected thrust block show that poorly machined gears were manufactured at GE’s facility in Lynn, Massachusetts as the “root cause.”

There is a reason why the Navy has kept this failure a secret for many months — because it is a complete embarrassment. If the Navy went out of their way to hide this failure, what else are they hiding from taxpayers?

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-11/sos-americas-newest-nuclear-powered-aircraft-carrier-suffers-breakdown-sea

Raginfridus
05-11-2018, 05:59 PM
What do we do men? America is not looking great...

Anti Federalist
05-11-2018, 06:02 PM
Meh, this kind of shit is to be expected on a "shakedown" cruise.

And with fours shafts and wheels, they'd hardly be disabled if they lost one shaft thrust bearing.

That said, do we really need another 15 billion dollar aircraft carrier?

Danke
05-11-2018, 06:05 PM
Meh, this kind of shit is to be expected on a "shakedown" cruise.


Yas, I was gonna post something along those lines. New shit always has a few bugs to work out.

asurfaholic
05-11-2018, 08:55 PM
I’m just surprised the captains haven’t crashed it into a slow moving object in a wide open sea yet.

TheTexan
05-11-2018, 09:02 PM
That said, do we really need another 15 billion dollar aircraft carrier?

Sounds like what we need, is a 16 billion dollar aircraft carrier

phill4paul
05-11-2018, 09:04 PM
Meh, this kind of shit is to be expected on a "shakedown" cruise.

And with fours shafts and wheels, they'd hardly be disabled if they lost one shaft thrust bearing.

That said, do we really need another 15 billion dollar aircraft carrier?

Where was the bearing manufactured?

TheCount
05-11-2018, 11:03 PM
Sounds like we need to give the DoD even more money. That's how government problems are solved, right?

Swordsmyth
05-11-2018, 11:13 PM
Where was the bearing manufactured?

Huntington Ingalls declined to state who was responsible for the defective thrust bearing, but Bloomberg noted that an inspection of the parts inside the affected thrust block show that poorly machined gears were manufactured at GE’s facility in Lynn, Massachusetts as the “root cause.”

nobody's_hero
05-12-2018, 02:38 PM
Meh, this kind of $#@! is to be expected on a "shakedown" cruise.

And with fours shafts and wheels, they'd hardly be disabled if they lost one shaft thrust bearing.

That said, do we really need another 15 billion dollar aircraft carrier?

They're extremely effective against jihadists hiding in alleyways. Same with nuclear submarines. We need more to confront these people with camels, AK-47s and IEDs. We cannot allow them to gain technological superiority.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
05-12-2018, 03:00 PM
Sounds like we need to give the DoD even more money. That's how government problems are solved, right?


Yes; at least according to your progressive quote (in my signature line). You said, "I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will."

TheCount
05-12-2018, 03:11 PM
Yes; at least according to your progressive quote (in my signature line). You said, "I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will."

Your reading comprehension is as good as ever. Luckily, anyone can click on the link and see just how stupid it is to reference that line as being a 'progressive quote' or advocating larger government.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
05-12-2018, 04:41 PM
Your reading comprehension is as good as ever. Luckily, anyone can click on the link and see just how stupid it is to reference that line as being a 'progressive quote' or advocating larger government.


Your spin is as good as ever, "supporting member." Luckily, anyone can click on that link and the rest of your fakery and know that you are a big gov supporter. You are pure comedy gold!

Swordsmyth
05-31-2018, 03:16 PM
Brand-new Navy aircraft carrier and floating catastrophe USS Gerald R. Ford was forced to return to Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia after encountering issues with its propulsion train, Navy Times reports (https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/05/23/why-the-navys-newest-aircraft-carrier-was-forced-back-into-port/) — the second critical failure in the propulsion system to roil (https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/129-billion-warship-upgrades-fixes-55435687) the next-generation supercarrier, after a previously undisclosed failure was initially discovered months ago.


-The engines don’t work. Well, sort of: According to Navy Times, problems “reside in the mechanical components associated in turning steam created by the nuclear plant into spinning screws that power the ship through the water,” although Naval Sea Systems Command spokesman Bill Couch asserted that the new problem was different from an earlier problem identified (https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/129-billion-warship-upgrades-fixes-55435687) by the crew in January and publicly disclosed this month. NAVSEA told (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-08/carrier-suffers-new-failure-at-sea-as-u-s-navy-seeks-more-funds) Bloomberg that shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls identified (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-08/carrier-suffers-new-failure-at-sea-as-u-s-navy-seeks-more-funds) the issue as a “manufacturing defect” rather than an overall design flaw.


-This is what testing is supposed to accomplish. Sure, the headlines sound bad, (https://taskandpurpose.com/uss-kitty-hawk-navy-trump/) but naval warfare reporter Chris Cavas rightfully points out that these errors turn up all the time in pre-service shakedown; indeed, the Associated Press notes that the Ford was expected to steam to the Newport News in July to fix any existing technical issues, of which there are many (https://taskandpurpose.com/uss-gerald-ford-navy-problems/).“Ford has been tasked with conducting critical test and evaluation operations that identify construction and design issues,” NAVSEA spokesman Colleen O’Rourke told (https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/05/23/why-the-navys-newest-aircraft-carrier-was-forced-back-into-port/) Navy Times. “As a continuation of that testing and evaluation process, Ford got underway to conduct an independent steaming event that would allow the ship and its crew to continue testing its systems and procedures.”


-Yet another issue… News of the Ford’s propulsion issues comes months after an intensive assessment, (http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2017/) conducted by the Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and published in January, revealed a slew of technical problems plaguing the Pentagon’s first new carrier design in nearly four decades. Those problems included “poor or unknown reliability” among critical systems and, most embarrassingly (https://taskandpurpose.com/trump-uss-gerald-ford-catapult/), inconsistencies with that brand-new “digital” Electromagnetic Aircraft Launching System (EMALS) that President Donald Trump railed against (https://taskandpurpose.com/trump-uss-gerald-ford-catapult/) last year.


-… and bad timing: Even if the Ford’s myriad issues are worked out through the Navy’s standard testing evaluation protocol, news of the propulsion issues couldn’t have emerged at a worse time for the service. NAVSEA announced (http://www.janes.com/article/80055/carrier-uss-gerald-r-ford-cost-rises) on May 11 that the Navy would have to shell out an additional $120 million for the carrier, bringing (http://www.janes.com/article/80055/carrier-uss-gerald-r-ford-cost-rises) its total cost to around $13.03 billion — well above the $12.9 billion cap set by Congress back in April. It doesn’t help that the Navy is currently pushing (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-08/carrier-suffers-new-failure-at-sea-as-u-s-navy-seeks-more-funds) lawmakers to expedite the purchase of a fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-navys-brand-new-aircraft-carrier-has-yet-another-major-26044

TheCount
05-31-2018, 04:15 PM
We need to put tariffs on foreign supercarriers to solve this national security issue.

Swordsmyth
05-31-2018, 04:24 PM
We need to put tariffs on foreign supercarriers to solve this national security issue.

That is the most sensible thing you have said in a long time.