Democratic Party files suit alleging conspiracy by Trump campaign, Russia, WikiLeaks

[Swordsmyth]

The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in Donald Trump's favor.
Calling it an “all-out assault on our democracy,” the Democratic National Committee filed the civil suit in federal district court in Manhattan. The suit amounts to another legal broadside related to the 2016 race, on top of the special counsel's ongoing Russia probe and the FBI raid on Trump's personal attorney last week.
"The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency," the suit states.
It claims that Trump campaign officials worked in tandem with the Russian government and its military spy agency to bring down Hillary Clinton by hacking into the computer networks of the DNC and spreading stolen material.
“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” said DNC Chairman Tom Perez in a statement, calling the alleged collusion “an act of unprecedented treachery.”

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/democratic-party-files-federal-lawsuit-alleging-conspiracy-by-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-to-disrupt-2016-presidential-election.html



Discovery for the defense should be interesting.

[Brian4Liberty]

Grasping at straws now.

[dannno]

Lol, probably not their best decision...

[timosman]

Hail Mary pass :cool:

[spudea]

the suit gives no allusion to physical evidence or depositions, but supports its claims with links to "reputable" news stories including Fox News! Ask a liberal you know if Fox News is credible, then say they are referenced in this suit, so is the suit credible?

[FSP-Rebel]

Hail Mary pass :cool:

Lulz

[angelatc]

I hope they spend millions of dollars on lawyers working on this.

[dannno]

I hope they spend millions of dollars on lawyers working on this.

They should definitely work on retainer..

[oyarde]

If you know any dems let them know the money they donate is being used to sue the russians .

[Swordsmyth]

Blue Ebb Tide.

[angelatc]

If you know any dems let them know the money they donate is being used to sue the russians .
Zippyjuan, Listen to Uncle Oyarde.

[milgram]

987461629305536512

[timosman]

Blue Ebb Tide.

https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/1600x900/51869-Warren-Buffett-Quote-You-never-know-who-s-swimming-naked-until-the.jpg

[timosman]

987470932989050881

[Swordsmyth]

987470932989050881

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FEsuAnPH mEej4I%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1

[Swordsmyth]

The Democrats are suing @WikiLeaks (https://twitter.com/wikileaks) and @JulianAssange (https://twitter.com/JulianAssange) for revealing how the DNC rigged the Democratic primaries. Help us counter-sue. We've never lost a publishing case and discovery is going to be amazing fun: https://www.iamwikileaks.org/donate/ (https://www.iamwikileaks.org/donate/) More options: https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate (https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate)

3:13 PM - 20 Apr 2018

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/987454233862705152

[Dr.3D]

There they go again, throwing around that word, "democracy" like it's something we should have.

Nowhere in the Constitution is that word even mentioned.

[timosman]

There they go again, throwing around that word, "democracy" like it's something we should have.

Nowhere in the Constitution is that word even mentioned.

This is a battle call for the ignorant. ;)

[Dr.3D]

This is a battle call for the ignorant. ;)
Heck, they even have the so called 'conservative news' using that stupid word.

[goldenequity]

Senor Trump is right... this suit opens 'discovery'. hahaha

my guess?
This ill advised 'suit' was/is introduced 'solely' for the 2018 mid-term as a 'talking point'... a campaign strategy.
It will be slo-footed at every opportunity in the courts (by the Dems)...
and hammered 'nightly' by the MSMs.

It will be 'dropped' after the elections.

[dannno]

Senor Trump is right... this suit opens 'discovery'. hahaha

my guess?
This ill advised 'suit' was/is introduced 'solely' for the 2018 mid-term as a 'talking point'... a campaign strategy.
It will be slo-footed at every opportunity in the courts (by the Dems)...
and hammered 'nightly' by the MSMs.

It will be 'dropped' after the elections.

Will the judge be another close personal friend of George Soros :confused:

[thoughtomator]

It will go to a Deep State judge and another fresh set of scandalous behavior by political actors betraying the public trust will ensue.

[goldenequity]

Senor Trump is right... this suit opens 'discovery'. hahaha

my guess?
This ill advised 'suit' was/is introduced 'solely' for the 2018 mid-term as a 'talking point'... a campaign strategy.
It will be slo-footed at every opportunity in the courts (by the Dems)...
and hammered 'nightly' by the MSMs.

It will be 'dropped' after the elections.

apparently it's not a novel thought :rolleyes:

987494159748685824

[enhanced_deficit]

Democratic Party files suit alleging conspiracy by Trump campaign, Russia, WikiLeaks

The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in Donald Trump's favor.


This is controversial at many levels and crosses so many lines. Going after elders/nation states is one thing but they have even sued son and widey respected son-in-law of a sitting POTUS right in the middle of his mideast peace mission:


https://gdb.voanews.com/B27B9736-1880-4D58-B0BA-8556BB1C4021_w1023_r1_s.jpg






Fox news in probably in hurry mised their names. Even if Dems are looking to create a contigency venue to keep this affair in headlines if Mueller is fired on Giuliani advise, bringing children and in laws into this will create too much of a media distraction for POTUS trying to serve people the best way he knows how to.

[nobody's_hero]

I feel like the lawsuit should be heard by a 3rd party, outside of our legal/political system, and I think it would be hilarious if the Russians were asked to mediate.

[Brian4Liberty]

I hope they spend millions of dollars on lawyers working on this.

They'll have GoFundMe for legal fees. Pocket change to the big donors, but they would also get a bunch of poor, ignorant people.

[Brian4Liberty]

Senor Trump is right... this suit opens 'discovery'. hahaha

my guess?
This ill advised 'suit' was/is introduced 'solely' for the 2018 mid-term as a 'talking point'... a campaign strategy.
It will be slo-footed at every opportunity in the courts (by the Dems)...
and hammered 'nightly' by the MSMs.

It will be 'dropped' after the elections.

Probably.


Will the judge be another close personal friend of George Soros :confused:


It will go to a Deep State judge and another fresh set of scandalous behavior by political actors betraying the public trust will ensue.

But they may have a chance with the corrupt legal system.

[Pauls' Revere]

If you know any dems let them know the money they donate is being used to sue the russians .

No, let them donate and waste it away in the hopes the party goes bankrupt. :D

[TheCount]

I hope they spend millions of dollars on lawyers working on this.
They're probably betting on it causing more media talk on the issue / party / election in general than they could buy with the same amount of money.

[enhanced_deficit]

Democrats sue Trumps, Kushner and Russia over election hacking
Apr 20, 2018


Defense has also been beefed up with widely celeberated legal eagle Giuliani.

"Nothing wrong with surrounding yourself with the best.
To give credit where due, new addition also seems well connected and seems more competent than Michael Cohen:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDY4tSibYpo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDY4tSibYpo
"

A year and half after the elections, this suit could be political posturing ahead of midterms to inflict political damage. Timing is bit peculiar, the suit is filed just days after Trump's personal lawyer was raided by FBI. Is it possibe DNC and Stormy Daniel's lawyer (allegedly ex Dem operative) are colluding/tag-teaming here and DNC opportunsitcally trying to capitalize on new evidence that may have been collected in other cases?


Stormy Daniels lawyer predicts Trump deposition, says they’ve found his ‘Achilles heel’

By Luis Sanchez - 04/21/18

Stormy Daniels’s lawyers told “Real Time” host Bill Maher on Friday that he has found President Trump’s “Achilles' heel” and predicts he can get Trump and Michael Cohen to appear for a deposition.

“I think we are going to get an opportunity to depose Michael Cohen and the president within the next 60 to 90 days and ... I truly believe this is the Achilles' heel of the president,” Avenatti said about the president and his personal lawyer. “He has trusted a moron with his innermost secrets."

“The problem is he has surrounded himself in his adult life with people that are incompetent and the chickens are going to come home to roost,” Avenatti added.

Maher said that even if Trump gets a deposition, he might not show up to court and trigger a constitutional crisis.
Avenatti predicted the president would show up to court, but argued that it might not matter since he thinks Cohen will end up telling the court everything he knows about the president.
“Michael Cohen knows where almost all the bodies are buried and I think he is going to sing like a canary,” Avenatti said. “I know he is going to fold.”
“When you have a fixer, you need two things, at least. You need a guy who is tough and you need a guy that is smart,” Avenatti said. “This guy is neither tough nor smart.”


http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/384256-stormy-daniels-lawyer-predicts-trump-deposition-says-theyve-found-his

[AZJoe]

987454233862705152

[AZJoe]

So the DNC is upset that Wikileaks exposes its rigging of the primary, rigging of debates, and lying to voters. I guess the DNC thinks it has a right to cheat, rig and lie without any pesky press exposing its fraudulent dirty deeds:

" WikiLeaks has hit back (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-22/wikileaks-countersue-democrats-discovery-going-be-amazing-fun)against a multimillion-dollar lawsuit filed by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), … seeking donations for a counter-suit, noting "We've never lost a publishing case and discovery is going to be amazing fun," …

The DNC suit has drawn criticism from prominent Democrats who would like to restore dignity to the party - such as Claire McCaskill (MO), Jackie Speier (CA) and former Obama White House adviser and CNN commentator David Axelrod … Despite the fact that the DNC's bank account is running on empty (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-21/broke-and-bleeding-cash-dnc-ends-june-33-million-debt), Perez says that the party "can't afford not to" pursue the lawsuit. ..."

[AZJoe]

Get this: The DNC's theory of a claim against Wikileaks Press is that its rigging of primaries, rigging of debates, cheating, and lying to voters are "trade secrets". By taking the position the disclosed material are "trade secrets", the DNC is now also finally confirming that the material leaked by Wikileaks is genuine.

987846162924408832

988414622012198913

The DNC's theory should fail as a matter of law for multiple reasons:
A) the DNC is not a business; to be a "trade secret" it must be used in business;
B) trade secret must have "economic value";
C) fraudulent practices are not practices unknown to the public or competitors;
D) Wikileaks is not bound by any confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement with the DNC;
E) the DNC is both a political entity, and its fraudulent misdeeds are a matter of public concern, both of which makes Wikileaks' reporting of the crooked deeds protected by the first amendment;

By the DNC's looney theory , the WaPo should have been liable to Nixon and the break -in crew for exposing their crooked "trade secret" practices and cover up.

[AZJoe]

From the Intercept:

The DNC’S Lawsuit Against WikiLeaks Poses a Serious Threat to Press Freedom (https://theintercept.com/2018/04/20/the-dncs-lawsuit-against-wikileaks-poses-a-serious-threat-to-press-freedom/)

THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (DNC) filed a lawsuit (http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/the-dncs-lawsuit-against-the-russian-government-trump-campaign-and-wikileaks/2302/) this afternoon in a Manhattan federal court against the Russian Government, the Trump campaign and … WikiLeaks …

The DNC’s suit, as it pertains to WikiLeaks, poses a grave threat to press freedom. ...

It is extremely common for media outlets to publish or report on materials that are stolen, hacked, or otherwise obtained … New York Times … published parts of [Trump’s tax return] (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html) even though it is illegal to disclose someone’s tax returns (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-tax-returns-legal-precedent.html) without the taxpayer’s permission; … MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow did the same thing (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/14/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html) with Trump’s 2005 tax returns. …

In April, 2016, the Washington Post obtained and published a confidential internal memo (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/04/internal-memo-reveals-trump-campaigns-mounting-fury-with-its-critics/?utm_term=.9d8732195a0b) from the Trump campaign. Media outlets constantly publish private companies’ internal documents (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/apple-warns-employees-to-stop-leaking-information-to-media). Just three weeks ago, BuzzFeed obtained and published a secret Facebook memo (https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanmac/growth-at-any-cost-top-facebook-executive-defended-data?utm_term=.gnElod4Prl#.nkjqZYwWnq) outlining the company’s internal business strategies …

Some of the most important stories in contemporary journalism have come from media outlets obtaining and publishing materials that were taken without authorization or even in violation of the law. … Pentagon Papers after Daniel Ellsberg took them without authorization from the Pentagon – and they won the right to publish them (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/20/us/pentagon-papers-post.html) in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Guardian and the Washington Post won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for publishing and reporting on huge numbers of top secret documents taken by Edward Snowden from the NSA. The Guardian, the New York Times, and numerous papers from around the world broke multiple stories by publishing classified classified documents downloaded by Chelsea Manning (https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/world/middleeast/23intro.html) … In 2016, more than 100 newspapers from around the world published and reported on millions of private financial documents (http://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/articles/56febff0a1bb8d3c3495adf4/) known as the “Panama Papers,” which were taken without authorization … [

the DNC lawsuit seeks to … turn a core part of journalism into something illegal. … the DNC’s lawsuit – just like the attempts of the Obama and Trump DOJ to criminalize and prosecute whistleblowing (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/30/opinion/sunday/if-donald-trump-targets-journalists-thank-obama.html) under the Espionage Act – is an actual, grave threat to those press freedoms. …

Nor does it matter at all whether one views WikiLeaks as “real journalists” – whatever that might mean. The First Amendment’s guarantee of a free press is not just for media corporations … but rather operates to protect an activity when engaged in by anyone. It protects (https://gigaom.com/2014/01/19/on-free-speech-and-blogging-the-first-amendment-applies-to-everyone-not-just-journalists/)everyone (https://gigaom.com/2014/01/19/on-free-speech-and-blogging-the-first-amendment-applies-to-everyone-not-just-journalists/) who wishes to publish information that informs the public on matters of public interest. …

WikiLeaks’ publications … informed the public about matters legitimately in the public interest. That’s why literally every major media outlet reported on their contents (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/20/13308108/wikileaks-podesta-hillary-clinton), why those documents forced the resignation of five top DNC officials (https://theintercept.com/2017/04/14/trumps-cia-director-pompeo-targeting-wikileaks-explicitly-threatens-speech-and-press-freedoms/) and the firing of a CNN commentator (http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/31/media/donna-brazile-cnn-resignation/index.html), …

The DNC, unfortunately, is not nearly as wise, nor nearly as worried about destroying press freedom in the U.S. The theory it embraced today to sue WikiLeaks for publishing documents is a far more serious menace than any of Donald Trump’s insulting tweets about Chuck Todd. It deserves condemnation and scorn by anyone who actually cares about press freedom.

[AZJoe]

Great Quote from Caitlin Johnstone (https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2018/04/21/trump-scores-major-north-korea-points-dems-sue-wikileaks-for-telling-the-truth/):

The Democratic party suing WikiLeaks for costing them the election is like an armed robbery convict suing a security camera company for getting him arrested. The emails it published are 100 percent authentic and entirely undisputed, and they consist of nothing other than Democratic party big wigs talking to one another.

The documents published by WikiLeaks in 2016 showed an unquestionable violation of the DNC’s Impartiality Clause (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2989759-Impartiality-Clause-DNC-Charter-Bylaws-Art-5-Sec-4.html) in the “us vs them” tone of the conversations in the more egregious DNC leaks (http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/wikileaks-emails-clinton-bernie-list-directory-photos-most-damaging-worst-rhode-island-delegate-fec-jvf/), the Podesta emails (http://observer.com/2016/11/wikileaks-clinton-camp-rigging-primaries-as-early-as-2014/) showing that the DNC and the Clinton camp were colluding as early as 2014 to schedule debates and primaries in a way that favored her, and then-DNC Vice Chairwoman Donna Brazile acting as a mole (https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/785573145700892673) against the Sanders campaign and passing Clinton questions (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/17/brazile-admits-forwarded-debate-questions-to-clinton-camp.html) in advance to prep her for debates with Sanders. It also revealed more broadly incriminating facts about the Democratic party in general, including the Clintons taking bribes from Qatar (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/13/wikileaks-emails-reveal-bill-clintons-1m-birthday-/) and Morocco (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-morocco-wikileaks/505043/) and knowingly accepting funds (http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/11/04/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-knew-saudi-qatar-were-funding-isis-but-still-took-their-money-for-foundation/) from political bodies that arm ISIS, an email showing how a CitiGroup executive (https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton) was responsible for selecting Obama’s acceptable cabinet picks, and Clinton’s infamous “public position and a private position (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927)” statement.

Contrary to what their lawsuit claims, Democrats didn’t lose massively in 2016 because of a secret conspiracy between Russia, WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign to rob them of their rightful place on the throne, they lost massively in 2016 because people found out the truth about what the party is and how it operates. …

The Democratic party has proven beyond all doubt that it has no interest in serving the American people and at this point exists only to protect the tiny empires of its leaders. …

[jmdrake]

Why don't we do a moneybomb to raise funds to file a lawsuit on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters for Hillary stealing the nomination from him? I'd gladly pitch in for that. It would be worth it just for the chuckles.


Fictionalized account of Bill Gates arguing with Steve Jobs.

"Bill Gates: You and I are like guys that had this rich neighbor Xerox. And they just left the door open. And you went in to steal the TV set. Only you realize I got there first. I GOT THE LOOT STEVE! And you're yelling? That's not fair? I wanted to try to steal it first! You're too late.

Steve Jobs: We're better than you are! We have better stuff.

Bill Gates: You don't get it Steve. That doesn't matter."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFcb-XF1RPQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQocN_c2uLI

[timosman]

Why don't we do a moneybomb to raise funds to file a lawsuit on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters for Hillary stealing the nomination from him? I'd gladly pitch in for that. It would be worth it just for the chuckles.


Fictionalized account of Bill Gates arguing with Steve Jobs.

"Bill Gates: You and I are like guys that had this rich neighbor Xerox. And they just left the door open. And you went in to steal the TV set. Only you realize I got there first. I GOT THE LOOT STEVE! And you're yelling? That's not fair? I wanted to try to steal it first! You're too late.

Steve Jobs: We're better than you are! We have better stuff.

Bill Gates: You don't get it Steve. That doesn't matter."

What matters is having mom on the board of IBM.:cool:

[Anti Globalist]

And the witch hunt continues.

[Jamesiv1]

Reportedly, Putin is very troubled about this and rightly so.

http://www.prestongroup.org/stuff/putin02.jpg

http://www.prestongroup.org/stuff/putin01.jpg

[Swordsmyth]

Many have suggested the lawsuit is a tactical error by the DNC, as it may expose or confirm claims against the organization - such as whether they rigged the primary against Bernie Sanders, the level of coordination between the DNC and the Clinton Campaign, and the details surrounding the funding of the "Steele dossier," paid for in part by both the Clinton campaign and the DNC.
The defendants - from President Trump, to Wikileaks - and now Roger Stone - are excited at the prospect of examining the DNC servers which cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike determined were victims of Russian hacking in advance of the 2016 elections. Notably, the DNC would not allow the FBI or anyone else to inspect said servers.
To that end, Stone's attorneys have slapped the DNC with a notification to preserve evidence related to the case with a "standard pre-discovery notice." Discovery is a pre-trial process by which one party can obtain evidence from the opposing party relevant to the case.

My lawyers and I will demand to examine the DNC’s servers and expose them to real forensic analysis, not merely accepting the claims of the DNC’s paid contractor, to finally extinguish this bogus Russian hacking claim, once and for all. My lawyers have served the DNC with standard pre-discovery notice directing the DNC of their obligation under law to preserve all possible evidence, including their servers, for ultimate inspection and exposure to critical review. As Julian Assange wrote on Twitter, via the WikiLeaks feed, “Discovery is going to be fun.” -Roger Stone (https://stonecoldtruth.com/why-the-dnc-lawsuit-will-backfire/)
Stone notes that "Former CIA experts like Bill Binney and Ray McGovern examined the basic data available about the copying of DNC data and concluded that there is more forensic evidence that the material was downloaded to a portable drive, meaning it had to be someone with physical access to DNC computers."
"Having made their computer systems the subject matter of multi-million dollar demands for judicial relief, the DNC has now exposed them to the discovery process," writes Stone.

Stone writes (https://stonecoldtruth.com/why-the-dnc-lawsuit-will-backfire/) that at the end of the day "Let’s not forget that at the heart of this Democrat lawsuit is their core claim that the exposure of genuine documents created by the hands of their own top officials, revealing to the American people the horrible truth about the how ruthless and cynical the Democrats, Hillary Clinton and her henchpeople really are, is considered BY THEM to be so damaging that it effectively torpedoed the Democrat party’s multi-billion-dollar efforts to install the single most sleazy corrupt brazen criminal to seek the presidency since Lyndon Baines Johnson."

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-24/democrats-slapped-demand-preserve-evidence-roger-stone-goes-after-dnc-servers

[Swordsmyth]

From the ZH comment section:

DesertRat1958 (https://www.zerohedge.com/users/desertrat1958) Tue, 04/24/2018 - 19:28 Permalink (https://www.zerohedge.com/comment/11565594#comment-11565594) One other thought. Now that the Russians have been named as co-conspirators, they would legally be allowed to share evidence. I might be interesting, in order to extricate themselves from “time out”, to see what starts to appear form the various attorneys in defense of the suit. In the words of Jack Reacher “Remember you ask for this.”.

[TheCount]

From the ZH comment section:

DesertRat1958 (https://www.zerohedge.com/users/desertrat1958) Tue, 04/24/2018 - 19:28 Permalink (https://www.zerohedge.com/comment/11565594#comment-11565594) One other thought. Now that the Russians have been named as co-conspirators, they would legally be allowed to share evidence. I might be interesting, in order to extricate themselves from “time out”, to see what starts to appear form the various attorneys in defense of the suit. In the words of Jack Reacher “Remember you ask for this.”.
Zerohedge comments, the only source of information on the planet less accurate than Qanon.

[Swordsmyth]

Just so you know what the Demoncrats think voters are:


The DNC alleges in the complaint that these defendants violated a multitude of laws, from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to the State of Virginia’s common law prohibiting ‘Conspiracy to Commit Trespass to Chattels’.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-24/latest-ridiculous-lawsuit-sue-nited-states

[osan]

The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in Donald Trump's favor.
Calling it an “all-out assault on our democracy,” the Democratic National Committee filed the civil suit in federal district court in Manhattan. The suit amounts to another legal broadside related to the 2016 race, on top of the special counsel's ongoing Russia probe and the FBI raid on Trump's personal attorney last week.
"The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency," the suit states.
It claims that Trump campaign officials worked in tandem with the Russian government and its military spy agency to bring down Hillary Clinton by hacking into the computer networks of the DNC and spreading stolen material.
“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” said DNC Chairman Tom Perez in a statement, calling the alleged collusion “an act of unprecedented treachery.”

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/democratic-party-files-federal-lawsuit-alleging-conspiracy-by-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-to-disrupt-2016-presidential-election.html



Discovery for the defense should be interesting.

Sounds like the Ds are in full-desperation mode.

Trump has been actively investigated by Mueller for what, nearly a year - still nothing.

This all strikes me as an attempt to skew public perception by setting the tacit "out there" subtext.

Trump may not be optimal, but the fact that he has progressives on the verge of arterial failure pleases my inner demon.

[Swordsmyth]

Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
No.139
(https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#139)
Aug 11 2018 12:12:31 (EST)

(https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/#t1534007551) These people are stupid!
https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.com
"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."
Discovery.
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/400882-wikileaks-says-senate-panel-requested-assange-testimony-in-russia-probe
Do you believe in coincidences?
We have the source.

Q