DamianTV
02-26-2018, 05:07 PM
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/censorship-youtube-and-twitter-scrub-users-who-question-florida-shooting-narrative_02262018
If those questioning the media’s “official narrative” of the events of the Florida school shooting needed any more evidence that they are on the right track, they’ve just gotten it. YouTube and Twitter are now scrubbing users who dare to question the students demanding gun control and the media’s account of the school shooting.
According to Natural News, starting a few days ago, both Twitter and YouTube began scrubbing all videos and tweets that don’t follow the “official narrative” on the Florida school shooting. Anyone who questions the wisdom of the school students-turned-propagandists (who were all probably eating Tide pods a week ago) is immediately banned and silenced with censorship. Only one side of this “debate” is allowed to exist: The side that worships the government and demands that all law-abiding Americans surrender their self-defense firearms because a group of traumatized school kids were shot at by their own lunatic classmate.
Online platforms that once hosted conversations and debates are now nothing more than crazy liberal echo chambers of cognitive illiteracy combined with demanded obedience toward the government. All of these left-wing extremist tech companies have now decided to crush the speech of their political opponents and transform the entire internet into a totalitarian bubble of barely functioning idiots who literally believe that school children should not be protected by armed citizens.
On Wednesday, Twitter Safety released a statement regarding the Parkland students. Anyone “harassing” (disagreeing with) the Parkland students demanding your disarmament will be banned. Twitter also said that they are using “anti-abuse tools to weed out malicious automation around these individuals and the topics they are raising.” According to Natural News, in other words, if you dare question or refute anything these teenagers say, you risk being banned from the platform. How dare you question the wisdom of children who didn’t know last week that eating Tide pods is dangerous, but have now decided what kind of gun laws you need to be regulated by.
...
Full article and reference material on link.
---
The Danger of Censorship is twofold:
People can be punished for disapproved expressions
People are not allowed to communicate about how to solve problems
Both are exceptionally damaging to Liberty. But lets address why. I hope everyone has some perspectives to add to a conversation on this. Now, first of all, if a person makes any expression that people in power do not want to be heard, that person can be deemed a Criminal which is their justification through rationalizations that allow all degrees of punishment for that behavior to occur. Basically, if you say "I dont believe you", that is grounds for them to kill you quite literally. Wanna talk about a slippery slope? This is more like a cliff.
Next is even more severe. When large problems do occur, people need to communicate about the problem in order to come up with a solution that works for as many people as possible. This allows the individuals and citizens to be actively involved in causing positive change for their community and society that benefits the people and not the State. Thus, it should be plainly obvious that prohibition of Free Speech by way of Censorship can ONLY benefit those in power. Cui Bono. Latin for "who benefits". Follow the money.
Thing is that Censorship gets even worse. When people get together and discuss problems peacefully, they are all able to present arguments for or against any particular topic. Censorship flat out prevents arguments from being heard. If we have a discussion about the risks of Lactose in Ice Cream (lame example) and look at the many sides, such as statements by those with Lactose Intolerance as well as the business side, you end up amassing a collection of viewpoints and perspectives that one person may not have concluded themselves. Censorship creates a bubble in which you are not allowed to think outside of. Now, given the Lactose Intolerant example, only one side would ever be heard. That would result in Ice Cream Companies having total control of the narrative and eventually they may demand that all people consume their product because it increases their profit margins and quite possibly attempting to do so by other means such as saying that Lactose Intolerance flat out does not exist and is nothing more than a myth. Or, at least claiming that Lactose Intolerance is so exceptionally rare that it poses no threat to the public. Their narrative would be supported only on one side with biased statistics that are manipulated to draw a preconceived conclusion by way of Simpson's Paradox (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDinnCwP3dg) (link to video). Counter arguments would be prohibited, and punishable. Now, try replacing Lactose Intolerance with vaccines.
Censorship is Mandatory Propaganda and Mandatory Brainwashing.
Propaganda tells people what to think by preventing people from being able to entertain both sides of the topic. This creates a "box" in which only "allowed thoughts" are tolerated, and anything that is "outside the box" to be silenced. This is nothing short of Mind Control. So why is it the Media only has one point of view on School Shootings? Their intent is to convince people to give up their guns while not demanding the protectors of the elite do the same. Once disarmed, the people will not have any meaningful way to resist demands to silence Free Speech. Once Free Speech is gone, expect to be thrown in a FEMA camp for ever having supported Ron Paul or Liberty or the Constitution.
Constitutions themselves do not stop Tyranny. Communist USSR had a Constitution and they got Stalin. Germany had a Constitution and they got Hitler. One of the first things both Stalin and Hitler did was to disarm the public. And look at what they got for it. Millions of people whose deaths were directly caused by their own governments, which had Constitutions.
Belief, Money, Violence
To have total power over a population, all three things need to powers exclusive to the rulers. Censorship is to create a Monopoly on Belief. Belief may also be thought of as Perception. This allows Manipulation. Once people believe that private citizens owning guns is too dangerous, such as School Shootings, the people willingly give up their ability to resist government Violence making them absolutely controllable. Simultaneously, we here all seem to understand that compulsory Public Education is Indoctrination, which again is the application of Monopoly of Belief. Tell students what to think, create obedient workers, and strip students of individuality, and use any student whose spirit is harmed enough by the system to break and attack the system which attacked them first. The MSM official narrative is never to address the exceptional levels of brainwashing that take place in Public Education and ALWAYS place all the blame on the Shooter themselves, who is truly nothing short of a victim of the system.
It can be said that there are two types of people in the world, those who just want to be left alone, and those who wont leave you alone. For those who just want to be left alone, they would not gain anything by attacking anyone. If they are not left alone by those that wont leave others alone, then a few very well may attack. If the people would have conducted an attack on anyone for any reason, then they are not the type of person who just wants to be left alone in the first place.
The MSM will also continue to push another agenda, more psychological screenings of ALL children. Reason for this is that it lines the coffers of Big Pharma, whose drugs are used to sedate and incapacitate children with any potential of becoming anything but what the State wants them to be. Its a standard Brainwashing technique. If a person is able to resist the psychological means of replacing the natural identity with the assigned identity of an obedient worker, then Drugs are used to disable that persons defenses.
Discussions such as this will NEVER take place when Censorship is carried out by governments. I have already heard plenty of arguments about Google having full authority over what kind of videos will be censored because Private Property. I can understand that to a reasonable degree, so my reaction is definitely mixed. However, take it to the next step. Not when its just Google and Fedbook and Apple and Microsoft and Amazon censor everything in opposition to the official narrative, but the next step is when ALL COMMUNICATION is mandated by your government on EVERY PLATFORM, even private verbal in person forms, to only support the official narrative. You may NOT speak in opposition to disarmament of the public, vaccinations, public education, economics, religion, vulgarity, unions, or ANY topic and perspective that is not pre-approved by the State.
This is the creation of the Thought Criminal, and for reading this, you are now are committing Thought Crimes.
If those questioning the media’s “official narrative” of the events of the Florida school shooting needed any more evidence that they are on the right track, they’ve just gotten it. YouTube and Twitter are now scrubbing users who dare to question the students demanding gun control and the media’s account of the school shooting.
According to Natural News, starting a few days ago, both Twitter and YouTube began scrubbing all videos and tweets that don’t follow the “official narrative” on the Florida school shooting. Anyone who questions the wisdom of the school students-turned-propagandists (who were all probably eating Tide pods a week ago) is immediately banned and silenced with censorship. Only one side of this “debate” is allowed to exist: The side that worships the government and demands that all law-abiding Americans surrender their self-defense firearms because a group of traumatized school kids were shot at by their own lunatic classmate.
Online platforms that once hosted conversations and debates are now nothing more than crazy liberal echo chambers of cognitive illiteracy combined with demanded obedience toward the government. All of these left-wing extremist tech companies have now decided to crush the speech of their political opponents and transform the entire internet into a totalitarian bubble of barely functioning idiots who literally believe that school children should not be protected by armed citizens.
On Wednesday, Twitter Safety released a statement regarding the Parkland students. Anyone “harassing” (disagreeing with) the Parkland students demanding your disarmament will be banned. Twitter also said that they are using “anti-abuse tools to weed out malicious automation around these individuals and the topics they are raising.” According to Natural News, in other words, if you dare question or refute anything these teenagers say, you risk being banned from the platform. How dare you question the wisdom of children who didn’t know last week that eating Tide pods is dangerous, but have now decided what kind of gun laws you need to be regulated by.
...
Full article and reference material on link.
---
The Danger of Censorship is twofold:
People can be punished for disapproved expressions
People are not allowed to communicate about how to solve problems
Both are exceptionally damaging to Liberty. But lets address why. I hope everyone has some perspectives to add to a conversation on this. Now, first of all, if a person makes any expression that people in power do not want to be heard, that person can be deemed a Criminal which is their justification through rationalizations that allow all degrees of punishment for that behavior to occur. Basically, if you say "I dont believe you", that is grounds for them to kill you quite literally. Wanna talk about a slippery slope? This is more like a cliff.
Next is even more severe. When large problems do occur, people need to communicate about the problem in order to come up with a solution that works for as many people as possible. This allows the individuals and citizens to be actively involved in causing positive change for their community and society that benefits the people and not the State. Thus, it should be plainly obvious that prohibition of Free Speech by way of Censorship can ONLY benefit those in power. Cui Bono. Latin for "who benefits". Follow the money.
Thing is that Censorship gets even worse. When people get together and discuss problems peacefully, they are all able to present arguments for or against any particular topic. Censorship flat out prevents arguments from being heard. If we have a discussion about the risks of Lactose in Ice Cream (lame example) and look at the many sides, such as statements by those with Lactose Intolerance as well as the business side, you end up amassing a collection of viewpoints and perspectives that one person may not have concluded themselves. Censorship creates a bubble in which you are not allowed to think outside of. Now, given the Lactose Intolerant example, only one side would ever be heard. That would result in Ice Cream Companies having total control of the narrative and eventually they may demand that all people consume their product because it increases their profit margins and quite possibly attempting to do so by other means such as saying that Lactose Intolerance flat out does not exist and is nothing more than a myth. Or, at least claiming that Lactose Intolerance is so exceptionally rare that it poses no threat to the public. Their narrative would be supported only on one side with biased statistics that are manipulated to draw a preconceived conclusion by way of Simpson's Paradox (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDinnCwP3dg) (link to video). Counter arguments would be prohibited, and punishable. Now, try replacing Lactose Intolerance with vaccines.
Censorship is Mandatory Propaganda and Mandatory Brainwashing.
Propaganda tells people what to think by preventing people from being able to entertain both sides of the topic. This creates a "box" in which only "allowed thoughts" are tolerated, and anything that is "outside the box" to be silenced. This is nothing short of Mind Control. So why is it the Media only has one point of view on School Shootings? Their intent is to convince people to give up their guns while not demanding the protectors of the elite do the same. Once disarmed, the people will not have any meaningful way to resist demands to silence Free Speech. Once Free Speech is gone, expect to be thrown in a FEMA camp for ever having supported Ron Paul or Liberty or the Constitution.
Constitutions themselves do not stop Tyranny. Communist USSR had a Constitution and they got Stalin. Germany had a Constitution and they got Hitler. One of the first things both Stalin and Hitler did was to disarm the public. And look at what they got for it. Millions of people whose deaths were directly caused by their own governments, which had Constitutions.
Belief, Money, Violence
To have total power over a population, all three things need to powers exclusive to the rulers. Censorship is to create a Monopoly on Belief. Belief may also be thought of as Perception. This allows Manipulation. Once people believe that private citizens owning guns is too dangerous, such as School Shootings, the people willingly give up their ability to resist government Violence making them absolutely controllable. Simultaneously, we here all seem to understand that compulsory Public Education is Indoctrination, which again is the application of Monopoly of Belief. Tell students what to think, create obedient workers, and strip students of individuality, and use any student whose spirit is harmed enough by the system to break and attack the system which attacked them first. The MSM official narrative is never to address the exceptional levels of brainwashing that take place in Public Education and ALWAYS place all the blame on the Shooter themselves, who is truly nothing short of a victim of the system.
It can be said that there are two types of people in the world, those who just want to be left alone, and those who wont leave you alone. For those who just want to be left alone, they would not gain anything by attacking anyone. If they are not left alone by those that wont leave others alone, then a few very well may attack. If the people would have conducted an attack on anyone for any reason, then they are not the type of person who just wants to be left alone in the first place.
The MSM will also continue to push another agenda, more psychological screenings of ALL children. Reason for this is that it lines the coffers of Big Pharma, whose drugs are used to sedate and incapacitate children with any potential of becoming anything but what the State wants them to be. Its a standard Brainwashing technique. If a person is able to resist the psychological means of replacing the natural identity with the assigned identity of an obedient worker, then Drugs are used to disable that persons defenses.
Discussions such as this will NEVER take place when Censorship is carried out by governments. I have already heard plenty of arguments about Google having full authority over what kind of videos will be censored because Private Property. I can understand that to a reasonable degree, so my reaction is definitely mixed. However, take it to the next step. Not when its just Google and Fedbook and Apple and Microsoft and Amazon censor everything in opposition to the official narrative, but the next step is when ALL COMMUNICATION is mandated by your government on EVERY PLATFORM, even private verbal in person forms, to only support the official narrative. You may NOT speak in opposition to disarmament of the public, vaccinations, public education, economics, religion, vulgarity, unions, or ANY topic and perspective that is not pre-approved by the State.
This is the creation of the Thought Criminal, and for reading this, you are now are committing Thought Crimes.